Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

5 - Evidence in the international criminal tribunals

Summary

Towards an international system of justice

In the last chapter we discussed the attempts that have been made to fashion a common law of criminal evidence within international human rights regimes and we argued that the European Court of Human Rights in particular has been developing within its jurisprudence a participatory model of proof that is rooted in both common and civil law traditions, but may be genuinely classified as sui generis. These regimes marked an important turning point for international law, as they shifted the focus away from the interests of states towards the interests of individuals. The individual rights theories that developed during the Enlightenment were re-invigorated within the international arena as the treatment of individuals by states became a matter of international concern. But these regimes were still state-centred in the sense that their rulings were concerned with whether states had met their obligations towards individuals, such as the obligation to ensure a fair trial. For our purposes, we have seen that they tolerated a fair degree of divergence between states as to how fair trials could be achieved. When international law took a further step towards recognising the significance of the individual by making individuals responsible for international crimes, however, agreement had to be reached not only on the principles of fair trial, but also on detailed rules of procedure and evidence for trying persons charged with such crimes.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Robertson, G.Crimes against Humanity: The Struggle for Global JusticeLondonPenguin 2002
Cassese, A.International Criminal LawOxford University Press 2003 40
Bassiouni, C. M.Crimes against Humanity in International Criminal LawAmsterdamKluwer 1999
Jones, J. R. W. D.Powles, S.International Criminal PracticeOxford University Press 2003 20
Wald, P.Fair Trials for War Criminals 2006 4 International Commentary on Evidence
Wald, P.Iraq, Cambodia and International Criminal Justice 2006 21 American University International Law Review
Schabas, W. A.The International Criminal CourtCambridge University Press 2007 174
Politi, M.Gioia, F.The International Criminal Court and National JurisdictionsAldershotAshgate 2008
Fairlie, M.The Marriage of Common Law and Continental Law at the ICTY and its Progeny, Due Process Deficit 2004 4 International Criminal Law Review
Damaška, M.What is the Point of International Criminal Justice? 2007 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review
Schabas, W. A.The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra LeoneCambridge University Press 2006 67
Cryer, R.Friman, H.Robinson, D.Wilmshurst, E.An Introduction to International Criminal Law and ProcedureCambridge University Press 2010
Jorda, C.The Major Hurdles and Accomplishments of the ICTY 2004 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice
Cassese, A.Opinion: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Human Rights 1997 European Human Rights Law Review 329
Doak, J.Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal JusticeHartOxford 2008
Roberts, P.Restoration and Retribution in International Criminal Justice: An Exploratory AnalysisRestorative Justice and Criminal JusticeOxfordHart 2003
WashingtonDC: US Government 1949
Taylor, T.The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal MemoirLondonBloomsbury 1993 54
May, R.Wierda, M.Evidence before the ICTYEssays on the ICTY Procedure and Evidence: In Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonaldAmsterdamKluwer 2001 349
Arendt, H.Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of EvilLondonPenguin 1994
Wilson, R. A.Judging History: The Historical Record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2005 27 Human Rights Quarterly908
Damaška, M.Problematic Features of International Criminal ProcedureThe Oxford Companion to International Criminal JusticeOxford University Press 2009 175
May, R.Wierda, M.International Criminal EvidenceArdsleyTransnational Publishers 2001 15
Harmon, M. B.Gaynor, F.Prosecuting Massive Crimes with Primitive Tools: Three Difficulties Encountered by Prosecutors in International Criminal Proceedings 2004 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice403
Scharf, M.Balkan JusticeDurhamCarolina Academic Press 1997 212
Murphy, P.Excluding Justice or Facilitating Justice? International Criminal Law would benefit from Rules of Evidence 2008 12 International Journal of Evidence & Proof1
Cryer, R.Witness Evidence before International Criminal Tribunals 2003 3 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals411
Cryer, R.A Long Way From Home: Witnesses before the International Criminal Tribunals 2006 4 International Commentary on Evidence
McDonald, G. K.Problems, Obstacles and Achievements of the ICTY 2004 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice558
Schabas, W. A.Fair Trials and National Security Evidence 2006 4 International Commentary on Evidence
Boas, G.Creating Laws of Evidence for International Criminal Law: The ICTY and the Principle of Flexibility 2001 12 Criminal Law Forum41
Sarat, A.Clarke, C.Beyond Discretion: Prosecution, the Logic of Sovereignty, and the Limits of the Law 2008 33 Law & Social Inquiry387
Bohlander, M.The International Criminal Judiciary – Problems of Judicial Selection, Independence and EthicsInternational Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and ProceduresLondonCameron 2007
Simpson, G.Objective Responsibility: Show Trials and War Crimes Trials 2006 4 International Commentary on Evidence
Simpson, G.Law, War and Crime: War Trials and the Reinvention of International LawCambridgePolity Press 2007
Laughland, J.Travesty: The Trial of Slobodan Milošević and the Corruption of JusticeLondonPluto Press 2007
Damaška, M.The Faces of Justice and State AuthorityNew HavenYale University Press 1986 73
Pizzi, W.Overcoming Logistical and Structural Barriers to Fair Trials at International Tribunals 2006 4 International Commentary on Evidence
Damaška, M.Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts 2004 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice1018
Henman, R.Punishment and Process in International Criminal TrialsAldershotAshgate 2005
