Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:54:38.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2017

Colin Heydt
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain
God, Self, and Other
, pp. 255 - 275
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Adams, John. An Essay Concerning Self-Murther. London: 1699.Google Scholar
Adams, Samuel. “The Rights of the Colonists: The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772.”Google Scholar
Addison, Joseph. The Spectator, #10, March 12, 1711.Google Scholar
Allestree, Richard. The Whole Duty of Man. London: 1658.Google Scholar
Ames, William. Conscience, with the Power and Cases Thereof. London: 1639.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Shaftesbury's Ghost Conjur'd or a letter to Mr. Francis Hutcheson, Professor of Moral Philosophy in the University of Glasgow, Glasgow: 1738.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Vindication of Mr. Hutcheson from the Calumnious Aspersions of a Late Pamphlet. Glasgow: 1738.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Ethices Compendium in Usum Juventutis Academicae. Oxford: 1745.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . “Anti Suicide.” In Essays on Suicide, and the Immortality of the Soul, Ascribed to the Late David Hume, Esq. London: 1783.Google Scholar
Anonymous. A Dissertation or Discourse on Suicide. Northampton: 1785.Google Scholar
Antoninus, Marcus Aurelius. The Meditations of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, translated and with notes by Hutcheson, Francis and Moor, James. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008 [1742].Google Scholar
Aquinas. Summa Theologica.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics.Google Scholar
Augustine. City of God Against the Pagans, edited and translated by Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Augustine. “Of the Good of Marriage.”Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Advancement of Learning, edited by Vickers, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [1605].Google Scholar
Balfour, James. A Delineation of the Nature and Obligation of Morality, with Reflexions upon Mr Hume's Book Entitled An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edinburgh: 1753.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean. “An Historical and Critical Account of the Science of Morality.” In Pufendorf, Samuel, The Law of Nature and Nations, edited by Kennet, Basil. London: 1749.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean. “The Judgments of an Anonymous Writer on the Original of This Abridgement.” In Pufendorf, Samuel, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, edited by Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003.Google Scholar
Beattie, James. Elements of Moral Science, 2 vols. Edinburgh: 1790–3.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. Of Crimes and Punishments, translated by Grigson, Jane. New York: Marsilio Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
Bentham, Edward. An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Oxford: 1745.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Anarchical Fallacies, Vol. 2 of Bowring, John (ed.), Works (1843). Edinburgh: William Tait.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by Bowring, John, 10 vols. New York: Russell and Russell, 1962.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Deontology Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism, edited by Goldworth, Amnon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [1789].Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. Passive Obedience, Or the Christian Doctrine of Not Resisting the Supreme Power, Proved and Vindicated upon the Principles of the Law of Nature. Dublin: 1712.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. The Theory of Vision Vindicated and Explained in the Works of George Berkeley, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1871.Google Scholar
Birks, Peter and McLeod, Grant (eds.). Justinian's Institutes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979 [1765–9].Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh. “On the Union of Piety and Morality.” In Sermons. Edinburgh: 1777.Google Scholar
[Blount, Charles]. The Proceedings of the Present Parliament Justified, By the Opinion of the most Judicious and Learned Hugo Grotius. Edinburgh: 1689.Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, Lord. The Works of Lord Bolingbroke, Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Carey and Hart, 1841.Google Scholar
Boston, Thomas. Human Nature in Its Four-fold State…In Several Practical Discourses. Edinburgh: 1720.Google Scholar
Brent, Charles. An Essay Concerning the Nature and Guilt of Lying. London: 1702.Google Scholar
Brown, John. Essays on the Characteristics of the Earl of Shaftesbury. London: 1751.Google Scholar
Bruce, John. Elements of the Science of Ethics. London: Strahan and Cadell/Creech, 1786.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, Franco. Idea Philosophiae Tum Moralis, Tum Naturalis, Oxford: 1667 [2nd ed. 1629].Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert. Two Dissertations Written by the Late Bishop Burnet, 3rd ed. London: 1731 [1670].Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph. Analogy of Religion Natural and Revealed to the Constitution and Course of Nature. London: 1736.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph. The Works of the Right Reverend Father in God, Joseph Butler, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1849.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Commentaries on the Prophet Daniel. Edinburgh: 1852 (1561).Google Scholar
Campbell, Archibald. An Enquiry into the Original of Moral Virtue. Edinburgh: 1733.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Alexander. The Autobiography of Dr. Alexander Carlyle of Invernesk, 1722–1805. London and Edinburgh: T. N. Foulis: 1910.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Gershom. Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Moore, J. and Silverthorne, M.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002 [1724].Google Scholar
Chapone, Sarah. The Hardships of the English Laws in Relation to Wives. London: 1735.Google Scholar
Cicero, . On Duties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation. London: 1706.Google Scholar
Cleghorn, William. Student notes on “Lectures on Moral Philosophy” (Manuscript from St. Andrews University Library, MS BJ 1021.C6), 1752.Google Scholar
Cockman, Thomas (ed.), Tully's Offices, in English, 3rd ed. London: Buckley, 1714.Google Scholar
The Confession of Faith and the Larger and Shorter Catechism, First agreed upon by the Assembly of Divines at Westminster. Edinburgh: 1683 [1646].Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard. A Treatise of the Laws of Nature. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005 [1672].Google Scholar
Day, Thomas. “Fragment of an Original Letter on the Slavery of the Negroes, Written in the Year 1776.” London, 1784.Google Scholar
