Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

Chapter 10 - Man and thinker: Denis Saurat, and the old new Milton criticism

Summary

Counting among its participants some of the central figures in English letters, including T. S. Eliot, F. R. Leavis, C. S. Lewis, and William Empson, the lively mid-twentieth-century dispute known as the Milton Controversy represents a fascinating chapter in the emergence of the discipline of academic literary criticism. My intention here is not to rehearse that dispute in any great detail. My primary subject is a book that preceded the Milton Controversy, which began in earnest with the publication of Leavis’s 1933 essay, “Milton’s Verse.” I argue that Denis Saurat’s 1925 landmark study, Milton: Man and Thinker, was the underlying trigger for the Milton Controversy in the wake of which it has been largely consigned to its role as an aberrant curiosity. For the last fifty years, Saurat’s work has been remembered – if it is remembered at all – for its claims concerning Milton’s debt to Jewish mysticism. In an effort to correct this widespread misapprehension, I shall argue that Saurat’s book played a central role in the formulation of many of the key features of the academic study of Milton’s writings, prompting the development of an old new Milton criticism long before its insights, albeit not identified with Saurat, began to receive renewed attention in the New Milton Criticism the present volume seeks to delineate. In my recovery of this critical genealogy, one that restores Saurat and many of his early readers – William Empson being perhaps the most prominent among them – to their proper places in the history of Milton studies, I shall also have occasion to reconsider what has become something of a truism in accounts of trends in Milton studies, that is, the apparent absence of any explicit influence or imprint of what generically gets called “theory.” Critical theory, in all its diverse and often conflicting avatars, has come to represent the destabilizing of literary signification; similarly, Saurat’s work anticipates the New Milton Criticism’s arguments with interpretive orthodoxies. Yet Saurat is also largely responsible for the stubborn, and seemingly un-theoretical, presence of the author Milton – Man and Thinker – in virtually all efforts to render his writings meaningful, whether they be neo-Christian or heterodoxical. By making Saurat’s influence more visible, I will suggest how we might better understand the characteristically idiosyncratic presence – and erasure – of theoretical approaches to the reading of Milton’s writings.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Kendrick, ChristopherCritical Essays on John MiltonNew YorkG. K. Hill & Co. 1995
Alpers, Paul J.The Milton ControversyTwentieth-Century Literature in Retrospect 2 1971 269
Leavis, F. R.Milton’s VerseScrutiny 2 1933 123
Leavis, F. R.Revaluation: Tradition and Development in English PoetryLondonChatto and Windus 1936
Saurat, DenisMilton: Man and ThinkerNew YorkThe Dial Press 1925
Shoulson, Jeffrey S.Milton and the Rabbis: Hebraism, Hellenism, and ChristianityNew YorkColumbia University Press 2001
Stephens, Mitchell 1994
Raleigh, WalterMiltonLondonEdward Arnold & Co. 1900
Hanford, James Holly 1921
1926
1921
Hanford, James Holly 1919
Thorpe, JamesMilton Criticism: Selections from Four CenturiesLondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. 1951
Saintsbury, GeorgeThe Nation & the Athenæum 37 1925 178
Liljegren, S. B.Beiblatt zur Anglia 36 1925 274
Haven, Raymond D.Saturday Review of Literature 2 1925 276
Mirsky, D. S.London Mercury 12 1925 547
Greenlaw, EdwinJournal of English and Germanic Philology 25 1925 437
Legouis, ÉmileRevue Anglo-Americaine 3 1926 254
Grierson, H. J. C.Modern Language Review 21 1926 440
Smith, T. V.Studies in Philology 23 1926 184
Forster, E. M.La France Libre 8 1944 449
1944
Williams, CharlesThe Spectator 172 1944 154
Bennett, JoanNew Statesman and Nation 28 1944 156
Woodhouse, A. S. P.University of Toronto Quarterly 15 1946 200
Kelley, MauriceThis Great Argument: A Study of “De Doctrina Christiana” as a Gloss upon “Paradise LostPrinceton University Press 1941
Loewenstein, DavidTurner, James GranthamPolitics, Poetics, and Hermeneutics in Milton’s ProseCambridge University Press 1990
1914
Eliot, T. S.Essays in StudiesOxford University Press 1936
1969
Eliot, T. S. 1947
Patterson, AnnabelReading Between the LinesMadisonUniversity of Wisconsin Press 1993
Leavis, F. R.The Common PursuitNew YorkGeorge W. Stewart 1952
Stoll, E. E.Give the Devil his Due: A Reply to Mr. LewisThe Review of English Studies 20 1944 115
Woodhouse, A. S. P.University of Toronto Quarterly 15 1946 200
Silver, VictoriaImperfect Sense: The Predicament of Milton’s IronyPrinceton University Press 2001
Bryson, MichaelThe Tyranny of Heaven: Milton’s Rejection of God as KingNewarkUniversity of Delaware Press 2004
Kolbrener, WilliamMilton’s Warring Angels: A Study of Critical EngagementsCambridge University Press 1997
Adams, Robert MartinMilton and the Modern CriticsIthacaCornell University Press 1955
Biberman, MatthewMasculinity, Anti-Semitism, and Early Modern English Literature: From the Satanic to the Effeminate JewLondonAshgate 2004
Herman, Peter C.Paradigms Lost, Paradigms Found: The New Milton CriticismLiterature Compass 2 2005 14
1992
Kerrigan, WilliamRedrawing the Boundaries: The Transformation of English and American Literary StudiesNew YorkMLA Press 1992
1989
Brooks, Douglas A.Milton and the JewsCambridge University Press 2008
Rumrich, JohnMilton Unbound: Controversy and ReinterpretationCambridge University Press 1996
Waldock, A. J. A.Paradise Lost and its CriticsCambridge University Press 1947
Freedman, JonathanThe Temple of Culture: Assimilation and Anti-Semitism in Literary Anglo-AmericaOxford University Press 1999
1971
Shoaf, R. A.Milton, Poet of Duality: A Study of Semiosis in the Poetry and ProseGainesvilleUniversity of Florida Press 1993
Rapaport, HermanMilton and the PostmodernLincolnUniversity of Nebraska Press 1983
Foucault, MichelLanguage, Counter-Memory, PracticeIthacaCornell University Press 1977
Wimsatt, W. K.Beardsley, Monroe C.The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of PoetryLexingtonUniversity of Kentucky Press 1954
Barthes, RolandImage-Music-TextNew YorkThe Noonday Press 1977
Smith, NigelIs Milton Better than Shakespeare?CambridgeHarvard University Press 2008
Dobranski, Stephen B.Rumrich, John P.Milton and HeresyCambridge University Press 1998
Herman, Peter C., the Miltonic ‘Or,’ and the Poetics of IncertitudeSEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 43 2003 181