Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:33:03.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - ART Monitoring: An End to Frequent Clinic Visits and Needle Sticks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Alice D. Domar
Affiliation:
Boston IVF, Waltham, MA
Denny Sakkas
Affiliation:
Boston IVF, Waltham, MA
Thomas L. Toth
Affiliation:
Boston IVF, Waltham, MA
Get access

Summary

Since the early eighties there has been tremendous evolution in the clinical approach to ART and in how to practically carry execution of these treatments. From a patients’ perspective, some of the most significant innovations were: complete replacement of laparoscopic oocyte retrieval under general anesthesia by transvaginal puncture guided by sonography; total disappearance of E2 monitoring using urinary assessments in favor of serum determinations; clinical use of both agonists and antagonists to suppress endogenous LH-peaks avoiding LH-peak monitoring through three-hourly urine collections; specifically designed calibrated devices, called pens, to allow patients to inject daily gonadotrophins themselves instead of being dependent on nurses or hospital facilities willing to inject hCG at odd hours; and recognition of psychological stress leading to active intervention of mental-health professionals in helping patients to cope with both the infertility and with its treatments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
How to Integrate Exceptional Care with Cutting-Edge Technology
, pp. 39 - 53
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kwan, I, Bhattacharya, S, Kang, A, Woolner, A. Monitoring of Stimulated Cycles in Assisted Reproduction (IVF and ICSI) (Review). Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. 2014.Google Scholar
Martins, WP, Vieira, CV, Teixeira, DM, Barbosa, MA, Dassunção, LA, Nastri, CO. Ultrasound for Monitoring Controlled Ovarian Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 2533.Google Scholar
Gerris, J, Geril, A, De Sutter, P. Patient Acceptance of Self-Operated Endo-Vaginal Tele-Monitoring (SOET): A Step Towards More Patient Friendly ART? Facts, Views and Vision in Ob/Gyn. 2009; 1: 161–70.Google Scholar
Gerris, J, De Sutter, P Self-Operated Endo-Vaginal Tele-Monitoring (SOET): A Step Towards More Patient-Centered ART? Hum Reprod. 2010; 25: 562–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerris, J, Delvigne, A, Dhont, N et al. Self-Operated Endo-Vaginal Tele-Monitoring Versus Traditional Monitoring of Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproduction: An RCT. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 1941–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerris, J. Self-Operated Endo-Vaginal Tele-Monitoring: Using Internet-Based Home Monitoring of Follicular Growth in Assisted Reproduction Technology. In: Ultrasonography in Gynecology. Botros, RMB Rizk, Puscheck, EE (eds.) Cambridge University Press. 2015; 369–74.Google Scholar
Gerris, J, Vandekerckhove, F, De Sutter, P. Outcome of One Hundred Consecutive ICSI Attempts Using Patient Operated Home Sonography for Monitoring Follicular Growth. Facts, Views and Vision in Ob/Gyn. 2016; 141–6.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Zhang, Y, Hu, M et al. Timing of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Hormone Administration in IVF/ICSl Protocols Using GnRH Agonist and Antagonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014; 30: 431–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casalegno, J-S, Le Bail Carval, K, Eibach D, et al. High Risk HPV Contamination of Endo-cavity Vaginal Ultrasound Probes: An Underestimated Route of Nosocomial Infection? PLoS ONE. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, STC, Yeung, AC, Chan, PKS et al. Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound Probe Contamination by the Human Papillomavirus in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med J. 2012.Google Scholar
Agha, Z, Schapira, M, Laud, PW et al. Patient Satisfaction with Physician–Patient Communication During Telemedicine. In: Telemedicine and e-Health. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2009; 831–9.Google Scholar
