Aarsleff, Hans. 1967. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aarsleff, Hans 1988. Introduction. In Wilhelm von Humboldt, On Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Agrippa von Nettesheim, Cornelius. 1533 (1992). De occulta philosophia libri tres. Compagni, Vittoria Perrone, ed. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Alford, Dan Moonhawk. 1978. The Demise of the Whorf Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, Dan Moonhawk 1981. Is Whorf's Relativity Einstein's Relativity?Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 7: 13–26.Google Scholar

Alford, Dan Moonhawk 2002. The Great Whorf Hypothesis Hoax. www.enformy.com/dma-Chap7.htm (last accessed 29 July 2010).Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. 1973 (1976). Reply to John Lewis. Trans. Grahame Lock. In Essays in Self-Criticism, pp. 33–99. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis, and Balibar, Etienne. 1965 (1970). Reading Capital. Trans. Brewster, Ben. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine, and Lancelot, Claude. 1660 (1830). Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris: Delalain.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. 1662 (1992). La logique ou l'art de penser. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston. 1932 (1970). Noumène et microphysique. In Etudes, pp. 11–24. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston 1934 (1984). The New Scientific Spirit. Trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston 1938. La formation de l'esprit scientifique: contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston 1938 (1964). The Psychoanalysis of Fire. Trans. Ross, Alan C. M.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston 1953. Le matérialisme rationnel. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. 1620 (1863). The New Organon. In Works, VIII. Ed. and trans. Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie, and Heath, Douglas. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Alford, Dan Moonhawk 1623 (1860). Of the Dignity and Advancement of Learning. In Works, IV, pp. 275–498. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Balibar, Renée. 1984. Galilée, Newton lus par Einstein. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Baril, Daniel. 2004. Langage et perception ne sont pas liés. Forum, Université de Montréal 39(2), September 7, 2004.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1978 (1982). Inaugural Lecture, Collège de France. Trans. Howard, Richard. In Sontag, Susan, ed., Barthes: Selected Writings, pp. 457–78. Oxford: Fontana.Google Scholar

Bashkow, Ira, Bunzl, Matti, Handler, Richard, Orta, Andrew, and Rosenblatt, Daniel. 2004. A New Boasian Anthropology: Theory for the 21st Century. American Anthropologist 106: 433–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basilius, Harold. 1952. Neo-Humboldtian Ethnolinguistics. Word 8: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassnett, Susan. 1980. Translation Studies. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bastian, Adolf. 1860. Der Mensch in der Geschichte. Zur Begründung einer psychologischen Weltanschauung. Leipzig: Wigand.Google Scholar

Bate, Bernard. 2009. Tamil Oratory and the Dravidian Aesthetic. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batteux, Charles. 1748. Lettres sur la phrase françoise comparée avec la phrase latine. In Cours de belles lettres, II. Paris: Dessaint et Saillant.Google Scholar

Baugh, Albert Croll, and Cable, Thomas. 1978. A History of the English Language. Third edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard. 1973 (2001). Verbal Art as Performance. American Anthropologist 77: 290–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L.. 2000. Language Philosophy as Language Ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder. In Kroskrity, Paul V., ed., Regimes of Language, pp. 139–204. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Studies Press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, David. 2000. Grammatical Convergence and the Genesis of Diversity in the Northwest Coast Sprachbund. Anthropological Linguistics 42(2): 1–67.Google Scholar

Becker, A. L. 1995. Beyond Translation: Essays toward a Modern Philology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellay, Joachim du. 1549 (1948). La deffence et illustration de la langue françoyse. Paris: Marcel Didier.Google Scholar

Belmont, Nicole. 1986. Paroles païennes: mythe et folklore. Paris: Imago.Google Scholar

Benedict, Ruth. 1934. Patterns of Culture. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Benes, Tuska. 2008. In Babel's Shadow: Language, Philology, and the Nation in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1958 (1966). Catégories de pensée et catégories de langue. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, pp. 63–74. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Bergheaud, Patrice. 1990. Entwicklungen der sprachtheoretischen Reflexion im Großbrittanien des 18. Jahrhunderts. Trans. Ulrich Ricken. In Ricken, Ulrichet al., Sprachtheorie und Weltanschauung in der europäischen Aufklärung, pp. 38–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

Berlin, Brent, and Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1976. Vico and Herder. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Berman, Antoine. 1985 (1992). The Experience of the Foreign: Culture and Translation in Romantic Germany. Trans. Heyvaert, S.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Black, Max. 1959 (1962). Linguistic Relativity: The Views of Benjamin Lee Whorf. In Models and Metaphors, pp. 244–57. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Blackall, Eric A. 1978. The Emergence of German as a Literary Language 1700–1775. Second edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, Alfred. 1981. The Linguistic Shaping of Thought: A Study of the Impact of Language on Thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bloom, Paul, and Keil, Frank C.. 2001. Thinking through Language. Mind and Language 16: 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. 1893. Notes on the Chinook Language. American Anthropologist 6: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, Franz 1895 (2002). Indian Myths and Legends from the North Pacific Coast of America. Trans. Bertz, Dietrich. Vancouver: Talonbooks.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz 1910. Publicaciones nuevas sobre la lingüística americana. In Reseña de la segunda sesión del XVII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas: 225–32. Mexico: Museo Nacional.

Boas, Franz 1911a. Introduction. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, pp. 1–83. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz 1911b. Kwakiutl. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, pp. 423–557. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz 1939. An Anthropologist's Credo. In Fadiman, Clifton, ed., I Believe, pp. 19–29. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz 1940. Race, Language, and Culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz 1942. Language and Culture. In Studies in the History of Culture, pp. 178–84. Menasha, WI: George Banta.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz 1974. The Shaping of American Anthropology 1883–1911: A Franz Boas Reader. Stocking, George W., Jr., ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Borges, Jorge Luis. 1942 (1984). The Analytical Language of John Wilkins. In Borges, Other Inquisitions, 1937–1952, trans. Simms, Ruth L. C.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology 43: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera 2002. Interview with Todd Munt, Michigan Radio Ann Arbor and NPR, 20 March 2002.

