Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:05:11.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Delivery of Twins

from Section 3 - Pathology of Labor and Labor and Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

By
M. Laubach  and
Y. Jacquemyn
Edited by
P. Joep Dörr ,
Vincent M. Khouw ,
Frank A. Chervenak ,
Amos Grunebaum ,
Yves Jacquemyn  and
Jan G. Nijhuis
P. Joep Dörr
Affiliation:
HMC Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague
Vincent M. Khouw
Affiliation:
VMK Designs, Utrecht
Frank A. Chervenak
Affiliation:
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Amos Grunebaum
Affiliation:
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Yves Jacquemyn
Affiliation:
Antwerp University Hospital
Jan G. Nijhuis
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Interventions , pp. 91 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Loos, RJF, Derom, C, Eeckels, R, et al. Length of gestation and birthweight in dizygotic twins. Lancet. 2001;358:560–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breart, G, Barros, H, Wagener, Y, et al. Characteristics of the childbearing population in Europe. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111:S45–52.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, DP. Intrapartum management of twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1167–76.Google Scholar
Cheung, YB, Yip, P, Karlberg, L. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:1107–16.Google Scholar
Lee, YM, Wylie, B, Simpson, L, D’Alton, ME. Twin chorionicity and the risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:301–8.Google Scholar
Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Elias, SG, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG. 2008;115:58–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergani, P, Russo, FM, Follesa, I, et al. Perinatal complications in twin pregnancies after 34 weeks: effects of gestational age at delivery and chorionicity. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(7):545–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Vayssière, C, Benoist, G, Blondel, B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):12–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045Google Scholar
Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Elias, SG, et al Perinatal mortality and mode of delivery in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies >32 weeks of gestation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2011;118:1090–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:50–9.Google Scholar
Sullivan, AE, Hopkins, PN, Hsoin-Yi, W, et al. Delivery of monochorionic diamniotic twins in the absence of complications: analysis of neonatal outcome and costs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:257e1–7.Google Scholar
Bakr, AF, Karkour, T. What is the optimal gestational age for twin delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006;6:3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Haslam, RR, Robinson, JDS; Twins Timing of Birth Study group. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy near term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomized Trial. BJOG. 2012; 119:964–73.Google Scholar
Carroll, MA, Yeomans, ER. Vaginal delivery of twins. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:154–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, AC, Mullin, PM, Chmait, RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011;118(5):523–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmeyr, GJ, Barrett, JF, Crowther, CA. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12: CD006553.Google Scholar
Vendetelli, F, Rivière, O, Crenn-Hébert, C, et al. Is a planned cesarean necessary in twin pregnancies? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:1147–58.Google Scholar
Barrett, JFR, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al. Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group: a randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, HB. Monoamniotic twin pregnancy. Br J Clin Pract. 1996;40:294–7.Google Scholar
Steins Bisschop, CN, Vogelvang, TE, May, AM, Schuitemaker, NW. Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(1):237–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, T, de Carnavalet, C, Azria, E, et al. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:695–703.Google Scholar
Armson, BA, O’Connell, C, Persa, V, et al. Determinants of perinatal mortality and serious morbidity in the second twin. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:556–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Bowes, WA Jr, Grey, TW, et al. Twin delivery and neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:593–8.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, NA, Levine, EM. Delivery of the second twin. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91:217–20.Google Scholar
Amaru, RC, Bush, MC, Berkowitz, RL, et al. Is discordant growth in twins an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:71–6.Google Scholar
Ford, AA, Bateman, BT, Simpson, L. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1138–42.Google Scholar
Yang, Q, Walker, MC, Chen, XK, et al. Impacts of operative delivery for the first twin on neonatal outcomes in the second twin. Am J Perinatol. 2006;23(7):381–6.Google Scholar
Edris, F, Oppenheimer, L, Yang, Q, et al. Relationship between intertwin delivery interval and metabolic acidosis in the second twin. Am J Perinatol. 2006;23(8):481–5.Google Scholar
Wen, SW, Fung Kee Fung, K, Oppenheimer, L, et al. Neonatal mortality in second twin according to cause of death, gestational age, and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):778–83.Google Scholar
Barrett, J, Bocking, A. The SOGC Consensus Statement: management of twin pregnancies. Part 2. J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can. 2000;22:623.Google Scholar
Robinson, C, Chauhan, SP. Intrapartum management of twins. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;47:248–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayburn, WF, Lavin, JP Jr, Miodovnik, M, et al. Multiple gestation: time interval between delivery of first and second twins. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:502–5.Google Scholar
Brown, HL, Miller, JM Jr, Neumann, DE, et al. Umbilical cord blood gas assessment of twins. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:826–9.Google Scholar
Stein, W, Misselwitz, B, Schmidt, S. Twin-to-twin delivery time interval: influencing factors and effect on short-term outcome of the second twin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:346–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentilhes, L, Bonhours, AC, Biquard, F, et al. Mode d’accouchement des grosses gemellaires. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009;37:432–41.Google Scholar
Usta, IM, Nassar, AH, Awwad, JT, et al. Comparison of the perinatal morbidity and mortality of the presenting twin and its co-twin. J Perinatol. 2002;22:391–6.Google Scholar
Chauhan, SP, Roberts, WE, McLaren, RA, et al. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: breech extraction versus external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1015–20.Google Scholar
Gocke, SE, Nageotte, MP, Garite, T, et al. Management of the nonvertex second twin: primary cesarean section, external version, or primary breech extraction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:111–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, SR, Thorp, JM Jr, Bowes, WA Jr. Management of the nonvertex second twin. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172:383–5.Google Scholar
Smith, SJ, Zebrowitz, J, Latta, RA. Method of delivery of the nonvertex second twin: a community hospital experience. J Matern Fetal Med. 1997;6:146–50.Google Scholar
Barrett, JF, Ritchie, WK. Twin delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16:43–56.Google Scholar
Rabinovici, J, Barkai, G, Reichmann, B, et al. Internal podalic version with unruptured membranes for the second twin in transverse lie. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:428–30.Google Scholar
Caukwell, S, Murphy, DJ. The effect of mode of delivery and gestational age on neonatal outcome of the non-cephalic-presenting second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1356–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baghdadi, S, Gee, H, Whittle, MJ. Twin pregnancy outcome and chorionicity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:18–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sau, A, Chalmers, S, Shennan, AH, et al. Vaginal delivery can be considered in monochorionic diamniotic twins. BJOG. 2006;113:602–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riethmuller, D, Lantheaume, S, Teffaud, O, et al. [Obstetrical and neonatal prognosis of monoamniotic twin gestations.] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(7):632–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sau, AK, Langford, K, Elliott, C, et al. Monoamniotic twins, what should be the optimal antenatal management. Twin Res. 2003;6:270–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzel, RB. Twin entanglement revisited. Twin Res. 1998;1(3):138–41.Google Scholar
Dufour, P, Vinatyier, D, Vanderstichele, S, et al. Intravenous nitroglycerin for internal podalic version of the second twin in transverse lie. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:416–19.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×