Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: May 2010

5 - Precaution against terrorism


Terrorism poses a serious risk to health, safety and the environment. Using conventional methods such as bombs or aircraft, terrorism can cause dozens to thousands of human fatalities, spread toxic plumes of smoke, and trigger widespread fear and restrictions on civil liberties. Using weapons of mass destruction (WMD) – chemical, biological or nuclear weapons – terrorism could inflict much greater harm, perhaps millions of deaths and irreparable ecological devastation. Managing the risk of terrorism has become the paramount concern of many governments. Yet the sources of terrorism are highly uncertain, very difficult to assess and manage, and intent on evading preventive measures.

Governments have many options for managing threats to national security. After several decades of pursuing deterrence and containment against the Soviet Union, the US won the Cold War, only to be stunned by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Concerned that deterrence and containment would not succeed against non-state actors willing to commit suicide attacks, and loath to repeat the mistake of 9/11 (perhaps next time involving WMD), the Bush administration adopted a new National Security Strategy in September 2002. The UK government took a similar stance. This new strategy calls for anticipatory attacks against potential enemies with uncertain capacities and intentions, even before their threat is imminent. Rather than wait for evidence of WMD, it shifts the burden of proof, obliging “rogue” states to show that they do not harbor WMD or terrorist cells, or else face the possibility of attack.