Davis, RM, Hitch, AD, Salaam, MM et al. TeleHealth Improves Diabetes Self-Management in an Underserved Community. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33: 1712–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khader, YS, Jarrah, MI, Al-Shudifat, AE et al. Telecardiology Application in Jordan: Its Impact on Diagnosis and Disease Management, Patients’ Quality of Life, and Time- and Cost-Savings. Int J Telemed Appl. 2014.Google Scholar
Ferreira, AC, O’Mahony, E, Hélio, A et al. Teleultrasound: Historical Perspective and Clinical Application. Int J Telemed App. 2015.Google Scholar
Bashshur, Rashid L RL, Shannon, GW, Smith, BR et al. The Empirical Evidence for the Telemedicine Intervention in Diabetes Management. In: Telemedicine and e-Health. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015; 134.Google Scholar
Resetkova, N, Sakkas, D, Bayer, S, Penzias, A, Alper, M. Home Based Ultrasound Monitoring Is a Feasible Method of in Cycle Monitoring. Oral Presentation at ASRM in Salt Lake City, Utah. 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraretti, AP, La Marca, A, Fauser, BCJM et al. ESHRE Consensus on the Definition of “Poor Response” to Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization: The Bologna Criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 1616–24.Google Scholar
Verdonckt, S, Gerris, J. Patients’ Ideas, Expectations and Experience with Self-Operated Endo-Vaginal Tele-Monitoring: A Prospective Pilot Study. Facts Views and Vis ObGyn. 2017.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, A, Amso, NN. Embryo Freezing for Preventing Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Cochrane Review. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 2787.Google Scholar
Pereira, I, von Horn, K, Depenbusch, M et al. Clinical Evaluation of Self-operated Endo-vaginal Tele-monitoring. Fertil Steril. 2016.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, de Wert, G. Innovative Reproductive Technologies: Risks and Responsibilities. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1604–8.Google Scholar
Fiers, T, Dielen, C, Somers, S, Kaufman, JM, Gerris, J. Salivary Estradiol as a Surrogate Marker for Serum Estradiol in Assisted Reproduction Treatment. Clin Biochem. 2017; 50: 145–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dielen, C, Fiers, T, Somers, S, Deschepper, E, Gerris, J. Correlation Between Saliva and Serum Concentrations of E2 in Women Undergoing Ovarian Hyperstimulation with Gonadotropins for IVF/ICSI. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2017; 9: 8591.Google Scholar
Alper, M, Matin, M, French, B, Widra, E, Copperman, A, Levy, M et al. Blind Validation of Estrogen Monitoring in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation IVF Cycles Using a “Patient-Friendly” Saliva Based E2 Assay. Poster Am Soc Reprod Med. 2017 Scientific Congress, Salt Lake City, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cision. Boston IVF Pioneers World’s First Needle-Free Saliva Test Used in Infertility Treatment; Patient Friendly Monitoring Replaces Daily Blood Tests. Online article. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/boston-ivf-pioneers-worlds-first-needle-free-saliva-test-used-in-infertility-treatment-patient-friendly-monitoring-replaces-daily-blood-tests-138043113.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kells, J, Dollbaum, C. Saliva Test Part 1: Clinical Use, Elements of Testing and Guidelines for Posttreatment Interpretation. Int J Pharm Comp. 2009; 13: 280–8.Google Scholar
Celec, P, Ostatnikova, D, Skoknova, M, Hodosy, J, Putz, Z, Kudela, M. Salivary Sex Hormones During the Menstrual Cycle. Endocrine Journal. 2009; 56: 521–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rottiers, AS, Dalewyn, L, Somers, S, Alper, MM, Sakkas, D, Gerris, J. Correlation Between Sonographic Follow-Up of Follicular Growth, Serum Estradiol and Salivary Estradiol in Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (IVF/ICSI). Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018; 10(4): 173–9.Google Scholar
Zimon, A, Lannon, B, Sheller, S, Sakkas, D, Ulrich, M, Alper, M. Venopuncture-Free IVF: Measurement of Estrogen in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation IVF Cycles Using a “Patient-Friendly” Saliva-Based E2 Assay. ASRM abstracts. 2013; 100 (3).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×