Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:28:00.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Court of Würzburg

from PRINCIPALITIES AND PRINCE-BISHOPRICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Dieter Kirsch
Affiliation:
Hochschule für Musik Würzburg
Samantha Owens
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Barbara M. Reul
Affiliation:
University of Regina
Janice B. Stockigt
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A PRINCIPAL DIFFERENCE between ecclesiastical governments and secular ones is the lack of dynastic succession. The consequences arising from this circumstance are illustrated, pars pro toto, by the Würzburg Hofmusik, an institution that continued to exist into the nineteenth century. The continual succession of rulers from different backgrounds prevented the ongoing pursuit of any specific long-term goals over the course of several reigns. This tendency was strengthened by the cathedral chapter, which, as the governing body, tended to let itself be guided by experiences gathered under the immediate predecessor when selecting a new ruler. Consequently, the prince-bishops who succeeded one another might hold entirely different, even contradictory interests, and this could affect the musical institutions of the court.

THE SOURCES

During the bombing of Würzburg on 16 March 1945, great quantities of valuable primary sources were irretrievably lost, including the entire surviving musical repertory of the Hofkapelle, of which not even an inventory has been preserved. Important files from the State Archives, such as salary registers of the court servants, also went up in flames. Subsequently, given the decimation of the holdings, research in this area was hardly considered an encouraging prospect. On closer inspection, however, it became apparent that the pre-war researchers who were able to draw from the complete collection did not come close to uncovering all the sources: on the one hand, they appear to have overlooked a fair amount, while on the other, a meticulous examination of the sources undoubtedly required a great deal of time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Music at German Courts, 1715–1760
Changing Artistic Priorities
, pp. 305 - 330
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×