Delany, Patrick. Reflections upon Polygamy. London: 1737.Google Scholar
Descartes, Rene. Passions of the Soul. In Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald (eds.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1, 325404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Diggs, Dudley. The Unlawfulnesse of Subjects, Taking up Armes against Their Soveraigne, 1647.Google Scholar
Doddridge, Phillip. A Course of Lectures. London: 1763.Google Scholar
Doolittle, Thomas. A Plain Method of Catechizing. London: 1699.Google Scholar
Donne, John. Biathanatos. London: 1648.Google Scholar
Epictetus, . Handbook. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. Institutes of Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: A. Kincaid and J. Bell, 1769.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. Principles of Moral and Political Science, 2 vols. Edinburgh: Creech, 1792.Google Scholar
Fiddes, Richard. Theologica Practica. Dublin: 1720.Google Scholar
Fiering, Norman. Moral Philosophy at Seventeenth Century Harvard. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. “The Anarchy of a Limited or Mixed Monarchy,” in Patriarcha and Other Writings, edited by Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fleming, Caleb, A Dissertation upon the Unnatural Crime of Self-Murder. London: 1773.Google Scholar
Fordyce, David, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, edited by Kennedy, Thomas. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003 [1754].Google Scholar
Fownes, Joseph. An Enquiry into the Principles of Toleration. London: 1772.Google Scholar
Gay, John. “Preliminary Dissertation. Concerning the fundamental principle of virtue or morality.” Prefixed to King, William, Essay on the Origin of Evil, translated by Law, E.. London: R. Knaplock, J. Knapton, and W. Innis, 1731.Google Scholar
Gigas, Emil (ed.), Briefe Samuel Pufendorfs an Christian Thomasius (1687–1693). Munich: Oldenbourg, 1897.Google Scholar
Gildon, Charles. “An Account of the Life and Death of the Author,” in The Miscellaneous Works of Charles Blount, Esq. London: 1695.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Thomas. The Principles of Moral Philosophy Investigated. London: 1790.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Thomas. An Enquiry into the Duties of Men in the Higher and Middle Classes of Society in Great Britain. London: B. and J. White, 1794.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. London: 1793.Google Scholar
Gregory, George. Essays Historical and Moral. London: 1788.Google Scholar
Gregory, George. A Sermon on Suicide. London: 1797.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace, Vol. 3. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, edited by van Ittersum, Martine Julia. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006.Google Scholar
Grove, Henry with Amory, Thomas. A System of Moral Philosophy, 3rd ed. London: 1755 [1749].Google Scholar
Heineccius, J. G. (1741) A Methodical System of Universal Law: Or, the Laws of Nature and Nations, with Supplements and a Discourse by George Turnbull, translated by Turnbull, G. and edited by Ahnert, T. and Schröder, P.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008.Google Scholar
Herries, John, An Address to the Public on the Crime of Suicide. London: 1774.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society. London: 1651.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England in Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, edited by Cromartie, Alan and Skinner, Quentin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hume, David. The Life of David Hume, Esq. Written by Himself. London: Strahan and Cadell, 1777.Google Scholar
Hume, David. The Letters of David Hume, Vol. 1, edited by Grieg, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Hume, David. History of England. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983 [1754–62].Google Scholar
Hume, David. Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985 [1777].Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Beauchamp, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006 [1751].Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [1739–40].Google Scholar
Hume, David. “A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh…” [1745], in Hume, D, A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [1739–40].Google Scholar
Hume, David. The Natural History of Religion In Beauchamp, T. (ed.), A Dissertation on the Passions: The Natural History of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [1757].Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. “On Human Nature.” In The Dublin Weekly Journal X, 5 June 1725.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. “Reflections upon Laughter.” The Dublin Weekly Journal, 5 June 1725.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy, 3 vols., introduction and edited by Leechman, W.. London: A. Millar, 1755.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, edited by Garrett, A.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002 [1728].Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, edited by Leidhold, W.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004 [1725].Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis.On the Natural Sociability of Mankind.” In Moore, J. and Silverthorne, M. (eds.), Logic, Metaphysics, and the Natural Sociability of Mankind, 189--216. ndianapolis: Liberty Press, 2006 [1730].Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria (A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy), edited by Turco, L.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2007 [1745–7].Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. “Letter to Henry Lee, May 8, 1825.” In Peterson, Merrill D. (ed.), Thomas Jefferson: Writings, 15001501. New York: Library of America, [1825] 1984.Google Scholar
Jenyns, Soame. A Free Inquiry into the Nature and Origin of Evil, excerpted in Crimmins, James, Utilitarians and Religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kames, Lord [Home, Henry]. Historical Law Tracts, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: 1761.Google Scholar
Kames, Lord [Home, Henry]. Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion, 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005 [1779].Google Scholar
Kames, Lord [Home, Henry]. Sketches of the History of Man, 3 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2007.Google Scholar
Kames, Lord [Home, Henry]. Principles of Equity. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2014 [1760, 1767, 1778].Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Knaggs, Thomas. A Discourse against the Abominable Sin of Lying. London: 1710.Google Scholar
The Latter-Day Saints. Millennial Star. Liverpool: February 14, 1876.Google Scholar
Law, Edmund. “On Morality and Religion.” In Crimmins, James, Utilitarians and Religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Law, William. Theses Philosophicae. Edinburgh: 1705.Google Scholar
