Application of Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment (preliminary objection), I.C.J. Reports 2022.Google Scholar

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Compensation, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2018.Google Scholar

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2015.Google Scholar

Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2014.Google Scholar

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2010.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004.Google Scholar

Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1997.Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Judgment (preliminary objection), I.C.J. Reports 1996.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat and Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996.Google Scholar

East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1995.Google Scholar

Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) Case, Order, I.C.J. Reports 1995.Google Scholar

Case concerning The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co., Ltd (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment (second phase), I.C.J. Reports 1970.Google Scholar

Factory at Chorzow Case (Merits) (Germany/Poland), Judgment of 26 July 1927, PCIJ documents Series A, No. 13, 1928.Google Scholar

Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber), Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011, ITLOS Case No. 17.Google Scholar

Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore) (Request for Provisional Measures), Order of 8 October 2003, ITLOS Case No. 12.Google Scholar

MOX Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom) (Request for Provisional Measures), Order of 3 December 2001, ITLOS Case No. 10.Google Scholar

Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia V. Japan) (Request for Provisional Measures), Order of 27 August 1999, ITLOS Cases Nos 3 & 4.Google Scholar

Iron Rhine Railway Arbitration (Belgium v. the Netherlands), Award of 24 May 2005.Google Scholar

Trail Smelter case (United States v. Canada), Awards of 16 April 1938 and 11 March 1941, UNRIAA, Vol. III, 1905–1982.Google Scholar

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al., v. the Ss Zoe Colocotroni, U.S. 628 F.2d 652, 1980.Google Scholar

Ohio v. United States Department of the Interior, U.S. 880 F.2d 432, 1989.Google Scholar

Application of Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment (preliminary objection), I.C.J. Reports 2022.Google Scholar

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Compensation, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2018.Google Scholar

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2015.Google Scholar

Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2014.Google Scholar

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2010.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004.Google Scholar

Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1997.Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Judgment (preliminary objection), I.C.J. Reports 1996.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat and Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996.Google Scholar

East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1995.Google Scholar

Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) Case, Order, I.C.J. Reports 1995.Google Scholar

Case concerning The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co., Ltd (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment (second phase), I.C.J. Reports 1970.Google Scholar

Factory at Chorzow Case (Merits) (Germany/Poland), Judgment of 26 July 1927, PCIJ documents Series A, No. 13, 1928.Google Scholar

Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber), Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011, ITLOS Case No. 17.Google Scholar

Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore) (Request for Provisional Measures), Order of 8 October 2003, ITLOS Case No. 12.Google Scholar

MOX Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom) (Request for Provisional Measures), Order of 3 December 2001, ITLOS Case No. 10.Google Scholar

Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia V. Japan) (Request for Provisional Measures), Order of 27 August 1999, ITLOS Cases Nos 3 & 4.Google Scholar

Iron Rhine Railway Arbitration (Belgium v. the Netherlands), Award of 24 May 2005.Google Scholar

Trail Smelter case (United States v. Canada), Awards of 16 April 1938 and 11 March 1941, UNRIAA, Vol. III, 1905–1982.Google Scholar

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al., v. the Ss Zoe Colocotroni, U.S. 628 F.2d 652, 1980.Google Scholar

Ohio v. United States Department of the Interior, U.S. 880 F.2d 432, 1989.Google Scholar

United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea, adopted on 10 December 1982, entered into force on 14 November 1994.Google Scholar

Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, adopted on 28 July 1994, entered into force on 28 July 1996.Google Scholar

Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, adopted on 19 December 1966, entered into force on 10 October 1967.Google Scholar

Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, adopted on 29 November 1971, entered into force on 1 September 1972.Google Scholar

Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, adopted by on 18 December 1979, entered into force on 11 July 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antarctic Treaty, adopted on 1 December 1959, entered into force on 23 June 1961.Google Scholar

Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, adopted on 20 May 1980, entered into force on 7 April 1982.Google Scholar

Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, adopted on 4 October 1991, entered into force on 14 January 1998. Annex V to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty – Area Protection and Management, adopted on 17 October 1991, entered into force on 24 May 2002. Annex VI to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty – Liability Arising from Environmental Emergencies, adopted on 17 June 2005, not yet in force.Google Scholar

Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities, 25 November 1988, not in force. [It is expected this Convention will not ever enter into force.]Google Scholar

Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, adopted on 25 February 1991, entered into force on 10 September 1997.Google Scholar

International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (adopted on 29 November 1969, entered into force on 19 June 1975) replaced by 1992 Protocol, adopted on 27 November 1992, entered into force on 30 May 1996.Google Scholar

Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, adopted on 23 March 2001, entered into force on 21 November 2008.Google Scholar

International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea (adopted on 3 May1996, not in force) as amended by the Protocol of 2010, adopted on 1 June 2010, not yet entered into force.Google Scholar

Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy, adopted on 29 July 1960, entered into force on 1 April 1968; amended by the 1964 Protocol (entered into force on 1 April 1968), the 1982 Protocol (entered into force on 7 October 1988), and the 2004 Protocol (not yet entered into force).Google Scholar

Convention on the Liability of Operators of Nuclear Ships, adopted on 25 May 1962, not in force.Google Scholar

Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, adopted on 21 May 1963, entered into force on 12 November 1977, as amended by the 1997 Protocol (entered into force on 4 October 2003).Google Scholar

Convention on Civil Liability for Damage Resulting from Activities Dangerous to the Environment, adopted on 21 June 1993, not yet in force.Google Scholar

Protocol on Liability and Compensation for Damage Resulting from Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, adopted on 10 December 1999, not in force. [It is expected that this Protocol will not ever enter into force.]Google Scholar

Aguon, J. and Hunter, J., ‘Second Wave Due Diligence: The Case for Incorporating Free, Prior, and Informed Consent into the Deep Sea Mining Regulatory Regime’ (2018) 38(3) Stan. Envtl. L. J. 1–55.Google Scholar

Ahlborn, C., ‘The Rules of International Organizations and the Law of International Responsibility’ (2011) 8(2) IOLR 397–482.Google Scholar

Ahlborn, C., ‘The Use of Analogies in Drafting the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: An Appraisal of the “Copy-Paste Approach”’ (2012) 9 IOLR 53–66.Google Scholar

Akehurst, M., ‘International Liability for Injurious Consequences Arising out of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law’ (1985) 16 NYIL 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akehurst, M., ‘Reprisal by Third States’ (1967) 44 BYIL 1–18.Google Scholar

Alshdaifat, S. A., ‘Who Owns What in Outer Space? Dilemmas Regarding the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (2018) 21 Pecs Journal of International and European Law.Google Scholar

Ambrus, M., ‘The Precautionary Principle and a Fair Allocation of the Burden of Proof in International Environmental Law’ (2012) 21(3) RECIEL 259–270.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, C., ‘Comments on the ILC’s Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’ (2012) 9 IOLR 29–31.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, C., ‘Liability to Third Parties of Member States of International Organizations: Practice, Principle and Judicial Precedent’ (1991) 85(2) AJIL 259–280.Google Scholar

Amon, Diva et al., ‘Assessment of Scientific Gaps Related to the Effective Environmental Management of Deep-Seabed Mining’ (2022) 105006 Marine Policy 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, C., ‘Damage to Natural Resources and the Costs of Restoration’ (1997) 72 Tul. L. Rev. 417–491.Google Scholar