Boroditsky, Lera 2003. Linguistic Relativity. In Nadel, Lynn, ed., Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, pp. 917–21. London: Nature.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera, Schmidt, Lauren A., and Phillips, Webb. 2003. Sex, Syntax, and Semantics. In Gentner, Dedre and Goldin-Meadow, Susan, eds., Language in Mind, pp. 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Borst, Arno. 1957–1963. Der Turmbau von Babel. Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar

Borst, Arno 1988 (1992). Medieval Worlds. Trans. Eric Hansen. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bouhours, Dominique. 1671 (1920). Entretiens d'Ariste et d'Eugène. Paris: Bossard. [Collection des Chefs-d'œuvre Méconnus.]Google Scholar

Boutroux, Emile. 1881. Notice sur la vie et la philosophie de Leibnitz. In Leibniz, G. W., La Monadologie, pp. 1–134. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa, and Levinson, Stephen C., eds. 2001. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Brandt, William J. 1966. The Shape of Medieval History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bréhier, Emile. 1938 (1993). Histoire de la philosophie. Le XVIIIe siècle. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Brinton, Daniel Garrison. 1890. Essays of an Americanist. Philadelphia, PA: Porter and Coates.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope. 2006. Cognitive Anthropology. In Jourdan, Christine and Tuite, Kevin, eds., Language, Culture, and Society, pp. 96–114. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Roger Langham. 1967. Wilhelm von Humboldt's Conception of Linguistic Relativity. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Roger, and Lenneberg, Eric H.. 1954 (1970). A Study in Language and Cognition. In Brown, Roger, Psycholinguistics, pp. 235–57. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Buffier, Claude. 1732. Cours de sciences sur des principes nouveau & simples. Paris: Cavelier et Giffart.Google Scholar

Bumann, Waltraud. 1965. Die Sprachtheorie Heymann Steinthals. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain.Google Scholar

Bunzl, Matti. 1996. Franz Boas and the Humboldtian Tradition: From Volksgeist and Nationalcharakter to an Anthropological Concept of Culture. In Stocking, George W., Jr., ed., Volksgeist as Method and Ethic, pp. 17–78. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Bunzl, Matti 2004. Boas, Foucault, and the “Native Anthropologist”: Notes toward a Neo-Boasian Anthropology. American Anthropologist 106: 435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnett, James, Monboddo, Lord. 1773. Of the Origin and Progress of Language, I. Edinburgh: Kincaid and Creech.Google Scholar

Bynon, Theodora. 1966. Leo Weisgerber's Four Stages in Linguistic Analysis. Man n.s. 1: 468–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calame-Griaule, Geneviève. 1987. Ethnologie et langage. La parole chez les Dogon. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter, and Boucher, Jill, eds. 1998. Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Carruthers, Peter, Laurence, Stephen, and Stitch, Stephen, eds. 2005–2007. The Innate Mind. 3 volumes. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Cassirer, Ernst. 1923 (1953). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. I. Language. Trans. Ralph Mannheim. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst 1932 (1951). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Trans. Koelln, Fritz C. A. and Pettegrove, James P.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Caton, Steven C. 1987. Contributions of Roman Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 223–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chabrolle-Cerretini, Anne-Marie. 2007. La vision du monde de Wilhelm von Humboldt. Histoire d'un concept linguistique. Lyon: ENS Editions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chafe, Wallace, and Nichols, Johanna, eds. 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Chakrabarty, Dinesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan. 2005. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. In Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher, eds., Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, pp. 178–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Ranjit. 1985. Reading Whorf through Wittgenstein: A Solution to the Linguistic Relativity Problem. Lingua 67: 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Christmann, Hans Helmut. 1967. Beiträge zur Geschichte der These vom Weltbild der Sprache. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Cloeren, Hermann J. 1988. Language and Thought: German Approaches to Analytic Philosophy in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1984. Review of Ekkehart Malotki, Hopi Time. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4: 131–3.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 2001. Different Views of Language Typology. In Haspelmath, Martinet al., eds., Language Typology and Language Universals, pp. 24–39. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Condillac, Etienne Bonnot. 1747 (1980). Les Monades. Bongie, Laurence L., ed. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar

Condillac, Etienne Bonnot 1749 (2001). Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Trans. Aarsleff, Hans. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conklin, Harold. 1955 (1964). Hanunóo Color Categories. In Hymes, Dell, ed., Language in Culture and Society, pp. 189–92. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Constantinescu, Ilinca. 1974. John Wallis (1616–1703): A Reappraisal of His Contribution to the Study of English. Historiographia Linguistica 1: 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordemoy, Gérauld. 1669 (1968). Traité physique de la parole. In Œuvres philosophiques, pp. 201–56. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Cowan, William, Foster, Michael K., and Koerner, Konrad, eds. 1986. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crespi, John. 1997. Wallace Stevens and Benjamin Lee Whorf: The Uncertain Business of a Poet, a Linguist, and a Jar. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington.

Dagognet, François. 1965. Bachelard. Sa vie, son oeuvre. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Danto, Elizabeth Ann. 2005. Freud's Free Clinics: Psychoanalysis and Social Justice, 1918–1938. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darnell, Regna. 1990. Edward Sapir: Linguist, Anthropologist, Humanist. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Darnell, Regna 1998a. And Along Came Boas: Continuity and Revolution in Americanist Anthropology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darnell, Regna 1998b. Camelot at Yale: The Construction and Dismantling of the Sapirian Synthesis, 1931–39. American Anthropologist 100: 361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1974. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, Hannah. 2007. Locke, Language and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeBernardi, Jean. 1997. Whorf in China. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Society, Washington.