Leechman, William. The Temper, Character, and Duty of a Minister of the Gospel. A Sermon Preached before the Synod of Glasgow and Air, at Glasgow, April 7th, 1741.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine. Institutio Philosophiae Secundum Principia D. Renati Descartes, 3rd ed. London: 1675.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine. An Entire Body of Philosophy According to the Principles of the Famous Renate Des Cartes, In Three Books. London: 1694.Google Scholar
Leland, John. The Advantage and Necessity of the Christian Revelation, Shewn from the State of Religion in the Ancient Heathen World, Vol. 2. London: 1764.Google Scholar
Lobb, Theophilius, A Dialogue on the Sin of Lying, Between a Master, and His Servants, 2nd ed. London: 1750.Google Scholar
Locke, John, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Nidditch, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975 [1700].Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [1698].Google Scholar
Locke, John. Some Thoughts Concerning Education and Of the Conduct of the Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996 [1693].Google Scholar
Locke, John. “Of Ethic in General.” In Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. A Discourse on the Law of Nature and Nations. In Winch, Donald (ed.), Vindiciae Gallicae and Other Writings on the French Revolution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006.Google Scholar
[MacLaurin, John.] The Philosopher's Opera. Edinburgh: 1757.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. The Virgin Unmask'd, 2nd ed. London: 1731.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and The Usefulness of Christianity in War. London: 1732.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. “A Search into the Nature of Society.” In The Fable of the Bees, 2 vols., edited by Kaye, F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1988 [1732].Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees, 2 vols., edited by Kaye, F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1988 [1732].Google Scholar
Maxwell, John. “Concerning the Imperfectness of the Heathen Morality.” In Cumberland, Richard, A Treatise of the Laws of Nature, edited by Maxwell, John, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005 [1727].Google Scholar
Middleton, George. Theses philosophicae. Aberdeen: 1675.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Collected Works, Vol. X: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society, edited by Robson, John. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Millar, John. The Origin of the Distinction of Ranks. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006 [1771].Google Scholar
Millar, John. An Historical View of the English Government. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006 [1787; 2nd ed. 1803].Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de [de Secondat, Charles-Louis]. Persian Letters. London: Penguin Classics, 2004 [1721].Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. “Of Cannibals.” In The Complete Essays, translated by Screech, M. A.. London: Penguin Classics, 2003.Google Scholar
More, Henry. Enchiridion Ethicum, 2nd ed. London, 1669.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. “General Scholium.” In The Principia, edited by Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999 [1713, 2nd ed.].Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992 [1791–2].Google Scholar
Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002 [1785].Google Scholar
A Person of Quality. “Remedy for Uncleanness.” London: 1658.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974 [1787].Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. The Law of Nature and Nations, 5th ed., translated by Kennet, B. London: 1749 [1672].Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, edited by Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003.Google Scholar
Rawlins, Thomas. Truth and Sincerity, Recommended in a Sermon against Lying. London: 1713.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Active Powers of Man. Edinburgh: 1788.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Practical Ethics, edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel. Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded. London: 1740.Google Scholar
Robertson, William. “The Situation of the World at the Time of Christ's Appearance.” Edinburgh: 1775 [1755].Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1997 [1750].Google Scholar
Rutherforth, Thomas. An Essay on the Nature and Obligations of Virtue. Cambridge: 1744.Google Scholar
Rutherforth, Thomas. Institutes of Natural Law, 2 vols. Cambridge: 1754–6.Google Scholar
Sacheverell, Henry. The Perils of False Brethren, both in Church, and State. London: 1709.Google Scholar
Seneca, , On Favours in Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, edited by Procope, J. F. and Cooper, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, , Earl of (Anthony Ashley Cooper). Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001 [1714].Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, , Earl of (Anthony Ashley Cooper). Several Letters Written by a Noble Lord to a Young Man at the University. London: 1716.Google Scholar
Sidney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1996 [1698].Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976 (1790). [Reprinted by Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985].Google Scholar
Smith, Adam.Letter to the Edinburgh Review.” In Wightman, W. P. D. (ed.), Essays on Philosophical Subjects, 242256. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980 [1756].Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by Wightman, W. P. D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980 [1795].Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982 (1762–3/1766).Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Correspondence of Adam Smith, edited by Mossner, E. C. and Ross, I. S.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1987.Google Scholar
Stackhouse, Thomas. A Compleat Body of Speculative and Practical Divinity. London: 1760 [1729].Google Scholar
Steele, Richard. The Spectator 274, 1712.Google Scholar
Stewart, Dugald. Outlines of Moral Philosophy, 4th ed. Edinburgh: 1818 [1793].Google Scholar
Stewart, Dugald. “Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith.” In Smith, Adam, Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982 [1794].Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco. Selections from Three Works. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2015.Google Scholar
Suetonius, . The Lives of the Caesars, translated by Rolfe, J. C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy. The Rule of Conscience, edited by Barcroft, Richard. London: 1725 [1660].Google Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy. Ductor Dubitantiam in The Whole Works of the Right Reverend Jeremy Taylor, Vol. 9. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1855 [1660].Google Scholar
