Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T13:34:04.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Jeffrey M. Stonecash
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Get access

Summary

The present is confusing because we do not really understand the past.

Our understandings of politics evolve. At one time – much of the first half of the 1900s – it was widely understood that presidential and House election results were closely tied together. The partisan votes for presidential and House candidates in House districts were very similar, and we presumed that voting was primarily for a party and not individuals. Then in the 1960s the relationship between presidential and House results declined. By the 1970s a new interpretation emerged about what was dominating elections and how the presidential–House connection was being altered. The conclusion was that House elections were becoming dominated by incumbency, elections were candidate-centered, and parties were of less relevance in voting choices. House incumbents were becoming more immune to shifts in partisan presidential electoral support in the nation. The conventional wisdom quickly became that we were witnessing a diminished capability for elections to simultaneously register voter sentiment in the institutions of the presidency and the House.

[The House elections of the 1960s represent] a set of electoral arrangements that is…quite unresponsive to shifts in the preferences of voters. (1973)

Incumbents have become quite effectively insulated from the electoral effects, for example, of adverse presidential landslides. As a result, a once-notable phenomenon, the so-called coattails effect, has virtually been eliminated. (1975)

The incumbency advantage in House races has increased to such a level during the last decade that the electoral outcomes for president and Congress have become virtually independent. (1983)

Voting in congressional elections has become detached from broad national currents reflecting reactions to the president and national issues and problems. (1985)

No matter which party wins the White House each four years, presidential elections seem to have little impact on the partisan balance in Congress. The discrepancy between presidential and congressional election results is frequently attributed…to a decline in presidential coattails. (1995)

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Koger, GregoryFilibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and SenateChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward T.The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party SystemsAmerican Political Science Review 67 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter D.Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional ElectionsPolitical Science Quarterly 90 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall L.Ferejohn, John A.Coattail Voting in Recent Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 77 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A.Fiorina, Morris P.Incumbency and Realignment in Congressional ElectionsNew Directions in American PoliticsWashington, DCBrookings Institution 1985Google Scholar
Fleming, Gregory N.Presidential Coattails in Open-Seat ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly 20 1995 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Preface
  • Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Syracuse University, New York
  • Book: Party Pursuits and The Presidential-House Election Connection, 1900–2008
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139333733.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Preface
  • Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Syracuse University, New York
  • Book: Party Pursuits and The Presidential-House Election Connection, 1900–2008
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139333733.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Preface
  • Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Syracuse University, New York
  • Book: Party Pursuits and The Presidential-House Election Connection, 1900–2008
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139333733.001
Available formats
×