Andresen, S. and Skjaerseth, J. B., ‘Science and Technology: From Agenda Setting to Implementation’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnee, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Annacker, C., ‘The Legal Regime of Erga Omnes Obligations in International Law’ (1994) 46(2) AJPIL 131–166.Google Scholar

Ardron, J. et al., ‘Incorporating Transparency into the Governance of Deep-Seabed Mining in the Area beyond National Jurisdiction’ (2018) 89 Marine Policy 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arsanjani, M. and Reisman, W. M., ‘The Quest for an International Liability Regime for the Protection of the Global Commons’, in Wellens, K. (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy (Martinus Nijhoff 1998).Google Scholar

Baker, M. et al., ‘Restoration Scaling Approaches to Addressing Ecological Injury: The Habitat-Based Resource Equivalency Method’ (2020) 65 Environ. Manage. 161–177.Google Scholar

Barboza, J., The Environment, Risk, and Liability in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2011).Google Scholar

Baslar, K., The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bastmeijer, K. and Koivurova, T. (eds.), Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (Martinus Nijhoff 2008).Google Scholar

Baxter, R., ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’ (1965) 41 BYIL 275–300.Google Scholar

Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter (Sage 1992).Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L. and Goldsmith, B. (eds.), The EU Environmental Liability Directive: A Commentary (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Berwick, T. A., ‘Responsibility and Liability for Environmental Damage: A Roadmap for International Environmental Regimes’ (1998) 10 Georgetown IELR 257–267.Google Scholar

Beyerlin, U., ‘State Community Interests and Institution-Building in International Environmental Law’ (1996) 56 ZaoRV 602–627.Google Scholar

Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C., International Law and the Environment, 3rd ed. (OUP 2009).Google Scholar

Blokker, N., ‘International Organizations and Their Members: “International Organizations Belong to All Members and To None”: Variations on a Theme’ (2004) 1 IOLR 139–161.Google Scholar

Blokker, N. and Wessel, R., ‘Introduction: First Views at the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’ (2012) 9 IOLR 1–6.Google Scholar

Bloom, E., ‘Introductory Note to Antarctic Treaty Environmental Protocol Liability Annex’ (2006) 45 ILM 1–4.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., ‘Deconstructing the Precautionary Principle’, in Caron, D and Scheiber, H (eds.), Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters (Martinus Nijhoff 2004).Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’ (1999) 93 AJIL 596–624.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., Brunnee, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (OUP 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonatti, E. and Rammohanroy Nayudu, Y., ‘The Origin of Manganese Nodules on the Ocean Floor’ (1965) 263(1) American Journal of Science 17–39.Google Scholar

Borchard, E., ‘Relation between International Law and Municipal Law’ (1940) 27(2) Va. Law Rev. 137–148.Google Scholar

Borowy, I., Defining Sustainable Development for Our Common Future: A History of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) (Routledge 2014).Google Scholar

Boschen, R. et al., ‘Mining of Deep-Sea Seafloor Massive Sulfides: A Review of the Deposits, Their Benthic Communities, Impacts from Mining, Regulatory Frameworks and Management Strategies’ (2013) 84 Ocean Coast Management 54–67.Google Scholar

Boschen, R. E. et al., ‘Seafloor Massive Sulfide Deposits Support Unique Megafaunal Assemblages: Implications for Seabed Mining and Conservation’ (2016) 115 Marine Environmental Research 78–88.Google Scholar

Bowman, M. and Alan, B. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Bowman, M., ‘Environmental Protection and the Concept of Common Concern of Mankind’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Bowman, M., ‘The Definition and Valuation of Environmental Harm: An Overview’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘Developments in the International Law of Environmental Impact Assessments and Their Relation to the Espoo Convention’ (2012) 20(3) RECIEL 227–231.Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law’ (2005) 17(1) JEL 3–26.Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘Making the Polluter Pay? Alternatives to State Responsibility in the Allocation of Transboundary Environmental Cost’, in Francioni, F. and Scovazzi, T. (eds.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm (Graham and Trotman 1991).Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘Reparation for Environmental Damage in International Law: Some Preliminary Problems’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 ICLQ 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brager, S., Gabriela, Q., Romero, R. and Sandor, M., ‘The Current Status of Environmental Requirements for Deep Seabed Mining Issued by the International Seabed Authority’ (2020) 103258 Marine Policy 114.Google Scholar

Brans, E., ‘Liability and Compensation for Natural Resource Damage under the International Oil Pollution Conventions’ (1996) 5(4) RECIEL 297–304.Google Scholar

Brans, E., ‘Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources under the 2004 EC Environmental Liability Directive: Standing and Assessment of Damages’ (2005) 7 ELR 90–109.Google Scholar

Brans, E., Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources: Standing, Damage and Damage Assessment (Kluwer 2001).Google Scholar

Brans, E. and Dorith, D., ‘The Supplementary Protocol and the EU Environmental Liability Directive: Similarities and Differences’, in Akiko, S. (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Routledge 2014).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., System of Law of Nations: State Responsibility (OUP 1983).Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’ (2004) 53(2) ICLQ 351–367.Google Scholar

Burmester, H., ‘Liability for Damage from Antarctica Mineral Resource Activities’ (1989) 29 Virginia JIL 621–660.Google Scholar

Cameron, J. and Juli, A., ‘The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment’ (1991) 14(1) B.C. Int’l & Comp 1–27.Google Scholar

Cameron, J. and Juli, A., ‘The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law’, in Freestone, D. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar

Cancando Trindade, A., ‘International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium’ (2005) 316 RdC 9–439.Google Scholar

Carrato, J., John, B. and Phil, G., ‘The Industry’s Compact and Its Implications for the Supplementary Protocol’, in Shibata, A. (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Routledge 2014).Google Scholar

Cassar, A. and Carl, B., ‘Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in International Watercourse Management’ (2003) 12 NYU ELJ 169–244.Google Scholar

Castllo-Winckels, N., ‘Why “Common Concern of Humankind” Should Return to the Work of the International Law Commission on the Atmosphere’ (2016) 29 Georgetown IELR 131.Google Scholar

Charles, E., ‘The Enterprise under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Common Heritage of Mankind’, in Ascencio-Herrera, A. and Nordquist, M. H. (eds.), The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Part XI Regime and the International Seabed Authority: A Twenty-Five Year Journey (Brill 2022).Google Scholar

Charney, J., ‘Third State Remedies in International Law’ (1989) 10 Michigan JIL 57–101.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., ‘Attribution, Causation and Responsibility of International Organization’, in Sarooshi, D. (ed.), Remedies and Responsibility for the Actions of International Organizations (Martinus Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar

Christiansen, S., Brager, S. and Jaeckel, A., ‘Evaluating the Quality of Environmental Baselines for Deep Seabed Mining’ (2022) 9 Front. Mar. Sci. 898711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiansen, S. et al., ‘Towards a Contemporary Vision for the Global Seafloor: Implementing the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (2019) Heinrich Boll Stifung (Publication Series Ecology Vol. 45).Google Scholar