Temple, Sir William. Observations upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands, 7th ed. London: 1705 [1673].Google Scholar
Tertullian, , “On Exhortation to Chastity.”Google Scholar
Tertullian, , “On Monogamy.”Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Institutes of Divine Jurisprudence. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2011 [1688].Google Scholar
Tindal, Matthew. Christianity as Old as the Creation. London: 1730.Google Scholar
Trenchard, John and Gordon, Thomas. Cato's Letters, 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1995 [1720–3].Google Scholar
Turnbull, George. Observations Upon Liberal Education, edited by Moore, T. O., Jr. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003 [1742].Google Scholar
Turnbull, George. The Principles of Moral and Christian Philosophy, 2 vols., edited by Broadie, A.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund., 2005 [1740].Google Scholar
Turnbull, George. “A Discourse upon the Nature and Origine of Moral and Civil Laws.” In Turnbull, G. and Heineccius, J. G. A Methodical System of Universal Law: Or, the Laws of Nature and Nations, with Supplements and a Discourse by George Turnbull, edited by Ahnert, T. and Schröder, P.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008 [1741].Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. and Heineccius, J. G. A Methodical System of Universal Law: Or, the Laws of Nature and Nations, with Supplements and a Discourse by George Turnbull, edited by Ahnert, T. and Schröder, P.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008 [1741].Google Scholar
Varrentrapp, Konrad. “Briefe von Pufendorf,” Historische Zeitschrift, 70 [1893].Google Scholar
Warburton, William. The Divine Legation of Moses Demonstrated. London, 1766 [1737].Google Scholar
Warburton, William. “Remarks on Mr. David Hume's Essay on ‘The Natural History of Religion’.” In The Works of the Right Reverend William Warburton, Vol. XII, 341376. London: 1811 [1757].Google Scholar
Waterland, Daniel. “Advice to a Young Student in Theology.” Oxford: 1755.Google Scholar
Watts, Isaac. Improvement of the Mind, 2nd ed. London 1743.Google Scholar
Wesley, John, Sermons on Several Occasions, Vol. 2. New York: Lane and Scott, 1851.Google Scholar
William Adams: A Short Account of the Life and Death of A Youth of Virginia.” The Arminian Magazine: Consisting of Extracts and Original Treatises on General Redemption, 1:2 (Feb. 1789), 8092.Google Scholar
Wilson, James. Lectures on Law in Collected Works of James Wilson, 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2007.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, John. Ecclesiastical Characteristics in The Works of John Witherspoon, Vol. vi, Edinburgh: 1805 [1753].Google Scholar
Witherspoon, John. Lectures on Moral Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1912 [combining student lecture notes from 1772, 1782, and 1795].Google Scholar
Wollaston, William. The Religion of Nature Delineated, 8th ed. London: 1759 [1722].Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Men. London: 1790.Google Scholar
Zouch, Richard. Ethicae Compendium. Oxford: 1743.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Ahnert, Thomas. “Clergymen as Polite Philosophers. Douglas and the Conflict between Moderates and Orthodox in the Scottish Enlightenment.” Intellectual History Review, 18:3 (2008), 375–83.Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas. The Moral Culture of Enlightenment: Religion and Virtue in Scottish Enlightenment Thought, 1690–1805. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Alvey, James E.. “The ‘New View’ of Adam Smith and the Development of His Views over Time.” In Cockfield, Geoff, Firth, Ann, and Laurent, John (eds.), New Perspectives on Adam Smith's The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 6683. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2007.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy, 22:124 (Jan. 1958), 119.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard and Goldsmith, M. M.Locke, Revolution Principles, and the Formation of Whig Ideology.The Historical Journal, 26:4 (Dec. 1983), 773800.Google Scholar
Aston, Nigel. “Edward Bentham.” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. [http://www.oxforddnb.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/view/article/2150, accessed August 9, 2017]Google Scholar
Baier, Kurt. The Moral Point of View. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Batty, M.Campbell, Archibald (1691–1756).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/4476, accessed August 9, 2017]Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom. “History and Theory in ‘Applied Ethics.’Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17.1 (2007), 5564.Google Scholar
Berman, David. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley's Passive Obedience.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 47.2 (Apr.–June, 1986), 309–19.Google Scholar
Birks, Peter and McLeod, Grant. “The Implied Contract Theory of Quasi-Contract: Civilian Opinion Current in the Century before Blackstone.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 6.1 (1986), 4685.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ruth H.The American Revolution, Wife Beating, and the Emergent Value of Privacy.” Early American Studies, 5:2 (Fall 2007), 223–51.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W.Felix Qui Potuit Rerum Cognoscere Causas: Burgersdijk's Moral and Political Thought.” In Bos, E. P. and Krop, H. A. (eds.), Franco Burgersdijk (1590–1635), 119–50. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel. Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. A History of Scottish Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cairns, John. “The First Edinburgh Chair in Law: Grotius and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In van den Bergh, Rena (ed.), Ex iusta causa traditum: Essays in Honour of Eric H. Pool, 3258. Pretoria: Unisa, 2005.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D.Francis Hutcheson: ‘Father” of the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S. (eds.). The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment, 167–85. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers, 1982.Google Scholar
Carey, Daniel. Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson: Contesting Diversity in the Enlightenment and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. “Republicanism versus Commercial Society: Paine, Burke, and the French Revolution Debate.” History of European Ideas, 11 (1989), 313–24.Google Scholar
