Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

Conclusion

Summary

In 1215 the Fourth Lateran Council decreed that every Christian who had come to the age of discretion should confess his sins at least once a year individually in front of his own priest. This decree is sometimes regarded as innovative for introducing regular lay confession, but it should rather be seen as the first general regulation on this topic in a centralizing Christian Church. There had been earlier rules concerning the frequency of confession, which was mostly closely related to receiving the Eucharist, sometimes requiring a higher rate of three times a year. Regino of Prüm had included among his demands for the laity that they should confess their sins at the beginning of Lent and fulfil their penitential obligations at least once a year. What was new was the way in which Innocent III now called together this enormous gathering of prelates and secular lords in order to formulate a truly formidable programme of reform that was to be applicable for all Christendom. The Fourth Lateran Council has been called ‘the most important statement of the nature and structure of the Catholic faith since the great ecumenical councils of late antiquity’, as well as ‘the most pastoral of all the general church councils of the Middle Ages’. Inspired by ideas about a much more active role of the church in society as they had been developing in Parisian circles, Lateran IV inaugurated a remarkable increase in the composition of pastoral works, a development that is sometimes referred to as a pastoral revolution. These works, many of which still need careful study, were meant to propagate the new ideas about penance and confession as they had developed in the twelfth-century schools to the priests and monks hearing confession and through them to communicate these to the laity. Penance, vices and virtues became the main subjects of a wealth of pastoral literature that was being produced in this period.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
García y García, A., Constitutiones Concilii quarti Lateranensis una cum Commentariis glossatorum, Monumenta Iuris Canonici, Series A: Corpus Glossatorum 2 (Vatican 1981), pp. 67–8.
Ohst, M., Pflichtbeichte. Untersuchungen zum Bußwesen im Hohen und Späten Mittelalter (Tübingen 1995), pp. 21–2
Jordan, W. C., Europe in the High Middle Ages (London 2001), p. 212
Boyle, L., ‘The Fourth Lateran Council and manuals of popular theology’, in Heffernan, T. J. (ed.), The Popular Literature of Medieval England (Knoxville TN 1985), pp. 30–43, at p. 30.
Baldwin, J., Masters, Princes and Merchants. The Social Views of Peter the Chanter & His Circle, 2 vols. (Princeton 1970), vol. i, pp. 315–43
Neumann, F., Öffentliche Sünder in der Kirche des späten Mittelalters. Verfahren – Sanktionen – Rituale (Cologne / Weimar / Vienna 2008), p. 28
Nelson, J., ‘Women at the court of Charlemagne. A case of monstrous regiment?’, in Parsons, J. (ed.), Medieval Queenship (New York 1993), pp. 43–62 and 203–6.