Demetracopoulou, Dorothy (= Lee, Dorothy D.). 1935. Wintu Songs. Anthropos 30: 483–94.Google Scholar

Demonet, Marie-Luce. 1992. Les Voix du signe. Nature et origine du langage à la Renaissance (1480–1580). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1967 (1978). Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Trans. Bass, Alan, pp. 278–94. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques 1973 (1980). The Archeology of the Frivolous: Reading Condillac. Trans. Leavey, John P., Jr. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1984. The Philosophical Writings. Trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy. 2010. Through the Language Glass: How Words Colour Your World. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. 1916. Early Philosophical Works. Trans. Jourdain, Margaret. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, David W. 2006. Time and the Individual. In Kan, Sergei A. and Strong, Pauline Turner, eds., New Perspectives on Native North America, pp. 327–48. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Domergue, Urbain. 1785. Compte-rendu de Rivarol, De l'universalité de la langue françoise. Journal de la Langue Françoise 2: 886–7.Google Scholar

Dryhurst, James. 1971. Les premières activités de l'Académie française: Le Discours sur le dessein de l'Académie et sur le différent génie des langues, de Bourzeys. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 81: 225–42.Google Scholar

Dubois, Claude-Gilbert. 1970. Mythe et langage au seizième siècle. Bordeaux: Ducros.Google Scholar

Du Marsais, César Chesneau. 1730. Des tropes, ou des différens sens dans lesquels on peut prendre un même mot dans une même langue. Paris: Veuve Brocas.Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 2003. Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology: Three Paradigms. Current Anthropology 44: 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, Emile, and Mauss, Marcel. 1902 (1963). Primitive Classification. Trans. Needham, Rodney. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1993 (1995). The Search for the Perfect Language. Trans. Fentress, James. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eliot, John. 1666. The Indian Grammar Begun; or, an Essay to Bring the Indian Language into Rules. Cambridge, MA: Marmaduke Johnson.Google Scholar

Elliott, Ralph W. V. 1957. Isaac Newton's Of an Universall Language. Modern Language Review 52: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmorey, Karen. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Erickson, Jon, Gymnich, Marion, and Nünning, Ansgar. 1997. Wilhelm von Humboldt, Edward Sapir, and the Constructivist Framework. Historiographia Linguistica 24: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ervin, Susan. 1962. The Connotations of Gender. Word 18: 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Context, Culture, and Structuration in the Languages of Australia. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 32: 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2009. The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology 46: 621–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabian, Johannes. 1971. Language, History and Anthropology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1: 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrar, Frederick William. 1865. Chapters on Language. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Faust, Manfred. 1981. Schottelius' Concept of Word Formation. In Trabant, Jürgen, ed., Logos Semantikos, I, pp. 359–70. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Fénelon, François de la Mothe. 1716. Réflexions sur la grammaire, la rhétorique, la poétique et l'histoire. Paris: Coignard.Google Scholar

Fernandez, James W., ed. 1991. Beyond Metaphor: The Play of Tropes in Culture. Stanford University Press.

Alford, Dan Moonhawk 2006. La tropología y la figuración del pensamiento y de la acción social. Revista de Antropología Social 15.Google Scholar

Feuer, Lewis S. 1953. Sociological Aspects of the Relation between Language and Philosophy. Philosophy of Science 20: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichant, Michel. 1973. L'épistemologie en France. In Chatelet, François, ed., Histoire de la Philosophie, VIII, pp. 135–78. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. 1937. The Tongues of Men. London: Watts.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. 1985. Précis of The Modularity of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8(1–42): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foley, William A. 1997. Anthropological Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Alford, Dan Moonhawk 2005. Do Humans Have Innate Mental Structures? Some Arguments from Linguistics. In McKinnon, Susan and Silverman, Sydel, eds., Complexities: Beyond Nature and Nurture, pp. 43–63. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Formigari, Lia. 2003. Herder entre universalisme et relativité. Trans. Anquetil, Mathilde. Revue germanique internationale 20: 133–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fornel, Michel. 2002. Le destin d'un argument. Le relativisme linguistique de ­Sapir–Whorf. In Fornel, Michel and Passeron, Jean-Claude, eds., L'argumentation, pp. 121–47. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2002. Herder's Philosophy of Language, Interpretation, and Translation: Three Fundamental Principles. Review of Metaphysics 56: 323–56.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2007. Johann Gottfried von Herder. Revised version. In Zalta, Edward N., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/ /entries/herder/.

Foucault, Michel. 1966 (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel 1969. Introduction. In Antoine Arnauld and Claude Lancelot, Grammaire générale et raisonnée, pp. iii–xxvii. Paris: Republications Paulet.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1895 (1953). Project for a Scientific Psychology. Trans. Strachey, James. In Complete Psychological Works, I, pp. 281–391. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul. 1979. Poetic Language and the Imagination: A Reformulation of the Sapir Hypothesis. In Language, Context, and the Imagination, pp. 441–517. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul 1985. Review of Paul Hopper, ed., Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Language 61: 182–7.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul 1986. The Language Parallax: Linguistic Relativism and Poetic Indeterminacy. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul 1989. Language, Ideology, and Political Economy. American Anthropologist 91: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, Paul 1996. The Culture in Poetry and the Poetry in Culture. In Valentine Daniel, E. and Peck, Jeffrey M., eds., Culture/Contexture, pp. 37–58. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul 2006. Maximizing Ethnopoetics. In Jourdan, Christine and Tuite, Kevin, eds., Language, Culture, and Society, pp. 207–28. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise. 1990. Saussure. Une science de la langue. Second edition. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Garat, Dominique-Joseph. 1785. Compte-rendu de Rivarol, De l'universalité de la langue française. Mercure de France 33(13): 10–34, 63–73.Google Scholar

Gelli, Giovan Battista. 1551 (1976). I caprici del Bottaio. In Maestri, Delmo, ed., Gelli, Opere, third edition, pp. 125–288. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar

Gensini, Stefano. 1990. “Vulgaris opinio babelica.” Sui fondamenti storico-teorico della pluralità delle lingue nel pensiero di Leibniz. In Mauro, Tullio and Formigari, Lisa, eds., Leibniz, Humboldt, and the Origins of Comparativism, pp. 61–83. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Aubrey L., Regier, Terry, Kay, Paul, and Ivry, Richard B.. 2006. Whorf Hypothesis Is Supported in the Right Visual Field but Not the Left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 489–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gipper, Helmut. 1956. Muttersprachliches und wissenschaftliches Weltbild. Spr­ach­forum 2: 1–10.Google Scholar

