Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:43:55.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Explorations in the Nonfinite Verbal System in Asamiya

from Morphology, Syntax, and Semantics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Runima Chowdhary
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Gauhati University
Stephen Morey
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, La Trobe University, Australia
Mark Post
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, La Trobe University, Australia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This paper is an attempt to redefine the notion of Nonfinite verb in Standard Asamiya (Assamese) and to provide a description of the verbal forms in the language on the basis of factual observations of the inventory of the nonfinite verbals in the language, thereby explicating their different uses and functions for fulfilling various communicative needs in the language.

A survey of the available works on the structure of Asamiya shows a dearth of attempts at a comprehensive treatment on the issue. The works of various traditional grammarians of the language, starting from Hemchandra Barua's pioneering work (first published in 1857) are more or less confined to providing a notional basis for the concept of nonfinite verbs, as evidenced from the term Asamapika Kriya (Incomplete verb) popularly used to refer to such verbal forms. The notion of ‘incompleteness’ has been defined by different scholars in various ways, by some as indicative of ‘non-completion of a sentence’ (Barua 1984:138), whereas by some as that of ‘non-completion of an action’ (Bora 2005:136), yet by some others as indicative of not only of ‘non-completion of a sentence, but also that of completion or progression of an action’ (Goswami 2003:295). Kakati (1972), the first ever analytic work carried out on the language, while subcategorizing such forms as conjunctives or gerunds, infinitives and participles has basically focused on their morphological derivation from a historical perspective only. However, all are unanimously in agreement that a nonfinite verb is an invariable form lacking concord in terms of the grammatical category of person.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Foundation Books
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×