Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: January 2010

3 - Outcomes analysis and systems of children's surgical care

from Part I - General issues
Export citation

Summary

Institutions which provide the basis for contemporary children's specialty units and pediatric clinical care first developed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. These reflected efforts to care for urban populations of children brought together by the forces of industrialization and were often the work of altruistic individuals, typically but not exclusively, well-to-do women, who were motivated by compassion for children. Their primary mission was often to provide an acceptable level of charity care to poor children in their communities. This is, in fact, still the case for many major children's hospitals worldwide.

The concept that children are unique patients with particular developmental, physiological and psychological needs, for whom a demonstrably better outcome could be obtained with specialized medical care came more recently. With particular regard to children's surgical care, events detailed in Chapter 1 by Dr. Hendren (North America) and Dr. O'Donnell (Europe/UK) gave rise to what we recognize as contemporary pediatric surgery by the mid twentieth century. Specialization and credentialing were progressively driven by the view that the quality of care for children was improved by having practitioners fully dedicated to children, by providing focused professional training for individuals interested in childhood disease, and by creating a children's specific environment for the delivery of that care. The wider medical community has not been free of controversy over these points. Perceived economic threat and fear of professional or institutional loss remain powerful forces even today when we discuss issues like regionalization or consolidation of certain services.

REFERENCES
Luft, H. S., Bunker, J. P., & Enthoven, A. C.Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 1979.1; 301:1364–1369.
Hughes, R. G., Hunt, S. S., & Luft, H. S.Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals. Med Care 1987; 29:1094–1107.
Birkmeyer, J. D.High-risk surgery – follow the crowd. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2000; 283(9): 1191–1193.
Birkmeyer, J. D., Siewers, A. E., Finlayson, E. V.et al.Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 346(15) :1128–1137.
Birkmeyer, J. D., Stukel, T. A., Siewers, A. E., Goodney, P. P., Wennberg, D. E., & Lucas, F. L.Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 349(22): 2117–2127.
Halm, E. A., Lee, C., Chassin, M. R.Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systemic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002; 137:511–520.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Public Health Surveillance; available online at: http://www.epo.cdc.gov/wonder.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS) [Online]. (2003) National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (producer). Available from URL: www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars.
Knudson, M. M., Shagoury, C., & Lewis, F. R.Can adult trauma surgeons care for injured children?J. Trauma. 1992; 32(6):729–739.
Fortune, J. B., Sanchez, J., Graca, L.et al.A pediatric trauma center without a pediatric surgeon: a four-year outcome analysis. J. Trauma. 1992; 33(1):130–139.
Bensard, D. D., McIntyre, R. C., Moore, E. E., & Moore, F. A.A critical analysis of acutely injured children managed in an adult level I trauma center. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1994; 29(1): 11–18.
Hall, J. R., Reyes, H. M., Meller, J. L., Loeff, D. S., & Dembek, R.The outcome for children with blunt trauma is best at a pediatric trauma center. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1996; 31(1):72–77.
Nakayama, D. K., Copes, W. S., Sacco, W.Differences in trauma care among pediatric and nonpediatric trauma centers. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1992; 27(4):427–431.
Potoka, D. A., Schall, L. C., & Ford, H. R.Improved functional outcome for severely injured children treated at pediatric trauma centers. J. Trauma. – Injury Infect. Crit. Care. 2001; 51(5):824–832; discussion 832–4.
Potoka, D. A., Schall, L. C., Gardner, M. J.et al.Impact of pediatric trauma centers on morality in a statewide system. J. Trauma 2000; 49:237–245.
Densmore, J. S., Oldham, K. T., & Guice, K. S.Relationship of pediatric trauma mortality rates to type of institution providing care. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2006; 41(1):92–98.
Upadhyaya, P. & Simpson, J. S.Splenic trauma in children. Surg, Gynecol. Obstet. 1968; 126:781–790.
Stylianos, S. and the APSA Trauma Committee. Evidence-based guidelines for resource utilization in children with isolated spleen or liver injury. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2000; 35:164–169.
Stylianos, S. and the APSA Liver/Spleen Trauma Study Group. Compliance with evidence-based guidelines in children with isolated spleen or liver injury: a prospective study. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002; 37:453–456.
Rothstein, D. H., Forbes, P. W., & Mooney, D. P. Variation in the management of pediatric splenic injuries in the United States (unpublished data).
Densmore, J. S., Oldham, K. T., & Guice, K. S. Splenic surgery rates following pediatric trauma in the United States (unpublished data).
Stylianos, S. Variation in practice for splenic injury (unpublished data).
Mooney, D. P. & Forbes, P. W.Variation in the management of pediatric splenic injuries in New England. J. Trauma. 2004; 56: 328–333.
Godbole, P. & Stringer, M. D.Splenectomy after paediatric trauma: could more spleens be saved?Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2002; 84:106–108.
Epstein, A. M.Volume and outcome – it is time to move ahead. N. Eng. J. Med. 2002; 346(15):1161–1164.
Chardot, C., Carton, M., Spire-Bendelac, N.et al.Prognosis of biliary atresia in the era of liver transplantation: French national study from 1986 to 1996. Hepatology 1999; 30:606–611.
McKiernan, P. J., Baker, A. J., & Kelly, D. A.The frequency and outcome of biliary atresia in the UK and Ireland. Lancet 2000; 355: 25–29.
Yoon, P. W., Bresee, J. S., Olney, R. S., James, L. M., & Khoury, M. J.Epidemiology of biliary atresia: a population-based study. Pediatrics 1997; 99:376–382.
Fischler, B., Haglund, B., & Hjern, A.A population-based study on the incidence and possible pre- and perinatal etiologic risk factors of biliary atresia. J. Pediatr. 2002; 141:217–222.
Howard, E. R., MacClean, G., Nio, M., Donaldson, N., Singer, J., & Ohi, R.Biliary atresia: survival patterns after portoenterostomy and comparison of a Japanese with a UK cohort of long-term survivors. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2001; 36:892–897.
Bucuvalas, J. C., Britto, M., Krug, S.et al.Health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients: a single-center study. Liver Transpl. 2003; 9:62–71.
McClement, J. W., Howard, E. R., & Mowat, A. P.Results of surgical treatment for extrahepatic biliary atresia in United Kingdom 1980–2. Br. Med. J. 1985; 290:345–347.
Davenport, M., Ville de Goyet, J., Stringer, M. D.et al.Seamless management of biliary atresia in England and Wales (1999–2002). Lancet 2004; 363:1354–1357.
Davison, S., Miller, V., Thomas, A., Bowen, J., & Bruce, J.The profession, not the media, should assess where Kasai portoenterostomy should be performed. Br. Med. J. 1999; 318:1013.
Lloyd, D., Jones, M., & Dalzell, M.Surgery for biliary atresia. Lancet 2000; 355:1099–1100.
McKiernan, P., Baker, A., Mieli-Vergani, G., & Kelly, D.The BPSU study of biliary atresia – outcome after 8 years. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2003; 36:529 (abstract) 26.
Arul, G. S. & Spicer, R. D.Where should paediatric surgery be performed?Arch. Dis. Child. 1998; 79:65–72.