Christiansen, S. et al., ‘Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Management in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: REMPs for Deep Seabed Mining and the Proposed BBNJ Instrument’ (2022) 9 Front. Mar. Sci..CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, M., Durden, J. and Christiansen, S., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment for Deep-Sea Mining: Can We Improve Their Future Effectiveness?’ (2020) 114 Marine Policy 1–9.Google Scholar

Cogolati, S. and Wouters, J. (eds.), The Commons and A New Global Governance (Edward Elgar 2018).Google Scholar

Collins, P. et al., ‘A Primer for the Environmental Impact Assessment of Mining at Seafloor Massive Sulfides Deposits’ (2013) 42 Marine Policy 198–209.Google Scholar

Craik, N., ‘Implementing Adaptive Management in Deep Seabed Mining: Legal and Institutional Challenges’ (2020) 103256 Marine Policy 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craik, N., ‘The Duty to Cooperate in the Customary Law of Environmental Impact Assessment’ (2020) 69(1) ICLQ 239–259.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. ‘Responsibility to the International Community as a Whole’ (2001) 8(2) Ind. J. Global Legal Stud 303–322.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’ (2006) 319 RdC 335.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., State Responsibility: The General Part (CUP 2013).Google Scholar

Cross, F., ‘Natural Resource Damage Valuation’ (1989) 42(2) Vand. L. Rev. 269.Google Scholar

Crutzen, P., ‘Geology of Mankind’ (2002) 415(6867) Nature 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

D’Aspremont, J., ‘Abuse of the Legal Personality of International Organizations and the Responsibility of Member States’ (2007) 4 IOLR 91–119.Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, J., ‘The Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: Magnifying the Fissures in the Law of International Responsibility’ (2012) 9 IOLR 15–28.Google Scholar

Daniel, A., ‘Civil Liability Regimes as a Complement to Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Sound International Policy or False Comfort?’ (2003) 12(3) RECIEL 225–241.Google Scholar

Danovaro, R. et al., ‘An Ecosystem-Based Deep Ocean Strategy’ (2017) 355(6324) Science 452–454.Google Scholar

Davenport, T., ‘Responsibility and Liability for Damage Arising Out of Activities in the Area: Potential Claimants and Possible Fora’ CIGI, Liability Issues for Deep Seabed Mining Series Paper No. 5, February 2019.Google Scholar

De la Fayette, L., ‘The ILC and International Liability: A Commentary’ (1997) 6(3) RECIEL 322–333.Google Scholar

De Sadeleer, N., ‘Preliminary Reference on Environmental Liability and the Polluter Pays Principle: Case C-534/13, Fipa’ (2015) 24(2) RECIEL 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Sadeleer, N., ‘The Principles of Prevention and Precaution in International Law: Two Heads of the Same Coin?’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

De Sadeleer, N., Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (OUP 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deacon, M., Rice, T. and Summerhayes, C. (eds.), Understanding the Oceans: A Century of Ocean Exploration (Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar

Dingwall, J., International Law and Corporate Actors in Deep Seabed Mining (OUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durant, R., Fiorino, D. and O’Leary, R. (eds.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities (MIT 2004).Google Scholar

Durden, J. et al., ‘A Procedural Framework for Robust Environmental Management of Deep-Sea Mining Projects Using a Conceptual Model’ (2017) 84 Marine Policy 193–201.Google Scholar

Durden, J. et al., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment Process for Deep-Sea Mining in “the Area”’ (2018) 87 Marine Policy 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duvic-Paoli, L.-A., The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law (CUP 2018).Google Scholar

Eagleton, C., ‘International Organizations and the Law of Responsibility’ (1950) 76 RdC 319.Google Scholar

Egede, E., Africa and the Deep Seabed Regime: Politics and International Law (Springer 2011).Google Scholar

Elias, O., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Elias, O., ‘The UN Compensation Commission and Liability for the Costs of Monitoring and Assessment of Environmental Damage’, in Fitzmaurice, M. and Sarooshi, D. (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Hart 2004).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, U. et al., (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, U., ‘Relative Normativity in International Law’ (1993) 4 EJIL 305–340.Google Scholar

Faure, M. (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability: Future Development in the European Union (Springer 2003).Google Scholar

Faure, M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2016).Google Scholar

Faure, M. and Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage (Springer 2007).Google Scholar

Faure, M. and Hartlief, Ton, ‘Compensation Funds versus Liability and Insurance for Remedying Environmental Damage’ (1996) 5(4) RECIEL 321–327.Google Scholar

Faure, M., ‘Alternative Compensation Mechanisms as Remedies for Uninsurability of Liability’ (2004) 29(3) GRIR 455–489.Google Scholar

Feichtner, I., ‘Community Interest’, MPEPIL (last updated February 2007).Google Scholar

Fellmeth, A. and Horwitz, M., Guide to Latin in International Law (OUP 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorino, D., ‘Rethinking Environmental Regulation: Perspectives on Law and Governance’ (1999) 23(2) HELR 441–469.Google Scholar

Fisher, E., ‘Precaution, Precaution Everywhere: Developing a “Common Understanding” of the Precautionary Principle in the European Community’ (2002) 9 MJECL 7–28.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘International Protection of the Environment’ (2001) 293 RdC.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Francioni, F. and Scovazzi, T. (eds.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm (Graham and Trotman 1991).Google Scholar

Freestone, D. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar

French, D., ‘From the Depths: Rich Pickings of Principles of Sustainable Development and General International Law on the Ocean Floor: The Seabed Disputes Chamber’s 2011 Advisory Opinion’ (2011) 26(4) IJMCL 525–568.Google Scholar

French, D. and Pontin, B., ‘The Science of Climate Change: A Legal Perspective on the IPCC’, in Farber, D. and Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change Law (Edward Elgar 2016).Google Scholar

Friedmann, W., General Course at The Hague Academy (1969) 127 RdC.Google Scholar

Frowein, J., ‘Reaction by Not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International Law’ (1994-IV) 248 RdC 345.Google Scholar

Gaines, S., ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle: From Economic Equity to Environmental Ethos’ (1991) 26(3) TILJ 463–495.Google Scholar

Gaja, G., ‘Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations’, UN Audiovisual Library of International Law, New York, 9 December 2011. Available at: http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ario/ario.html.Google Scholar

Gerber, L. and Grogan, R., ‘Challenges of Operationalising Good Industry Practice and Best Environmental Practice in Deep Seabed Mining Regulation’ (2020) 114 Marine Policy 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginzky, H., Pradeep, S. and Markus, T., ‘Strengthening the ISA’s Knowledge-Base: Addressing Uncertainties to Enhance Decision-Making’ (2020) 114 Marine Policy 103823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godet, L. et al., ‘Scientists as Stakeholders in Conservation of Hydrothermal Vents’ (2011) 25(2) Conservation Biology 1–9.Google Scholar

Grady, K., ‘Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoe Colocotroni: State Action for Damage to Non-Commercial Living Natural Resources’ (1980) 9(2) B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 397–429.Google Scholar

Graefrath, B., ‘Responsibility and Damages Caused: Relationship between Responsibility and Damages’ (1984-II) 185 RdC 9.Google Scholar

