Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-w95db Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T20:03:42.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Curtis
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Orientalism and Islam
European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India
, pp. 353 - 366
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbattista, Guido S. “Empire, Liberty, and the Rule of Difference: European Debates on British Colonialism in Asia at the End of the Eighteenth Century,” European Review of History 13:3 (2006): 473–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Perry. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso, 1974.Google Scholar
Ballaster, Ros, ed. Fables of the East: Selected Tales, 1662–1785. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Blanks, David R., and Frassetto, Michael, eds. Western Views of Islam in Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Perception of Other. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.CrossRef
Boesche, Roger. Theories of Tyranny, from Plato to Arendt. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, 1996.Google Scholar
Bonner, Michael David. Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. The Islamic World from Classical to Modern Times: Essays in Honor of Bernard Lewis. Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Boulanger, Nicolas Antoine. The Origin and Progress of Despotism in the Oriental and Other Empires of Africa, Europe, and America. Amsterdam: Printed, 1764.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. Uncivil Society: The Perils of Pluralism and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, trans. Reynolds, Sian. London: Collins, 1972–73.
Burton, Jonathan. Traffic and Turning: Islam and English Drama, 1579–1624. Newark: University of Delaware, 2005.Google Scholar
Buruma, Ian and Margalit, Avishai. Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies. New York: Penguin Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cannadine, David. Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Carlton, Eric. Faces of Despotism. Aldershot, UK: Scolar Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Chew, Samuel C. The Crescent and the Rose: Islam and England during the Renaissance. New York: Octagon Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Christensen, Stephen Turk, ed. Violence and the Absolutist State: Studies in European and Ottoman History. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 1990.
Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin et la naissance de la théorie absolutiste. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Barbara. Mimesis and Empire: The New World, Islam, and European Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furet, François. In the Workshop of History, trans. Mandelbaum, Jonathan. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1984.Google Scholar
Gibb, H. A. R. Mohammedanism: An Historical Survey, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Goitein, S. D. Studies in Islamic History and Institutions. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jason. Lords of the Horizons: A History of the Ottoman Empire. New York: Holt, 1999.Google Scholar
Hanioglu, M. Sukru. A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Irving Louis. Behemoth: Main Currents in the History and Theory of Political Sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Hourani, Albert. Islam in European Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Howard, Deborah. Venice and the East: The Impact of the Islamic World on Venetian Architecture 1100–1500. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Francis G. The Illusion of Permanence: British Imperialism in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. The Ottoman Empire: Conquest, Organization and Economy. London: Variorum Reprints, 1978.Google Scholar
Irwin, Robert. Dangerous Knowledge: Orientalism and Its Discontents. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, 2006a.Google Scholar
Irwin, Robert. For Lust of Knowing: The Orientalists and Their Enemies. London: Allen Lane, 2006b.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric L. The European Miracle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal H., ed. The Ottoman State and Its Place in World History. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 1974.
Labib, Subhi. “The Era of Suleyman the Magnificent: Crisis of Orientation,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 10:4 (1979): 435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, Deepak. In Praise of Empires: Globalization and Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann K. S. State and Government in Medieval Islam: An Introduction to the Study of Islamic Political Theory: The Jurists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Landes, David S. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York: Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
Laurens, Henry. Aux sources de l'Orientalisme: la Bibliothèque Orientale de Barthélemy d' Herbelot. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose, 1978.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. Islam and the West. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lowe, Lisa. Critical Terrains: French and British Orientalisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. Arabic and Islamic Studies, in Honor of Hamilton A. R. Gibb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1965.Google Scholar
Millet, Claude. Le despote Oriental. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose, 2001.Google Scholar
Persram, Nalini, ed. Postcolonialism and Political Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007.
Richter, Melvin. “A Family of Political Concepts,” European Journal of Political Theory 4:3 (2005): 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Benedict Scott. Islam and Early Modern Literature: The Politics of Romance from Spenser to Milton. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruthven, Malise. Islam in the World, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schwoebel, Robert. The Shadow of the Crescent: The Renaissance Image of the Turks, 1453–1517. Nieuwkoop, the Netherlands: de Graaf, 1967.Google Scholar
Southern, R. W. Western Views of Islam in the Middle Ages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. On Tyranny, Including the Strauss-Kojève correspondence, eds. Gourevitch, Victor and Michael, S. Roth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ann. Barbary and Enlightenment: European Attitudes towards the Maghreb in the 18th Century. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 1987.Google Scholar
Tibi, Bassam. Islam between Culture and Politics, 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valensi, Lucette. Venise et la sublime porte: la naissance du despote. Paris: Hachette, 1987.Google Scholar
Valiunas, Algis. “Encountering Islam,” Claremont Review of Books 7:2 (Spring 2007): 32–9.Google Scholar
Grunebaum, Gustave E., ed. Unity and Variety in Muslim Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.
