Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: October 2010

2 - The myth of the common law constitution

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between the common law and statute law is a subject of debate. The controversy goes deeper than questions of interpretation, such as – given the doctrine of legislative supremacy over the common law – why, how and to what extent the meaning of a statute can legitimately be governed by common law principles. The answers to those questions depend partly on more basic issues concerning the legal foundations of the two bodies of law, and their respective status. The orthodox view is that because Parliament can enact statutes that override any part of the common law, statute law is superior to common law. But according to an increasingly popular theory, Britain's ‘unwritten’ constitution consists of common law principles, and therefore Parliament's authority to enact statutes derives from the common law. Sir William Holdsworth once expressed the view that ‘our constitutional law is simply a part of the common law’. For Trevor Allan, it follows that ‘the common law is prior to legislative supremacy, which it defines and regulates’. This theory has become so popular that even the British government has endorsed it. When the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, was asked in Parliament what was the government's understanding of ‘the legal sources from which the legislative powers of Parliament are derived’, he replied, ‘The source of the legislative powers is the common law.’

Holdsworth, W., A History of English Law (2nd edn) (London: Methuen and Sweet & Maxwell, 1937)
Allan, T.R.S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 271
Thomas, Justice E.W., ‘The Relationship of Parliament and the CourtsVictoria University of Wellington Law Review 31 (2000) 5 at 26.
Conaglen, M.D.J., ‘Judicial Supremacy: An Alternative Constitutional TheoryAuckland University Law Review 7 (1994) 665
Goudie, James (eds.), Judicial Review (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths Law, 1997), para. 4.17
Dixon, O., Jesting Pilate, And Other Papers and Addresses (Woinarski, ed.) (Melbourne: Law Book Co., 1965), p. 203
Wait, Michael, ‘The Slumbering Sovereign: Sir Owen Dixon's Common Law Constitution RevisitedFederal Law Review 29 (2001) 58
Walters, Mark D., ‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of the Lex Non Scripta as Fundamental LawUniversity of Toronto Law Journal 51 (2001) 91 at 92
Walters, Mark D., ‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’ in Dyzenhaus, David (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 431
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Homogenising ConstitutionsOxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003) 483
Edlin, D., Judges and Unjust Laws; Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2008), pp. 188–9
Poole, Thomas, ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law ConstitutionalismOxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003) 435
Poole, Thomas, ‘Questioning Common Law ConstitutionalismLegal Studies 25 (2005) 142
Reid, John Phillip, Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority to Legislate (Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991)
Pocock, J.G.A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957)
McIlwain, Charles H., The High Court of Parliament and Its Supremacy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1910), ch. 2
McIlwain, Charles H., ‘Magna Carta and Common Law’ in Constitutionalism and the Changing World (New York: Macmillan, 1939), 132 at p. 143
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), pp. 38–45
Tubbs, J.W., The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), p. 206
Sommerville, Johann P., ‘The Ancient Constitution Reassessed: The Common Law, the Court and the Languages of Politics in Early Modern England’ in Smuts, R. Malcolm (ed.), The Stuart Court and Europe: Essays in Politics and Political Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 39–64
Sommerville, Johann P., Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 (2nd edn) (London: Longman, 1999), pp. 103–4
Tamanaha, Brian Z., On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 57
Williams, I., ‘Dr Bonham's Case and “Void” StatutesJ Legal History 27 (2006) 111
Hamburger, P., Law and Judicial Duty (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2008), ch. 8 and Appendix I
Helmholz, R., ‘Bonham's Case, Judicial Review and the Law of NatureJ of Legal Analysis (2009) 325
Allison, J., The Historical English Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 131–48
Joseph, P., Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand (3rd edn) (Wellington: Brookers, 2007), pp. 488–9
Loveland, I., Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights; a Critical Introduction (4th edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 22
Chrimes, S.B., English Constitutional Ideas in the Fifteenth Century (New York: American Scholar Publications, 1966), p. xvi.
Doe, Norman, Fundamental Authority in Late Medieval English Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)
Brand, Paul, ‘The Age of Bracton’ in Hudson, John (ed.), The History of English Law: Centenary Essays on ‘Pollock and Maitland’, Proceedings of the British Academy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)
Holt, J.C., ‘The Origins of the Constitutional Tradition in England’ in Holt, Magna Carta and Medieval Government (London: Hambledon Press, 1985), 1 at p. 13
Greenberg, Janelle, The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
Hanson, Donald, From Kingdom to Commonwealth: The Development of Civic Consciousness in English Political Thought (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1970)
Ogilvie, Sir Charles, The King's Government and the Common Law 1471–1641 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958), p. 10