For useful discussions, see Wiener, J. B., “Precaution” in Brunée, J., Bodansky, D. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law, (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Sandin, P., “Dimensions of the precautionary principle,” Human & Ecological Risk Assessment, 5 (1999), 889
Raffensperger, C. and Tickner, J. (eds.), Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle (Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999)
Wiener, J. B. and Rogers, M. D., “Comparing precaution in the US and Europe,” Journal of Risk Research, 5 (2002), 317–49
Boehmer-Christiansen, S., “The precautionary principle in Germany – enabling government” in T. O'Riordan and Cameron, J. (eds.), Interpreting the precautionary principle (London: Cameron and May, 1994)
,European Environment Agency, Late lessons from early warnings (EEA, 2002).
Sanderson, H. and Peterson, S., “Power analysis as a reflexive scientific tool for interpretation and implementation of the precautionary principle in the European Union,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 8 (2001), 1–6.
Suskind, R., The one percent doctrine (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006).
Gore, A., Earth in the balance (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1992).
Runciman, D., “The precautionary principle,” London Review of Books, 26(7) (April 1, 2004)
Krugman, P., “Who's accountable?New York Times, A27 (June 10, 2003)
Wildavsky, A., But is it true? (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).
Lewis, A., “The feelings of a coup,” New York Times, A15, (March 31, 2001)
Jervis, R., “Understanding the Bush doctrine,” Political Science Quarterly, 118 (2003), 365–88.
Ackerman, D. M., “International law and the pre-emptive use of force against Iraq,” Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report RS21314 (April 11, 2003).
Walzer, M., Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1977), pp. 74–75.
Grimmett, R. F., “US use of pre-emptive military force,” Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report RS21311 (April 11, 2003)
Feinstein, L. and Slaughter, A., “A duty to prevent,” Foreign Affairs, 83(1) (2004), 136–51.
Yoo, J., “Using force,” University of Chicago Law Review, 71 (2004), 729–97.
Posner, E. and Sykes, A., “Optimal war and jus ad bellum,” Georgetown Law Journal, 93 (2004), 993–1022.
Pearce, D., “The precautionary principle in economic analysis,” in O'Riordan, T. and Cameron, J. (eds.), Interpreting the precautionary principle (London: Cameron and May, 1994)
Graham, J. D.. and Wiener, J. B., Risk vs. risk: tradeoffs in protecting health and the environment (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995)
Keeney, R. L. and Winterfeldt, D., “Appraising the precautionary principle – a decision analysis perspective,” Journal of Risk Research, 4 (2001), 191
Dekay, al., “Risk-based decision analysis in support of precautionary policies,” Journal of Risk Research, 5 (2002), 391
Stewart, R. B., “Environmental regulatory decision-making under uncertainty,” Research in Law and Economics, 20 (2002), 71–152
Gollier, C. and Treich, N., “Decision making under uncertainty: the economics of the precautionary principle,” Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 27 (2003), 77
Farrow, S., “Using risk-assessment, best-cost analysis, and real options to implement a precautionary principle,” Risk Analysis, 24 (2004), 727
Posner, R. A., Catastrophe: risk and response (Oxford University Press, 2004)
Barrieu, P. and Sinclair-Dégagné, B., “On precautionary policies,” Management Science, 52 (2006), 1145–54
Sunstein, C., “Irreversible and catastrophic,” Cornell L. Rev., 91 (2006), 841.
Malkin, M., In defense of internment (Regnery Publishing, 2004).
Feaver, P., “The fog of WMD,” Washington Post, A21 (January 28, 2004).
,National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, The 9/11 commission report: final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States, authorized edition (New York: W. W. Norton, 2004).
Shane, S. and Sanger, D. E., “The intelligence critique: the report: Bush panel finds big flaws remain in US spy efforts,” New York Times, A1 (April 1, 2005).
Brom, S., “The war in Iraq: an intelligence failure,” Jaffe Center's Strategic Assessment, 6(3) (2003)
Stern, J., The ultimate terrorists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).
Jehl, D., “CIA review is critical of pre-war analysis,” New York Times, A18 (September 22, 2004).
Dana, D., “A behavioral economic defense of the precautionary principle,” Northwestern University Law Review, 97 (2003), 1315.
Slovic, P., The perception of risk (London: Earthscan, 2000)
Pillar, P., “Counterterrorism after Al Qaeda,” Washington Quarterly, 27(3) (2004), 101–13.
Sunstein, C. R. and Kuran, T., “Availability cascades and risk regulation,” Stanford Law Review, 51 (1999), 683–768.
Andrews, R. N. L., Managing the environment, managing ourselves: a history of American environmental policy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999)
Percival, R., “Environmental legislation and the problem of collective action,” Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 9 (1998), 9–28.
Posner, R. A., “Review of the book The 9/11 Report,” New York Times Book Review, 9 (August 29, 2004).
Chalk, P., West European terrorism and counter-terrorism (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996), p. 99.
Stern, J., “Dreaded risks and the control of biological weapons,” International Security, 27(3) (2002) 89–123
Slovic, , “Perception of risk,” as cited in note 196; C. R. Sunstein, The laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Nieman, S., Evil in modern thought (Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 284–85.
Miller, W. I., The anatomy of disgust (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997), p. 26.
Bentham, J., Principles of legislation (Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1830), xviii, section 17.
Wiener, J. B., “Better regulation in Europe,” Current Legal Problems, 59 (2006)
Sunstein, C. R., “Cognition and cost-benefit analysis” in Adler, M. and Posner, E. (eds.), Cost–benefit analysis (University of Chicago Press Journals, 2001)
Wiener, J. B., “Managing the iatrogenic risks of risk management,” Risk: Health Safety & Environment, 9 (1998), 49–82
Rascoff, S. J. and Revesz, R. L., “The biases of risk tradeoff analysis: towards parity in environmental and health-and-safety regulation,” University of Chicago Law Review, 69 (2002), 1763–1836
Haimes, Y., “Risk of extreme events and the fallacy of expected value” in Yacov Haimes (ed.), Risk modeling, assessment and management (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998) pp. 297–345.
Zakaria, F., “How to change ugly regimes,” Newsweek, 31 (June 27, 2005).
Scheuer, M., Imperial hubris: why the west is losing the war on terror (Potomac Books, 2004)
Pape, R. A., Dying to win: the strategic logic of suicide terrorism (New York: Random House, 2005).
Wiener, , “Managing the iatrogenic risks of risk management,” as cited in note 211; J. Stern, “The protean enemy,” Foreign Affairs, 82(4) (2003), 27–40.
Tuchman, B. W., The march of folly: from Troy to Vietnam (New York: Ballantine Books, 1984).
Keeney, R., “Countering terrorism: the clash of values,” ORMS Today, 28(6) (2001).
Lakdawalla, D. and Zanjani, G., “Insurance, self-protection and the economics of terrorism,” J. Public Economics, 89 (2005) 1891–1905
Keohane, N. and Zeckhauser, R., “The ecology of terror defense,” J. Risk & Uncertainty, 26 (2003), 201–29
Clotfelter, C. T., “Private security and the public safety,” Journal of Urban Economics, 5 (1978) 388–402.
Johnson, C., Blowback: The costs and consequences of American empire, 2nd edn., (Owl Books, 2004)
Rosendorff, B. P. and Sandler, T., “Too much of a good thing? The proactive response dilemma,” J. Conflict Resolution, 48 (2004), 657–71
Wiener, J. B., “Precaution in a multirisk world” in Paustenbach, D. D. (ed.), Human and ecological risk assessment: theory and practice (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002).
Roberts, al., “Mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: cluster sample survey,” The Lancet, 364 (October 29, 2004), 1857–64
Clarke, R., Against all enemies: inside America's war on terror (New York: The Free Press, 2004)
Fanon, F., The wretched of the earth (New York: Grove Press, 1961).
Buchanan, P. J., Where the right went wrong (New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2004).
Bloom, M., Dying to kill: the allure of suicide terror (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).
Breyer, S. G., Breaking the vicious circle: toward effective risk regulation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993).
Graham, J. D., “Decision-analytic refinements of the precautionary principle,” Journal of Risk Research, 4 (2001), 127
Lofstedt, R., “The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe,” Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 28 (2004), 237–60.
Smalter, D., “The influence of Department of Defense practices on corporate planning,” Management Technology, 115 (1964), 116.
Hammond, P., “A functional analysis of Defense Department decision-making in the McNamara administration,” American Political Science Review, 62 (1968), 57.
Jaiswal, N. K., Military operations research: quantitative decision making (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
Rothkopf, D. J., Running the world: the inside story of the National Security Council and the architects of American power (Washington, DC: Public Affairs, 2005).