Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: July 2012

9 - What’s Loving Got to Do with It?

Summary

In 1955, I was born to a white mother and an African-American father in Springfield, Illinois. Except for the three years that my family lived in Germany, we lived in a transitional neighborhood near where Abraham Lincoln lived when he was elected president. Railroad tracks at 10th Street separated the neighborhood from the center of town determined by the Old State Capitol Building where Lincoln delivered the “House Divided” speech. During my youth, the neighborhood was an integrated neighborhood of middle-class white and African-American residents, but eventually became an African-American neighborhood comprised of families of more fragile economic status. When I was about ten, an African-American playmate, whose family was relatively new to Springfield, asked whether it was illegal for my parents to be married. I was surprised to discover that I would be expected to defend my parent’s marriage even as I was developing my own sense of racial identity and coming to terms with the racial identities assigned me by others.

That first childhood encounter with other people’s views of the racial identity of my family illustrates both the liberating and limiting impacts of law in shaping the lived experience of families formed through interracial marriages. Today, as an adult and a lawyer, I have the tools to reflect on the transformative impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. Virginia – and other civil rights cases of the 1950s and 1960s – in enabling me to make certain life choices, such as where to go to school, where to live, where to eat and shop, and who to marry, on the same basis that white Americans had long taken for granted. While Loving gave the imprimatur of the legal establishment to the concept of interracial marriage, my conversation with a childhood neighbor and other personal experiences illustrate that legal recognition is not sufficient to alter settled societal expectations and practices. Race still matters in the choices most individuals make regarding marriage and in their reactions to the marriages of others. Loving did not settle these matters for all time and for all Americans. A parallel history is evolving as the legal system and society react to demands of same-sex couples for full equality with respect to legal recognition of their relationships and all the rights and responsibilities such recognition entails.

Newbeck, Phyl 2004
2006
Eskridge, William N. 2002
Gerstmann, Evan 2004
Ramirez, Deborah 2003
Graham, Susan R. 2003
Moran, Rachel 2001
Chen, Jim 1994
Kilson, MarionLadd, Florence 2008
Lincoln, Abraham 1989
1858
1858
1858
Owens, Gene 2000 http://www.stateline.org/live/viewPage.action?siteNodelId=136&languageID
1978
1984
Ogletree, Charles 2004
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1993
Cottrol, Robert J. 2003
Chemerinsky, ErwinLost Opportunity: The Burger Court and the Failure to Achieve Equal Educational Opportunity 45 Mercer L. Rev999 1994
Chemerinsky, ErwinThe Segregation and Resegregation of American Public Education: The Courts’ Role 81 N.C. L. Rev1597 2003
1973
1991
1992
2007
Landers, Renée M.Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform Legislation: An Effective Tool for Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care? 28 Hamline J. of Pub. L. & Pol’y1 2007
1978
1986
1965
2003
2003
2005
1996