Gundling, L., ‘The Status in International Law of the Principle of Precautionary Action’, in Freestone, D. and Ijlstra, T. (eds.), The North Sea: Perspectives on Regional Environmental Co-operation (Graham & Trotman 1990).Google Scholar

Hafner, G., ‘Is the Topic of Responsibility of International Organizations Ripe for Codification? Some Critical Remarks’, in Fastenrath, U. et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Hanley, N., ‘The Economic Value of Environmental Damage’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Hardin, G., ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ (1968) 162(3859) Science 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hardman Reis, T., Compensation for Environmental Damages under International Law: The Role of the International Judge (Kluwer 2011).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (OUP 1961) 79–88.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy (OUP 1982) 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartwig, M., ‘Responsibility and Liability of International Organizations or Institutions’, MPEPIL (last updated in May 2011).Google Scholar

Horbach, N., Liability versus Responsibility under International Law, Defending Strict State Responsibility for Transboundary Damage (S.l.: s.n. 1996) [Proefschrift Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden].Google Scholar

Huguenin, M., Donlan, M., Van Geel, A. and Paterson, R., ‘Assessment and Valuation of Damage to the Environment’, in Cymie, P. and Sand, P. (eds.), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Environmental Liability (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Jacobsson, M. and Trotz, N., ‘The Definition of Pollution Damage in the 1984 Protocols to the 1969 Civil Liability Convention and the 1971 Fund Convention’ (1986) 17(4) JMLC 467–491.Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A., Kristina, G. and Ardron, J., ‘Conserving the Common Heritage of Humankind: Options for the Deep Seabed Mining Regime’ (2017) 78 Marine Policy 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeckel, A., ‘An Environmental Management Strategy for the International Seabed Authority? The Legal Basis’ (2015) 30 IJMCL 93–119.Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A., ‘Deep Seabed Mining and Adaptive Management: The Procedural Challenges for the International Seabed Authority’ (2016) 70 Marine Policy 205–211.Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A., ‘Strategic Environmental Planning for Deep Seabed Mining in the Area’ (2020) 114 Marine Policy 103423.Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A., The International Seabed Authority and the Precautionary Principle: Balancing Deep Seabed Mineral Mining and Marine Environmental Protection (Brill 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenks, C. W., ‘Liability for Ultra-Hazardous Activities in International Law’ (1966-I) 117 RdC 99.Google Scholar

Jessup, P., A Modern Law of Nations: An Introduction (Macmillan 1948).Google Scholar

Johnson, D. and Ferreira, M. A., ‘ISA Areas of Particular Environmental Interest in the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone’ (2015) 30(3) IJMCL 559–574.Google Scholar

Johnston, J., ‘Is the Polluter-Pays Principle Really Fundamental? An Economic Explanation of the Relative Unimportance of Environmental Liability and Taxes in the US Environmental Law’, in Faure, M., Han, L. and Shan, H. (eds.), Maritime Pollution Liability and Policy: China, Europe and the US (Kluwer 2010).Google Scholar

Jones, D. et al., ‘Environmental Considerations for Impact and Preservation Reference Zones for Deep-Sea Polymetallic Nodule Mining’ (2020) 118 Marine Policy 103312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, D. et al., ‘Existing Environmental Management Approaches Relevant to Deep-Sea Mining’ (2019) 103 Marine Policy 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jungcurt, S. and Schabus, N., ‘Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’ (2010) 19(2) RECIEL 197–206.Google Scholar

Kareiva, P. and Marvier, M., ‘What Is Conservation Science?’ (2012) 62(11) BioScience 962–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazazi, M., ‘Environmental Damage in the Practice of the UN Compensation Commission’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Kennett, J., Marine Geology (Prentice-Hall 1982).Google Scholar

Kim, R., ‘Should Deep Seabed Mining Be Allowed?’ (2017) 82 Marine Policy 134–137.Google Scholar

Kini, E., The Precautionary Principle, Multilateral Treaties and the Formation of Customary International Law (Editions interuniversitaires suisses-Edis 2008).Google Scholar

Klein, N., Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (CUP 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, J., ‘Assessing the Candidates for A Global Treaty on Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment’ (2003) 12 N.Y.U. Envtl. L. J. 153–168.Google Scholar

Knox, J., ‘The Myth and Reality of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment’ (2002) 96(2) AJIL 291–319.Google Scholar

Koivurova, T., ‘Due Diligence’, MPEPIL (2010).Google Scholar

Koivurova, T., ‘The Transnational EIA Procedure of the Espoo Convention’ (1997) 8 FinnishYBIL 161–199.Google Scholar

Kojima, C., ‘Compensation Fund’, MPEPIL (last updated November 2009).Google Scholar

Kong, L., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (2011) 10 Chinese JIL 651–669.Google Scholar

La Fayette, L., ‘The Concept of Environmental Damage in International Liability Regimes’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Lallier, L. and Maes, F., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure for Deep Seabed Mining in the Area: Independent Expert Review and Public Participation’ (2016) 70 Marine Policy 212–219.Google Scholar

Le Gurun, G., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment and the International Seabed Authority’, in Bastmeijer, K. and Koivurova, T. (eds.), Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (Martinus Nijhoff 2008).Google Scholar

Lefeber, R., Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origin of State Liability (Kluwer 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefeber, R. and Nieto Carrasco, J., ‘Negotiating the Supplementary Protocol: The Co-Chairs’ Perspective’, in Shibata, A. (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Routledge 2014).Google Scholar

Leigh, K., ‘Liability for Damage to the Global Commons’ (1992) 14 AustYBIL 129–156.Google Scholar

Levin, L. et al, ‘Defining “Serious Harm” to the Marine Environment in the Context of Deep-Seabed Mining’ (2016) 74 Marine Policy 245.Google Scholar

Levy, J-P., ‘International Seabed Authority: 20 Years’, (2014) paper submitted at the special session in memory of the 20th Anniversary of the ISA.Google Scholar

Li, Y., Transfer of Technology for Deep Sea-Bed Mining: the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention and Beyond (Martinus Nijhoff 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindhout, P. and van den Broek, B., ‘The Polluter Pays Principle: Guidelines for Cost Recovery and Burden Sharing in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice’ (2004) 10 Utrecht L. Rev. 46–59.Google Scholar

Lodge, M. et al., ‘Seabed Mining: International Seabed Authority Environmental Management Plan for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone: A Partnership Approach’ (2014) 49 Marine Policy 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, M., ‘Improving International Governance in the Deep Sea’ (2004) 19 IJMCL 299–316.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., ‘Some Legal and Policy Considerations Relating to the Establishment of a Representative Network of Protected Areas in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone’ (2011) 26(3) IJMCL 463–480.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind’ (2012) 27 IJMCL 733–742.Google Scholar

Macdonald, R. and Johnston, D. (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff 1983).Google Scholar

Madereira, P. et al., ‘Exploration of Polymetallic Nodules in the Area: Reporting Practices, Data Management and Transparency’ (2016) 70 Marine Policy 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makarczyk, J. and Krzysztof Skubiszewski, K. (eds.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21^st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar

Mark, V., Customary International law and Treaties, 2nd ed. (Brill, 1997).Google Scholar

Marr, S., ‘The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: The Precautionary Approach and Conservation and Management of Fish Resources’ (2000) 11(4) EJIL 815–831.Google Scholar

