Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Part I Election Patterns and INTERPRETIVE Frameworks
- 1 Disconnecting and Reconnecting Presidential–House Election Results
- 2 The Study of Presidential–House Elections
- 3 Reconsidering Conclusions
- 4 Explaining Change
- Part II Explaining a Changing Relationship
- Appendix I Presidential–House Elections by House Districts
- Appendix II The Presidential–House Relationship and Uncontested Races
- Appendix III Alternative Explanations of Change
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
2 - The Study of Presidential–House Elections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Part I Election Patterns and INTERPRETIVE Frameworks
- 1 Disconnecting and Reconnecting Presidential–House Election Results
- 2 The Study of Presidential–House Elections
- 3 Reconsidering Conclusions
- 4 Explaining Change
- Part II Explaining a Changing Relationship
- Appendix I Presidential–House Elections by House Districts
- Appendix II The Presidential–House Relationship and Uncontested Races
- Appendix III Alternative Explanations of Change
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The study of presidential and House elections developed slowly. The progression of analyses, in conjunction with the timing of major changes in American politics, combined to significantly affect what has become the focus of studies. The ability to examine presidential and House elections was limited for much of the first half of the 1900s because data were hard to acquire from individual states. Presidential results were being collected but only for states and counties. Lacking results by House districts, the early quantitative studies focused on aggregate-level results, either at the national or regional level. Apparently the first publication that gathered presidential and House results by House districts was that of Malcolm Moos, Politics, Presidents and Coattails, in 1952. He presented results for both offices by district for the years 1938–1950. That data set was incomplete because he could not get results for all states. For some states there were also no presidential results by House district in counties containing multiple districts.
By the mid-1950s data for all House districts were becoming more available, and subsequent studies focused on House elections over time. In 1957 Congressional Quarterly published an Almanac containing the first data on presidential and House elections by House district, covering the years 1952 and 1956. The availability of these data resulted in efforts to assess the relationship between presidential and House results, and soon there were numerous efforts to assess the extent of presidential coattails. The general conclusion was that the connection was declining.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
Research Problems in the Field of Parties, Elections, and LeadershipAmerican Political Science Review 24 1930 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Election Statistics in the United StatesAmerican Political Science Review 27 1933 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Changing Shape of the American Political UniverseAmerican Political Science Review 59 1965 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tides and Patterns in American PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review 36 1942 637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Elections 1896–1944: The Sectional Basis of Political Democracy in the House of RepresentativesNormanUniversity of Oklahoma Press 1947Google Scholar
Congressional District Party Strength and the 1960 ElectionThe Journal of Politics 24 1962 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Party Constituency Differences and Congressional Voting BehaviorAmerican Political Science Review 57 1963 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressmen and the Electorate: Elections for the U.S. House and the President, 1920–1964New YorkFree Press 1966Google Scholar
Voting Statistics and Presidential CoattailsAmerican Political Science Review 52 1958 1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Using Aggregate Voting Data to Measure Presidential Coattail EffectsPublic Opinion Quarterly 35 1971 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House Incumbents and Inter-Election Vote ChangeJournal of Politics 39 1977 1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Impact of Presidential Coattails on Outcomes of Congressional ElectionsAmerican Politics Quarterly 7 1979 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reassessing the Decline of Presidential Coattails: U.S. House Elections from 1952–1980The Journal of Politics 46 1984 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malapportionment, Gerrymandering and Party Fortunes in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 66 1972 1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Party and Incumbency in Postwar Senate Elections: Trends, Patterns, and ModelsAmerican Political Science Review 67 1973 1229Google Scholar
A Research Note on the Impact of Interparty Competition on Congressional Voting in a Competitive EraAmerican Political Science Review 67 1973 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nationalization and Partisan Realignment in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 81 1987 1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elections to Open Seats in the U.S. House: Where the Action IsLanham, MDRowman & Littlefield 2000Google Scholar
Presidential Coattails, Incumbency Advantage, and Open Seats: A District-Level Analysis of the 1976–2000 ElectionsElectoral Studies 24 2005 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Personal and Partisan Advantage in U.S. Congressional Elections, 1846–1986Congress ReconsideredWashington, DCCongressional Quarterly 1989 153Google Scholar
Party and Constituency: Pressures on CongressBaltimore, MDThe Johns Hopkins Press 1951Google Scholar
Party, Constituency and Congressional VotingBaton RougeLouisiana University Press 1968Google Scholar
Political Upheaval and Congressional Voting: The Effect of the 1960s on Voting Patterns in the House of RepresentativesJournal of Politics 38 1976 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidential Coattails Revisited: Partisanship and Incumbency EffectsAmerican Journal of Political Science 23 1979 615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House Careerists: Changing Patterns of Longevity and AttritionAmerican Political Science Review 66 1972 1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Membership Stability in Three State Legislatures: 1869–1969American Political Science Review 68 1974 106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Changing Shape of the American Political UniverseAmerican Political Science Review 59 1965 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Generational Change and the Decline of Party Identification in America: 1952–1974American Political Science Review 70 1976 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incumbent Effects on Individual-Level Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections: A Decade of ExaggerationJournal of Politics 47 1985 958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two ExplanationsAmerican Journal of Political Science 27 1983 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Responsible Parties: A Dissent from the FloorAmerican Political Science Review 45 1951 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: Political Science, Policy Science, or Pseudo-ScienceAmerican Political Science Review 65 1971 965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candidates and Policy in United States Senate ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 80 1986 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968American Political Science Review 66 1972 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional ElectionsPolitical Science Quarterly 90 1975 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incumbency and Short-Term Influences on VotersPolitical Research Quarterly 57 2004 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American PoliticsNormanUniversity of Oklahoma Press 2009Google Scholar
