Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- I Introduction
- II Youth-Constructed Socialization
- III Personal Agency Through Collective Activity
- IV Learning in Practice and Discourse
- V Intergenerational Sites for Thinking
- 15 Thinking with Others: The Social Dimension of Learning in Families and Schools
- 16 The Role of Discourse in the Transformation of Parent–Adolescent Relationships
- 17 Interactive Minds: A Paradigm from Life Span Psychology
- 18 Thinking “Youth,” Thinking “School”: Social Representations and Fieldwork in Educational Research
- VI Pathways to Adulthood in National Context
- Index
- References
15 - Thinking with Others: The Social Dimension of Learning in Families and Schools
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- I Introduction
- II Youth-Constructed Socialization
- III Personal Agency Through Collective Activity
- IV Learning in Practice and Discourse
- V Intergenerational Sites for Thinking
- 15 Thinking with Others: The Social Dimension of Learning in Families and Schools
- 16 The Role of Discourse in the Transformation of Parent–Adolescent Relationships
- 17 Interactive Minds: A Paradigm from Life Span Psychology
- 18 Thinking “Youth,” Thinking “School”: Social Representations and Fieldwork in Educational Research
- VI Pathways to Adulthood in National Context
- Index
- References
Summary
My primary research effort over the past 10 years has been devoted to quasi-ethnographic studies of verbal interactions in schools (Pontecorvo, 1992) and families (Ochs, Pontecorvo, & Fasulo, 1996). That research contributes to the issues raised in this volume by throwing light on conditions that can facilitate cognitive and social elaborations in children and adolescents during their complex socialization process in society.
This research interest began while I was studying curriculum implementation in innovative school settings with an interdisciplinary group of researchers. I was particularly struck by the collective development of reasoning through arguing and opposition, which could easily be observed when primary and secondary schoolchildren had the right to speak freely, as in a normal conversation (Pontecorvo, 1987). In social settings such as autonomous or teacher-guided groups, students were allowed and requested to say what they actually thought about a physical or biological phenomenon, a social event, a historical document, a literary text, an everyday issue, and so on: in other words, about something that was really questionable and problematic for them and that they wanted to understand thoroughly. As shown by scholars such as Barnes (1976; Barnes & Todd, 1977), it is possible to create the proper motivation to think and learn in children when interacting and speaking in a group within the context of primary or secondary schools.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Joining SocietySocial Interaction and Learning in Adolescence and Youth, pp. 227 - 240Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003