Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T19:15:05.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Biocompatibility, sterilization, and materials selection for implant design

from Part I - Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Lisa A. Pruitt
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Ayyana M. Chakravartula
Affiliation:
Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, California
Get access

Summary

Inquiry

All medical implants must be sterilized to ensure no bacterial contamination to the patient. How would you sterilize a total hip replacement comprising a titanium stem, a cobalt-chromium alloy head, and an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular shell? Could the same method be employed for all three materials? How do you ensure that there is no degradation to the material or its structural properties? What factors would you need to consider in the optimization of this problem?

The inquiry posed above represents a realistic challenge that one might face in the field of orthopedic biomaterials. At a minimum, one would want to know the sterilization methods available for medical implants and which materials they best serve. For example, steam or autoclaving work well for sterilization of metals and ceramics but are generally unsuitable for polymers due to the lower melting and distortion temperatures of medical plastics. Also, one needs to consider whether there are any changes in the mechanical properties or if any time-dependent changes are expected owing to the sterilization method employed; for example, gamma radiation is known to leave behind free radicals (unpaired electrons) and these free radicals are highly reactive with elements such as oxygen that may be present or may diffuse into the implant material. In certain polymer materials such as ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, gamma radiation can result in oxidation-induced embrittlement (shelf aging) that can severely degrade its wear and fracture properties. The case study presented at the end of this chapter addresses this issue.

Historical perspective and overview

Designing medical implants is a complex process, and this textbook aims to provide insight into the material, mechanical, and clinical factors that affect implant design and performance. The goal of this book is to integrate all aspects of implant design including clinical issues, structural requirements, materials selection, and processing treatments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mechanics of Biomaterials
Fundamental Principles for Implant Design
, pp. 3 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2007 Osteolysis and implant wear: biological, biomedical engineering and surgical principlesJournal of the AAOS 16 S1Google Scholar
Baker, D.Hastings, R.Pruitt, L. 2000 Compression and tension fatigue resistance of medical grade UHMWPE: the effect morphology, sterilization, aging and temperaturePolymer 41 795Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, C.Buggy, M.Dally, S. 1988 Mechanism of aging in irradiated polymersPolymer Degradation and Stability 22 285Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, C.Buggy, M.Dally, S.O’Neill, M. 1989 The effect of gamma radiation in the physical structure and mechanical properties of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethyleneJournal of Applied Polymer Science 38 1967Google Scholar
Black, J. 1999 Biological Performance of Materials: Fundamentals of BiocompatibilityNew YorkMarcel Dekker
Bronzino, J.D.Yong, J.Y. 2003 BiomaterialsBoca Raton, FLCRC Press
Bruck, S.D.Mueller, E.P. 1988 Radiation sterilization of polymeric implant materialsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research 22 133Google Scholar
Dole, M.Milner, D.C.Williams, T.F. 1958 Irradiation of polyethylene. II. Kinetics of unsaturation effectsJournal of the American Chemical Society 80 1580Google Scholar
Goldman, M.Pruitt, L. 1998 A comparison of the effects of gamma radiation and plasma sterilization on the molecular structure, fatigue resistance, and wear behavior of UHMWPEJournal of Biomedical Materials Research 40 378Google Scholar
Goldman, M.Ranganathan, R.Gronsky, R.Pruitt, L. 1996 The effects of gamma radiation sterilization and aging on the structure and morphology of medical grade ultra high molecular weight polyethylenePolymer 37 2909Google Scholar
Howie, D.W.Haynes, D.R.Rogers, S.D.McGee, M.A.Pearcy, M.J. 1993 The response to particulate debrisClinical Orthopedics: North America 24 571Google Scholar
Jasty, M. 1993 Clinical reviews: particulate debris and failure of total hip replacementsJournal of Applied Biomaterials 4 273Google Scholar
Kurtz, S.M. 2009 Packaging and sterilization of UHMWPEIn UHMWPE Biomaterials HandbookKurtz, S.MLondonElsevier21
Kurtz, S.M.Muratoglu, O.K.Evans, M.Edidin, A.A. 1999 Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplastyBiomaterials 20 1659Google Scholar
Park, J.B.Bronzino, J.D. 2003 Biomaterials: Principles and ApplicationsBoca RatonCRC Press
Park, J.B.Lakes, R.S. 1992 Biomaterials: An IntroductionNew YorkPlenum Press
Premnath, V.Harris, W.H.Jasty, M.Merrill, E.W. 1996 Gamma sterilization of UHMWPE articular implants: an analysis of the oxidation problemBiomaterials 17 1741Google Scholar
Pruitt, L. 2003 Radiation effects on medical polymers and on their mechanical propertiesAdvances in Polymer Science: Radiation EffectsKausch, H.H.Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag63
Pruitt, L.Ranganathan, R. 1995 Effect of sterilization on the structure and fatigue resistance of medical grade UHMWPEMaterials Science and Engineering91Google Scholar
Ratner, B.D.Hoffman, A.S.Schoen, F.J.Lemons, J.E. 1996 Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in MedicineNew YorkAcademic Press
Ries, M.D.Weaver, K.Beals, N. 1996 Safety and efficacy of ethylene oxide sterilized polyethylene in total knee arthroplastyClinical Orthopedics 331 159Google Scholar
Sutula, L.C.Collier, J.P.Saum, K.A.Currier, B.H.Currier, J.H.Sanford, W.M.Mayor, M.B.Wooding, R.E.Sperling, D.K.Williams, I.R.Karprazak, D.J.Surprenant, V.A. 1995 Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hipClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 319 28Google Scholar
Williams, D.F. 2008 On the mechanisms of biocompatibilityBiomaterials 29 2941Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×