Waardenburg, Jean-Jacques. l' Islam dans le miroir de l'Occident. Paris: Mouton, 1963.Google Scholar
Waardenburg, Jean-Jacques. Islam: Historical, Social and Political Perspectives. Berlin: Gruyter, 2002.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl A. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
,Actes du Congrès. Montesquieu réuni à Bordeaux, 1955. Bordeaux, France: Delmas, 1956.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. Against the Current. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. “Fearing Monarchs and Merchants: Montesquieu's Two Theories of Despotism,” Western Political Science Quarterly 43:4 (December 1990): 741–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick, eds. Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002.
Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael, and Rahe, Paul, eds. Montesquieu's Science of Politics: Essays on the Spirit of Laws. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.
Cohler, Anne M. Montesquieu's Comparative Politics and the Spirit of American Constitutionalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988.Google Scholar
Conroy, Peter. Montesquieu Revisited. New York: Twayne, 1992.Google Scholar
Courtney, C. P. Montesquieu and Burke. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Muriel. Les récits de voyages, sources de ‘L'Esprit des Lois’ de Montesquieu. Paris: Champion, 1929.Google Scholar
Fournal, Etienne Maurice. Bodin, prédécesseur de Montesquieu; Étude sur quelques théories de la “République” et de “l'Esprit des Lois.” Geneva, Switzerland: Slatkine Reprints, 1970.Google Scholar
Gilson, David, and Smith, Martin, eds. Essays on Montesquieu and on the Enlightenment. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1988.
Grosrichard, Alain. Structure du sérail. Paris: Seuil, 1979.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Juppé, Alain. Montesquieu: le moderne. Paris: Perrin Grasset, 1999.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Thomas. “The Evil Empire? The Debate on Turkish Despotism in Eighteenth-Century French Political Culture,” The Journal of Modern History 72:1 (2000): 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Sharon. “Despotism in the Spirit of Laws,” in Montesquieu's Science of Politics: Essays on the Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael, and Rahe, Paul. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001, 231–71.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Les Typologies des Gouvernements chez Montesquieu,” in Études sur le XVIIIe siècle, ed. Ehrard, Jean. Clermont-Ferrand, France: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres, 1979, 87–103.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. 1748, L'année de l'Esprit des Lois. Paris: Champion, 1999.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Nugent, Thomas. New York: Hafner Library of Classics, 1949.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. De l'Esprit des Lois. Paris: Didot, 1872.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. Lettres Persanes. Paris: Le Livre de poche, 1966.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des Romains et leur décadence. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1968.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. The Persian Letters, trans. Betts, C. J.. London: Penguin Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A. “The Particulars of a Universal Politics: Hegel's Adaptation of Montesquieu's Typology,” American Political Science Review 78 (1984): 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Montesquieu's Theory and Practice of the Comparative Method,” History of the Human Sciences 15:2 (2002): 21–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaub, Diana J. “Montesquieu on Slavery,” Perspectives on Political Science 34:2 (2005): 70–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. Montesquieu, a Critical Biography. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. Montesquieu. Paris: Seuil, 1979.Google Scholar
Roosbroeck, Gustave L. Persian Letters before Montesquieu. New York: Franklin, 1973.Google Scholar
Vernière, Paul. Montesquieu et l'Esprit des Lois ou la raison impure. Paris: Société d' Édition d' Enseignment Supérieur, 1977.Google Scholar
Young, David. “Montesquieu's View of Despotism and His Use of Travel Literature,” Review of Politics 40:3 (1978): 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, Jeff D. “The Perversion of Empire: Edmund Burke and the Nature of Imperial Responsibility,” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (1995): 208–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Jeremy. Dawning of the Raj: The Life and Trials of Warren Hastings. Chicago: Dee, 2000.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke. Boston: Little, Brown, 1901.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. The Speeches of Edmund Burke on the Impeachment of Warren Hastings. London: Bell, 1902.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. On Government, Politics, and Society, ed. Hill, B. W.. New York: International Publications Service, 1976.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “India: The Hastings Trial, 1789–1794,” in The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 7, ed. Marshall, Peter J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cambridge History of English and American Literature: Vol. XI, The Period of the French Revolution. New York: Bartleby, 2000.