Baker, J.H., The Law's Two Bodies: Some Evidential Problems in English Legal History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
Cromartie, Alan, Sir Matthew Hale 1609–1676: Law, Religion and Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 14–15
Nenner, Howard, The Right to be King: The Succession to the Crown of England 1603–1714 (North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1995), pp. 1–12
Fortescue, Sir John, De Natura Legis Naturae (New York: Garland Publishing, 1980)
Dunham, W.H. and Wood, C.T., ‘The Right to Rule in England: Depositions and the Kingdom's Authority, 1327–1485American Historical Review 81 (1976) 738 at 750
Wilkinson, Bertie, Studies in the Constitutional History of Medieval England 1216–1399 (vol. 2) (London: Longmans, 1952), pp. 280 and 282
Chrimes, S.B. and Brown, A.L. (eds.), Select Documents of English Constitutional History 1307–1485 (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1961), pp. 146–9
Levack, Brian P., The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641: A Political Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 143
Knafla, Louis A., Law and Politics in Jacobean England: The Tracts of Lord Chancellor Ellesmere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), p. 297
Guy, John, ‘The “Imperial Crown” and the Liberty of the Subject: The English Constitution from Magna Carta to the Bill of Rights’ in Kunze, Bonnelyn Young and Brautigam, Dwight D. (eds.), Court, Country and Culture: Essays on Early Modern British History in Honor of Perez Zagorin (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 1992), 65 at pp. 72–3
Sommerville, Johann P. (ed.), King James VI and I: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 212 at p. 213
Hale, Sir Matthew, The History of the Common Law of England (Gray, Charles M., ed.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), p. 4
Blackstone, Sir William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (vol. 1) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1765), p. 15
Gray, Charles M., ‘Parliament, Liberty, and the Law’ in Hexter, J.H. (ed.), Parliament and Liberty: From the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), 155 at pp. 162–3
Cromartie, Alan, ‘The Constitutionalist Revolution: The Transformation of Political Culture in Early Stuart England’, (1999) 163 Past and Present76
Fraser, John Farquhar (ed.), The Reports of Sir Edward Coke (Joseph Butterworth and Son, 1826), pp. xxxviii
Callis, quoting Robert, The Reading of that Famous and Learned Gentleman Robert Callis; Sergeant at Law, upon the Statute of 23 Henry VIII, cap. 5 of Sewers (London: William Leak, 1647), pp. 85–6
Finch, Sir Henry, Law, or A Discourse Thereof (London: Society of Stationers, 1627), p. 85
Foster, Elizabeth Read (ed.), Proceedings in Parliament 1610 (vol. 2) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), p. 174
Morrill, John, Slack, Paul and Woolf, Daniel (eds.), Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 101 at p. 117
Tanner, J.R. (ed.), Constitutional Documents of the Reign of James I 1603–1625 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1930), 221 at 224
Weston, Corinne Comstock and Greenberg, Janelle R., Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 87
Hooker, Richard, ‘Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity’ in Keble, J. (ed.), The Works of Mr. Richard Hooker (7th edn) (vol. 3) (Georg Olms Verlag, 1977), p. 443
Wootton, David, (ed.), Divine Right and Democracy: An Anthology of Political Writing in Stuart England (Penguin, 1986), p. 129
Spedding, James S., Ellis, R.L. and Heath, D.D. (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon (vol. 10) (London: Longman, 1858–1874), p. 371
McIlwain, Charles H., The Political Works of James I (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1918), p. 333
Burns, J.H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 374 at p. 377
Prynne, William, The Treachery and Disloyalty of Papists to their Sovereigns in Doctrine & Practice (Cambridge University Press, 1643), pp. 35–6
Sommerville, Johann P., Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 (London: Longman, 1986), pp. 105–6
Filmer, Robert, Patriarcha, or the Natural Power of Kings (Richard Chiswell, 1680), p. 11
Sommerville, Johann P. (ed.), Patriarcha and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 54
Peck, Linda Levy (ed.), The Mental World of the Jacobean Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 71 at pp. 83–5
Tuck, Richard, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 96 and 99–100
Hale, Matthew, ‘Reflections on Hobbes’ Dialogue' in Holdsworth, Sir William (ed.), History of English Law (vol. 5) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1945), 500 at p. 505
Plucknett, Theodore Frank Thomas, Legislation of Edward I (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962), pp. 8–9
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), pp. 46–7
Dicey, A.V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th edn) (London: Macmillan, 1959), p. 196
Jennings, W.I., The Law and the Constitution (2nd edn) (London: University of London Press, 1938), pp. 38–40
Jennings, W.I., The Law and the Constitution (2nd edn) (London: University of London Press, 1938), pp. 38–9
Jennings, W.I., The Law and the Constitution (5th edn) (London: University of London Press, 1959), p. 39
Wade, H.W.R., ‘The Basis of Legal SovereigntyCambridge Law Journal (1955) 172, 188–9
Tomkins, Adam, Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 103
Simpson, A.W.B., ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’ in Simpson, A.W.B. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973)
Elliott, Mark, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and ConventionLegal Studies 22 (2002) 340 at 362–76
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (2nd edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), ch. 6
Thomas, E.W., ‘The Relationship of Parliament and the CourtsVictoria University of Wellington Law Review 5 (2000) 31 at 14 and 19 respectively