Redline, RW, Boyd, T, Campbell, V, Hyde, S, Kaplan, C, Khong, TY, Prashner, HR, Waters, BL, Society for Pediatric Pathology, Perinatal Section, Maternal Vascular Perfusion Nosology Committee. Maternal vascular underperfusion: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2004;7(3):237–49.Google Scholar

Korzeniewski, SJ, Romero, R, Chaiworapongsa, T, Chaemsaithong, P, Kim, CJ, Kim, YM, Kim, JS, Yoon, BH, Hassan, SS, Yeo, L. Maternal plasma angiogenic index-1 (placental growth factor/soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) is a biomarker for the burden of placental lesions consistent with uteroplacental underperfusion: a longitudinal case-cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:629.e1–629.e17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Himmelmann, K, Ahlin, K, Jacobsson, B, Cans, C, Thorsen, P. Risk factors for cerebral palsy in children born at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1070–81.Google Scholar

Redline, RW. Severe fetal placental vascular lesions in term infants with neurologic impairment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:452–7.Google Scholar

Redline, RW, Wilson-Costello, D, Borawski, E, Fanaroff, AA, Hack, M. Placental lesions associated with neurologic impairment and cerebral palsy in very low-birth-weight infants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:1091–8.Google Scholar

Redline, RW. Disorders of placental circulation and the fetal brain. Clin Perinatol 2009;36:549–59.Google Scholar

O’Leary, H, Gregas, MC, Limperopoulos, C, et al. Elevated cerebral pressure passivity is associated with prematurity-related intracranial hemorrhage. Pediatrics 2009;124:302–9.Google Scholar

Folkerth, RD. Neuropathologic substrate of cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2005;20:940–9.Google Scholar

Graziani, G, Tal, S, Adelman, A, Kugel, C, Bdolah-Abram, T, Krispin, A. Usefulness of unenhanced postmortem computed tomography – Findings in postmortem non-contrast computed tomography of the head, neck and spine compared to traditional medicolegal autopsy. J Forensic Leg Med 2018;55:105–11.Google Scholar

Norman, W, Jawad, N, Jones, R, Taylor, AM, Arthurs, OJ. Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique. Br J Radiol 2016;89:1062–74.Google Scholar

Birkl, C, Langkammer, C, Golob-Schwartzl, N, Leoni, M, Haybaeck, J, Goessler, W, Fazekas, F, Ropele, S. Effects of formalin fixation and temperature on MR relaxation times in the human brain. NMR Biomed 2016;29:458–65.Google Scholar

Tashiro, K, Shiotani, S, Kobayashi, T, Kaga, K, Saito, H, Someya, S, Miyamoto, K, Hayakawa, H. Cerebral relaxation times from postmortem MR imaging of adults. Magn Reason Med Sci 2015;14:51–6.Google Scholar

Panigrahy, A, Wisnowski, JL, Furtado, A, Lepore, N, Paquette, L, Bluml, S. Neuroimaging biomarkers of preterm brain injury: toward developing the preterm connectome. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42 Suppl 1:S33–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siebert, JR. Central Nervous System Manifestations of Chromosomal Change. In: Adle-Biassette, H, Harding, BN, Golden, JA, eds. Developmental Neuropathology, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018:1–11.Google Scholar

Graham, JM, Jr., Sanchez-Lara, PA, eds. Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Deformation, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar

Winter, RM, Knowles, SAS, Bieber, FR, Baraitser, M. The Malformed Fetus and Stillbirth: A Diagnostic Approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1988.Google Scholar

Archie JG, Collins JS, Lebel RR. Quantitative standards for fetal and neonatal autopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126(2):256–65.Google Scholar

Holder, AR, Levine, RJ. Informed consent for research on specimens obtained at autopsy or surgery: a case study in the overprotection of human subjects. Clin Res. 1976;24(2):68–77.Google Scholar

McGuire, AL, Moore, Q, Majumder, M, Walkiewicz, M, Eng, CM, Belmont, JW, et al. The ethics of conducting molecular autopsies in cases of sudden death in the young. Genome Res. 2016;26(9):1165–9.Google Scholar

Roberts, LW, Nolte, KB, Warner, TD, McCarty, T, Rosenbaum, LS, Zumwalt, R. Perceptions of the ethical acceptability of using medical examiner autopsies for research and education: a survey of forensic pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(10):1485–95.Google Scholar

Walker, B. Inquiry into matters arising from the post mortem and anatomical examination practices of the Institute of Forensic Medicine. Sydney: The Government of the State of New South Wales; 2001.Google Scholar

Kurosu, M, Mukai, T, Ohno, Y. Regulations and guidelines on handling human materials obtained from medico-legal autopsy for use in research. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2003;5 Suppl 1:S76–S8.Google Scholar

Sheach Leith, VM. Consent and nothing but consent? The organ retention scandal. Sociol Health Illn. 2007;29(7):1023–42.Google Scholar

Sque, M, Long, T, Payne, S, Roche, WR, Speck, P. The UK postmortem organ retention crisis: a qualitative study of its impact on parents. J R Soc Med. 2008;101(2):71–7.Google Scholar

Turnbull, A, Osborn, M, Nicholas, N. Hospital autopsy: endangered or extinct? J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(8):601–4.Google Scholar

Khong, TY, Arbuckle, SM. Perinatal pathology in Australia after Alder Hey. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002;38(4):409–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Khong, TY, Tanner, AR. Foetal and neonatal autopsy rates and use of tissue for research: the influence of ‘organ retention’ controversy and new consent process. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42(6):366–9.Google Scholar