Canavan, Francis. Edmund Burke: Prescription and Providence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Carnell, Geoffrey and Nicholson, Colin, eds. The Impeachment of Warren Hastings: Papers from a Bicentenary Commemoration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1989.
Crowe, Ian, ed. Edmund Burke: His Life and Legacy. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 1997.
Crowe, Ian. An Imaginative Whig: Reassessing the Life and Thought of Edmund Burke. Columbia:University of Missouri Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bruyn, Frans. “Edmund Burke's Gothic Romance: The Portrayal of Warren Hastings in Burke's Writings and Speeches on India,” Criticism 29 (1987): 415–38.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicolas B. The Scandal of Empire: India and the Creation of Imperial Britain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, David P. and Welsh, Jennifer M., eds. Empire and Community: Edmund Burke's Writings and Speeches on International Relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.
Lock, F. P. Edmund Burke, Vol. 2, 1784–1797. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Conor Cruise. The Great Melody: A Thematic Biography and Commented Anthology of Edmund Burke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Samet, Elizabeth D. “A Prosecutor and A Gentleman: Edmund Burke's Idiom of Impeachment,” English Literary History 68:2 (2001): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanlis, Peter. Edmund Burke: The Enlightenment and Revolution. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
Whelan, Fredrick G. Edmund Burke and India: Political Morality and Empire. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Main Currents in Sociological Thought, trans. Howard, Richard and Weaver, Helen. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. An Essay on Freedom, trans. Weaver, Helen. New York: New American Library, 1970.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Defense of Political Reason, ed. Mahoney, Daniel J.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994.Google Scholar
Benoît, Jean-Louis. Comprendre Toqueville. Paris: Colin, 2004.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. “The Dark Side of Tocqueville. On War and Empire,” The Review of Politics 67:4 (Fall 2005): 737–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesche, Roger. Tocqueville's Road Map: Methodology, Liberalism, Revolution, and Despotism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. “Tocqueville's Algeria,” Society 38:6 (2001): 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogan, Hugh. Alexis de Tocqueville: A Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. “Tocqueville's Paradoxical Moderation,” The Review of Politics 67:4 (Fall 2005): 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Stéphane. “La conciliation du libéralisme et du nationalisme chez Tocqueville.” La Revue Tocqueville/The Tocqueville Review XVI:1 (1995): 219–27.Google Scholar
Drescher, Seymour. Dilemmas of Democracy: Tocqueville and Modernization. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Furet, François. Interpreting the French Revolution, trans. Forster, Elborg. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. “The Civil and the Sacred,” Tanner Lectures, Harvard University, March 1990.Google Scholar
Gershman, Sally. “Alexis de Tocqueville and Slavery,” French Historical Studies 9:3 (1976): 467–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Doris S. Trial of Faith: Religion and Politics in Tocqueville's Thought. New York: Elsevier, 1975.Google Scholar
Jardin, André. Tocqueville: A Biography, trans. Davis, Lydia. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1988.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan S. Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Maguire, Matthew. The Conversion of Imagination: From Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mancini, Matthew. Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Twayne, 1994.Google Scholar
Mancini, Matthew. “Alexis de Tocqueville's Post-Civil War Reputation,” Society 43:1 (November–December 2005): 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, Matthew. Alexis de Tocqueville and American Intellectuals: From His Time to Ours. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. “Tocqueville philosophe politique,” Commentaire 107 (2004): 581–7.Google Scholar
Mélonio, Française. Tocqueville and the French, trans. Raps, Beth G.. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1998.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert. “Many Tocquevilles,” American Scholar 46:1 (1976–7): 59–75.Google Scholar
Pappe, H. O. “Mill and Tocqueville,” Journal of the History of Ideas 25:2 (1964): 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Whitney. Alexis de Tocqueville: His Social and Political Theory. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, 1986.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Tocqueville on Algeria,” Review of Politics 25:3 (1963): 362–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzmann, Ariel. Tocqueville in the Ottoman Empire: Rival Paths to the Modern State. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Alan B. “Tocqueville's Modern Nationalism,” French History 19:1 (2005): 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessitore, Aristide. “Tocqueville and Gobineau on the Nature of Modern Politics,” The Review of Politics 67:4 (Fall 2005): 631–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard, 1952–95.
