Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T12:24:00.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Imaging the neonatal brain

from Section 3 - Radiological and neurophysiological investigations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

By
Mary A. Rutherford
Edited by
Hugo Lagercrantz ,
M. A. Hanson ,
Laura R. Ment  and
Donald M. Peebles
Hugo Lagercrantz
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
M. A. Hanson
Affiliation:
Southampton General Hospital
Laura R. Ment
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Donald M. Peebles
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Ultrasound is the routine imaging tool for assessing and monitoring the neonatal brain. It is cheap, mobile, and easy to use, and in experienced hands serial examination provides valuable information about the normal and abnormal brain. Computed tomography exposes the already sick neonate to unacceptable radiation and may miss clinically important pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an invaluable adjunct to ultrasound: the two techniques have complementary roles with ultrasound providing an ideal screening tool. MRI is safe and can therefore be used serially; in addition, unlike ultrasound, it may be used when the anterior fontanelle has closed. Unfortunately MRI of the sick or very preterm neonate is not easy and experience is limited to relatively few centers, both in the practicalities of performing a successful examination and in the interpretation of the results.

The increasing literature on advanced postacquisition analysis of MR images is evidence of the power of this tool to investigate the normal and abnormal developing brain but these techniques depend on high-quality imaging datasets, which may be difficult to acquire. The aim of any neonatal MR examination, whether performed for clinical or research studies, is to produce high-quality datasets, safely and in an acceptable acquisition time.

