Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: March 2017

Compactness and incompactness phenomena in set theory

from ARTICLES
[1] U., Abraham and M., Magidor, PCF theory, To appear in the Handbook of Set Theory.
[2] A., Apter and S., Shelah, Menas' result is best possible, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 349 (1997), no. 5, pp. 2007–2034.
[3] A., Apter, On the strong equality between supercompactness and strong compactness, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 349 (1997), no. 1, pp. 103–128.
[4] M., Burke and M., Magidor, Shelah's PCF theory and its applications, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 50 (1990), pp. 207–254.
[5] J., Cummings, M., Džamonja, and S., Shelah, A consistency result on weak reflection, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 148 (1995), no. 1, pp. 91–100.
[6] J., Cummings and M., Foreman, The tree property, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 133 (1998), no. 1, pp. 1–32.
[7] J., Cummings, M., Foreman, and M., Magidor, Squares, scales and stationary reflection, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (2001), no. 1, pp. 35–99.
[8] J., Cummings, Canonical structure in the universe of set theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, (To appear).
[9] J., Cummings and S., Shelah, Some independence results on reflection, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 59 (1999), no. 1, pp. 37–49.
[10] K., Devlin and R., Jensen, Marginalia to a theorem of Silver, Logic colloquium, Kiel, 1974 (Berlin), Springer-Verlag, 1975, pp. 115–142.
[11] M., Džamonja and S., Shelah, Saturated filters at successors of singular, weak reflection and yet another weak club principle, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 79 (1996), no. 3, pp. 289–316.
[12] M., Džamonja, Weak reflection at the successor of a singular cardinal, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 67 (2003), pp. 1–15.
[13] M., Foreman, Games played on Boolean algebras, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 714–723.
[14] M., Foreman and M., Magidor, A very weak square principle, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 62 (1997), no. 1, pp. 175–196.
[15] R., Jensen, The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, Annals ofMathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 229–308.
[16] R., Jensen, Circulated notes, 1998.
[17] R., Laver, Making the supercompactness of indestructible under directed closed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), pp. 385–388.
[18] M., Magidor and S., Shelah, The tree property at successors of singular cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 35 (1996), no. 5-6, pp. 385–404.
[19] W., Mitchell, Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972), pp. 21–46.
[20] S., Shelah, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
[21] J., Steel, An outline of inner model theory, To appear in the Handbook of Set Theory.