Marr, S., The Precautionary Principle in the Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J., ‘The Responsibility of Members Due to Wrongful Acts of International Organizations’ (2013) 12 Chinese JIL 679–721.Google Scholar

Mason, M., ‘Civil Liability Oil Pollution Damage: Examining the Evolving Scope for Environmental Compensation in the International Regime’ (2003) 27 Marine Policy 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, J. and Stules, Megan, ‘Legal Strategies for Adaptive Management under Climate Change’ (2014) 26 JEL 25–53.Google Scholar

Mengerink, K. et al., ‘A Call for Deep-Ocean Stewardship’ (2014) 344 Science 696–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mensah, T., ‘The Civil Liability and Compensation for Environmental Damage in the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea’, in the Hamburg Lectures on Maritime Affairs (2007 and 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mero, J., ‘Ocean Floor Manganese Nodules’ (1962) 57 Economic Geology 747, 756–758.Google Scholar

Mero, J., The Mineral Resources of the Sea (Elsevier 1965) 235.Google Scholar

Mickelson, K., ‘Common Heritage of Mankind as a Limit to Exploitation of the Global Commons’ (2019) 30(2) EJIL 635–663.Google Scholar

Moldner, M., ‘Responsibility of International Organizations: Introducing the ILC’s DARIO’ (2012) 16 MaxPlankUNYB 282–327.Google Scholar

Mosler, H., ‘The International Society as a Legal Community’ (1973) 140(3) RdC 1–320, 11–12.Google Scholar

Murray, O., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil: The Responsibility of Member States of an IO’ (2011) 8 IOLR 291–347.Google Scholar

Nakatani, K., ‘Responsibility of Member States towards Third Parties for an International Wrongful Act of the Organization’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Ndiaye, T. and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff 2007).Google Scholar

Nijar, G., ‘The Nagoya-Kuala Lumper Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: An Analysis and Implementation Challenges’ (2013) 13 INEA 271–290.Google Scholar

Niner, A. et al., ‘Deep-Sea Mining with No Net Loss of Biodiversity: An Impossible Aim’ (2018) 5 Front. Mar. Sci. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nollkaemper, A., ‘“What You Risk Reveals What You Value”, and Other Dilemmas Encountered in the Legal Assaults on Risks’, in Freestone, D. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A. and Jacobs, D., ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2013) 34(2) Mich. J. Int’l L. 359–438.Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘From Dionisio Anzilotti to Robert Ago: The Classical International Law and State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-State Relations’ (2002) 13 EJIL 1083.Google Scholar

Nordquist, M., Nandan, S., Rosenne, S. and Lodge, M. (eds.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary (Vol. VI) (Martinus Nijhoff 2002).Google Scholar

O’Riordan, T. and Cameron, J. (eds.), Interpreting the Precautionary Principle (Earthscan 1994).Google Scholar

Okowa, P., ‘Procedural Obligations in International Environmental Agreements’ (1996) 67 BYIL 275–336.Google Scholar

Ong, D. ‘The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and Marine Environmental Protection’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Orlando, E., ‘Public and Private in the International Law of Environmental Liability’, in Lenzerini, F. and Vrdoljak, A. (eds.), International Law for Common Goods (Hart 2014).Google Scholar

Orrego-Vicuña, F., ‘Responsibility and Liability for Environmental Damage under International Law: Issues and Trends’ (1997) 10 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 279–308.Google Scholar

Oude Elferink, A., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ (2012) 27(2) IJMCL 449–480.Google Scholar

Palchetti, P., ‘Exploring Alternative Routes: The Obligation of Members to Enable the Organization to Make Reparation’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Pardo, A. and Christol, Carl, ‘The Common Interest: Tension between the Whole and the Parts’, in Macdonald, St. J. and Johnston, D. (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff 1983).Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘International Community’, MPEPIL (last updated in March 2013).Google Scholar

Payne, C. and Sand, P. (eds.), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Environmental Liability (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Peel, J., ‘Precaution: A Matter of Principle, Approach or Process?’ (2004) 5(2) MJIL 483.Google Scholar

Pellet, A., ‘International Organizations Are Definitely Not States: Cursory Remarks on the ILC Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Peterson, S. et al., ‘News from the Seabed: Geological Characteristics and Resource Potential of Deep-Sea Mineral Resources’ (2016) 70 Marine Policy 175–187.Google Scholar

Pineschi, L., ‘The Duty of Environmental Impact Assessment in the First ITLOS Chamber’s Advisory Opinion: Towards the Supremacy of the General Rule to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment as a Common Value?’, in Boschiero, N. et al. (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (Asser 2013).Google Scholar

Pinto, M. C. W., ‘Common Heritage of Mankind: From Metaphor to Myth, and the Consequences of Constructive Ambiguity’, in Makarczyk, J. and Skubiszewski, K. (eds.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21^st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar

Pinto, M. C. W., ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind: Then and Now’ (2012) 361 RdC 9–130.Google Scholar

Pinzauti, G., ‘It Takes Two to Tango: States’ Conferral of Powers on International Organizations and Its Implications for the Responsibility of the Organization and its Members’, in Sarooshi, D. (ed.), Remedies and Responsibility for the Actions of International Organizations (Martinus Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar

Plakokokefalos, I., ‘The Practice of Shared Responsibility in relation to Environmental Protection of the Deep Seabed’, SHARES Research Paper 94 (2016).Google Scholar

Preller-Borquez, S., ‘Integrating Sustainable Development into the Adoption of Emergency Orders for the Protection of the Common Heritage of Mankind and the Marine Environment’ (2022) 37 IJMCL 73–88.Google Scholar

Proelss, A., ‘The Role of the Authority in Ocean Governance’, in Scheiber, H. and Paik, J-h. (eds.), Regions, Institutions, and Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Pufendorf, S., Two Books on the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, trans. Oldfather, W. A. (Clarendon Press 1931).Google Scholar

Pyhala, M., Brusendorff, A. and Paulomaki, H., ‘The Precautionary Principle’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Martinus Nijhoff 2005).Google Scholar

Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Ragazzi, M., The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Clarendon 1997).Google Scholar

Ranganathan, S., ‘Global Commons’ (2016) 27 EJIL 693–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Remaoun, M., ‘The International Seabed Authority and the Enterprise: How Africa is Reinvigorating the Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (2021) 1(1) JOGA.Google Scholar

Røsæg, E., ‘Compulsory Maritime Insurance’ (2000) Marlus 258 SIMPLY.Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘Some Reflections Erga Omnes’, in Anghie, A. and Sturgess, G. (eds.), Legal Visions of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Judge Christopher Weeramantry (Kluwer 1998).Google Scholar

Sand, P., ‘Environmental Damage Claims from the 1991 Gulf War: State Responsibility and Community Interests’, in Fastenrath, U. et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Sand, P., ‘Environmental Dispute Settlement and the Experience of the UN Compensation Committee’ (2011) 54 JYIL 151–189.Google Scholar

Sand, P., ‘The Evolution of International Environmental Law’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnee, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Sander, G., ‘International Legal Obligations for Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment in the Arctic Ocean’ (2016) 31(1) IJMCL 88–119.Google Scholar