Morris, V.Scharf, M.An Insider's Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: A Documentary History and AnalysisIrvington-on-HudsonTransnational Publishers 1995 7
Wallach, E. J.The Procedural and Evidentiary Rules of the Post World War II War Crimes Trials: Did They Provide an Outline for International Legal Procedure? 1999 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law854
Jackson, J.Judicial Responsibility in Criminal Proceedings 1996 49 Current Legal Problems59
Jackson, R. H.Nurnberg in Retrospect 1949 27 Canadian Bar Review761
Amann, D.Harmonic Convergence? Constitutional Criminal Procedure in an International Context 2000 75 Indiana Law Journal809
May, R.Wierda, M.Trends in International Criminal Evidence: Nuremberg, Tokyo, The Hague, Arusha 1999 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law727
Zappalà, S.Human Rights in International Criminal ProceedingsOxford University Press 2003 19
Roling, B. V. A.Cassese, A.The Tokyo Trial and Beyond – Reflections of a PeacemongerCambridgePolity Press 1993 54
2006
Warbrick, C.International Criminal Courts and Fair Trial 1998 3 Journal of Armed Conflict Law45
1994
Langer, M.The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law 2004 53 American Journal of Comparative Law835
Weigend, T.Prosecution: Comparative AspectsEncyclopedia of Crime & JusticeNew YorkMacmillan 2001 1233
1994
Cassese, A.The ICTY: A Living and Vital Reality 2004 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice585
Langer, M.The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law 2004 53 American Journal of Comparative Law835
Wald, P.To “Establish Incredible Events by Credible Evidence”: The Use of Affidavit Testimony in Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal Proceedings 2001 42 Harvard International Law Journal535
Mundis, D. A.From “Common Law” towards “Civil Law”: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence 2001 14 Leiden Journal of International Law287
Orie, A.Accusatorial v. Inquisitorial Approach in International Criminal Proceedings Prior to the Establishment of the ICC and in the Proceedings before the ICCThe Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – A CommentaryOxford University Press 2002 1439
Scharf, M.Self-Representation versus Assignment of Defence Counsel before International Criminal Tribunals 2006 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice31
Roper, S. D.Barria, L. A.Designing Criminal TribunalsAldershotAshgate 2006
Pakes, F. J.Styles of Trial Procedure at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2003 17 Perspectives in Law & Psychology309
Keane, A.The Modern Law of EvidenceOxford University Press 2006 122
O’Sullivan, E.Judicial NoticeEssays in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonaldAmsterdamKluwer 2001 329
Kay, S.The Move from Oral to Written Evidence 2004 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice495
Frankel, M.The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View 1975 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1031
Jackson, J.Doran, S.Judge without Jury: Diplock Trials in the Adversary SystemOxfordClarendon 1995
Boas, G.The Milošević Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal ProceedingsCambridge University Press 2007 206
1975
Nice, G.Vallieres-Roland, P.Procedural Innovations in War Crimes Trials 2005 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice354
Robinson, P.Rough Edges in the Alignment of Legal Systems in the Proceedings at the ICTY 2005 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice1037
Sluiter, G.International Criminal Proceedings and the Protection of Human Rights 2003 37 New England Law Review935
Leigh, M.The Yugoslav Tribunal: Use of Unnamed Witnesses against Accused 1996 90 American Journal of International Law235
Chinkin, C. M.Due Process and Witness Anonymity 1997 91 American Journal of International Law75
Ambos, K.International Criminal Procedure: “Adversarial”, “Inquisitorial” or “Mixed”? 2003 3 International Criminal Law Review1
Jackson, J.Finding the Best Epistemic Fit for International Criminal Tribunals – Beyond the Adversarial-Inquisitorial Dichotomy 2009 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice17
Cogan, J. K.International Criminal Courts and Fair Trials: Difficulties and Prospects 2002 27 Yale Journal of International Law111
Koopes, G.-J. A.Theory and Practice of International and Internationalised Criminal ProceedingsThe HagueKluwer 2005 42
McIntyre, G.Equality of Arms – Defining Human Rights in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2003 16 Leiden Journal of International Law269
Mettraux, G.Cengic, A.The Role of a Defence Office – Some Lessons from Recent and Not So Recent War Crimes PrecedentsInternational Criminal Justice 13 54
Higgins, G.Fair and Expeditious Pre-trial Proceedings 2007 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice394
Stein, A.Foundations of Evidence LawOxford University Press 2005 190
1931
2004
Khan, K.Dixon, R.Archbold International Criminal CourtsLondonSweet & Maxwell 2009
Damaška, M.The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments 1997 45 American Journal of Comparative Law839
Bassiouni, M. C.Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court 1999 32 Cornell International Law Journal443
Karemaker, R.Taylor, B. D.Pittman, T. W.A Critical Analysis of Widening Procedural Divergency in International Criminal Tribunals 2008 21 Leiden Journal of International Law683
Vasiliev, S.Proofing the Ban on “Witness Proofing”: Did the ICC Get it Right? 2009 20 Criminal Law Forum193
Fernandez de Gurmendi, S. A.International Criminal Law ProceduresThe International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome StatuteThe HagueKluwer 1999 231
Roberts, P.Why International Criminal Evidence?Innovations in Evidence and ProofOxfordHart 2007 347
Hodgson, J.French Criminal JusticeOxfordHart 2005
Sluiter, G.The Law of Domestic Criminal Procedure and Domestic War Crimes Trials 2006 6 International Criminal Law Review605
de Hemptinne, J.The Creation of Investigating Chambers at the ICC 2007 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice402
Miraglia, M.The First Decision of the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber – International Criminal Procedure Rules Under Construction 2006 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice188