Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:56:29.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Preaching to the Choir or Converting the Flock

Presidential Communication Strategies in the Age of Three Medias

from Section III - Civic Mobilization and Governance in the New Information Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Richard L. Fox
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University, California
Jennifer M. Ramos
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University, California
Get access

Summary

On September 9, 2009, President Barack Obama delivered a prime-time television address on health care reform to a joint session of Congress. According to nielsenwire.com, more than 32 million Americans watched the president's appeal on TV. Less than two weeks later, on September 21, 2009, Obama took to the stage of the Late Show With David Letterman, only the second time a sitting U.S. president had appeared on a network late-night comedy show. This appearance – Obama's fifth on the Letterman show – capped an intensive media push by the president to promote health care reform, a push that included interviews on five Sunday news shows the previous day, spanning ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and the Spanish-language network Univision. That same month, Obama's Internet team sent weekly e-mails on health care (followed by two per week in October) to the roughly 13 million individuals in its famed e-mail database.

Obama's media frenzy was notable not only for the sheer number of public appeals but also for the diversity of outlets to which he carried his message. In addition, Obama's messages had quite different tenors, depending on the outlet audience to whom he was communicating. In his nationally televised address to the nation, the president was, to borrow a phrase, a unifier, not a divider, offering a solemn appeal for national unity. He thus observed, “In 1965, when some argued that Medicare represented a government takeover of health care, members of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – did not back down. They joined together so that all of us could enter our golden years with some basic peace of mind.…I still believe we can replace acrimony with civility.”

Type
Chapter
Information
iPolitics
Citizens, Elections, and Governing in the New Media Era
, pp. 183 - 205
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, Matthew A 2003 Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media AgePrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Baum, Matthew A 2005 Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show CircuitAmerican Journal of Political Science 44 213Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A 2007 Soft News and Foreign Policy: How Expanding the Audience Changes the PoliciesJapanese Journal of Political Science 8 109Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew AGroeling, Tim 2008 New Media and the Polarization of American Political DiscoursePolitical Communication 25 345Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew AGroeling, Tim 2009 Shot by the Messenger: An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Party Cues on Public Opinion regarding National Security and WarPolitical Behavior 31 157Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew AGroeling, Tim 2009 War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Citizen Views of WarPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Baum, Matthew AJamison, Angela 2006 The Oprah Effect: How Soft News Helps Inattentive Citizens Vote ConsistentlyJournal of Politics 68 946Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew AKernell, Samuel 2009 How Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television: From 1969–2006Kernell, SamuelSmith, Steven SThe Principles and Practice of American PoliticsWashington, DCCQ Press
Baum, Matthew AKernell, Sam 1999 Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?American Political Science Review 93 1Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew ANau, Henry 2009
Blumler, Jay GKavanagh, Dennis 1999 The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and FeaturesPolitical Communication 16 209Google Scholar
Brinkley, Joel 2005 The Man behind the Secretary of State's Rock Star ImageNew York Times A3Google Scholar
Feltus, Will 2009
Gentzkow, MatthewShapiro, Jesse M 2010 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15916.pdf
Gold, MateaCandidates Embrace the Chat: Daytime Gabfests and Latenight Comedy TV Become Essential Stops on the Presidential Trail to Reach ‘Regular FolksNew York Times 29 2007Google Scholar
Groeling, TimBaum, Matthew A 2009 Journalists’ Incentives and Coverage of Elite Foreign Policy EvaluationsConflict Management and Peace Science 26 437Google Scholar
Hallin, Daniel 1994 We Keep America on Top of the World: Television Journalism and the Public SphereLondonRoutledge
Hamilton, James T 2003 All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into NewsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Hindman, Matthew 2007 The Myth of Digital DemocracyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Jamison, AngelaBaum, Matthew A 2011 Soft News and the Four Oprah EffectsJacobs, LawrenceShapiro, RobertOxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the MediaOxfordOxford University Press
Kernell, Samuel 2006 Going PublicWashington, DCCQ Press
Kernell, SamuelRice, Laurie L
Parkin, Michael 2010 Taking Late Night Comedy Seriously: How Candidate Appearances on Late Night Television Can Engage ViewersPolitical Research Quarterly 63 3Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas 2000 Doing Well and Doing GoodJoan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public PolicyCambridge, MAHarvard University
Popkin, Samuel 2006 Changing Media, Changing PoliticsPerspectives on Politics 4 327Google Scholar
Prior, Markus 2007 Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes ElectionsCambridgeCambridge University Press
Sunstein, Cass 2009 Republic.com 2.0Princeton, NJPrinceton University Press
Xenos, MichaelBecker, Amy 2009 Moments of Zen: Effects of on Information SeekingPolitical Communication 26 317Google Scholar
Zaller, John 1992 The Nature and Origins of Mass OpinionNew YorkCambridge University Press
Zaller, John 2003 A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial CitizenPolitical Communication 20 109Google Scholar
Zaller, 2000

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×