Sands, P., Peel, J., Fabra, A. and MacKenzie, R. (eds.), Principles of International Environmental Law, 3rd ed. (CUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarooshi, D. (ed.), Remedies and Responsibility for the Actions of International Organizations (Martinus Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar

Sarooshi, D., International Organizations and their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (OUP 2005).Google Scholar

Savaresi, A., Kulovesi, K. and van Asselt, H., ‘Beyond COP26: Time for an Advisory Opinion on Climate Change?’ EJIL: Talk! blog posted on 17 December 2021. Available at: www.ejiltalk.org/beyond-cop26-time-for-an-advisory-opinion-on-climate-change/.Google Scholar

Sax, J., ‘The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention’ (1970) 68 Mich. L. Rev. 471–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schermers, H., ‘Liability of International Organizations’ (1988) 1(1) LJIL 3–14.Google Scholar

Schermers, H. and Blokker, N., International Institutional Law, 5th ed. (Martinus Nijhoff 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoenbaum, T., ‘Environmental Damages in the Common Law: An Overview’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Schrijver, N. and Prislan, V., ‘From Mare Liberum to the Global Commons: Building on the Grotian Heritage’ (2009) 30 Grotiana 168.Google Scholar

Schrijver, N., ‘Managing the Global Commons: Common Good or Common Sink?’ (2016) 37(7) Third World Quarterly 1252–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrijver, N., ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’, MPEPIL (2008).Google Scholar

Schrijver, N., Development without Destruction. The United Nations and Global Resource Management (Indiana University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Schrijver, N., The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status (Martinus Nijhoff 2008).Google Scholar

Schrijver, N., Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties (CUP 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrijver, N., ‘The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law and its Application and Interpretation in International Litigation’, in Pierre Cot, J. (ed.), Le procès international: liber amicorum Jean-Pierre Cot (Bruylant 2009).Google Scholar

Schroder, M., ‘Precautionary Approach/ Principle’, MPEPIL (2009).Google Scholar

Schwartz, P., ‘Principle 16: The Polluter-Pays principle’, in Vinuales, J. (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Schwartz, P., ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M. and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Scovazzi, T., ‘Mining Protection of the Environment, Scientific Research and Bioprospecting: Some Considerations on the Role of the International Sea-Bed Authority’ (2004) 19 IJMCL 383.Google Scholar

Seyersted, F., ‘Objective International Personality of International Organization: Do their Capacities Really Depend upon the Convention Establishing Them?’ (1964) 34(3) Nordisk Tidsskrift Int’l Ret 1.Google Scholar

Shackelford, S., ‘The Tragedy of the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (2009) 28 Stan. Envtl. L. J. 109–169.Google Scholar

Shelton, D., ‘Stockholm Declaration (1972) and Rio Declaration (1992)’, MPEPIL (2008).Google Scholar

Shelton, D., ‘Common Concern of Humanity’ (2009) 39(2) Environmental Law and Policy 83.Google Scholar

Shibata, A. (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shibata, A., ‘A New Dimension in International Environmental Liability Regimes: A Prelude to the Supplementary Protocol’, in Shibata, A. (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shigeta, Y., ‘Obligation to Protect the Environment in the ICJ’s Practice: To What Extent Erga Omnes?’ (2012) 55 JYIL 176–207.Google Scholar

Silva Soares, G. and Vargas, E. V., ‘The Basel Liability Protocol on Liability and Compensation for Damage Resulting from Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal’ (2002) 12(1) YIntlEnvL 69–104.Google Scholar

Simma, B., ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’ (1994-VI) 250 RdC 221–384.Google Scholar

Simma, B., ‘The Antarctic Treaty as a Treaty Providing for an “Objective Regime”’ (1986) 19 Cornell Int’L. J. 189.Google Scholar

Singh, P., ‘The Two-Year Deadline to Complete the International Seabed Authority’s Mining Code: Key Outstanding Matters that Still Need to Be Resolved’ (2021) 104804 Marine Policy 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SPC-EU Deep Sea Minerals Project, ‘Manganese Nodules: A Physical, Biological, Environmental, and Technical Review’ (2013) 23. Available at: http://dsm.gsd.spc.int/public/files/meetings/TrainingWorkshop4/UNEP_vol1B.pdf.Google Scholar

Spijkers, O., ‘Intergenerational Equity and the Sustainable Development Goals’ (2018) 10(11) Sustainability 3836.Google Scholar

Stoll, P-T., ‘State Immunity’, MPEPIL (last updated in April 2011).Google Scholar

Stumer, A., ‘Liability of Member States for Acts of International Organizations: Reconsidering the Policy Objections’ (2007) 48(2) HILJ 553–580.Google Scholar

Sun, L., ‘Dispute Settlement Relating to Deep Seabed Mining: A Participant’s Perspective’ (2017) 18(1) MJIL 71–94.Google Scholar

Sverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W., and Fleming, R., The Oceans: Their Physics, Chemistry, and General Biology (Prentice Hall 1942).Google Scholar

Swords, D. and Ohio, V., ‘United States Department of the Interior: A Contingent Step Forward for Environmentalists’ (1991) 51(6) La. L. Rev. 1347–1376.Google Scholar

Tams, C., Enforcing Obligation Erga Omnes in International Law (CUP 2005).Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y., ‘Obligations and Liability of Sponsoring States Concerning Activities in the Area: Reflections on the ITLOS Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011’ (2013) 60(2) NILR 205–230.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y., ‘Protection of Community Interests in International Law: The Case of the Law of the Sea’ (2011) 15 MaxPlanckUNYB 329–375.Google Scholar

Tansley, A., ‘The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms’ (1935) 16(3) Ecology 284–307.Google Scholar

Telesetsky, A., ‘Introductory Note to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress’ (2011) 50(1) ILM 105–113.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Obligations Arising for States without or Against Their Will’ (1993) 241(4) RdC 199–374.Google Scholar

Trouwborst, A., Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law (Kluwer 2002).Google Scholar

Trouwborst, A., Precautionary Rights and Duties of States (Martinus Nijhoff 2006).Google Scholar

Tunnicliffe, V. et al., ‘Strategic Environmental Goals and Objectives: Setting the Basis for Environmental Regulation of Deep Seabed Mining’ (2020) 114 Marine Policy 103347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, P. et al., ‘Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Ecosystem Principles: Identification of Ecosystem Processes, Services and Communication of Value’ (2019) 101 Marine Policy 118–124.Google Scholar

Van Doorn, E., ‘Environmental Aspects of the Mining Code: Preserving Humankind’s Common Heritage While Opening Pardo’s Box?’ (2016) 70 Marine Policy 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dover, C.L. et al., ‘Designating Networks of Chemosynthetic Ecosystem Reserves in the Deep Sea’ (2012) 36 Marine Policy 378–381.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, J., ‘The Evolution and International Acceptance of the Precautionary Principle’, in Caron, D. and Scheiber, H. (eds.), Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters (Martinus Nijhoff 2004).Google Scholar