Underwood, JC. The impact on histopathology practice of new human tissue legislation in the UK. Histopathology. 2006;49(3):221–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scott, IS, MacDonald, AW. An evaluation of overnight fixation to facilitate neuropathological examination in Coroner’s autopsies: our experience of over 200 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(1):50–3.Google Scholar

Thayyil, S. Less invasive autopsy: an evidenced based approach. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(7):681–7.Google Scholar

Shelmerdine, SC, Arthurs, OJ, Gilpin, I, Norman, W, Jones, R, Taylor, AM, et al. Is traditional perinatal autopsy needed after detailed fetal ultrasound and post-mortem MRI? Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(9):818–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellkvist, A, Wikstrom, J, Mulic-Lutvica, A, Ericson, K, Eriksson-Falkerby, C, Lindgren, P, et al. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging vs autopsy of second trimester fetuses terminated due to anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):865–876.Google Scholar

McPherson, E, Nestoridi, E, Heinke, D, Roberts, DJ, Fretts, R, Yazdy, MM, et al. Alternatives to autopsy for fetal and early neonatal (perinatal) deaths: insights from the Wisconsin Stillbirth Service Program. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(18):1430–41.Google Scholar

Lewis, C, Riddington, M, Hill, M, Arthurs, OJ, Hutchinson, JC, Chitty, LS, et al. Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed methods study with bereaved parents. BJOG. 2019;126(6):745–753.Google Scholar

Fallet-Bianco, C, De Bie, I, Desilets, V, Oligny, LL. No. 365-Fetal and perinatal autopsy in prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormalities with normal chromosome analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(10):1358–66 e5.Google ScholarPubMed

Simonds, VW, Garroutte, EM, Buchwald, D. Health literacy and informed consent materials: designed for documentation, not comprehension of health research. J Health Commun. 2017;22(8):682–91.Google Scholar

Beskow, LM, Lin, L, Dombeck, CB, Gao, E, Weinfurt, KP. Improving biobank consent comprehension: a national randomized survey to assess the effect of a simplified form and review/retest intervention. Genet Med. 2017;19(5):505–12.Google Scholar

Foe, G, Larson, EL. Reading level and comprehension of research consent forms: an integrative review. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016;11(1):31–46.Google Scholar

Eka, I, Rowan, C, Osborn, M. Mind the gap: are NHS trusts falling short of recommended standards for consent to autopsy? J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(1):10–13.Google Scholar

Heazell, AE, McLaughlin, MJ, Schmidt, EB, Cox, P, Flenady, V, Khong, TY, et al. A difficult conversation? The views and experiences of parents and professionals on the consent process for perinatal postmortem after stillbirth. BJOG. 2012;119(8):987–97.Google Scholar

Henry, J, Nicholas, N. Dead in the water – are we killing the hospital autopsy with poor consent practices? J R Soc Med. 2012;105(7):288–95.Google Scholar

Schirmann, A, Boyle, FM, Horey, D, Siassakos, D, Ellwood, D, Rowlands, I, et al. Understanding mothers’ decision-making needs for autopsy consent after stillbirth: Framework analysis of a large survey. Birth. 2018;45(3):255–62.Google Scholar

Lane, M, Vercler, CJ. Is consent to autopsy necessary? Cartesian dualism in medicine and its limitations. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(8):771–8.Google Scholar

Odendaal, HJ, Elliott, A, Kinney, HC, Human, M, Gaspar, D, Petersen, D, et al. Consent for autopsy research for unexpected death in early life. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(1):167–71.Google Scholar

Cohen, MC, Blakey, S, Donn, T, McGovern, S, Parry, L. An audit of parents’/guardians’ wishes recorded after coronial autopsies in cases of sudden unexpected death in infancy: issues raised and future directions. Med Sci Law. 2009;49(3):179–84.Google Scholar

Elliot, JG, Ford, DL, Beard, JF, Fitzgerald, KN, Robinson, PJ, James, AL. Informed consent for the study of retained tissues from postmortem examination following sudden infant death. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(10):742–6.Google Scholar

Zarbo, RJ, Baker, PB, Howanitz, PJ. Quality assurance of autopsy permit form information, timeliness of performance, and issuance of preliminary report. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5434 autopsies from 452 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;120(4):346–52.Google Scholar

Krinsky, CS, Lathrop, SL, Reichard, RR. A policy for the retention and extended examination of organs at autopsy. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(2):418–22.Google Scholar

Krook, MA, Chen, HZ, Bonneville, R, Allenby, P, Roychowdhury, S. Rapid research autopsy: piecing the puzzle of tumor heterogeneity. Trends Cancer. 2019;5(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alabran, JL, Hooper, JE, Hill, M, Smith, SE, Spady, KK, Davis, LE, et al. Overcoming autopsy barriers in pediatric cancer research. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(2):204–9.Google Scholar

Pentz, RD, Cohen, CB, Wicclair, M, DeVita, MA, Flamm, AL, Youngner, SJ, et al. Ethics guidelines for research with the recently dead. Nat Med. 2005;11(11):1145–9.Google Scholar

Hakimian, R, Korn, D. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research. JAMA. 2004;292(20):2500–5.Google Scholar

Harris, J. Law and regulation of retained organs: the ethical issues. Leg Stud. 2002;22(4):527–49.Google ScholarPubMed

Harris, J. Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(4):242–8.Google Scholar

Stjernschantz Forsberg, J, Hansson, MG, Eriksson, S. Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(5):325–8.Google Scholar