Gipper, Helmut 1963. Bausteine zur Sprachinhaltforschung. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar

Gipper, Helmut 1972. Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir–Whorf-Hypothese. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar

Gipper, Helmut 1987. Das Sprachapriori. Strassburg: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Gipper, Helmut 1994. Wie Humboldts Sprachauffassung Korrekturen an B.L. Whorfs provozierenden Aussagen über die Hopi-Sprache erleichtert hat. In Zimmermann, Klaus, et al., eds., Wilhelm von Humboldt und die amerikanischen Sprachen, pp. 281–93. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Gleason, H. A., Jr. 1961. An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. Revised edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gopnik, Alison. 2001. Theories of Language and Culture: Whorf without Wincing. In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen C., eds., Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 45–69. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter. 2004. Numerical Cognition without Words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306: 496–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gould, Stephen Jay. 1990. Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Granet, Marcel. 1934. La pensée chinoise. Paris: Renaissance du Livre.Google Scholar

Griaule, Marcel. 1948 (1965). Conversations with Ogotemmêli: An Introduction to Dogon Religious Ideas. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gruppe, Otto Friedrich. 1831 (1914). Antäus: Ein Briefwechsel über speculative Philosophie in ihrem Conflict mit Wissenschaft und Sprache. Mauthner, Fritz, ed. Munich: Georg Müller.Google Scholar

Gruppe, Otto Friedrich 1834. Wendepunkt der Philosophie im neunzehnten Jahrhundert. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Gruppe, Otto Friedrich 1859. Deutsche Übersetzerkunst. Hanover: Rümpler.Google Scholar

Guiora, Alexander Z. 1983. Language and Concept Formation: A Cross-Lingual Analysis. Behavior Science Research 18: 228–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, John J., and Levinson, Stephen C., eds. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press.

Güntert, Hermann. 1938. Neue Zeit – neues Ziel. Wörter und Sachen n.s. 1: 1–11.Google Scholar

Hagège, Claude. 1986. L'homme de paroles. Second edition. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Hale, Horatio. 1884. On Some Doubtful or Intermediate Articulations. An Experiment in Phonetics. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14: 233–43.Google Scholar

Hall, Alfred J. 1889. A Grammar of the Kwagiutl Language. Montreal: Dawson Bros.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. 2007. Writings on Philosophy and Language. Ed. and trans. Haynes, Kenneth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hanks, William F. 1996. Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Hanzeli, Victor Egon. 1969. Missionary Linguistics in New France. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haroche, Claudine, and Maingueneau, Dominique. 1985. Du mythique au problématique: la “clarté” de la langue française. In Auroux, Sylvainet al., eds., La linguistique fantastique, pp. 347–57. Paris: Joseph Clims et Denoël.Google Scholar

Harris, James. 1751. Hermes: or, A Philosophical Enquiry Concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London: Woodfall.Google Scholar

Harris, Marvin. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar

Harvey, William. 1996. Linguistic Relativity in French, English, and German Philosophy. Philosophy Today 40: 273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European Linguistic Area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, Martinet al., eds., Language Typology and Language Universals, pp. 1492–510. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin 2007. Pre-Established Categories Don't Exist: Consequences for Language Descrip­tion and Typology. Linguistic Typology 11: 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf, and Raible, Wolfgang, eds. 2001. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRef

Haugen, Einar. 1987. Blessings of Babel. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haviland, John. 1998. Guugu Yimithirr Cardinal Directions. Ethos 26: 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heider, Eleanor Rosch (= Rosch, Eleanor). 1972. Universals in Color Naming and Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 10–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henderson, John. 2007. The Medieval World of Isidore of Seville: Truth from Words. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henson, Hilary. 1974. British Social Anthropologists and Language: A History of Separate Development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1783 (1833). On the Spirit of Hebrew Poetry. Trans. March, James. Burlington, VT: Edward Smith.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried 1992. Selected Early Works, 1764–1767. Menze, Ernest A. and Menges, Karl, eds., trans. Menze, Ernest A. and Palma, Michael. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried 2002. Philosophical Writings. Ed. and trans. Forster, Michael N.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hermann, Conrad. 1858. Philosophische Grammatik. Leipzig: Fleischer.Google Scholar

Heynick, Frank. 1983. From Einstein to Whorf: Space, Time, Matter, and Reference Frames in Physical and Linguistic Relativity. Semiotica 45(1–2): 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Jane H., and Mannheim, Bruce. 1992. Language and World View. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John J., eds. 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.

Hobson, Marion. 1976. La Letter sur les sourds et muets de Diderot: labyrinthe et langage. Semiotica 16: 291–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1966. The Problem of Universals in Language. In Greenberg, Joseph H., ed., Universals of Language, pp. 1–29. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hoijer, Harry. 1954. The Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis. In Hoijer, Harry, ed., Language in Culture, pp. 92–105. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Holden, Constance. 2004. Life without Numbers in the Amazon. Science 305: 1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horguelin, Paul. 1981. Anthologie de la manière de traduire. Domaine français. Montreal: Linguatech.Google Scholar

Horne Tooke, John. 1798. Epea pteroenta, or, The Diversions of Purley, Second Edition, Part I. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar

House, Juliane. 2000. Linguistic Relativity and Translation. In Pütz, Martin and Verspoor, Marjolijn H., eds., Explorations in Linguistic Relativity, pp. 69–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hüllen, Werner. 2001. Reflections on Language in the Renaissance. In Haspelmath, Martinet al., eds., Language Typology and Language Universals, pp. 210–21. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1836 (1999). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Development of Mankind. Trans. Heath, Peter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm 1997. Essays on Language. Harden, Theo and Farrelly, Dan, eds., trans. Wieczorek, John and Roe, Ian. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm 2000. Sur le caractère national des langues. Ed. and trans. Thouard, Denis. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Hutton, Christopher M. 1999. Linguistics and the Third Reich. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hutton, Christopher M. 2005. Race and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1961. On Typology of Cognitive Styles in Language. Anthropological Linguistics 3(1): 22–54.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell 1966. Two Types of Linguistic Relativity. In Bright, William, ed., Sociolinguistics, pp. 131–56. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell, and Fought, John. 1981. American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ildefonse, Frédérique, and Lallot, Jean, eds. 2002. Aristote. Catégories. Paris: Seuil.