Tocqueville, Alexis. L'Ancien régime et la Révolution, ed. Mayer, J. P.. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. Writings on Empire and Slavery, ed. and trans.Pitts, Jennifer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. De la colonie en Algérie. Brussels: Complex, 1988.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. Nous et les autres. Paris: Seuil, 1989.Google Scholar
Welch, Cheryl B. “Colonial Violence and the Rhetoric of Evasion: Tocqueville on Algeria,” Political Theory 31:2 (April 2003) 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Cheryl B. The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Zunz, Oliver, and Kahn, Alan S., eds. The Tocqueville Reader: A Life in Letters and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
Aron, Raymond. Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Vol. 1. New York: Basic Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Bearce, George D. British Attitudes towards India, 1784–1858. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, Carol A. and Veer, Peter, eds. Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
Cannadine, David. Orientalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. Oxford: University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicolas. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Janice. John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character. Athens: University of Georgia, 1991.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists, Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Great Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. “Castes of Mind,” Representations 37 (Winter 1992): 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Duncan. “James Mill and India,” Cambridge Journal (October 1951): 19–33.Google Scholar
Gray, John N. “John Stuart Mill: Traditional and Revisionist Interpretations,” Literature of Liberty 2:2 (April–June 1979): 7–37.Google Scholar
Habibi, Don A. John Stuart Mill and the Ethic of Human Growth. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habibi, Don A. “The Moral Dimensions of J.S. Mill's Colonialism,” Journal of Social Philosophy 30:1 (1999): 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halévy, Élie. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. Boston: Beacon Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Harris, Abram L. “John Stuart Mill: Servant of the East India Company,” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 30:2 (May 1964): 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Francis G. The Illusion of Permanence: British Imperialism in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. S. “John Stuart Mill as Moralist,” Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (1992): 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouse, Richard W. “Patriarchal Liberalism and Beyond: From John Stuart Mill to Harriet Taylor,” in The Family in Political Thought, ed. Elshtain, J. B.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kurfirst, Robert. “John Stuart Mill on Oriental Despotism including its British Variant,” Utilitas 8:1 (March 1996): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurfirst, Robert. “John Stuart Mill's Asian Parable,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34:3 (2001): 601–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, Michael, ed. A Cultivated Mind: Essays on John Stuart Mill Presented to John M Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.
Laski, Harold J. “Introduction,” in Autobiography, John Stuart Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Levin, Michael. John Stuart Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas. Speeches. London: Longmans Green, 1875.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry. Village Communities in the East and West, 7th ed. London: Murray, 1913.Google Scholar
Majeed, Javed. “James Mill's ‘The History of British India’ and Utilitarianism as a Rhetoric of Reform,” Modern Asian Studies 24:2 (1990): 209–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majeed, Javed. Ungoverned Imaginings: James Mill's the History of British India and Orientalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, Saree. Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manent, Pierre. An Intellectual History of Liberalism, trans. Balinski, Rebecca. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J. and Williams, Glynwr. The Great Map of Mankind: British Perceptions of the World in the Age of Enlightenment. London: Dent, 1982.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in the Nineteenth Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 1999.Google Scholar
Mill, James. “Affairs of India,” Edinburgh Review 16 (April 1810): 127–57.Google Scholar
Mill, James. “War,” The Philanthropist 3:11 (1813): 197–214.Google Scholar
Mill, James. Collected Works. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963–91.Google Scholar
Mill, James. The History of British India, ed. Thomas, William. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Moir, Martin I., Peers, Douglas M., and Zastoupil, Lynn, eds. John Stuart Mill's Encounter with India. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.CrossRef
Moore, R. J. “John Stuart Mill at East India House,” Historical Studies 20 (1983): 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. J. “John Stuart Mill and Royal India,” Utilitas 3:1 (May 1991): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, S. N. Sir William Jones: A Study in 18th Century British Attitudes to India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Pappe, H. O. “Mill and Tocqueville,” Journal of the History of Ideas 25:2 (April–June 1964): 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. “Liberalism and Colonialism: A Critique of Locke and Mill,” in The Decolonization of Imagination: Culture, Knowledge, and Power, eds., Nederveen Pieterse, Jan and Parekh, B.. London: Zed Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. Rethinking Multiculturalism, Cultural Diversity, and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn to Empires: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prager, Carol A. L. “Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations,” Political Studies 53:3 (2005): 621–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Gyan. “Post-Orientalist Third World Histories: Perspectives from Indian Historiography,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 32 (1990): 383– 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Bart. “Mill and Sidgwick: Imperialism and Racism,” Utilitas 19:1 (March 2007): 104–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, eds. Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.
