Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:25:51.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Capabilities and the Common Good

from Part I - The Need for New Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

By
Jonathan Warner
Edited by
Flavio Comim ,
Shailaja Fennell  and
P. B. Anand
Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Shailaja Fennell
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
P. B. Anand
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
New Frontiers of the Capability Approach , pp. 53 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airely, D. (2008) Predictably Irrational. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Shiller, R. J. (2015) Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. M. (2004) ‘Capabilities Human Rights and Moral Pluralism’. The International Journal of Human Rights Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 451–69.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958) ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’. Philosophy Vol. 22, No. 124, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. (1965) Political Argument. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty Lecture, Oxford University, 31 October; subsequently published by the Clarendon Press, and in Berlin (1969).Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969) Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, J. (1994) Sustaining the Common Good. Cleveland, OH: The Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1819) ‘The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns’. In Fontana, Biancamaria ed., The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 309–28.Google Scholar
Davies, N. (1981) God's Playground: A History of Poland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. (2006) ‘Individual well-being, migration remittances and the common good’. The European Journal of Development Research Vol. 18, No. 1 (March), pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. (2009) ‘Ideas related to human development’. In Deneulin, Séverine and Shahni, Lila, eds. An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. and Stewart, F. (2002) ‘Amartya Sen's Contribution to Development Thinking’. Studies in Comparative International Development Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
Dodes, L. and Dodes, Z. (2014) The Sober Truth: Debunking the Bad Science behind 12-step Programs and the Rehab Industry. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Douglass, B. (1980) ‘The Common Good and the Public Interest’. Political Theory Vol. 8, No. 1 (February), pp. 103–17.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1982) ‘Sour grapes: Utilitarianism and the genesis of wants’. In Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, eds. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–38.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1985) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (2002) ‘Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen's development as freedom’. Studies in Comparative International Development Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 54–60.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. (1909) ‘The Machine Stops’. The Oxford and Cambridge Review November.Google Scholar
Gaudium et Spes (1965) [Joy and Hope] Encyclical of Pope Paul VI, promulgated December 7.Google Scholar
Geetz, C. (1973) ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretative Theory of Culture’. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic Books, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1963) Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. (2008) Putting on Virtue: The Legacy of the Splendid Vices. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hollenbach, D. (2002) The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’. Econometrica Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263–91.Google Scholar
Khader, S. J. (2011) Adaptive Preferences and Women's Empowerment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (2009) How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? The New York Times, 2 September.Google Scholar
Laudato Si’ (2015) [Praise be to you] Encyclical of Pope Francis, promulgated 24 May.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1981) After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
Mankiw, G. N. (1998) Principles of Economics. Fort Worth: Harcourt College.Google Scholar
Mater et Magistra (1961) [Mother and Teacher] Encyclical of Pope John XXIII, promulgated 15 May.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1863) Utilitarianism London: Parker, Son and Bourn.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2010) ‘A distinction regarding happiness in ancient philosophy’. Social Research: An International Quarterly Vol. 77, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 595–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. and Ebbesen, E. B. (1970) ‘Attention in delay of gratification’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 329–337.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., et al. (2011) ‘“Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation’. SCAN Vol. 6, pp. 252–6.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. and Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) ‘Delay of Gratification in Children’. Science New Series Vol. 244, No. 4907, pp. 933–8.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2005) The common good The Review of Metaphysics Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 133–64.Google Scholar
Naylor, G. (1990) Better than Life (Red Dwarf). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
New York Times (2016) ‘A Surreal Life on the Precipice in Puerto Rico’ (August 7).Google Scholar
NIV (2016) New International Version Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2003) ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’. Feminist Economics Vol. 9, No. 2–3, pp. 33–59.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1977) Class: ‘The Self, the Future and the Rational Thing To Do’. Oxford University, Hillary Term.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1983) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Plato, The Meno. Available at http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/meno.html.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009) ‘Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity’. Ecology and Society Vol. 14, No. 2, Art. 32. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, J. (2007) The Home We Build Together: Recreating Society. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2004) Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (2007) Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. (1973) Utilitarianism: For and Against Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. (2005) ‘Groups and Capabilities’. Journal of Human Development Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
Tasker, J. P. (2016) ‘Trudeau cabinet approves Trans Mountain, Line 3 pipelines, rejects Northern Gateway’. CBC news. www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3872828 (29 November).Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1980) ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Vol. 1, pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Welby, J. (2015) ‘Building the common good’. In Sentamu, John, ed. On Rock or Sand? Firm Foundations for Britain's Future. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Wood, R. (2004) ‘The Heresy of Solitary Faith’. Christianity Today (January), pp. 58–60.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×