Isermann, Michael. 1996. John Wallis on Adjectives: The Discovery of Phrase Structure in the Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae (1653). Historiographia Linguistica 23: 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Isidore of Seville. 615 (1960). Isidore de Séville: Traité de la nature. Ed. and trans. Fontaine, Jacques. Bordeaux: Féret.Google Scholar

Seville, Isidore of 636 (2006). The Etymologies. Ed. and trans. Barney, Stephen J.et al. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1941 (1968). Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. Trans. Keiler, Allan R.. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobson, Roman 1960. Linguistics and Poetics. In Sebeok, Thomas E., ed., Style in Language, pp. 350–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman 1971. Selected Writings, II. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman 1985. Selected Writings, VII. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, and Halle, Morris. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Joos, Martin, ed. 1966. Readings in Linguistics, I. University of Chicago Press.

Joseph, John E. 1996. The Immediate Sources of the “Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis.”Historiographia Linguistica 23: 365–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalmar, Ivan. 1987. The Völkerpsychologie of Lazarus and Steinthal and the Modern Concept of Culture. Journal of the History of Ideas 48: 671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenneally, Christine. 2007. The First Word: The Search for the Origins of Language. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Clemens. 2000. Begriffspolitik und Wissenschaftsrhetorik bei Leo Weisgerber. In Dutz, Klaus Dieter, ed., Interpretation und Re-Interpretation, pp. 145–74. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar

Koerner, E. F. Konrad. 1976. 1876 as a Turning-Point in the History of Linguistics. Journal of Indo-European Studies 4: 333–53.Google Scholar

Koerner, E. F. Konrad 1977. The Humboldtian Trend in Linguistics. In Hopper, Paul J., ed., Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics, pp. 145–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kohrt, Manfred. 1984. Phonetik, Phonologie und die “Relativität der Verhältnisse.” Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Konishi, Toshi. 1993. The Semantics of Grammatical Gender: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22: 519–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koyré, Alexandre. 1942. Entretiens sur Descartes. New York: Brentano's.Google Scholar

Krausz, Michael. 2009. Mapping Relativisms. Paper presented at A Transcultural Exploration of Ethics: A Dialogue between Western and Indian Traditions, Carleton University, Ottawa, June 2009.

Kroeber, Alfred. 1943. Franz Boas: The Man. In Franz Boas, 1858–1942, pp. 5–27. Menasha, WI: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul V., ed. 2000. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Studies Press.

Krulwich, Robert. 2009. Shakespeare Had Roses All Wrong. Krulwich on Science, National Public Radio, 6 April 2009. www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102518565.

Ladborough, R. W. 1938. Translation from the Ancients in Seventeenth-Century France. Journal of the Warburg Institute 2(2): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafitau, Joseph-François. 1724. Mœurs des sauvages amériquains, comparées aux mœurs des premiers temps. Paris: Saugrain et Hochereau.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1981. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lamy, Bernard. 1676. De l'art de parler. Paris: André Pralard.Google Scholar

Lamy, Bernard 1712. La Rhétorique, ou L'art de parler. Fifth edition. Amsterdam: Veuve Marret.Google Scholar

Lauzon, Matthew. 1996. Savage Eloquence in America and the Linguistic Construction of a British Identity in the 18th Century. Historiographia Linguistica 23: 123–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauzon, Matthew 2008. Welsh Indians and Savage Scots: History, Antiquarianism, and Indian Languages in 18th-Century Britain. History of European Ideas 34: 250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leavitt, John. 1991a. The Shapes of Modernity: Philosophical Foundations of Anthropological Doctrines. Culture 11(1–2): 29–42.Google Scholar

Leavitt, John 1991b. Review of Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, eds., Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Language 67: 133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leavitt, John 1996. Meaning and Feeling in the Anthropology of Emotions. American Ethnologist 23: 514–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leavitt, John 2001. Prophecy. In Duranti, Alessandro, ed., Key Terms in Language and Culture, pp. 197–200. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Leavitt, John 2006a. Linguistic Relativities. In Jourdan, Christine and Tuite, Kevin, eds., Language, Culture, and Society, pp. 47–81. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leavitt, John 2006b. Thick Translation: Three Soundings. In O'Neil, Catherine, Scoggin, Mary, and Tuite, Kevin, eds., Language, Culture, and the Individual, pp. 79–108. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar

Leavitt, John 2010. L'ethnopoétique: histoire d'une frontière interdisciplinaire. In Claude Calame, Florence Dupont, et al., eds., La voix actée. Pour une nouvelle ethnopoétique, pp. 125–42. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar

Lee, Dorothy D. (= Demetracopoulou, Dorothy). 1938. Conceptual Implications of an Indian Language. Philosophy of Science 5: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Dorothy D. 1944. Linguistic Reflection of Wintu Thought. International Journal of American Linguistics 10: 181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Penny. 1991. Whorf's Hopi Tensors: Subtle Articulators in the Language/Thought Nexus?Cognitive Linguistics 2: 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Penny 1996. The Whorf Theory Complex. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefevere, André, ed. 1992. Translation/History/Culture: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1677 (1951). Dialogue on the Connection between Things and Words. In Wiener, Philip P., ed., Leibniz Selections, pp. 5–11. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1695 (1989). Dialogue on Human Freedom and the Origin of Evil. In Leibniz, Philosophical Works, second edition, pp. 111–7. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1705 (1996). New Essays on Human Understanding. Trans. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1903. Opuscules et fragments inédits. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1998. Philosophical Texts. Trans. Francks, Richard and Woolhouse, R. S.. Oxford University Press.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 2000. L'harmonie des langues. Trans. Crépon, Marc. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Laboureur, Louis. 1669. Avantages de la langue françoise sur la langue latine. Paris: Guillaume de Luyne.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, Eric H. 1953. Cognition in Ethnolinguistics. Language 29: 463–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, Anthony. 2000. Belles infidèles. In Classe, Olive, ed., Encyclopedia of Literary Translation into English, I, pp. 126–7. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. Language and Space. Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 353–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C., Kita, Sotaro, et al. 2002. Returning the Tables: Language Affects Spatial Reasoning. Cognition 84: 155–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levinson, Stephen C., and Wilkins, David P.. 2006. Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1949 (1969). The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Revised edition. Trans. Bell, James Harleet al. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1962. La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Lewis, Rhodri. 2007. Language, Mind and Nature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Li, Peggy, and Gleitman, Lila. 2002. Turning the Tables: Language and Spatial Reasoning. Cognition 83: 265–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liss, Julia E. 1996. German Culture and German Science in the Bildung of Franz Boas. In Stocking, George W., Jr., ed., Volksgeist as Method and Ethic, pp. 155–84. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1700 (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lowell, Robert. 1961. Imitations. New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy.Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1992a. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1992b. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1997a. The Linguistics of “Color.” In Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, Luissa, eds., Color Categories in Thought and Language, pp. 320–46. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1997b. Linguistic Relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, John A. 2003. Semantic Accent and Linguistic Relativity. Paper presented at the Conference on Cross-Linguistic Data and Theories of Meaning, Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackert, Michael. 1993. The Roots of Franz Boas' View of Linguistic Categories as a Window to the Human Mind. Historiographia Linguistica 20: 331–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackert, Michael 1994. Franz Boas' Theory of Phonetics. Historiographia Linguistica 21: 351–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLaury, Robert E. 2001. Color Terms. In Martin Haspelmath et al., eds., Language Typology and Linguistic Universals, II, pp. 1227–51. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Maingueneau, Dominique. 1979. Les livres d'école de la République 1870–194 (discours et idéologie). Paris: Le Sycomore.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Yakov. 1974. A Herder–Humboldt–Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis?Romance Philology 28: 199.Google Scholar

Malotki, Ekkehart. 1979. Hopi-Raum. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Malotki, Ekkehart 1983. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marrache-Gouraud, Myriam. 2003. “Hors toute intimidation.” Panurge ou la parole singulière. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar

Martin, Laura. 1986. Eskimo Words for Snow: A Case Study in the Genesis and Decay of an Anthropological Example. American Anthropologist 88: 418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1857 (1973). The Grundrisse. Trans. Nicolaus, Martin. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl 1867 (1967). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Samuel Moore, I. and Aveling, Edward. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Matthews, Washington. 1877. Ethnography and Philology of the Hidatsa Indians. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

McLelland, Nicola. 2001. Albertus (1573) and Ölinger (1574): Creating the First Grammars of German. Historiographia Linguistica 28: 2–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, John. 1970. Bilingualism and Thought. In Alatis, James E., ed., Bilingualism and Language Contact, pp. 25–40. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

McRae, Robert. 1988. Locke and Leibniz on Linguistic Particles. Synthese 75: 155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meigret, Louis. 1550 (1880). Tretté de la grammere françoèze. Foerster, Wendelin, ed. Heilbron: Henninger.Google Scholar

Mertz, Elizabeth, and Richard, J. Parmentier, eds. 1985. Semiotic Mediation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Robert L. 1968. The Linguistic Relativity Principle and Humboldtian Ethnolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miner, Kenneth L. 1974. John Eliot of Massachusetts and the Beginnings of American Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 1: 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montag, Warren. 1994. The Unthinkable Swift: The Spontaneous Philosophy of a Church of England Man. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren 2000. Bodies, Masses, Power: Spinoza and His Contemporaries. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society. Chicago, IL: C. H. Kerr.Google Scholar

Morton, Michael. 1989. Herder and the Poetics of Thought. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Friedrich Max. 1887a. Three Introductory Lectures on the Science of Thought. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Müller, Friedrich Max 1887b. The Science of Thought. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1687 (1934). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. Trans. Motte, Andrew. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Niemeier, Susanne, and Dirven, René, eds. 2000. Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef

O'Brien, Flann. 1977. The Hair of the Dogma. London: Hart-Davis, McGibbon.Google Scholar

Obrist, Barbara. 1997. Wind Diagrams and Medieval Cosmology. Speculum 72: 33–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Öhman, Suzanne. 1953. Theories of the “Linguistic Field.”Word 9: 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olender, Maurice. 1989 (1992). The Languages of Paradise. Trans. Olender, Maurice and Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Olin, Dirk. 2003. Crash Course; Color Cognition. New York Times Magazine, 30 November 2003, Section 6, p. 55.

O'Neil, Catherine, Scoggin, Mary, and Tuite, Kevin, eds. 2006. Language, Culture, and the Individual: A Tribute to Paul Friedrich. Munich: LINCOM.

Padley, G. A. 1976. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700: The Latin Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, F.R. 1976. Semantics: A New Outline. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parmentier, Richard J. 1985. Semiotic Mediation: Ancestral Genealogy and Final Interpretant. In Mertz, Elizabeth and Parmentier, Richard J., eds., Semiotic Mediation, pp. 359–85. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Paxman, David B. 2003. Voyage into Language: Space and the Linguistic Encounter, 1500–1800. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Payne, Edward John. 1899. History of the New World Called America, II. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Penn, Julia M. 1972. Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The Origins of the Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis in German Thought. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penny, H. Glenn, and Bunzl, Matti, eds. 2003. Worldly Provincialism: German Anthropology in the Age of Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Percival, W. Keith. 1975. The Grammatical Tradition and the Rise of the Vernaculars. In Sebeok, Thomas A., ed., Current Trends in Linguistics, XIII, pp. 231–75. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1990. Language Acquisition. In Osherson, Daniel N. and Lasnik, Howard, eds., An Invitation to Cognitive Science, I. Language, pp. 199–242. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, Steven 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Porzig, Walter. 1923. Der Begriff der inneren Sprachform. Indogermanische Forschungen 41: 150–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pound, Ezra. 1934. ABC of Reading. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Powell, John Wesley. 1880. Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages. Second ­edition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey. 1989 (1991). The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax. In The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language, pp. 159–71. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rabelais, François. 2006. Gargantua and Pantagruel. Trans. Screech, M. A.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ramanujan, A. K. 1985. Poems of Love and War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Ramanujan, A. K. 1989. Is There an Indian Way of Thinking?Contributions to Indian Sociology 23: 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, Verne F.Techniques and Problems in the Study of Human Color Perception. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 8: 251–9.