Partisan Polarization and Congressional Accountability in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 54 2010 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partisan Redistricting and the 1982 Congressional ElectionsJournal of Politics 45 1983 767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Reapportionment Revolution and Bias in U.S. Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 43 1999 812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incumbents’ Advantages in the 1978 U.S. Congressional ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly 6 1981 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. HouseAmerican Political Science Review 73 1979 811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contours of the Modern Congressional CareerAmerican Political Science Review 85 1991 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of RepresentativesChapel HillUniversity of North Carolina Press 1991Google Scholar
The Personal Electoral Advantage of House IncumbentsAmerican Politics Quarterly 8 1980 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estimating Incumbency Effect without BiasAmerican Journal of Political Science 34 1990 1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Effects of Incumbency in U.S. Congressional Elections, 1950–1988Legislative Studies Quarterly 18 1993 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campaign Spending in U.S. Senate ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly 14 1989 487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for an Old ArgumentAmerican Journal of Political Science 34 1990 334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House ElectionsJournal of Politics 53 1991 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent OpinionAmerican Political Science Review 76 1982 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did ItAmerican Political Science Review 71 1977 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen So Much More Than Their Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 1979 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Grateful Electorate: Casework and Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 25 1981 568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else?American Journal of Political Science 25 1981 512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 25 1981 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Does Casework Matter? A Reply to Professor FiorinaAmerican Journal of Political Science 25 1981 581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constituency Attentiveness in the House: 1977–1982Journal of Politics 47 1985 1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework CaseLegislative Studies Quarterly 17 1992 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constituency Service and Incumbency AdvantageBritish Journal of Political Science 21 1991 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
What's in It for Me: The Impact of Congressional Casework on Incumbent EvaluationAmerican Politics Quarterly 22 1994 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimensions of District Attention over TimeAmerican Journal of Political Science 29 1985 330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Is There a Political Life Cycle in the House of Representatives?Legislative Studies Quarterly 11 1986 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congress: Keystone to the Washington EstablishmentNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1977Google Scholar
Candidates and Parties in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 74 1980 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The American Voter in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 74 1967 644Google Scholar
Name Familiarity, Reputation and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional ElectionWestern Political Quarterly 28 1975 668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Comparison of Voting for U.S. Senator and Representative in 1978American Political Science Review 74 1980 633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Advantage of Incumbency in House ElectionsAmerican Politics Quarterly 8 1980 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On the Decline of Competition in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 71 1977 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional ElectionsPolitical Science Quarterly 93 1978 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Return of the Incumbents: The Nature of the Incumbency AdvantageWestern Political Quarterly 36 1983 434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Deterrent Effect of Incumbency on Recruiting Challengers in U.S. House ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly 8 1983 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional ElectionsJournal of Politics 47 1985 510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preempting Quality Challengers in House ElectionsJournal of Politics 50 1988 920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in CongressAmerican Political Science Review 101 2007 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Primary ElectionsElectoral Studies 26 2007 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
What Did the Direct Primary Do to Party Loyalty in Congress?Party, Process, and Political Change in CongressPalo Alto, CAStanford University Press 2007 1Google Scholar
Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86American Political Science Review 83 1989 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correlates and Effects of Attention to District by U.S. House MembersLegislative Studies Quarterly 10 1985 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An ExplorationAmerican Political Science Review 71 1977 902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redistricting and Congressional Stability, 1962–72Journal of Politics 37 1975 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Theory of Political DistrictingThe American Political Science Review 72 1978 1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partisan Intentions and Election Day Realities in the Congressional Redistricting ProcessAmerican Political Science Review 79 1985 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partisan and Incumbency Effects of 1970s Congressional DistrictingAmerican Journal of Political Science 31 1987 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incumbency, Reapportionment, and U.S. House RedistrictingLegislative Studies Quarterly 48 1995 857Google Scholar
Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency AdvantageAmerican Journal of Political Science 44 2000 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment RevolutionNew YorkCambridge University Press 2002 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal VoteAmerican Journal of Political Science 47 2003 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Why Did the Incumbency Advantage Grow?American Journal of Political Science 40 1996 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency AdvantageLegislative Studies Quarterly 22 1997 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Tides and Local Results in US House ElectionsBritish Journal of Political Science 38 2008 722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and WashingtonWashington, DCCQ Press 2008 6Google Scholar