Coffey, J. Politics, Religion and the British Revolutions: The Mind of Samuel Rutherford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald and Burrow, John. That Noble Science of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Cooper, John. “Eudaimonism, the Appeal to Nature, and ‘Moral Duty’ in Stoicism.” In Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics, 261–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal. Argument and Authority in Early Modern England: The Presupposition of Oaths and Officies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal. “The Persona of the Philosopher and the Rhetorics of Office in Early Modern England.” In Condren, Conal, Gaukroger, Stephen, and Hunter, Ian (eds.), The Philosopher in Early Modern Europe, 6689. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Crimmins, James. Utilitarians and Religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Curtin, Michael. “A Question of Manners: Status and Gender in Etiquette and Courtesy.” The Journal of Modern History, 57:3, 1985, 396423.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’: 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. “Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent Work on Adam Smith.Philosophy and Public Affairs, 28:2 (1999), 139–64.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. “Norm and Normativity.” In Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Philosophy, 2 vols., 9871025. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. The Second Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion. Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Debes, Remy. “Dignity's Gauntlet.” Philosophical Perspectives, 23 (2009), 4578.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger. “Science and Moral Philosophy in the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, 136. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger. “Politics and the Glasgow Professors.” In The Glasgow Enlightenment, edited by Hook, Andrew and Sher, Richard B., 2139. East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger. Professors, Patronage and Politics – The Aberdeen Universities in the Eighteenth Century. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger. Academic Patronage in the Scottish Enlightenment: Glasgow, Edinburgh and St. Andrews Universities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger. An Enlightened Duke: The Life of Archibald Campbell (1682–1761), Earl of Ilay, 3rd Duke of Argyll. Kilkerran: Humming Earth, 2013.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. “Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7:2 (1978), 93123.Google Scholar
Fiering, Norman. Moral Philosophy at Seventeenth Century Harvard. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Christopher. “Morality and Office in Late Medieval England and France.” Fourteenth-Century England, 5 (2008), 178–90.Google Scholar
Force, Pierre. Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College De France, 1977–1978. New York: Picador, 2007.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. “Adam Smith and the Possibility of Sympathy with Nature.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87 (2006), 442480.Google Scholar
Fry, Michael. “John Bruce.” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [http://www.oxforddnb.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/view/article/3739, accessed August 9, 2017]Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter. Thinking about Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron.Human Nature.” In Haakonssen, K. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, 160233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. “Francis Hutcheson and the Origin of Animal Rights.Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45:2 (2007), 243–65.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron and Heydt, Colin. “Moral Philosophy: Practical and Speculative.” In Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, Vol. 1: The Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Garrett, Aaron and Harris, James, 77130. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, John. Cambridge in the Age of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Gellera, Giovanni. “The Reception of Descartes in the Seventeenth-Century Scottish Universities: Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy (1650–1680).Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 13:3 (Sept. 2015), 179201.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael. The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. “The Political Thought of the Anglican Revolution.” In Beddard, Robert (ed.), The Revolutions of 1688, 102–36. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. “The English System of Liberty.” In Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert (eds.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, 4078. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Graham, Gordon. “Adam Smith and Religion.” In Hanley, Ryan (ed.), Princeton Guide to Adam Smith, 305320. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume & Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud.From Natural Law to the Rights of Man: A European Perspective on American Debates.” In Lacey, M. and Haakonssen, K. (eds.), A Culture of Rights: The Bill of Rights in Philosophy, Politics, and Law, 1791 and 1991, 1961. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud.The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights.” In Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (eds.), Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought, 1326. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. Introduction to The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Philosophy, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud.Natural Jurisprudence and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Savage, R. (ed.), Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain: New Case Studies, 258–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Lisbeth. Medicine and Morals in the Enlightenment: John Gregory, Thomas Percival and Benjamin Rush. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan. Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Harris, B.Scotland's Newspapers, the French Revolution and Domestic Radicalism (c. 1789–1794).The Scottish Historical Review, 84:217 (2005), Part 1, 3862.Google Scholar
Harris, James. “Answering Bayle's Question: Religious Belief in the Moral Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 1, 229253. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Harris, James.Hume's Use of the Rhetoric of Calvinism.” In Frasca-Spada, M. and Kail, P. J. E. (eds.), Impressions of Hume, 141–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Harris, James. Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Harris, James. “Religion in Hutcheson's Moral Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46:2, 2008, 205–22.Google Scholar
Harris, James. “The Early Reception of Hume's Theory of Justice.” In Savage, Ruth (ed.), Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain: New Case Studies, 210–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. “Adam Smith and the History of the Invisible Hand.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 72:1 (Jan. 2011), 2949.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. “Adam Smith, Natural Theology, and the Natural Sciences.” In Oslington, Paul (ed.), Adam Smith as Theologian, 7791. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.Are There Any Natural Rights?Philosophical Review, 61:2 (1955), 175–91.Google Scholar
