Men's Reproductive and Sexual Health Throughout the Lifespan An Integrated Approach to Fertility, Sexual Function, and Vitality
Book contents
- Men’s Reproductive and Sexual Health throughout the Lifespan
- Men’s Reproductive and Sexual Health throughout the Lifespan
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 An Introduction to Men’s Health Care
- Chapter 1 How Has Men’s Health Changed over the Past Two Decades?
- Chapter 2 The Business Landscape of Men’s Health
- Chapter 3 Urologic Men’s Health, the Internet, and Social Media
- Section 2 The Biology of Male Reproduction and Infertility
- Section 3 Clinical Evaluation and Treatment of Male Infertility
- Section 4 Laboratory Evaluation and Treatment of Male Infertility
- Section 5 Medical and Surgical Management of Issues of Male Health
- Index
- References
Chapter 3 - Urologic Men’s Health, the Internet, and Social Media
from Section 1 - An Introduction to Men’s Health Care
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2023
Book contents
- Men’s Reproductive and Sexual Health throughout the Lifespan
- Men’s Reproductive and Sexual Health throughout the Lifespan
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 An Introduction to Men’s Health Care
- Chapter 1 How Has Men’s Health Changed over the Past Two Decades?
- Chapter 2 The Business Landscape of Men’s Health
- Chapter 3 Urologic Men’s Health, the Internet, and Social Media
- Section 2 The Biology of Male Reproduction and Infertility
- Section 3 Clinical Evaluation and Treatment of Male Infertility
- Section 4 Laboratory Evaluation and Treatment of Male Infertility
- Section 5 Medical and Surgical Management of Issues of Male Health
- Index
- References
Summary
The internet constantly evolves and facilitates the development of new avenues for users to interact and communicate internationally. Social media and search engines represent the forefront of internet technologies that enable users to produce content, develop digital participatory networks, and share information across various topics. These internet tools are reshaping the continuum of care by enabling patients to acquire medical information, consult peers and healthcare practitioners, and even make treatment decisions without leaving their connected device. The consequences of circumventing traditional pathways to care are amplified in men’s health due to the fact that men frequently do not engage with the healthcare system and that erectile dysfunction and male infertility are stigmatized. The focus of this chapter is to evaluate the emerging online landscape for common men’s health conditions including male infertility, erectile dysfunction, hypogonadism, and Peyronie’s disease.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Men's Reproductive and Sexual Health Throughout the LifespanAn Integrated Approach to Fertility, Sexual Function, and Vitality, pp. 16 - 22Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Hooper, GL, Quallich, SA. Health seeking in men: a concept analysis. Urol Nurs. 2016;36(4):163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, E, Xu, J. United States life tables, 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68(7):1–66.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, A, Zhang, CA, Spradling, K, Eisenberg, ML. The most common reasons for health care provider visits in reproductive aged men differ by race and age stratification. Urol Pract. 2020;7(3):194–198.Google Scholar
Houman, JJ, Eleswarapu, SV, Mills, JN. Current and future trends in men’s health clinics. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(S2):S116–S22.Google Scholar
Baker, P, Shand, T. Men’s health: time for a new approach to policy and practice? J Glob Health. 2017;7(1).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmot, M, Allen, J, Bell, R, Bloomer, E, Goldblatt, P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet. 2012;380(9846):1011–1029.Google Scholar
Brott, A, Dougherty, A, Williams, ST, Matope, JH, Fadich, A, Taddelle, M. The economic burden shouldered by public and private entities as a consequence of health disparities between men and women. Am J Mens Health. 2011;5(6):528–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ignarro, LJ. Nitric oxide: a unique endogenous signaling molecule in vascular biology. Biosci Rep. 1999;19(2):51–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constantinides, E, Fountain, SJ. Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. J Direct, Data Digit Mark Pract. 2008;9:231–244.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. oreilly.com. 2005. www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed October 26, 2022.Google Scholar
Cormode, G, Krishnamurthy, B. Key differences Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday. 2008;13(6). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125. Available October 26, 2022.Google Scholar
Pinkhasov, RM, Wong, J, Kashanian, J, et al. Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on health care utilization and health risk behavior in men and women in the United States. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(4):475–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontin, D, Porter, T, McDonagh, R. Investigating the effect of erectile dysfunction on the lives of men: a qualitative research study. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11(2):264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arya, ST, Dibb, B. The experience of infertility treatment: the male perspective. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016;19(4):242–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frederick, LR, Cakir, OO, Arora, H, Helfand, BT, McVary, KT. Undertreatment of erectile dysfunction: claims analysis of 6.2 million patients. J Sex Med. 2014;11(10):2546–2553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, B, McAchran, S, Paolone, D, Gralnek, D, Williams, D, Bushman, W. Assessing the variability in insurance coverage transparency for male sexual health conditions in the United States. Urology. 2017;102:126–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasubramanian, A, Yu, J, Srivatsav, A, et al. A review of the evolving landscape between the consumer internet and men’s health. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(S2):S123–S134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miner, SA, Daumler, D, Chan, P, Gupta, A, Lo, K, Zelkowitz, P. Masculinity, mental health, and desire for social support among male cancer and infertility patients. Am J Mens Health. 2019;13(1):155798831882039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, E, Gough, B. Searching for help online: an analysis of peer-to-peer posts on a male-only infertility forum. J Health Psychol. 2018;23(7):917–928.Google Scholar
