Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

3 - Realism and Neorealism in the study of regional conflict

Summary

When it comes to the study of regional conflicts, realists as a group have been loath to put forward a clear and generalizable theory. This is not to say that realists have not offered insights into the probability of militarized conflict in particular regions. In the early 1990s, for example, John Mearsheimer and Aaron Friedberg offered well-known and controversial arguments for the likelihood of war in Europe and the Far East based largely on the insights of realist logic. Yet there are few realist scholars who have attempted to derive a theory of conflict that would predict the relative stability of different regions based on an understanding of the power dynamics within these regions, as opposed to simply examining how external great powers might exploit regional politics for their own purposes.

This chapter will sketch the initial outlines of a realist theory that does seek to explain and predict the relative levels of stability across regions, both in historical terms and within the contemporary global system. Drawing on my previous work on major war between great powers, I will attempt to show that the logic of dynamic differentials theory (DDT), a structural realist theory designed to explain major wars at the level of the global great power system, can also be used effectively, with some qualifications, at the level of regional subsystems. Dynamic differentials theory argues that crises and wars are most likely when the most dominant military states in a system begin to anticipate steep and largely inevitable decline and thus start to fear the future intentions of rising actors. As I will discuss, whether these dominant states will initiate preventive attacks or destabilizing crises that might avert their decline will depend on a host of important structural variables, including the polarity of the system (in a regional subsystem, the number of important actors), the offense–defense balance, and the levels of relative economic and potential power. For now, it is important to grasp the essence of the approach: wars and militarized conflicts are driven by the dynamics of the power balance, and profound decline by the leading military state or its nearest rival can destabilize a system to the point of bilateral or subsystem-wide war.

Mearsheimer, John J.Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,International Security 15 1990 5
Friedberg, Aaron L.Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,International Security 18 1993 5
Lemke, DouglasRegions of War and PeaceCambridge University Press 2002
Meron, GilRealist Hypotheses on Regional Peace,Journal of Strategic Studies 26 2003 109
Copeland, Dale C.The Origins of Major WarIthaca, NYCornell University Press 2000
Ripsman, Norrin M.Two Stages of Transition from a Region of War to a Region of Peace: Realist Transition and Liberal Endurance,International Studies Quarterly 49 2005 669
Waltz, Kenneth N.Theory of International PoliticsReading, MAAddison-Wesley 1979
Lake, David A.Regional Orders: Building Security in a New WorldUniversity ParkPennsylvania State University Press 1997
Cashman, GregWhat Causes War? An Introduction to Theories of International ConflictNew YorkLexington Books 1993
Morgenthau, Hans J.Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and PeaceNew YorkAlfred A. Knopf 1978
Gulick, Edward V.Europe’s Classical Balance of PowerNew YorkW. W. Norton 1962
Sheehan, MichaelThe Balance of Power: History and TheoryLondonRoutledge 1996
Morgenthau, Hans J.Scientific Man versus Power PoliticsUniversity of Chicago Press 1946
Schweller, Randall L.Neorealism’s Status Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?,Security Studies 5 1996 90
Schweller, Randall L.Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,International Security 19 1994 72
Kydd, AndrewSheep in Sheep’s Clothing: Why Security Seekers do not Fight each Other,Security Studies 7 1997 114
Kydd, AndrewTrust and Mistrust in International RelationsPrinceton University Press 2005
Lobell, StevenNeoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign PolicyCambridge University Press 2009
Organski, A. F. K.World PoliticsNew YorkAlfred A. Knopf 1968
Organski, A. F. K.Kugler, JacekThe War LedgerUniversity of Chicago Press 1980
Kugler, JacekHandbook of War StudiesLondonUnwin Hyman 1989
Gilpin, RobertWar and Change in World PoliticsCambridge University Press 1981
Kugler, JacekParity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of the War LedgerAnn ArborUniversity of Michigan Press 1996
Lemke, DouglasWar and Rivalry Among Great Powers,American Journal of Political Science 45 2001 457
Mearsheimer, John J.The Tragedy of Great Power PoliticsNew YorkW. W. Norton 2001
Labs, Eric J.Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of War Aims,Security Studies 6 1997 10
Brooks, StephenDueling Realisms,International Organization 51 1997 445
Snyder, Jack L.Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International AmbitionIthaca, NYCornell University Press 1991
Glaser, Charles L.Realists as Optimists,International Security 19 1994 50
Glaser, Charles L.Rational Theory of International PoliticsPrinceton University Press 2010
Walt, Stephen M.Political Science: State of the Discipline,New YorkW. W. Norton 2002
Tang, ShipingA Theory of Security and Strategy for Our Time: Defensive RealismBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan 2010
Evera, Stephen VanCauses of WarIthaca, NYCornell University Press 1999
Walt, Stephen M.The Origins of AlliancesIthaca, NYCornell University Press 1987
Mansfield, EdwardElecting to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies go to WarCambridge, MAMIT Press 2005
Zakaria, FareedRealism and Domestic Politics: A Review Essay,International Security 17 1992 177
2007
Legro, JeffreyIs Anyone Still a Realist?,International Security 24 1999 5
Jervis, RobertAmerican Foreign Policy in a New EraNew YorkRoutledge 2005
Levy, Jack S.Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War,World Politics 40 1987 82
Levy, Jack S.Democracy and Preventive War: Israel and the 1956 Sinai Campaign,Security Studies 11 2001 1
Trachtenberg, MarcPreventive War and US Foreign Policy,Security Studies 16 2007 1
Schweller, Randall L.Domestic Politics and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?,World Politics 44 1992 235
Kim, WoosangWhen Do Power Shifts Lead to Wars?,American Journal of Political Science 36 1992 892
Ripsman, Norrin M.The Preventive War that Never Happened: Britain, France, and the Rise of Germany in the 1930s,Security Studies 16 2007 32
Paul, T. V.Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker PowersCambridge University Press 1994
Walt, Stephen M.Revolution and WarIthaca, NYCornell University Press 1996
Copeland, Dale C.A Tragic Choice: Japanese Preventive Motivations and the Origins of the Pacific War,International Interactions 37 2011 116
Miller, BenjaminStates, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and PeaceCambridge University Press 2007