Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: September 2009

4 - Returning textiles and clothing to GATT disciplines

Summary

Agreement on rules to reintegrate textiles and clothing under disciplines of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is frequently regarded as one of the major achievements of the Uruguay Round. Unfortunately, the agreement allowed the industrial countries a great deal of discretion in the manner in which they undertook this reintegration. And, as in the case of the agricultural tariffication discussed in chapter 2, this discretion was used to delay the process of reform.

The extremely backend-loaded nature of the reform program for textiles and clothing has been the focus of much concern for developing countries. Acceleration of the phase-out program was a major demand of developing countries in the lead-up to the failed 1999 Seattle Ministerial and in subsequent discussions. While developed countries have reiterated their intention to fully implement their commitment to eliminate barriers to textile and clothing trade, as promised under the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), the developing countries remain concerned about the possibility of backsliding. This issue will overhang at least the first three years of the negotiations initiated at the Doha Ministerial, despite the renewed affirmation of WTO members to full and faithful implementation of the ATC (WTO 2001). Clearly, then, it is important to have a clear understanding of the issues involved.

The establishment and abolition of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement

Textiles and clothing have been traded under restrictions whose origins can be traced to the 1930s.

REFERENCES
Anderson, K. (1996), “Sectoral Uruguay Round Agreements: textiles and clothing”, in Anderson, K. (ed.), Strengthening the Global Trading System: From General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to World Trade Organization, Adelaide: Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide
Elbehri, A., Hertel, T., and Martin, W. (1999), “Estimating the impact of trade reforms on the Indian cotton and textile sectors: a general equilibrium approach” Washington, DC: World Bank, Mimeo
Ianchovichina, E. andMartin, W.(2001), “Trade liberalization in China's accession to the World Trade Organization”, Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, DC: World Bank;Journal of Economic Integration 16 (4): 421–445
James, W. and Umemoto, M. (1999) “Rules of origin and the competitive position of Asian textiles and apparel producers in the North American market”, International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development Working Paper 99–1, January
Kaewjai Siriwatpatara (1989), “A study of the Multi-Fibre Arrangement and bilateral agreements and the effects of quota restriction on Thai textile exports”, Master's thesis, Thammasat University, Faculty of Economics, Bangkok
Kathuria, S., Martin, W., and Bhardwaj, A. (2001), “Implications of Multi-Fibre Arrangement abolition for South Asian countries”, Policy Research Working Paper 2721, Washington, DC: World Bank
Martin, W. and Winters, L. A. (1996), “Assessing the Uruguay Round: a milestone for the developing economies”, in Bora, B. and Pangestu, M. (eds.), Priority Issues in Trade and Investment Liberalization: Implications for the Asia Pacific Region, Singapore: Pacific Economic Cooperation Council
Moore, L.(1995), “Asian textile producers in the United States marketWorld Economy 18 (4)
Pangestu, M. and Stephenson, S. (1996), “Evaluation of Uruguay Round commitments by Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation members”, in Bora, B. and Pangestu, M. (eds.), Priority Issues in Trade and Investment Liberalization: Implications for the Asia Pacific Region, Singapore: Pacific Economic Cooperation Council
Reinert, K.(2000), “Give us virtue, but not yet: safeguard actions under the Agreement on Textiles and ClothingThe World Economy 23 (1): 25–55, January
Spinanger, D. (1999), “Faking liberalization and finagling protectionism: the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing at its best”, background paper for the workshop World Trade Organization 2000 Negotiations: Mediterranean Interests and Perspectives, Economic Research Forum and World Bank, Cairo, July 14–15
Suphachalasai, Suphat (1997), “The Thai textile and clothing industry and government's policy: ASP-5 sub-programme on liberalization of trade and investment”, Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok
United Nations (United Nations) (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) (1996a), Asian and Pacific Developing Economies and the First World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference: Issues of Concern, New York: United Nations
Suphachalasai, Suphat(1996b), Prospects for the Textile and Clothing Sector of the Economic and Social Commission of Asia and the Pacific Region in the Post-Uruguay Round Context, New York: United Nations
United States International Trade Commission (1997), Annual Statistical Report on United States Imports of Textiles and Apparel, Washington, DC: US, TC
World Trade Organization (2001), “Implementation-related issues and concerns”, Decision of November 14, 2001, Ministerial Conference, Fourth Session, Doha, MT/MIN(01)/17, World Trade Organization
Yang, Yongzheng, Martin, W. and Yanagishima, Koji (1997), “Evaluating the benefits of abolishing the Multi-Fibre Arrangement in the Uruguay Round package”, in Hertel, T. (ed.), Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press