Shtromas, Alexander, ed. The End of 'isms? Reflections on the Fate of Ideological Politics after Communism's Collapse. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
Smith, G. W., ed. John Stuart Mill's Social and Political Thought, vol. III. London: Routledge, 1998.
Souffrant, Eddy M. Formal Transgression: John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of International Affairs. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar
Stokes, Eric. The English Utilitarians and India. London: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Eileen. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J.S. Mill's Defense of the British Empire,” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (1983): 608–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunick, Mark. “Tolerant Imperialism: John Stuart Mill's Defense of British Rule in India,” Review of Politics 68 (2006): 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds. J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRef
Yasukawa, Ryuji. “James Mill on Peace and War,” Utilitas 3:2 (November 1991): 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zastoupil, Lynn. John Stuart Mill and India. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Introduction à la philosophie de l'histoire. Paris: Gallimard, 1981.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Le Marxisme de Marx, eds., Casanova, Jean-Claude and Bachelier, Christian. Paris: Éditions de Fallios, 2002.Google Scholar
Avineri, Shlomo, ed. Karl Marx on Colonialism and Modernization. New York: Doubleday, 1969.
Avineri, Shlomo. Marx's Socialism. New York: Lieber-Atherton, 1973.Google Scholar
Avineri, Shlomo. Varieties of Marxism. The Hague, the Netherlands: Nijhoff, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Anne M., and Llobera, J. R.. “The Asiatic Mode Of Production: An Annotated Bibliography,” Critique of Anthropology 1:2 (1974): 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Anne M., and Llobera, Joseph R., eds. The Asiatic Mode of Production: Science and Politics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
Bartolovich, Crystal, and Lazarus, Neil, eds. Marxism, Modernity, and Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRef
Berlin, Isaiah. Historical Inevitability. Loudon: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice. Marxism and Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Dunn, Stephen P. The Fall and Rise of the Asiatic Mode of Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982.Google Scholar
Fogel, Joshua A. “The Debates over the Asiatic Mode of Production in Soviet Russia, China, and Japan,” The American Historical Review 93:1 (1988): 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. Sur les sociétés précapitalistes. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1970.Google Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology, trans. Brain, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hindess, Barry, and Hirst, Paul Q.. Pre-capitalist Modes of Production. London: Routledge, 1975.Google Scholar
Hobsbawn, Eric, ed. Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1964.
Jessop, Bob, ed. Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments. London: Routledge, 1990.
Krader, Lawrence. The Asiatic Mode of Production: Sources, Development and Critique in the Writings of Karl Marx. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1975.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, George. The Concept of Ideology, and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Lowe, Donald. The Function of “China” in Marx, Lenin, and Mao. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lubasz, Heinz. “Marx's Concept of the Asiatic Mode of Production: A Genetic Analysis,” in Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments, ed. Jessop, Bob. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Daniel J. “Aron, Marx, and Marxism,” European Journal of Political Theory 2 (2002): 315–27.Google Scholar
Mardin, Serif. “Power, Civil Society and Culture in the Ottoman Empire,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 11:3 (1969) 258–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital, 3 vols. Chicago: Kerr, 1909.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Grundrisse. New York: Vintage Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick. Collected Works. New York: International Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
McLellan, David. Karl Marx: A Biography, 4th ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, Brendan. The Asiatic Mode of Production: Oriental Despotism, Historical Materialism, and Indian History. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Piccone, Paul. “Reading the Grundrisse: Beyond ‘Orthodox’ Marxism,” Theory and Society 2:2 (1975): 235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, Frederic L. “The Asiatic Mode of Production as an Economic System,” Journal of Comparative Economics 4:4 (1980): 420–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubel, Maximilien. Marx critique du Marxisme. Paris: Payot, 1974.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. Marxism and the Question of the Asiatic Mode of Production. The Hague, the Netherlands: Nijhoff, 1977.Google Scholar
Shanin, Teodor, ed. Late Marx and the Russian Road. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1983.
