Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Turksen, L.B.
1999.
Computing with descriptive and veristic words: knowledge representation and approximate reasoning.
p.
6.
Resnik, Michael D.
2000.
The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge.
p.
353.
Azzouni, Jody
2001.
Truth Via Anaphorically Unrestricted Quantifiers.
Journal of Philosophical Logic,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
329.
Cole, Julian C.
2005.
Book Review: Jody Azzouni. Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism.
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 2,
Azzouni, Jody
2005.
How to Nominalize Formalism†.
Philosophia Mathematica,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
135.
del Ávila Palacio, Alfonso C.
2006.
18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics.
p.
236.
Azzouni, Jody
2006.
18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics.
p.
201.
Benardete, José A.
2006.
A Companion to Philosophical Logic.
p.
349.
Azzouni, Jody
2007.
Perspectives On Mathematical Practices.
p.
3.
Bueno, Otávio
2007.
Perspectives On Mathematical Practices.
p.
83.
Azzouni, Jody
2007.
Ontological Commitment in the Vernacular1.
Noûs,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 2,
p.
204.
Coleman, Edwin
2009.
The Surveyability of Long Proofs.
Foundations of Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
27.
Azzouni, Jody
2009.
Why Do Informal Proofs Conform to Formal Norms?.
Foundations of Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
9.
Bueno, Otávio
2010.
A Defense of Second-Order Logic.
Axiomathes,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
365.
Bueno, Otávio
2011.
A Companion to Relativism.
p.
553.
Jacquette, Dale
2012.
Between Logic and Reality.
p.
29.
McEvoy, Mark
2013.
Does The Necessity of Mathematical Truths Imply Their Apriority?.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 4,
p.
431.
Hodesdon, Kate
2014.
Mathematical representation: playing a role.
Philosophical Studies,
Vol. 168,
Issue. 3,
p.
769.
Azzouni, Jody
2014.
A new characterization of scientific theories.
Synthese,
Vol. 191,
Issue. 13,
p.
2993.
Azzouni, Jody
2015.
Why deflationary nominalists shouldn’t be agnostics.
Philosophical Studies,
Vol. 172,
Issue. 5,
p.
1143.