Hayward, Tim. “On Prepositional Duties.” Ethics 123:2 (2013), 264–91.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin. “Bentham, Mill, and ‘Internal Culture’.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 14:2 (May 2006), 275302.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin. “Hutcheson's Short Introduction and the Purposes of Moral Philosophy.” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 26:3 (July 2009), 293309.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin. “Practical Ethics in Eighteenth Century Britain.” In Harris, J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth Century British Philosophy, 369–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin.Utilitarianism before Bentham.” In Eggleston, B. and Miller, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, 1533. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin. “The Problem of Natural Religion in Smith's Moral Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 78:1 (January 2017), 7394.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin.Hume's Innovative Taxonomy of the Virtues.” In Taylor, J. (ed.), Reading Hume on the Principles of Morals: Essays on the Second Enquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa. “The Hidden Theology of Adam Smith.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8:1 (2001), 129.Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, D. Bruce, The Evangelical Conversion Narrative: Spiritual Autobiography in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley. Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. “Religion and Moral Prohibition in Hume's ‘Of Suicide’.” Hume Studies, 31, 2005, 189210.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. Spectres of False Divinity: Hume's Moral Atheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Holley, David M.Voluntary Death, Property Rights, and the Gift of Life.” The Journal of Religious Ethics, 17:1, 1989, 103–21.Google Scholar
Holmes, Geoffrey. “The Sacheverell Riots: The Crowd and the Church in Early Eighteenth-Century London.” Past & Present, No. 72 (Aug. 1976), 5585.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. Rival Enlightenments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Jackson, Clare.Revolutions Principles, Ius Naturae and Ius Gentium in Early-Enlightenment Scotland: The Contribution of Sir Francis Grant, Lord Cullen (C. 1660–1726).” In Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schroeder, P. (eds.), Early Modern Natural Law Theories, 107–40. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
James, Susan. “The Passions in Metaphysics and the Theory of Action.” In Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy, Vol. 1, 913–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Dale. “Constructing Practical Ethics.” In Crisp, Roger (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, 843866. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Gavin. “Adam Smith on Religion.” In Berry, Christopher J., Paganelli, Maria Pia, and Smith, Craig (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith, 464–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kent, John. Wesley and the Wesleyans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kleer, Richard. “Final Causes in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33 (1995), 275300.Google Scholar
Klein, Lawrence. Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A.Being Properly Affected: Virtues and Feelings in Aristotle's Ethics.” In Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, edited by Rorty, Amelie Oksenberg, 103116 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. “Conceptions of Moral Philosophy.” In Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael (eds.), Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy, 12791316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lance, Mark and Kukla, Rebecca. “Leave the Gun; Take the Cannoli! The Pragmatic Topography of Second-Person Calls.Ethics, 123:3 (2013), 456–78.Google Scholar
Landsmann, N.Presbyterians and Provincial Society: The Evangelical Enlightenment in the West of Scotland, 1740–1775.” In Dwyer, J. and Sher, R. B. (eds.), Sociability and Society in Eighteenth-Century Scotland, 194209. Edinburgh: The Mercat Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. “Introduction” to Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. ‘Popular Liberty, Princely Government, and the Roman Law in Hugo Grotius's De Jure Belli ac Pacis.’ Journal of the History of Ideas, 72:3 (July 2011), 371–92.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Anthony. Some Political and Social Ideas of English Dissent, 1763–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Long, Brendan. “Adam Smith's Theodicy.” In Oslington, Paul (ed.), Adam Smith as Theologian, 98105. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “The Correlativity of Rights and Duties.Nous, 4:1 (1970): 4555.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Michael and Murphy, Terence. Sleepless Souls: Suicide in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L.Can There Be a Right-Based Moral Theory?” In Waldron, Jeremy (ed.), Theories of Rights, 168–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Marshall, John. John Locke, Toleration and Early Enlightenment Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Maurer, Christian. “Archibald Campbell's Views of Self-Cultivation and Self-Denial in context.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 10:1, (2012), 1327.Google Scholar
Maurer, Christian.Human Nature, the Passions and the Fall: Themes from Seventeenth-Century Scottish Moral Philosophy.” In Broadie, A. and Mason, R. (eds.), Scottish Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Maurer, Christian and Jaffro, Laurent. “Reading Shaftesbury's Pathologia: An Illustration and Defence of the Stoic Account of the Emotions.” History of European Ideas, 2012, 114.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas.Pufendorf and the Correlativity Theory of Rights.” In Haakonnsen, K. (ed.), Grotius, Pufendorf, and Modern Natural Law, 159–81. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas. “From Virtue to Morality: Antoine Le Grand (1629–1699) and the New Morality.Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 8 (2000), 209–32.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas. “War and Peace.British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15:2 (2007), 365–81.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. Church and Theology in Enlightenment Scotland: The Popular Party, 1740–1800. East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Mohl, Ruth. The Three Estates in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Monod, Paul. Jacobitism and the English People, 1688–1788. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Moore, James.The Two Systems of Francis Hutcheson: On the Origins of the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, 3759. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Moore, James.Hume and Hutcheson.” In Stewart, M. A. and Wright, J. P. (eds.), Hume and Hume's Connexions, 2357. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Moore, James. “The Eclectic Stoic, The Mitigated Sceptic.” In Mazza, E. and Ronchetti, E. (eds.), New Essays on David Hume, 133–69. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007.Google Scholar