Sofri, Gianni. Il modo di produzione asiatico. Turin, Italy: Einandi, 1969.Google Scholar
Thorner, Daniel. “Marx on India and the Asiatic Mode of Production,” Contributions to Indian Sociology 9 (1966): 33–66.Google Scholar
Tokei, Ferenc. Essays on the Asiatic Mode of Production. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1979.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. Marx and the End of Orientalism. London: Allen and Unwin, 1978.Google Scholar
Wolpe, Harold, ed. The Articulation of Modes of Production: Essays from Economy and Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. “Karl Wittfogel et le concept de ‘Mode de production Asiatique’,” Annales 19 (1964): 531–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitkin, M. “The Asiatic Mode of Production,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 8:1 (1991): 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreski, Stanislav. Max Weber's Insights and Errors. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1994.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. Max Weber: An Intellectual Biography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Breiner, Peter. “The Political Logic of Economics and the Economic Logic of Modernity in Max Weber,” Political Theory 23:1 (1995): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Thomas. Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Buss, Andreas E. Max Weber and Asia: Contributions to the Sociology of Development. Munich: Weltforum, 1985.Google Scholar
Diggins, John Patrick. Max Weber: Politics and the Spirit of Tragedy. New York: Basic Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neo-patrimonialism. Beverley Hills: Sage, 1973.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C., eds. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge, 1991.
Hennis, Wilhelm. Max Weber: Essays in Reconstruction, trans. Tribe, K.. London, Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
Hoenisch, Steve. “ Max Weber's View of Objectivity in Social Science,” published in Criticism.com, 2003.
Huff, Toby E., and Schluchter, Wolfgang, eds. Max Weber and Islam. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1999.
Kalberg, Stephen. “ Max Weber's Analysis of the Rise of Monotheism: A Reconstruction,” The British Journal of Sociology 45:5 (1994a): 563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalberg, Stephen. Max Weber's Comparative-Historical Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994b.Google Scholar
Krader, Lawrence. The Asiatic Mode of Production: Sources, Development and Critique in the Writings of Karl Marx. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1975.Google Scholar
Lassman, Peter, and Speirs, Ronald, eds. Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Lough, Joseph W. H. Weber and the Persistence of Religion: Social Theory, Capitalism and the Sublime. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang. The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. Weber: A Short Introduction. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz. “Max Weber on the Origin and Character of the Western City,” Critical Quarterly 36:4 (1994):12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Derek. Capitalism and Modernity: An Excursus on Marx and Weber. London: Routledge, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang. The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber's Developmental History, trans. Roth, Guenther. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang. Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective, trans. Solomon, Neil. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Sica, Alan. Max Weber and the New Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Spinard, William. “Charisma: A Blighted Concept and an Alternative Formula,” Political Science Quarterly 106:2 (1991): 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. Weber and Islam: A Critical Study. London: Routledge, 1974.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. Max Weber: From History to Modernity. London: Routledge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. La démocratie grecque vue d'ailleurs: essais d'historiographie ancienne et moderne. Paris: Flammarion, 1990.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. On the Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and eds. Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. General Economic History, trans. Wright, Frank H.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. On Law in Economy and Society, ed. Rheinstein, Max. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism, trans. and eds. Gerth, Hans H. and Martindale, Don. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, trans. Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Sociology of Religion, trans. Fischoff, Ephraim. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, eds. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus, 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Max Weber on Capitalism, Bureaucracy, and Religion: A Selection of Texts, ed. and trans. Andreski, Stanislav. London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, new ed. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Whimster, Sam. Understanding Weber. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Michael Curtis, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Orientalism and Islam
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812422.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Michael Curtis, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Orientalism and Islam
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812422.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Michael Curtis, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Orientalism and Islam
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812422.013
Available formats
×