Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T21:24:07.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - An agent-based model of group decision making in baboons

from Part III - Action selection in social contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Anil K. Seth
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Tony J. Prescott
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Joanna J. Bryson
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access

Summary

Summary

We present an agent-based model of the key activities of a troop of chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) based on data collected at De Hoop Nature Reserve in South Africa. The construction of the model identified some key elements that were missing from the field data that would need to be collected in subsequent fieldwork. We analyse the predictions of the model in terms of how well it is able to duplicate the observed activity patterns of the animals and the relationship between the parameters that control the agent's decision procedure and the model's predictions. At the current stage of model development, we are able to show that, across a wide range of decision parameter values, the baboons are able to achieve their energetic and social time requirements. The simulation results show that decisions concerning movement (group action selection) have the greatest influence on the outcomes. Group decision making is a fertile field for future research, and agent-based modelling offers considerable scope for understanding group action selection.

Introduction

Group living is a common strategy among mammals and is key to understanding the success of the primate order in general and early humans in particular. For animals that forage or move in social groups, decisions about when and where to move often depend upon social interactions between group members (Krause and Ruxton, 2002; Couzin et al., 2005). Little is actually known, however, about how groups of animals arrive at such collective decisions (Conradt and Roper, 2003). We focus on the problem of action selection in groups, i.e., where an individual's action choice is constrained by the choices of other members of the group.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behaviour: sampling methodsBehaviour 49 227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axtell, RAxelrod, REpstein, J. MCohen, M. D 1996 Aligning simulation models: a case study and resultsComputat. Math. Organiz. Theor 1 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshers, S. NFewell, J. H 2001 Models of division of labor in social insectsAnn. Rev. Entomol 46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, J. M 1988 Preflight signalling in swans: a mechanism for group cohesion and flock formationEthology 79 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, J. JFlack, J. C 2002 Action selection for an artificial life model of social behavior in non-human primatesProceedings of the International Workshop on Self-organization and Evolution of Social BehaviourHemelrijk, CSwitzerlandMonte Verita42Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W 2000 How monkeys find their way: leadership, coordination, and cognitive maps of African baboonsOn the MoveBoinski, SGarber, PChicago, ILUniversity ofChicago Press491Google Scholar
Campolongo, FSaltelli, ASorensen, TTaratola, S 2000 Hitchhikers’ guide to sensitivity analysisSensitivity AnalysisSaltelli, AChan, KScott, E. MChichester, UKWiley15Google Scholar
Cohen, P. RLevesque, H. J 1991 Nous 25 487CrossRef
Conradt, LRoper, T. J 2003 Group decision-making in animalsNature 421 155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conradt, LRoper, T. J 2005 Consensus decision making in animalsTrends Ecol. Evol 20 449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couzin, I. DKrause, JFranks, N. RLevin, S. A 2005 Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the moveNature 433 513CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deneubourg, J. LLioni, ADetrain, C 2002 Dynamics of aggregation and emergence of cooperationBiol. Bull 202 262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C 1987 The Intentional StanceCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C 1996 Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of ConsciousnessNew YorkBasic BooksGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M 1992 Time: a hidden constraint on the behavioural ecology of baboonsBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 31 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, J 1999 Multi-agent SystemsBoston, MAAddison Wesley LongmanGoogle Scholar
Georgeff, M. PPell, BPollack, M. ETambe, MWooldridge, M 1999 The belief-desire-intention model of agencyIntelligent Agents V. Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, 5th International Workshop ATAL’98 ProceedingsMüller, J. PSingh, M. PRao, A. SBerlinSpringer1Google Scholar
Gimblett, H. R 2002 Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-based Modelling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological ProcessesNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Grosz, B. JSidner, C. L 1990 Plans for discourseIntentions in communicationCohen, P. RMorgan, JPollack, MCambridge MAMIT Press,417Google Scholar
Hastie, RKameda, T 2005 The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisionsPsychol. Rev 112 494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemelrijk, C. J 1999 Effects of cohesiveness on intersexual dominance relationships and spatial structure among group-living virtual entitiesProceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL99)Floreano, DNicoud, J.-DMondada, FBerlinSpringer524Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, C. J 1999 An individual-oriented model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societiesProc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci 266 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemelrijk, C. J 2000 Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structureAnim. Behav 59 1035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemelrijk, C. J 2002 Self-organization and natural selection in the evolution of complex despotic societiesBiol. Bull 202 283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemelrijk, C. JWantia, J 2005 Individual variation by selforganisationNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev 29 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemelrijk, C. JWantia, JDatwyler, M 2003 Female co-dominance in a virtual world: ecological, cognitive, social and sexual causesBehaviour 140 1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemelrijk, C. JWantia, JGygax, L 2005 The construction of dominance order: comparing performance of five methods using an individual-based modelBehaviour 142 1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. A 1999
