Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Editors' Introduction: The Question of Modernity Meets the Question of Leo Strauss
- Why Leo Strauss? Four Answers and One Consideration concerning the Uses and Disadvantages of the School for the Philosophical Life
- Leo Strauss and the Contemporary Return to Political Philosophy
- Philosophy as the Right Way of Life in Natural Right and History
- The Philosopher's Ancient Clothes: Leo Strauss on Philosophy and Poetry
- Leo Strauss as Erzieher: The Defense of the Philosophical Life or the Defense of Life Against Philosophy?
- Modern Challenges – Platonic Responses: Strauss, Arendt, Voegelin
- Karl Löwith and Leo Strauss on Modernity, Secularization, and Nihilism
- Remarks on the Strauss-Kojève Dialogue and its Presuppositions
- Carl Schmitt and his Critic
- Postmodernism and the Art of Writing: The Importance of Leo Strauss for the 21st Century
- Leo Strauss's Gynaikologia
- Contributors
- Name Index
- Subject Index
Leo Strauss's Gynaikologia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Editors' Introduction: The Question of Modernity Meets the Question of Leo Strauss
- Why Leo Strauss? Four Answers and One Consideration concerning the Uses and Disadvantages of the School for the Philosophical Life
- Leo Strauss and the Contemporary Return to Political Philosophy
- Philosophy as the Right Way of Life in Natural Right and History
- The Philosopher's Ancient Clothes: Leo Strauss on Philosophy and Poetry
- Leo Strauss as Erzieher: The Defense of the Philosophical Life or the Defense of Life Against Philosophy?
- Modern Challenges – Platonic Responses: Strauss, Arendt, Voegelin
- Karl Löwith and Leo Strauss on Modernity, Secularization, and Nihilism
- Remarks on the Strauss-Kojève Dialogue and its Presuppositions
- Carl Schmitt and his Critic
- Postmodernism and the Art of Writing: The Importance of Leo Strauss for the 21st Century
- Leo Strauss's Gynaikologia
- Contributors
- Name Index
- Subject Index
Summary
Readers drawn to Leo Strauss have good reason to pay close attention to two books that by themselves might seem to have little to recommend them, as distant as they seem from the customary issues of intellectual life today (they are commentaries on Xenophon), and as superficial as they at first seem (they appear more like mere paraphrase than anything else Strauss wrote). But Strauss said in a letter to Gershom Scholem a year before he died that “my two books on Xenophon's Socrates… are not the last thing I have written, but I believe they are the best” (Strauss 2001, 764-765). Within his best two books, in his Preface to the second, Xenophon's Socrates, Strauss singled out the first, Xenophon's Socratic Discourse, as the more important: he wrote and published his interpretation of the Oeconomicus first, he said, “because that work is, it seems to me, the most revealing and at the same time the most misunderstood of Xenophon's Socratic writings.”
Xenophon narrates his Oeconomicus after uttering a single sentence of his own, its first: “I once heard him discourse on the management of the household as well, in about these words.” After that he relates only the words of Socrates or Kritoboulos except for “Socrates said,” “Kritoboulos said,” and the like. Xenophon's sole sentence implies his presence in the audience for the conversation he narrates.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modernity and What Has Been LostConsiderations on the Legacy of Leo Strauss, pp. 147 - 172Publisher: Jagiellonian University PressPrint publication year: 2010