Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: February 2010

9 - Contingency Learning and Biased Group Impressions

Summary

Impression formation about social groups relies on the sampling and integration of group-related information from the environment and from memory. As a consequence, biased group impressions may arise from increased prevalence of certain kinds of social information in the world, from differential retrieval of social information from memory, and from an uncritical use of environmental or stored information in the judgment process of the “naïve intuitive statistician.” The present chapter reframes well-known judgment biases in group impression formation, such as illusory correlations and spurious correlations, as sampling phenomena. In particular, it is argued that group-related probabilistic information is extracted quite accurately from the environment and that unwarranted inferences on the basis of correctly learned proportions and correlations can cause systematic judgment biases. Whereas traditional explanations of biased group impressions focus on distorted retrieval or simplistic representation of the co-occurrence of group membership with positive or negative behaviors, the theoretical perspective of pseudo-contingencies (Fiedler, 2000) implies that erroneous impressions may reflect inferences from true frequency relations and from true covariations in complex social scenarios. The present chapter reviews empirical evidence for the pseudo-contingency account from previous studies on biased group impression formation, and it presents two new experiments that test specific predictions of the novel account. The final section addresses the question of whether pseudo-contingencies merely mirror a metacognitive deficit in inductive inference or whether they result from a rational decision strategy.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548–564
Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197–215
Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C.-L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480–500
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754
Fiedler, K. (1991). The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: An information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 24–36
Fiedler, K. (1996). Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103, 193–214
Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676
Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Nickel, S. (2003). Inductive reasoning and judgment interference: Experiments on Simpson's paradox. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 14–27
Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Stryczek, E. (2002). Playing mating games in foreign cultures: A conceptual framework and an experimental paradigm for inductive trivariate inference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 14–30
Hamilton, D. L. (1981). Illusory correlation as a basis for stereotyping. In Hamilton, D. L. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and inter-group behavior (pp. 115–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407
Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28
Kareev, Y. (1995). Positive bias in the perception of covariation. Psychological Review, 102, 490–502
Kareev, Y., Lieberman, I., & Lev, M. (1997). Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 278–287
Klauer, K. C., & Meiser, T. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1074–1093
Klauer, K. C., Wegener, I., & Ehrenberg, K. (2002). Perceiving minority members as individuals: The effects of relative group size in social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 223–245
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & DeLeonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437–458
McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Illusory correlation in the perception of groups: An extension of the distinctiveness-based account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 414–429
McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1993). Illusory correlation as accentuation of actual intercategory difference: Evidence for the effect with minimal stimulus information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 391–410
Meiser, T. (2003). Effects of processing strategy on episodic memory and contingency learning in group stereotype formation. Social Cognition, 21, 121–156
Meiser, T. (2005). A hierarchy of multinomial models for multidimensional source monitoring. Methodology, 1, 2–17
Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116–137
Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization effects on the formation of illusory correlations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 443–466
Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: The role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 599–614
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Shavitt, S., & Gibson, B. D. (1994). Salience, set size, and illusory correlation: Making moderate assumptions about extreme targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1020–1033
Schaller, M. (1994). The role of statistical reasoning in the formation, preservation and prevention of group stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 47–61
Schaller, M., Boyd, C., Yohannes, J., & O'Brien, M. (1995). The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 544–555
Schaller, M., & O'Brien, M. (1992). “Intuitive analysis of covariance” and group stereotype formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 776–785
Smith, E. R. (1991). Illusory correlation in a simulated exemplar-based memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 107–123
Spellman, B. A., Price, C. M., & Logan, J. M. (2001). How two causes are different from one: The use of (un)conditional information in Simpson's Paradox. Memory & Cognition, 29, 193–208
Stroessner, S. J., & Plaks, J. E. (2001). Illusory correlation and stereotype formation: Tracing the arc of research over a quarter century. In Moskowitz, G. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 247–259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–97
van Knippenberg, A., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Social categorization and stereotyping: A functional perspective. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 105–144). Chichester, UK: Wiley
Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort. Cognition, 82, 27–58