Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: December 2013

12 - Large MIMO testbeds

Export citation

Summary

As in any new or emerging technology, demonstrators, testbeds, and prototypes play an important role in the development of large MIMO systems. The terms demonstrators, testbeds, and prototypes are often used loosely and interchangeably to refer to practical proof-of-concept-like implementations. The following broad definitions from [1],[2] bring out some key differences between them.

• A demonstrator is meant primarily to showcase and demonstrate technology to customers. Generally, it involves implementation of a new idea, concept, or standard that has been already established and has been finalized to some extent. Therefore, the requirements on functionality and design time are more important than scalability.

• A testbed is meant for research in general. It is a platform that allows the testing or verification of new algorithms or ideas under real-world conditions. Therefore, testbeds are expected to be more modular, scalable, and extendable.

• A prototype is meant to be serve as the initial realization of a research idea or a standard in real time, as a reference, a proof-of-concept, or a platform for future developments and improvements. It is often intended to evolve a prototype into a product.

From these definitions, one can see that testbeds and prototypes can play crucial roles in the research and development phase. While prototypes need necessarily to operate in real time, a testbed can be a real-time testbed or a non-real-time (offline) testbed depending on the available resources in comparison with the real-time computation need.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
[1] A., Burg andM., Rupp, Demonstrators and testbeds, In Smart Antennas: State of the Art, T., Kaiser, A., Bourcloux, H., Boche, et al., Eds., EURASIP Book Series on Signal Processing and Communications, vol. 3. New York, NY: Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2005.
[2] M., Rupp, C., Mehlfuhrer, S., Caban, et al., “Testbeds and rapid prototyping in wireless system design,” EURASIP Newsletter, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 32–50, Sep. 2006.
[3] P. W., Wolniansky, G. J., Foschini, G. D., Golden, and R. A., Valenzuela, “V-BLAST: an architecture for realizing very high data rates over the rich-scattering wireless channel,” in URSI Intl Symp. Signals, Systems and Electronics (ISSSE), Sept.-Oct. 1998, pp. 295–300.
[4] R. M., Rao, W., Zhu, et al., “Multi-antenna testbeds for research and education in wireless communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 72–81, Dec. 2004.
[5] S., Caban, C., Mehlfuhrer, R., Langwieser, A. L., Scholtz, and M., Rupp, “Vienna MIMO testbed,” EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., pp. 1–13, volume 2006, Article ID 54868, DOI 10.1155/ASP/2006/54868.
[6] P., Goud Jr., R., Hang, D., Truhachev, and C., Schlegel, “A portable MIMO testbed and selected channel measurements,” EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., pp. 1–11, volume 2006, Article ID 51490, DOI 10.1155/ASP/2006/51490.
[7] J. A., Garcia-Naya, M., Gonzalez-Lopez, and L., Castedo, “An overview of MIMO testbed technology,” in ISIVC'208, Bilbao, Jul. 2008.
[8] K., Kim and M., Torlak, “Rapid prototyping of a cost effective and flexible 4 × 4 MIMO testbed,” in IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM'2008), Darmstadt, Jul. 2008, pp. 5–8.
[9] P., Luethi, M., Wenk, T., Koch, N., Felber, W., Fichtner, and M., Lerjen, “Multi-user MIMO testbed,” in Win Tech'08, San Francisco, CA, Sep. 2008, pp. 4584–4589.
[10] N., Jalden, S., Bergman, P., Zetterberg, B., Ottersten, and K., Werner, “Cross layer implementation of a multi-user MIMO test-bed,” in IEEE WCNC'2010, Sydney, Apr. 2010.
[11] P., Chambers, X., Hong, Z., Chen, C.-X., Wang, M., Beach, and H., Haas, “The UC4G wireless MIMO testbed,” in IEEE GLOBECOM'2012, Anaheim, CA, Dec. 2012, pp. 4584–4589.
[12] H., Taoka and K., Higuchi, “Field experiments on 5-Gbit/s ultra-highspeed packet transmission using MIMO multiplexing in broadband packet radio access,” NTT DoCoMo Tech. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 25–31, Sep. 2007.
[13] NTT DOCOMO press release, “DOCOMO and Tokyo insitute of Techology achieve world's first 10 Gbps packet transmission in outdoor experimentpaving the way for super-high-bit-rate mobile communication,” 27 Feb. 2013 http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/english/info/media_center/pr/2013/0227J30.html. (accessed 26 July 2013).
[14] K., Nishimori, R., Kudo, N., Honma, Y., Takatori, and M., Mizoguchi, “16 × 16 multiuser MIMO testbed employing simple adaptive modulation scheme,” in IEEE VTC'2009 Spring, Barcelona, Apr. 2009, pp. 1–5.
[15] H. C., Shepard, N., Anand, L., Li, et al., “Argos: Practical many-antenna base stations,” in MobiCom'2012, Istanbul, Aug. 2012.
[16] P., Murphy, A., Sabharwal and B., Aazhang, “Design of WARP: a wireless open-access research platform”, in European Signal Processing conference (EUSIPCO' 2006), Florence, Sep. 2006.
[17] H., Suzuki, I. B., Collings, D., Hayman, J., Pathikulangara, Z., Chen, and R., Kendall, “Large-scale multiple antenna fixed wireless systems for rural areas,” in IEEE PIMRC'2012, Sydney, Sep. 2012, pp. 1622–1627.
[18] H., Suzuki, R., Kendall, K., Anderson, et al., “Highly spectrally efficient Ngara rural wireless broadband access demonstrator,” in Intl Symp. on Commun. and Inform. Tech. (ISCIT'2012), Gold Coast, Oct. 2012, pp. 914–919.
[19] H., Suzuki, D. B., Hayman, J., Pathikulangara, et al., “Design criteria of uniform circular array for multi-user MIMO in rural areas,” in IEEE WCNC'2010, Sydney, Apr. 2010, pp. 1–6.