Reines, Maria Francisca, and Prinz, Jesse. 2009. Reviving Whorf: The Return of Linguistic Relativity. Philosophy Compass 4: 1022–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricken, Ulrich. 1978. Grammaire et philosophie au siècle des Lumières. Villeneuve d'Ascq: Université de Lille III.Google Scholar

Ricken, Ulrich 1984 (1994). Linguistics, Anthropology and Philosophy in the French Enlightenment. Trans. Norton, Robert E.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ricken, Ulrich 1990. Sprachtheoretische Positionen une Entwicklungen in der deutschen Aufklärung. In Ricken, Ulrichet al., Sprachtheorie und Weltanschauung in der europäischen Aufklärung, pp. 210–73. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

Ridington, Robin. 2006. When You Sing It Now, Just Like New. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Rivarol, Antoine de. 1784. De l'universalité de la langue française. Berlin: Académie Royale.Google Scholar

Roberson, Debi, and Richard Hanley, J.. 2009. Relatively Speaking: An Account of the Relationship between Language and Thought in the Color Domain. Glimpse 2(3): 68–77.Google Scholar

Römer, Ruth. 1985. Sprachwissenschaft und Rassenideologie in Deutschland. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor (= Heider, Eleanor Rosch). 1974. Linguistic Relativity. In Silverstein, Albert, ed., Human Communication: Theoretical Explorations, pp. 96–121. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1972. Volksgeist. In Wiener, Philip P., ed., Dictionary of the History of Ideas, IV, pp. 490–6. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar

Roth Pierpont, Claudia. 2004. The Measure of America: How a Rebel Anthropologist Waged War on Racism. The New Yorker, 8 March 2004, pp. 48–63.Google Scholar

Runze, Georg. 1889. Sprache und Religion. Berlin: R. Gaertner.Google Scholar

Sachs, Aaron. 2006. The Humboldt Current. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Colors and Cultures. Semiotica 16: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall 1977. Culture and Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Salus, Peter H. 1976. Universal Grammar 1000–1850. In Parret, Herman, ed., History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics, pp. 85–101. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1907. Herder's Ursprung der Sprache. Modern Philology 5: 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sapir, Edward 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward 1931 (1964). Conceptual Categories in Primitive Languages. In Hymes, Dell, ed., Language in Culture and Society, p. 128. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward 1949. Selected Writings in Language, Culture and Personality. Mandelbaum, David G., ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916 (1972). Cours de linguistique générale. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert, eds. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Scaglione, Aldo D. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition, from Its Origins to the Present: A Historical Survey. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Schaff, Adam. 1964 (1973). Language and Cognition. Trans. Wojtasiewicz, Olgierd. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Schieffellin, Bambi, Woolard, Kathryn A., and Kroskrity, Paul V., eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris: Librairie Grecque-Latine-Allemande.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1813 (1973). Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens. In Störig, Hans Joachim, ed., Das Problem des Übersetzens, pp. 38–70. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, I.M. 1991. The Wax and Wane of Whorfian Views. In Robert L. Cooper and Bernard Spolsky, eds., The Influence of Language on Culture and Thought, pp. 7–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Schlichter, Alice. 1986. The Origins and Deictic Nature of Wintu Evidentials. In Chafe, Wallace and Nichols, Johanna, eds., Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, pp. 46–59. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Rohr, Georg. 1932. Die Sprache als Bildnerin der Völker. Eine Wesens- und Lebenskunde der Volkstümer. Jena: Eugen Diederich.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Rohr, Georg 1933. Mutter Sprache: vom Amt der Sprachen bei der Volkwerdung. Jena: Eugen Diederich.Google Scholar

Schottelius, Justus Georg. 1663. Ausführliche Arbeit von der Teutschen Haubt Sprache. Brunswick: Zilliger.Google Scholar

Schulenburg, Sigrid von. 1973. Leibniz als Sprachforscher. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Schultz, Emily A. 1990. Dialogue at the Margins: Whorf, Bakhtin, and Linguistic Relativity. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Sdun, Winfried. 1967. Probleme und Theorien des Übersetzens in Deutschland. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar

Seiffert, Leslie. 1968. Neo-Humboldtian Semantics in Perspective: “Sprache und Gemeinschaft.”Journal of Linguistics 4: 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sera, Maria D., Berge, Christian A.H., and Pintado, Javier del Castillo. 1994. Grammatical and Conceptual Forces in the Attribution of Gender by English and Spanish Speakers. Cognitive Development 9: 261–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherzer, Joel. 1983. Kuna Ways of Speaking. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Shetter, William Z. 1962. Review of Helmut Gipper, ed., Sprache, Schlüssel zur Welt. Language 38: 318–24.

Sikka, Sonia. 2007. On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37: 515–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1977. Cultural Prerequisites to Grammatical Analysis. In Saville-Troike, Muriel, ed., Anthropology and Linguistics, pp. 139–51. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael 1979. Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology. In Clyne, Paulet al., eds., The Elements, pp. 193–247. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael 1981 (2001). The Limits of Awareness. In Duranti, Alessandro, ed., Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, pp. 382–401. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael 2000. Whorfianism and the Linguistic Imagination of Nationality. In Kroskrity, Paul V., ed., Regimes of Language, pp. 85–138. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan Isaac, ed. 1985–1997. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. 5 volumes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Spencer, Herbert. 1862. First Principles. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, Edward. 1981. The “Genius” of Language in Sixteenth-Century Linguistics. In Trabant, Jürgen, ed., Logos Semantikos, I, pp. 177–89. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Starr, Frederick. 1901. Some First Steps in Human Progress. Cleveland, NY: Chautauqua.Google Scholar