Moore, James.Presbyterianism and the Right of Private Judgment.” In Savage, R. (ed.), 141–68. Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain: New Case Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Moore, James. “From the Divine Forum to the Invisible Hand: Or Natural Law and Political Education from Samuel Pufendorf to Adam Smith.” Paper prepared for the 23rd World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Montreal, July, 1924, 2014.Google Scholar
Moore, J. and Silverthorne, M.Protestant Theologies, Limited Sovereignties: Natural Law and Conditions of Union in the German Empire, The Netherlands and Great Britain.” In Robertson, J. (ed.), 171–97. A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the Union of 1707. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mossner, E. C. The Life of David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark. Princeton and the Republic, 1768–1822: The Search for a Christian Enlightenment in the Era of Samuel Stanhope Smith. Vancouver: Regent College Publishing, 1989.Google Scholar
Oman, Nathan B. “Natural Law and the Rhetoric of Empire: Reynolds v. United States, Polygamy, and Imperialism.Washington University Law Review, 88 (2011), 661706.Google Scholar
Oslington, Paul. “Introduction: Theological Readings of Smith.” In Oslington, Paul (ed.), Adam Smith as Theologian, 116. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011.Google Scholar
Oslington, Paul. “Divine Action, Providence and Adam Smith's Invisible Hand” in Oslington, Paul (ed.), Adam Smith as Theologian, 6174. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011.Google Scholar
Otteson, James R. Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Oz-Salzberger, F. Ferguson, Adam (1723–1816).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. [http://www.oxforddnb.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/view/article/9315, accessed August 9, 2017]Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Peltonen, Markku. The Duel in Early Modern England: Civility, Politeness and Honour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Nicholas. Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Virtue, Commerce, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.Post-Puritan England and the Problem of the Enlightenment.” In Zagorin, P. (ed.), Culture and Politics from Puritanism to the Enlightenment, 91111. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.Virtue, Rights, and Manners: A Model for Historians of Political Thought.” Political Theory, 9:3 (1981), 353–68.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.The Concept of a Language and the métier d'historien: Some Considerations on Practice.” In Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, 1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. The Creation of the Modern World. London: W. W. Norton, 2001.Google Scholar
Quarrie, P. “The Christ Church Collection Books.” In Sutherland, L. S. and Mitchell, L. G. (eds.), The History of the University of Oxford: Vol. V, The Eighteenth Century, 493512. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Rendall, J. The Origins of the Scottish Enlightenment 1707–1776. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Rivers, Isabel. Reason, Grace, and Sentiment, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rivers, Isabel. Reason, Grace, and Sentiment, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Robertson, John.The Scottish Contribution to the Enlightenment.” In Wood, P. B. (ed.), The Scottish Enlightenment: Essays in Reinterpretation, 3762. Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. The Case for Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ross, Ian Campbell. “Was Berkeley a Jacobite?Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 20 (2005), 1730.Google Scholar
Ross, D. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 [1930].Google Scholar
Russell, Paul. The Riddle of Hume's Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Kari. “Pufendorf on Natural Equality, Human Dignity, and Self-Esteem.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 71:1 (Jan. 2010), 3962.Google Scholar
Saunders, Alan. “The State as Highwayman: From Candour to Rights.” In Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth Century Britain, 241–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter. “Monogamy and polygyny.” In Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics, January 2009.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B.The Misfortunes of Virtue.Ethics 101 (1990), 4263.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B.Kant and Natural Law Ethics.” Ethics, 104:1 (Oct. 1993), 5374.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schwoerer, Lois. “The Right to Resist: Whig Resistance theory, 1688 to 1694.” In Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin (eds.), Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, 232252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. Francis Hutcheson: His Life, Teaching and Position in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.Google Scholar
Seagrave, S. Adam. “Self-Ownership vs. Divine Ownership: A Lockean Solution to a Liberal Democratic Dilemma.” American Journal of Political Science, 55.3 (July 2011), 710–23.Google Scholar
Seed, John. “‘A Set of Men Powerful Enough in Many Things’: Rational Dissent and Political Opposition in England, 1770–1790.” In Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth Century Britain, 140168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sell, Alan. Philosophy, Dissent and Nonconformity: 1689–1920. Cambridge: James Clarke and Co., 2004.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Christine. Philosophy and Science in the Arts Curriculum of the Scottish Universities of the 17th Century. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh, 1975.Google Scholar
Sher, George. “Blame for Traits.” Nous, 35:1 (2001), 146–61.Google Scholar
Sher, Richard. Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, and Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sher, Richard. “Professors of Virtue: The Social History of the Edinburgh Moral Philosophy Chair in the Eighteenth Century.” In Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, 87126. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sher, Richard (ed.) The Glasgow Enlightenment. East Linton, Scotland: Tuckwell Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sher, Richard. The Enlightenment and the Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Siebert, Donald. The Moral Animus of David Hume. London and New York: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. “Inalienable Rights and Locke's Treatises.Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12:3 (1983), 175204.Google Scholar
