Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: October 2013

5 - The legitimacy of international interpretive authorities for human rights treaties: an indirect-instrumentalist defence

Bibliography

Beitz, C., 2001. Human Rights as a Common Concern. American Political Science Review 95, 269–282.
Bellamy, R., 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, CambridgeUniversity Press.
Benhabib, S., 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens, CambridgeUniversity Press.
Buchanan, A., 2004. Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law, OxfordUniversity Press.
Buchanan, A., 2010. The Legitimacy of International Law. In S. Besson and J. Tasioulas eds. The Philosophy of International Law, OxfordUniversity Press.
Çalı, B., 2009. On Interpretivism and International Law. European Journal of International Law 20, 805822.
Çalı, B., 2012. Specialised Rules of Treaty Interpretation: Human Rights. In D. Hollis ed, The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press.
Coakley, M., 2011. On the Value of Political Legitimacy. Philosophy and Economics 10(4), 345–369.
Craven, M., 2000. Legal Differentiation and the Concept of a Human Rights Treaty. European Journal of International Law 11, 489519.
Drzemczewski, A., 1998. The European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R., 2008. Justice in Robes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Føllesdal, A., 2006. The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union. Journal of Political Philosophy 14, 441468.
Føllesdal, A., 2007. The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 40, 595607.
Freeman, S., 1990. Reason and Agreement in Social Contract Views. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19(2), 122–157.
Goldsmith, J. & Posner, E., 2005. The Limits of International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hafner-Burton, E. M., 2012. International Regimes for Human Rights. Annual Review of Political Science 15, 265–286.
Hessler, K., 2005. Resolving Interpretive Conflicts in International Human Rights Law. Journal of Political Philosophy 13, 2952.
Higgins, R., 1989. Human Rights: Some Questions of Integrity. Modern Law Review 52, 112.
Nickel, J., 2006. Making Sense of Human Rights, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Pellet, A., 2001. Droit de l’hommisme’ et droit international. The Gilberto Amado Memorial Lecture, Revue Droits Fondamenteux at www.revue.dh.org accessed on 8 October 2012.
Rawls, J., 1955. Two Concepts of Rules. The Philosophical Review 64, 332.
Rawls, J., 1996. Political Liberalism, 2nd edition, New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J., 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, S. Freeman ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raz, J., 2006. The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception. Minnesota Law Review 90, 10031044.
Sen, A., 2004. Elements of a Theory of Human Rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32, 315356.
Singer, P., 1973. Democracy and Disobedience, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sloss, D., 2009. The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement, Cambridge University Press.
Von Bogdandy, A. and Venzke, I., 2012. In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification. European Journal of International Law 23, 7–41.
Waldron, J., 2005. Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium. Harvard Law Review 119, 129147.
Wolff, R. B., 1970. In Defense of Anarchism, New York: Harper & Row.