Villalpando, S., ‘The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests Are Protected in International Law’ (2010) 21(2) EJIL 387–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vinuales, J. (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M. and Venzke, I., ‘From Public International to International Public Law: Translating World Public Opinion into International Public Authority’ (2017) 28(1) EJIL 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, H., ‘Ecosystem Management and Its Application to Large Marine Ecosystem: Science, Law, and Politics’ (2004) 35 ODIL 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warner, R., ‘Oceans beyond Boundaries: Environmental Assessment Frameworks’ (2012) 27(2) IJMCL 481–499.Google Scholar

Wedding, L. et al., ‘Managing Mining of the Deep Seabed: Contracts Are Being Granted, but Protections Are Lagging’ (2015) 349 Science 6244.Google Scholar

Wegener, A., The Origin of Continents and Oceans, trans. Biram, J. (Dover 1966).Google Scholar

Weil, P., ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1983) 77 AJIL 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, B., ‘Invoking State Responsibility in the 21^st Century’ (2002) 96 AJIL 798–816.Google Scholar

Wellens, K., Remedies against International Organizations (CUP 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wetterstein, P. (ed.), Harm to the Environment: The Right to Compensation and the Assessment of Damages (OUP 1997).Google Scholar

White, L., ‘The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis’ (1967) 155(3767) Science 1203–1207.Google Scholar

Wilde, L., ‘Scientific and Technic Advice: The Perspective of Iraq’s Experts’, in Payne, C. and Sand, P. (eds.), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Environmental Liability (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Wilfred Jenks, C., The Common Law of Mankind (Stevens 1958).Google Scholar

Williams, B., ‘Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Framework and Issues’ (2011) 92(5) JEM Africa 1364–1353.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘The Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind’, MPEPIL (last updated November 2009).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘The Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (1983) 43(2) Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches 312–337. Available at: www.zaoerv.de/43_1983/43_1983_2_a_312_337.pdf.Google Scholar

Woodliffe, J., ‘Environmental Damage and Environmental Impact Assessment’, in Bowman, M. and Boyle, A. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (OUP 2002).Google Scholar

Wright, G. et al., ‘Marine Spatial Planning in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ (2021) 132 Marine Policy 103384.Google Scholar

Xu, X., Responsibility to Ensure: Sponsoring States’ Environmental Legislation for Deep Seabed Mining and China’s Practice (Brill 2021).Google Scholar

Yee, S., ‘Member Responsibility and the ILC Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: Some Observations’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Yee, S., ‘The Responsibility of States Members of an International Organization for Its Conduct as a Result of Membership or Their Normal Conduct Associated with Membership’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Martinus Nijhoff 2005).Google Scholar

Zemanek, K., ‘State Responsibility and Liability’, in Winfried Lang, H-P. N. and Zemanek, K. (eds.), Environmental Protection and International Law (Graham & Trotman 1991).Google Scholar

Zhu, L., Compulsory Insurance and Compensation for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (Springer 2007).Google Scholar

Secretary-General’s Informal Consultations on Outstanding Issues Relating to the Deep Seabed Mining Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Collected Documents (ISA, 2002).Google Scholar

Legislative History of the ‘Enterprise’ under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the Convention, 2002.Google Scholar

Regulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Polymetalic Nodules in the Area, 2000, ISBA/6/A/18, revised in 2013 at the 19th session, ISBA/19/C/17, approved by the Assembly, ISBA/19/A/9.Google Scholar

Regulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Polymetallic Sulphides in the Area, 2010, ISBA/16/A/12/Rev.1. Amendments to regulation 21, ISBA/20/A/10.Google Scholar

Regulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Cobalt-Rich Ferromanganese Crusts in the Area, 2012, ISBA/18/A/11. Amendments to regulation 21, ISBA/20/A/9.Google Scholar

Rules of Procedure of the Legal and Technical Commission, entered into effect on 13 July 2000.Google Scholar

Financial Regulations of the Authority, approved by the Assembly on 23 March 2000.Google Scholar

Recommendations for the Guidance of Contractors for the Assessment of the Possible Environmental Impacts arising from Exploration for Marine Minerals in the Area, July, 2013, ISBA/19/LTC/8 (earlier versions: 2001, ISBA/7/LTC/1/REV.1; 2010, ISBA/16/LTC/7).Google Scholar

Draft Regulations on Exploitation of Mineral Resources in the Area, ISBA/25/C/WP.1, 2019.Google Scholar

Revised Draft Regulations on Exploitation of Mineral Resources in the Area, ISBA/24/LTC/WP.1, 2018.Google Scholar

The Implementation of the Precautionary Approach by the International Seabed Authority, Discussion Paper No. 5 (March 2017).Google Scholar

Draft Regulations on Exploitation of Mineral Resources in the Area, 2017Google Scholar

Discussion Paper on the Development and Drafting of Regulations on Exploitation for Mineral Resources in the Area (Environmental Matters), 2017.Google Scholar

First Working Draft Regulations on Exploitation of Mineral Resources in the Area, 2016.Google Scholar

Draft standards and guidelines under phase 1Google Scholar

Annual Reports of the Secretary-General of the ISA under Article 166(4), UNCLOS (2000–2022).Google Scholar

Content and Development of Standards and Guidelines for Activities in the Area under the Authority’s Regulatory Framework, Note by the Secretariat, ISBA/25/C/3, 2018.Google Scholar

Study on an Environmental Compensation Fund for Activities in the Area, ISA, Technical Study No. 27 (2021).Google Scholar

Towards an ISA Environmental Management Strategy for the Area, ISA Technical Study No. 17 (2017).Google Scholar

Environmental Assessment and Management for Exploitation of Minerals in the Area: Report of an International Workshop Convened by the Griffith University Law School in Collaboration with the ISA in Queensland, Australia, 23–26 May 2016, Technical Study No. 16 (2016).Google Scholar

Environmental Management of Deep-Sea Chemosynthetic Ecosystems: Justification of and Considerations for a Spatially-Based Approach, Technical Study No. 9 (2011).Google Scholar

Fauna of Cobalt-Rich Ferromanganese Crust Seamounts, Technical Study No. 8 (2011).Google Scholar

Biodiversity, Species Ranges and Gene Flow in the Abyssal Pacific Nodule Province: Predicting and Managing the Impacts of Deep Seabed Mining, Technical Study No. 3 (2008).Google Scholar

Addressing Serious Harm to the Marine Environment in the Regulations for the Exploitation of Mineral Resources in the Area, submitted by the delegation of the Netherlands, 2015, ISBA/21/C/13.Google Scholar

Strengthening Environmental Scientific Capacity of the ISA, a non-paper submission by Belgium to the ISA on June 22, 2018.Google Scholar

Egede, E., Pal, Mati and Charles, Eden, ‘A Study related to Issues on the Operationalization of the Enterprise: Legal, Technical and Financial Implications for the International Seabed Authority and for States Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, Technical Report 1/2019 of the International Seabed Authority.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. et al., ‘Final report on the periodic review of the International Seabed Authority pursuant to article 154 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, submission to the ISA, 30 December 2016.Google Scholar

Survey of State practice relevant to international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, prepared by the Secretariat, 1985, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/384.Google Scholar

Survey of liability regimes relevant to the topic of ‘international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law’, 1995, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/471.Google Scholar

Survey of liability regimes relevant to the topic of ‘international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law’, 2004, UN Doc. A/CN.4/543.Google Scholar

