Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T08:01:29.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 134 - Reconstruction after cancer ablation

from Section 25 - Otolaryngologic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Neil H. Winawer
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Reconstruction of head and neck defects following cancer ablation presents a difficult challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The upper aerodigestive system serves multiple important functions such as speech, swallowing, respiration, and protection of the airway that reconstruction must attempt to preserve in both form and function. During surgery, the normal anatomy of this system is disrupted and can impair all of these functions. The goal of reconstruction is to recreate the normal anatomy as best as possible in order to maintain function and decrease morbidity following cancer ablation, while taking into consideration aesthetics, body image and quality of life of the patient.

Multiple techniques for reconstruction are available. These include primary closure, skin grafting, local-regional flaps, pedicled fasciocutaneous or myocutaneous flaps, and free tissue transfer flaps. Each type of flap has a vascular pedicle supplying the tissue; a free tissue transfer will require microvascular anastamosis of this pedicle to local recipient vessels. Patients must be rigorously evaluated preoperatively to define the lesion and the anticipated defect, as well as to determine the best options for reconstruction. The reconstructive surgeon must have multiple options available prior to initiating cancer resection, as the final defect often cannot be determined until the lesion has been removed and all margins are free of cancer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
, pp. 773 - 776
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chien, W, Varvares, MA, Hadlock, T, Cheney, M, Deschler, DG.Effects of aspirin and low-dose heparin in head and neck reconstruction using microvascular free flaps. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 973–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farwell, DG, Reilly, DF, Weymuller, EA et al. Predictors of perioperative complications in head and neck patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futran, ND, Wadsworth, JT, Villaret, D, Farwell, DG.Midface reconstruction with the fibula free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luu, Q, Farwell, DG.Advances in free flap monitoring: have we gone too far?Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 17: 267–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Momoh, AO, Yu, P, Skoracki, RJ et al. A prospective cohort study of fibula free flap donor site morbidity in 157 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smeele, LE, Irish, JC, Gullane, PJ et al. A retrospective comparison of the morbidity and cost of different reconstructive strategies in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 800–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsue, TT, Desyatnikova, SS, Deleyiannis, FW et al. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123: 731–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadsworth, JT, Futran, N, Eubanks, TR.Laparoscopic harvest of the jejunal free flap for reconstruction of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 1384–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, FC, Jain, V, Celik, N et al. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2219–26; discussion 2227–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×