Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: February 2010

5 - Less Is More in Covariation Detection – Or Is It?

Summary

INTRODUCTION

One of the more celebrated conclusions in cognitive psychology refers to the limited computational capacity of controlled thought, as typically epitomized by Miller's (1956) estimate of a short-term-memory holding capacity of “seven-plus-or-minus-two” chunks. That people can only keep a limited amount of information active for controlled processing at any moment in time has inspired humbling conclusions in regard to problem solving (Newell & Simon, 1972), reasoning (Evans, Newstead, & Byrne, 1993), and, perhaps especially, judgment and decision making (Gilovich, Griffin, & Kahneman, 2002). This limitation is often raised as a main obstacle to people's attainment of classical rationality, suggesting that at best people can aspire to bounded rationality (Simon, 1990). In the context of this volume the implication is that at any moment in time controlled processes of thought can only access a small sample of observations.

The default interpretation seems to be to emphasize the liabilities of these limitations and to regard the current state in the evolutionary development as representing at best a local maximum. Organisms are thus restricted to limited samples of information, although there is agreement that on normative grounds as much information as possible is needed to optimize judgments and decisions. More rarely is the question raised of whether there can be a functional significance attached to apparent cognitive limitations.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Anderson, R. B., Doherty, M. E., Berg, N. D., & Friedrich, J. C. (2005). Sample size and the detection of correlation – A signal-detection account: A comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 268–279
Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag
Broadbent, D. E. (1975). The magic number seven after fifteen years. In Kennedy, A. & Wilkes, A. (Eds.), Studies in long term memory, (pp. 3–18). London: Wiley
Chater, N., Crocker, M., & Pickering, M. (1998). The rational analysis of inquiry: The case of parsing. In: Chater, N. & Oaksford, M. (Eds), Rational models of cognition (pp. 441–468). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Corter, J., & Gluck, M. (1992). Explaining basic categories: Feature predictability and information. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 291–303
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99
Evans, J., Newstead, S., & Byrne, R. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Potomac, Maryland: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Fiedler, K., & Kareev, Y. (2004). Does decision quality (always) increase with the size of information samples? Some vicissitudes in applying the Law of Large Numbers. Manuscript submitted for publication. Discussion Paper #347, Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Good, I. J. (1950). Probability and the weighing of evidence. London: Charles Griffin
Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (1998). Spatial representation and selection in the brain: Neuropsychological and computational constraints. Visual Cognition, 5, 9–47
Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2005). Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: Comment on Kareev (2000). Psychological Review, 112, 256–267
Kareev, Y. (1995). Through a narrow window: working memory capacity and the detection of correlation. Cognition, 56, 263–269
Kareev, Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlation. Psychological Review, 107, 397–402
Kareev, Y., Lieberman, I., & Lev, M. (1997). Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 278–287
Lindley, D. V. (1956). On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 986–1005
MacGregor, J. N. (1987). Short term memory capacity: Limitation or optimization?Psychological Review, 94, 107–108
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992). Information-based objective functions for active data selection. Neural Computation, 4, 590–604
MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608–631
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656
Thuijsman, F., Peleg, B.Amitai, M., & Shmida, A. (1995). Automata, matching and foraging behavior of bees. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 175, 305–316
Turkewitz, G., & Kenny, P. A. (1982). Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statement. Developmental Psychobiology, 15, 357–368
Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press