Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T13:16:12.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VII - The Opposition Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

Since 1969, when the opposition parties won a total of 57 out of the 144 seats to the Parliament, they had never been able to prevent the Barisan from getting a two-third or higher majority. The opposition saw this election as the best opportunity it would have, not only in denying the ruling coalition the two-third majority, but in wresting power from it. In the words of the DAP leader, this was “an unprecedented historic opportunity to effect far-reaching meaningful changes to the political order in the country”. The opposition estimated that a 12 per cent swing away from the Barisan would have the effect of preventing the government from getting the two-third majority and if the swing was to be more substantial, to the amount of 20 per cent, then the opposition coalitions would have been able to get enough seats in Parliament to form a new government. The optimism of the opposition was boosted by the fact that in this election, its votes would not be split as happened in past elections. In the state elections, the opposition felt that its best chances of winning control of the state legislatures were in Penang and the east coast states. Though the opposition as a whole made substantial gains, the results of the elections did not live up to expectations. However, an examination of the parties' performance showed significant differences in their gains and losses.

The DAP : Maintaining Its Ground

In the 1990 election, the DAP fielded fewer candidates than it did in 1986, primarily to give way to its ally, Semangat '46. This was particularly so in areas where the party was weak. Only 57 candidates were put up for the parliamentary election compared with 64 previously. On the whole, the party was able to repeat its good performance of the previous election. In the parliamentary election, it won 20 seats, four less than it did in 1986.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×