Reports submitted by the first Special Rapporteur Mr. Quentin-Baxter on the topic of international liability: The preliminary report, 1980, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/334; second report, 1981, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/346; third report, 1982, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/360 and Corr.1; fourth report, 1983, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/373 and Corr.1 and 2; fifth report, 1984, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/383 and Add.1;Google Scholar

Reports submitted by second Special Rapporteur Mr. Barboza on the topic of international liability: The preliminary report, 1985, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/394; second report, 1986, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/402 and Corr.1, 2 and 4; third report, 1987, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/405 and Corr.1 and 2; fourth report, 1988, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/413 and Corr.1; fifth report, 1989, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/423 and Corr. 1 and 2; sixth report, 1990, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/ 428 and Corr.1, 2 and 4; seventh report, 1991, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/ 437 and Corr.1; eighth report, 1992, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/443 and Corr. 1 and 3; ninth report, 1993, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/450; tenth report, 1994, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/459; eleventh report, 1995, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/468; twelfth report, 1996, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/475 and Corr. 1 and Add. 1 and Add. 1/Corr. 1.Google Scholar

Reports submitted by the third Special Rapporteur Mr. Rao on the topic of international liability: The first report on the subtopic of prevention, 1998, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/487 and Add. 1; second report, 1999, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/501; third report, 2000, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/510; the first report on the subtopic of international liability, 2003, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/531; second report, 2004, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/540; third report, 2006, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/566.Google Scholar

The reports of the working group on the topic of international liability, 1996, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/L.533 and Add. 1; 1997, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/L. 536.Google Scholar

Draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm from hazardous activities, adopted by UNGA Res. 56/82 of 12 December 2001.Google Scholar

Draft principles on the allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, adopted by UNGA Res. 61/36 of 4 December 2006.Google Scholar

The second reports of the second Special Rapporteur Mr. Ago on the topic of State responsibility, 1970, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/233.Google Scholar

First reading of Articles on State Responsibility adopted by drafting committee in 1996, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/L.524 and Corr. 2.Google Scholar

Articles on state responsibility, adopted by UNGA Res.56/83 of 12 December 2001.Google Scholar

The first report by the Special Rapporteur Mr. Gaja on the topic of responsibility of international organizations, 2003, UN Doc. A/CN.4/532; second report, 2004, UN Doc. A/CN.4/541; third report, 2005, UN Doc. A/CN.4/553; fourth report, 2006, UN Doc. A/CN.4/564 and Add. 1–2; fifth report, 2007, UN Doc. A/CN.4/583; six report, 2008, UN Doc. A/CN.4/597; seventh report, 2009, UN Doc. A/CN.4/610; eighth report, 2011, UN Doc. A/cn.4/640.Google Scholar

Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, with Commentaries, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2011, Vol. II, Part Two. Adopted by UNGA Resolution, UN Doc. A/RES/66/100.Google Scholar

Gaja, G., Obligations and Rights Erga Omnes: First Report, pp. 119–151 (Replies and Observations of the Commission to the First Report, pp. 152–187); and Second Report, pp. 188–202 (Replies and Observations of the Commission to the First Report, pp. 203–212), Yearbook of the Institute of International Law, Vol. 71-I, pp. 119–212, 2005.Google Scholar

Higgins, R., Report of The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-fulfilment by International Organizations of their Obligations toward Third Parties, Yearbook of Institute of International Law, Vol. 66-I, 1995.Google Scholar

IDI (the Fifth Commission) Resolution: Obligations and Rights Erga Omnes in International Law (rapporteur: Mr. Giorgio Gaja), adopted at Karkow Session on August 27, 2005. Available at: www.idi-iil.org/idiE/resolutionsE/2005_kra_01_en.pdf.Google Scholar

IDI Resolution (session of Lisbonne), The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-fulfilment by International Organizations of their Obligations toward Third Parties. Available at: www.idi-iil.org/idiE/resolutionsE/1995_lis_02_en.pdf.Google Scholar

IDI (the Eighth Commission) Resolution: Responsibility and Liability under International Law for Environmental Damage (Rapporteur: Mr Francisco Orrego Vicuña), adopted at the Session of Strasbourg on September 4, 1997. Available at: www.idi-iil.org/idiE/resolutionsE/1997_str_03_en.PDF.Google Scholar

Reports of the ILA Committee on Accountability of International Organizations: 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004.Google Scholar

ILA resolution No.1 (Berlin Conference), Accountability of International Organizations, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ILA New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development, 2002.Google Scholar

London Statement of Principles applicable to the formation of general customary international law, adopted at the sixty-ninth Conference of the International Law Association, in London, on 29 July 2000.Google Scholar

The final report of The Managing Impacts of Deep Sea Resource Exploitation project (‘MIDAS’ 2016). Available at: www.eu-midas.net/sites/default/files/deliverables/D9.6_FINAL_lowres.pdf.Google Scholar

First Census of Marine Life 2010: Highlights of a Decade of Discovery. Available at: www.coml.org/highlights-2010.Google Scholar

Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited, Environmental Impact Statement (Solwara 1 Project), Executive summary 2008 (prepared by Coffey Natural Systems, September 2008). Available at: www.nautilusminerals.com/irm/content/pdf/environment-reports/Environmental%20Impact%20Statement%20Executive%20Summary%20(English).pdf.Google Scholar

UNEP, The Meeting of the Group of Legal Experts to Examine the Concept of the Common Concern of Mankind in Relation to Global Environmental Issues (Co-Rapporteurs: A.A. Cançado Trindade and D. J. Attard), 1991. Available at: http://historico.juridicas.unam.mx/publica/librev/rev/iidh/cont/13/doc/doc29.pdf.Google Scholar

The reports of the SPC-EU deep seabed minerals project (2013). Available at: www.sopac.org/dsm/index.php/publications-and-reports.Google Scholar

Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 19 of Security Council Resolution 687 (199), UN Doc. S/22559, 2 May 1991.Google Scholar

Governing Council Decision 7, Criteria for Additional Categories of Claims, UN Doc. S/AC.26/1991/7/Rev.1, 17 March 1992.Google Scholar

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 9601, et seq.).Google Scholar

Oil Pollution Act (OPA) (33 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq.).Google Scholar

U.S. DOI NRDA Regulations (CERCLA) ‘Type A’ NRDA Regulations, 43 C.F.R. 11.Google Scholar

U.S. DOI NRDA Regulations (CERCLA) ‘Type B’ NRDA Regulations, 43 C.F.R. 11.Google Scholar

U.S. DOC/NOAA NRDA Regulations (OPA) NRDA Regulations 15 C.F.R. 990.Google Scholar

Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage.Google Scholar

Liability and Redress in the context of Paragraph 2 of Article 14 of the Convention on Biological Diversity – synthesis report on technical information relating to damage to biological diversity and approaches to valuation and restoration of damage to biological diversity, as well as information on national/domestic measures and experiences, UNEP/CBD/COP/9/20/Add.1, adopted on 20 March 2008.Google Scholar

Status of International Environmental-related Liability Instruments as of February 2008 in chronological order of adoption, UNEP/CBD/BS/GF-L&R/1/INF/1, 14–15.Google Scholar

IUCN World Conservation Congress ‘Motion 069’. Available at: www.iucncongress2020.org/motion/069.Google Scholar