Hanna, E, Gough, B. Emoting infertility online: a qualitative analysis of men’s forum posts. Heal An Interduces J Soc Study Heal Illn Med. 2016;20(4):363–382.Google ScholarPubMed
Beeder, L, Samplaski, MK. Analysis of online discussion boards for male infertility. Andrologia. 2019;51:e13422. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osadchiy, V, Mills, JN, Eleswarapu, SV. Understanding patient anxieties in the social media era: qualitative analysis and natural language processing of an online male infertility community. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(3):e16728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasubramanian, A, Yu, J, Thirumavalavan, N, Lipshultz, LI, Hotaling, JM, Pastuszak, AW. Analyzing online Twitter discussion for male infertility via the hashtag #MaleInfertility. Urol Pract. 2020;7(1):68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaila, KE, Osadchiy, V, Shahinyan, RH, Mills, JN, Eleswarapu, SV. Social media sensationalism in the male infertility space: a mixed methodology analysis. World J Mens Health. 2020;38(4):591–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaila, K, Osadchiy, V, Anderson, A, Eleswarapu, S, Mills, J. MP02–13 popularity and worldwide reach of targeted, evidence-based internet streaming video interventions focused on men’s health topics. J Urol. 2020;203:e16.Google Scholar
Shamloul, R, Ghanem, H. Erectile dysfunction. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):153–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, K, Yu, W, He, Z-J, Jin, J. Help-seeking behavior for erectile dysfunction: a clinic-based survey in China. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(1):131–135.Google Scholar
Baunacke, M, Groeben, C, Borgmann, H, Salem, J, Kliesch, S, Huber, J. Andrology on the Internet: most wanted, controversial and often primary source of information for patients. Andrologia. 2018;50:e12877. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, T, Osadchiy, V, Mills, JN, Eleswarapu, SV. Is it all in my head? Self-reported psychogenic erectile dysfunction and depression are common among young men seeking advice on social media. Urology. 2020;142:133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, J, Mati, E. Erectile dysfunction and the Internet: drug company manipulation of public and professional opinion. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(6):541–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fantus, R, Darves-Bornoz, A, Hehemann, M, et al. PD28–03 examining online traffic patterns to popular telemedicine websites for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2020;203:e613.Google Scholar
Shahinyan, R, Amighi, A, Carey, A, et al. PD28–05 direct-to-consumer PDE-5 inhibitor telemedicine marketing platforms overlook crucial pathology. J Urol. 2020;203:e613–614.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, J, Urban, RJ, Ottenbacher, KJ, Pierson, KS, Goodwin, JS. Trends in androgen prescribing in the United States, 2001 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(15):1465–1466.Google Scholar
Jasuja, GK, Bhasin, S, Rose, AJ. Patterns of testosterone prescription overuse. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017;24(3):240–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mascarenhas, A, Khan, S, Sayal, R, Knowles, S, Gomes, T, Moore, JE. Factors that may be influencing the rise in prescription testosterone replacement therapy in adult men: a qualitative study. Aging Male. 2016;19(2):90–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanov, N, Vuong, J, Gray, PB. A content analysis of testosterone websites: sex, muscle, and male age-related thematic differences. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(2):388–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberlin, DT, Masson, P, Brannigan, RE. Testosterone replacement therapy and the Internet: an assessment of providers’ health-related web site information content. Urology. 2015;85(4):814–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride, JA, Carson, CC, Coward, RM. Readability, credibility and quality of patient information for hypogonadism and testosterone replacement therapy on the Internet. Int J Impot Res. 2017;29(3):110–114.Google Scholar
Pirola, I, Cappelli, C, Delbarba, A, et al. Anabolic steroids purchased on the Internet as a cause of prolonged hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2331.e1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordaro, FG, Lombardo, S, Cosentino, M. Selling androgenic anabolic steroids by the pound: identification and analysis of popular websites on the Internet. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e247–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride, JA, Carson, CC, Coward, RM. The availability and acquisition of illicit anabolic androgenic steroids and testosterone preparations on the Internet. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1352–1357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasubramanian, A, Thirumavalavan, N, Srivatsav, A, Yu, J, Lipshultz, LI, Pastuszak, AW. Testosterone imposters: an analysis of popular online testosterone boosting supplements. J Sex Med. 2019;16(2):203–312.Google Scholar
Pryor, JP, Ralph, DJ. Clinical presentations of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(5):414–417.Google Scholar
Bole, R, Ziegelmann, M, Avant, R, Montgomery, B, Kohler, T, Trost, L. Patient’s choice of health information and treatment modality for Peyronie’s disease: a long-term assessment. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30(5):243–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bella, AJ, Perelman, MA, Brant, WO, Lue, TF. Peyronie’s disease (CME). J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1527–1538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasubramanian, A, Yu, J, Lipshultz, LI, Hotaling, JM, Pastuszak, AW. #Peyronies: an analysis of online Twitter discussion of Peyronie’s disease. Urol Pract. 2019;7(1):75–81.Google Scholar