Singer, Marcus G.On Duties to Oneself.” Ethics, 69 (1959), 202–5.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Rethinking Political Liberty.” History Workshop Journal, Issue 61 (2006), 156–70.Google Scholar
Sloan, Douglas. The Scottish Enlightenment and the American College Ideal. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Sobel, David. “Backing Away from Libertarian Self-Ownership.” Ethics, No. 123 (Oct. 2012), 3260.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne and Walsh, Julie. “Locke, the Law of Nature, and Polygamy.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2:1 (March, 2016), 91110.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, G.Duties and Their Direction.” Ethics, 120:3 (2010), 465–94.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, Vol. II. London: 1881.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A. “John Smith and the Molesworth Circle.” Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 2 (1987), 89102.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A. (ed.) Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A.The Curriculum in Britain, Ireland, and the Colonies.” In Haakonssen, K (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Philosophy, Vol. 1, 97120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stewart-Robertson, Charles. “The Pneumatics and Georgics of the Scottish Mind.” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 20:3 (1987), 296312.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter. “Freedom and Resentment.” Proceedings of the British Academy, 48 (1962), 125.Google Scholar
Stuart-Buttle, Tim. “Shaftesbury Reconsidered: Stoic Ethics and the Unreasonableness of Christianity.” Locke Studies, 15 (2016), 161211.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.What Is It to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice.” In Wallace, R. Jay, Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel, and Smith, Michael (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Philosophy of Joseph Raz, 333–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. The Idea of Natural Rights. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian.Dominion of Self and Natural Rights Before Locke and After.” In Makinen, V. and Korkman, P. (eds.), Transformations in Medieval and Early-Modern Rights Discourse, 173203. Netherlands: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
Turco, Luigi. “Introduction” to Hutcheson, Francis, Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria, with A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2007.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law.” In Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, 99119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Tully, James. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. “Libertarianism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/, 2010.Google Scholar
Varkemaa, Jussi. Conrad Summenhart's Theory of Individual Rights. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Varrentrapp, Konrad. “Briefe von Pufendorf.” Historische Zeitschrift, 70 [1893].Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. The Role of Providence in the Social Order. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1972.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C.Economics as Theology: Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.” Southern Economic Journal, 68:4, 907–21.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. “Natural and Artificial Virtues.” In Crisp, Roger (ed.), How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues, 131–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. “Adam Smith: Scottish Moral Philosopher as Political Economist.” The Historical Journal, 35.1 (March, 1992), 91113.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. “Scottish Political Economy.” In Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert (eds.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, 443–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wingren, Gustaf. Luther on Vocation. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1957.Google Scholar
Winkler, Kenneth. “Hutcheson and Hume on the Color of Virtue.” Hume Studies, XXII:1 (1995), 322.Google Scholar
Witte, John, Jr. The Reformation of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Witte, John, Jr. The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul. “Science and the Pursuit of Virtue in the Aberdeen Enlightenment.” In Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, 136. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul. The Aberdeen Enlightenment: The Arts Curriculum in the Eighteenth Century. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul. “‘The Fittest Man in the Kingdom’: Thomas Reid and the Glasgow Chair of Moral Philosophy.Hume Studies, XXIII:2 (1997), 277314.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul.Introduction: Dugald Stewart and the Invention of ‘The Scottish Enlightenment’.” In Wood, P. B. (ed.), The Scottish Enlightenment: Essays in Reinterpretation, 136. Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul. “Turnbull, George (1698–1748).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/40216, accessed August 9, 2017]Google Scholar
Wood, Paul. “Postscript: On Writing the History of Scottish Philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment.” In Garrett, Aaron and Harris, James A. (eds.), Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, Vol. I: Morals, Politics, Art, Religion, 453–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Wykes, David. “The Contribution of the Dissenting Academy to the Emergence of Rational Dissent.” In Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth Century Britain, 99139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Yeager, J. Enlightened Evangelicalism: The Life and Thought of John Erskine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Yolton, J.Schoolmen, Logic and Philosophy.” In Sutherland, and Mitchell, (eds.), The History of the University of Oxford: Vol. V, The Eighteenth Century, 565–92. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael. Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone. “Dignity and Equality in Pufendorf's Natural Law Theory.” In Hunter, Ian and Whatmore, Richard (eds.), Law, Rights, and Politics, 1579–1832.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Colin Heydt, University of South Florida
  • Book: Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108363327.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Colin Heydt, University of South Florida
  • Book: Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108363327.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Colin Heydt, University of South Florida
  • Book: Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108363327.013
Available formats
×