Stegmann von Pritzwald, Kurt. 1936. Kräfte und Köpfe in der Geschichte der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft. In Arntz, Helmut, ed., Germanen und Indogermanen: Volkstum, Sprache, Heimat, Kultur, pp. 1–24. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Steiner, George. 1975. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steinthal, Heymann. 1855. Grammatik, Logik und Psychologie, ihre Principien und ihr Verhältniss zu einander. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar

Steinthal, Heymann 1860. Charakteristik der hauptsächlichsten Typen des Sprachbaues. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar

Steinthal, Heymann 1867. Die Mande-Neger-Sprachen psychologisch und phonetisch betrachtet. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar

Steinthal, Heymann 1877. Der Ursprung der Sprache im Zusammenhange mit den letzten Fragen alles Wissens. Third edition. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar

Stewart, Matthew. 2006. The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Stimson, Dorothy. 1932. Ballad of Gresham Colledge. Isis 18: 103–17.Google Scholar

Stocking, George W., Jr. 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Stocking, George W., 1974. The Boas Plan for the Study of American Indian Languages. In Hymes, Dell, ed., Studies in the History of Linguistics, pp. 454–84. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Subbiondo, Joseph L., ed. 1992. John Wilkins and 17th-Century British Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef

Swiggers, Pierre. 1985. Catégories grammaticales et catégories culturelles dans la philosophie du langage de Humboldt: les implications de la “forme grammaticale.”Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 38: 729–36.Google Scholar

Terezakis, Katie. 2007. The Immanent Word: The Turn to Language in German Philosophy, 1759–1801. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Terray, Emmanuel. 1968 (1972). Marxism and “Primitive” Societies. Trans. Klopper, Mary. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Thurber, James. 1950. The Thirteen Clocks. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Trabant, Jürgen. 1986. Apeliotes oder Der Sinn der Sprache. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Trabant, Jürgen 1990a. Traditionen Humboldts. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Trabant, Jürgen 1990b. Humboldt et Leibniz: le concept intérieur de la linguistique. In Mauro, Tullio and Formigari, Lisa, eds., Leibniz, Humboldt, and the Origins of Comparativism, pp. 135–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Trabant, Jürgen 2000a. Le courant humboldtien. In Auroux, Sylvain, ed., Histoire des idées linguistiques, III, pp. 311–22. Brussels: Madarga.Google Scholar

Trabant, Jürgen 2000b. How Relativistic Are Humboldt's “Weltansichten”? In Pütz, Martin and Verspoor, Marjolijn H., eds., Explorations in Linguistic Relativity, pp. 25–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Trautmann-Waller, Céline. 2004. La Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie une Sprachwissenschaft (1859–1890). In Trautmann-Waller, Céline, ed., Quand Berlin pensait les peuples, pp. 105–20. Paris: CNRS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trautmann-Waller, Céline 2006. Aux origines d'une science allemande de la culture. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar

Tuite, Kevin. 2006. Interpreting Language Variation and Change. In Jourdan, Christine and Tuite, Kevin, eds., Language, Culture, and Society, pp. 229–56. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, Stephen, ed. 1969. Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1871. Primitive Culture. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Ullmann, Stephen. 1962. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Varchi, Benedetto. 1570 (1995). L'Hercolano. Sorella, Antonio, ed. Pescara: Libreria dell'Università.Google Scholar

Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator's Invisibility. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venuti, Lawrence, ed. 2004. The Translation Studies Reader. 2nd edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Verdon, Michel. 2006. Boas and Holism: A Textual Analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vickers, Brian, ed. 1987. English Science: Bacon to Newton. Cambridge University Press.

Vinciguerra, Lorenzo. 2005. Spinoza et le signe: la genèse de l'imagination. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Voegelin, Carl F., Voegelin, Florence M., and Jeanne, LaVerne Masayesva. 1979. Hopi Semantics. In Ortiz, Alfonso, ed., Handbook of North American Indians, 9. Southwest, pp. 581–7. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar

Vonk, Frank. 1999. Gustav Gerber and “Kantian” Linguistics. In Cram, Davidet al., eds., History of Linguistics 1996, II, pp. 289–95. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Vossler, Karl. 1910 (1923). Grammatik und Sprachgeschichte oder das Verhältnis von “richtig” und “wahr” in der Sprachwissenschaft. In Vossler, Gesammelte Aufsätze der Sprachphilosophie, pp. 1–19. Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo 1925 (1932). The Spirit of Language in Civilization. Trans. Oeser, Oscar. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Watterson, Bill. 1994. Homicidal Psycho Jungle Cat: A Calvin and Hobbes Collection. Kansas City: Andrews McMeel.Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo. 1926. Das Problem der inneren Sprachform und seine Bedeutung für die deutsche Sprache. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 14: 241–56.Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo 1939. Die volkhaften Kräfte der Muttersprache. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo 1950. Vom Weltbild der deutschen Sprache. Düsseldorf: Schwann. [Von den Kräften der deutschen Sprache, 2.]Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo 1954. Vom Weltbild der deutschen Sprache II. Die sprachliche Erschliessung der Welt. Düsseldorf: Schwann. [Von den Kräften der deutschen Sprache, 2nd edn., 2.]Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo 1962. Die sprachliche Gestaltung der Welt. Third edition. Düsseldorf: Schwann. [Von den Kräften der deutschen Sprache, 3rd edition, 2.]Google Scholar

Weisgerber, Leo 1963. Die vier Stufen in der Erforschung der Sprachen. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar

Whitfield, John. 2008. Across the Curious Parallel of Language and Species Evolution. PLoS Biology 6(7): e186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1946. The Hopi Language, Toreva Dialect. In Harry Hoijer et al., Linguistic Structures of Native America, pp. 158–83. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Carroll, John B., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, John. 1668. An Essay towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand and the Royal Society.Google Scholar

Winteler, Jost. 1876. Die Kerenzer Mundart des Kantons Glarus. Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar

Woodworth, R.S. 1910. The Puzzle of Color Vocabularies. Psychological Bulletin 7: 325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zammito, John H. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Andrew. 2001. Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuber, Roger. 1968. Les “belles infidèles” et la formation du goût classique. ParisArmand Colin.Google Scholar