Hill, R. A 2005 Day length seasonality and the thermal environmentPrimate Seasonality: Implications for Human EvolutionBrockman, D. Kvan Schaik, C. PCambridgeCambridge University Press,197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. A 2006 Thermal constraints on activity scheduling and habitat choice in baboonsAmer. J. Phys. Anthropol 129 242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R. A 2006 Why be diurnal? Or, why not be cathemeralFolia Primatol 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. ABarrett, LGaynor, D 2003 Day length, latitude and behavioural (in)flexibility in baboonsBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 53 278Google Scholar
Hill, R. ABarrett, LGaynor, D 2004 Day length variation and seasonal analyses of behaviourS. Afr. J. Wildl. Res 34 39Google Scholar
Hill, R. ADunbar, R. I. M 2002 Climatic determinants of diet and foraging behaviour in baboonsEvol. Ecol 16 579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. AWeingrill, T 2006 Predation risk and habitat use in chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus)Primates and their PredatorsGursky, SNekaris, K. A. INew YorkKluwer339Google Scholar
Jolly, C. J 2001 A proper study for mankind: analogies from the papionin monkeys and their implications for human evolutionYearb. Phys. Anthropol 44 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, JRuxton, G. D 2002 Living in GroupsOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Leca, J.-BGunst, NThierry, BPetit, O 2003 Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeysAnim. Behav 66 1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C 2004 Democracy in animal groups: a political perspectiveTrends Ecol. Evol 19 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomnicki, A 1992 Population ecology from the individual perspectiveIndividual-based Models and Approaches in EcologyDeAngelis, D. LGross, L. JNew YorkChapman and Hall,3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, SCioffi-Revilla, CPanait, LSullivan, KBalan, G 2005 MASON: a multiagent simulation environmentSimulation 81 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Smith, J 1995 Life at the edge of chaosNew York Rev. Books 2 28Google Scholar
Milinski, MParker, G. A 1991 Competition for resourcesBehavioural EcologyOxfordBlackwell,137Google Scholar
Norton, G. W 1986 Leadership: decision processes of group movement in yellow baboonsPrimate Ecology and ConservationElse, JLee, PCambridgeCambridge University Press,145Google Scholar
Post, D. G 1982 Feeding behaviour of yellow baboons in Amboseli National ParkInt. J. Primatol 3 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, S. CSumpter, D. J. TMallon, E. BFranks, N. R 2005 An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Anim. Behav 70 1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, H. H. T 1996 Ecology and Behaviour of the African BuffaloLondonChapman and HallCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rands, S. ACowlishaw, GPettifor, R. ARowcliffe, J. MJohnstone, R. A 2003 The spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in a foraging pairNature 423 432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A. SGeorgeff, M. P 1991
Reynolds, C. W 1987 Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive TechniquesNew YorkACM Press25Google Scholar
Richard, A. F 1985 Primates in NatureNew YorkW.H. Freeman and CompanyGoogle Scholar
Robbins, M. MRobbins, A. M 2004 Simulation of the population dynamics and social structure of the Virunga mountain gorillasAmer. J. Primatol 63 201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schüle, MHerrler, RKlüg, F 2004 Coupling GIS and multi-agent simulation: towards infrastructure for realistic simulationMultiagent System Technologies: Proceedings of the Second German Conference, (MATES 2004)Lindemann, GDenzinger, JTimm, I. JUnland, RBerlinSpringer228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, T. DBuhrman, S. C 1999 Group decision making in swarms of honey beesBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 45 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, T. DCamazine, SSneyd, J 1991 Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sourcesBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 28 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, W. IHill, R. ALogan, B 2005 Biorealistic modelling of baboon foraging using agent-based modellingModelling Natural Action Selection: Proceedings of an International WorkshopBryson, J. JPrescott, T. JSeth, A. KEdinburgh, UKAISB Press,127Google Scholar
Sellers, W. IHill, R. ALogan, B 2007 An agent-based model of group decision making in baboonsPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci 362 1699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, A. M 2004 Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigationTrends Ecol. Evol 19 453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stacey, P. B 1986 Group size and foraging efficiency in yellow baboonsBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 18 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K. JHarcourt, A. H 1994 Gorilla vocalisations during rest periods: signals of impending departureBehaviour 130 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueckle, SZinner, D 2008 To follow or not to follow: decision making and leadership during the morning departure of chacma baboonsAnim. Behav 75 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambe, M 1997 Towards flexible teamworkJ. Artif. Intell. Res 7 83Google Scholar
Topping, C. JHansen, T. SJensen, T. SNikolajsen, J. J. FOdderskaer, P 2003 Almass, an agent-based model for animals in temperate European landscapesEcol. Model 167 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, V 1970 The energetic cost of locomotion in animalsComp. Biochem. Physiol 34 841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Will, OHegselmann, R 2008 A replication that failed: on the computational model in ‘Michael W. Macy and Yoshimichi Sato: Trust, Cooperation and Market Formation in the US and Japan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, May 2002J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul 11Google Scholar
Zappala, J 2008

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×