Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: February 2010

10 - Mental Mechanisms: Speculations on Human Causal Learning and Reasoning

Summary

A fundamental goal of cognition is to reason about the causal properties of the physical and social worlds. However, as Hume (2004/1748) observed, knowledge of causality is puzzling because although events are directly observable, causal connections between them are not. Hume's puzzle has both philosophical and psychological aspects. The philosophical puzzle is how causal knowledge can be justified – that is, when should people infer causality? Hume argued that this problem is simply unsolvable – causality can never justifiably be inferred. But this leaves the psychological puzzle. Whether defensibly or not, people routinely do infer causality from experience; the puzzle is to understand what principles underlie these causal inferences.

Hume believed that this psychological problem was solvable: He suggested, in essence, that people infer causality from constant association or, in statistical terms, correlation. However, inferring causality from correlation is fraught with peril. One particularly serious difficulty concerns the theme of this book: sampling. Biased samples can induce numerous correlations that are spurious from a causal point of view; and, conversely, can lead to no correlation, or anticorrelation, where there is a causal link between events.

From Hume's skeptical perspective, this difficulty might not seem important. Indeed, if causal knowledge is unjustified and unjustifiable, there is really no question of whether causality is inferred correctly, or incorrectly: The associations between events are all there is. From a modern perspective, however, such skepticism seems untenable.

References
Ali, N., Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (2004). Causal interpretations affect conditional reasoning. Manuscript. Department of Psychology, University of Warwick
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.) (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. Psychological Review, 85, 1–21
Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Rotational dynamics and dynamic touch. In Heller, M. (Ed.), Touch, representation and blindness (pp. 27–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Chater, N., Oaksford, M., Nakisa, R., & Redington, M. (2003). Fast, frugal and rational: How rational norms explain behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 63–86
Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. (2003). The generalized universal law of generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 346–369
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). On the natural selection of reasoning theories. Cognition, 33, 285–313
Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276
Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theory on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289–310
Dickinson, A. (2001). Causal learning: An associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 3–25
Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104, 235–329
Evans, J.St, B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). The psychology of deductive reasoning. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum
Evans, J.St, B. T., & Over, D. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press
Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676
Fiedler, K., Brinkmann, B., Betsch, T., & Wild, B. (2000). A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: Beyond base-rate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 399–418
Fodor, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation. New York: Random House
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell
Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289–344
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669
Gigerenzer, G., & Murray, D. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press
Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Chen, S. (1995). Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the ‘Monty Hall’ problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 182–190
Gluck, M., & Bower, G. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive netword model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227–247
Glymour, C., & Cooper, G. (1999). Causation, computation and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Hahn, U., Chater, N., & Richardson, L. B. C. (2003). Similarity as transformation. Cognition, 87, 1–32
Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69, 366–378
Hume, D. (2004). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Beauchamp, T. L. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (originally published 1748)
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646–678
Kakade, S., & Dayan, P. (2002). Acquisition and extinction in autoshaping. Psychological Review, 109, 533–544
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction. In Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., & Weiner, B. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press
Krauss, S., & Wang, X. T. (2003). The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 3–22
Lauritzen, S. L., & Speigelhalter, D. J. (1988). Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 50, 157–224
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426
Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?Cognition, 25, 265–288
Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (1997). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity theory and its applications (2nd edition). Berlin: Springer-Verlag
McDermott, D. (1987). A critique of pure reason. Computational Intelligence, 3, 151–237
Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Universtiy Press
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1991). Against cognitive science. Mind and Language, 6, 1–38
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1998). Rationality in an uncertain world: Essays on the cognitive science of human reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2002). Commonsense reasoning, logic and human rationality. In Elio, R. (Ed.), Common sense, reasoning and rationality (pp. 174–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent system: Networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Poletiek, F. H. (2001). Hypothesis testing behaviour. Hove, UK: Psychology Press
Putnam, H. (1974). The ‘corroboration’ of theories. In Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 221–240). La Salle, IL: Open Court
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton
Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vols. 1 and 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Shimojo, S., & Ichikawa, S. (1989). Intuitive reasoning about probability: Theoretical and experimental analyses of the problem of three prisoners. Cognition, 32, 1–24
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 238–241
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22
Spelke, E. S. (1998). Nativism, empiricism, and the origins of knowledge. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 181–200
Sperber, D., Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (Eds.) (1995). Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. New York: Oxford University Press
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, prediction, and search, New York: Springer-Verlag
Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP. A model of autonomatic memory processing in animal behavior. In Spear, N. E. & Miller, R. R. (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Wellman, M. P., & Henrion, M. (1993). Explaining “explaining away.”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 287–292