Practical issues

Sedation

Successful imaging of the neonatal brain requires careful preparation of the infant and close cooperation between radiologist, radiographer, and neonatologist. Neonates may be successfully imaged during natural sleep, following a feed, or under light sedation (Rutherford, 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Newborn Brain
Neuroscience and Clinical Applications
 , pp. 199 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajayi-Obe, M., Saeed, N., Cowan, F. M., et al. (2000). Reduced development of cerebral cortex in extremely preterm infants. Lancet, 356, 1162–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aljabar, P., Bhatia, K. K., Murgasova, M., et al. (2008). Assessment of brain growth in early childhood using deformation-based morphometry. NeuroImage, 39, 348–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anjari, M., Srinivasan, L., Allsop, J. M., et al. (2007). Diffusion tensor imaging with tract-based spatial statistics reveals local white matter abnormalities in preterm infants. NeuroImage, 35, 1021–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassi, L., Ricci, D., Volzone, A., et al. (2008). Probabilistic diffusion tractography of the optic radiations and visual function in preterm infants at term equivalent age. Brain, 131, 573–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, J. P., Counsell, S. J., Rueckert, D., et al. (2006). Abnormal deep grey matter development following preterm birth detected using deformation-based morphometry. NeuroImage, 32, 70–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, J. P., Counsell, S. J., Rueckert, D., et al. (2007). Early growth in brain volume is preserved in the majority of preterm infants. Annals of Neurology, 62, 185–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, C., Rutherford, M., Boardman, J., et al. (2008). Patterns of cerebral injury and neurodevelopmental outcome following symptomatic neonatal hypoglycaemia. Pediatrics, 122, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, A. M., Cornette, L., Ramenghi, L. A., et al. (2001). Magnetic resonance and cranial ultrasound characteristics of periventricular white matter abnormalities in newborn infants. Clinical Radiology, 56, 647–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Counsell, S. J., Maalouf, E. F., Fletcher, A. M., et al. (2002). MR imaging assessment of myelination in the very preterm brain. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 23, 872–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Counsell, S. J., Shen, Y., Boardman, J. P., et al. (2006). Axial and radial diffusivity in preterm infants who have diffuse white matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging at term-equivalent age. Pediatrics, 117, 376–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Counsell, S. J., Dyet, L. E., Larkman, D. J., et al. (2007). Thalamo-cortical connectivity in children born preterm mapped using probabilistic magnetic resonance tractography. NeuroImage, 34, 896–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, F. M. & Vries, L. S. (2005). The internal capsule in neonatal imaging. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 10, 461–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, F., Dubowitz, L., Mercuri, E., et al., (2003). White matter injury can lead to cognitive without major motor deficits following perinatal asphyxia and early encephalopathy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology Supplement, 93(45), 14.Google Scholar
Vries, L. S., Groenendaal, F., Haastert, I. C., et al. (1999). Asymmetrical myelination of the posterior limb of the internal capsule in infants with periventricular haemorrhagic infarction: an early predictor of hemiplegia. Neuropediatrics, 30, 314–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyet, L. E., Kennea, N., Counsell, S. J., et al. (2006). Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial magnetic resonance imaging from birth and neurodevelopmental assessment. Pediatrics, 118, 536–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felderhoff-Mueser, U., Rutherford, M. A., Squier, W. V., et al. (1999). Relationship between MR imaging and histopathologic findings of the brain in extremely sick preterm infants. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 20, 1349–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. D., Paley, M. N., & Whitby, E. H. (2005). Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet, 365, 1271–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inder, T. E., Huppi, P. S., Warfield, S., et al. (1999). Periventricular white matter injury in the premature infant is followed by reduced cerebral cortical gray matter volume at term. Annals of Neurology, 46, 755–60.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, S., Xue, H., Glover, A., et al. (2007). MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 26, 967–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouvet, P., Cowan, F. M., Cox, P., et al. (1999). Reproducibility and accuracy of MR imaging of the brain after severe birth asphyxia. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 20, 1343–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Judas, M., Rados, M., Jovanov-Milosevic, N., et al. (2005). Structural, immunocytochemical, and MR imaging properties of periventricular crossroads of growing cortical pathways in preterm infants. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 26, 2671–84.Google Scholar
Kapellou, O., Counsell, S. J., Kennea, N., et al. (2006). Abnormal cortical development after premature birth shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth. PLoS Medicine, 3, e265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan, M. L., Dyet, L. E., Boardman, J. P., et al. (2007). Relationship between white matter apparent diffusion coefficients in preterm infants at term-equivalent age and developmental outcome at 2 years. Pediatrics, 120, e604–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maalouf, E. F., Duggan, P. J., Rutherford, M. A., et al. (1999). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in a cohort of extremely preterm infants. Journal of Pediatrics, 135, 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamateniou, C., Counsell, S. J., Allsop, J. M., et al. (2006). The effect of preterm birth on neonatal cerebral vasculature studied with magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla. NeuroImage, 32, 1050–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercuri, E., Rutherford, M., Cowan, F., et al. (1999). Early prognostic indicators of outcome in infants with neonatal cerebral infarction: a clinical, electroencephalogram, and magnetic resonance imaging study. Pediatrics, 103, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, M. J., Olofsson, K., & Sidaros, K. (2006). Noninvasive measurements of regional cerebral perfusion in preterm and term neonates by magnetic resonance arterial spin labeling. Pediatric Research, 60, 359–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modi, N., Lewis, H., Al-Naqeeb, N., et al. (2001). The effects of repeated antenatal glucocorticoid therapy on the developing brain. Pediatric Research, 50, 581–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholl, R. M., Balasubramaniam, V. P., Urquhart, D. S., et al. (2007). Postmortem brain MRI with selective tissue biopsy as an adjunct to autopsy following neonatal encephalopathy. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 11, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okereafor, A., Allsop, J., Counsell, S., et al. (2008). Patterns of brain injury in neonates exposed to perinatal sentinel events. Pediatrics, 121, 906–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramenghi, L. A., Fumagalli, M., Righini, A., et al. (2007). Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of brain maturation in preterm neonates with punctate white matter lesions. Neuroradiology, 49, 161–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M. A. (ed.) (2002). MRI of the Neonatal Brain. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
Rutherford, M., Counsell, S., Allsop, J., et al. (2004). Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in term perinatal brain injury: a comparison with site of lesion and time from birth. Pediatrics, 114, 1004–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M. A., Azzopardi, D., Whitelaw, A., et al. (2005). Mild hypothermia and the distribution of cerebral lesions in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics, 116, 1001–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, L., Allsop, J., Counsell, S. J., et al. (2006). Smaller cerebellar volumes in very preterm infants at term-equivalent age are associated with the presence of supratentorial lesions. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 27, 573–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, L., Dutta, R., Counsell, S. J., et al. (2007). Quantification of deep gray matter in preterm infants at term-equivalent age using manual volumetry of 3-tesla magnetic resonance images. Pediatrics, 119, 759–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner, S. F., Cornette, L., Ramenghi, L. A., et al. (2003). Cerebral perfusion in infants and neonates: preliminary results obtained using dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 88, F525–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, D. K., Warfield, S. K., Carlin, J. B., et al. (2007). Perinatal risk factors altering regional brain structure in the preterm infant. Brain, 130, 667–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, P., Counsell, S., Allsop, J., et al. (2006). Reduced fractional anisotropy on diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics, 117, e619–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, H., Srinivasan, L., Jiang, S., et al. (2007a). Automatic segmentation and reconstruction of the cortex from neonatal MRI. NeuroImage, 38, 461–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, H., Srinivasan, L., Jiang, S., et al. (2007b). Longitudinal cortical registration for developing neonates. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 10, 127–35.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×