Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: August 2010

46 - Intrauterine Insemination

from PART III - ASSISTED REPRODUCTION

Summary

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is one of the most commonly performed treatments for infertile or hypofertile couples. General indications for IUI include cervical factor infertility, male infertility, minimal to mild endometriosis, and unexplained infertility. Age of the female, duration of infertility, follicular count, presence of trilaminar endometrium, sperm count and morphology are the various parameters which determines the outcome of IUI. The choice of IUI versus other forms of artificial insemination, the use of natural cycles versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), timing of insemination, the number of IUI cycles to be carried, whether the couple will need single or double insemination, the type of catheter, and the choice of sperm preparation technique are the various options available to the couples. Contamination with viruses has also occurred during use of reproductive technologies. However, there is evidence that use of IUI with washed sperm may decrease the risk of contamination.
REFERENCES
Dickinson, RL. Artificial impregnation: essays in tubal insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1921;1:252–61.
Gerli, S, Gholami, H, Manna, C, Di Frega, AS, Vitiello, C, Unfer, V. Use of ethinyl estradiol to reverse the antiestrogenic effects of clomiphene citrate in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a comparative, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):85–9.
Nallella, KP, Sharma, RK, Aziz, N, Agarwal, A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):629–34.
Zhao, Y, Garcia, J, Jarow, JP, Wallach, EE. Successful management of infertility due to retrograde ejaculation using assisted reproductive technologies: a report of two cases. Arch Androl. 2004;50(6):391–4.
Shieh, JY, Chen, SU, Wang, YH, Chang, HC, Ho, HN, Yang, YS. A protocol of electroejaculation and systematic assisted reproductive technology achieved high efficiency and efficacy for pregnancy for anejaculatory men with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):535–40.
Ohl, DA, Wolf, LJ, Menge, AC, Christman, GM, Hurd, WW, Ansbacher, R, Smith, YR, Randolph, JF Jr. Electroejaculation and assisted reproductive technologies in the treatment of anejaculatory infertility. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(6):1249–55.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Fertility: assessment and treatment of people with fertility problems, Clinical guidelines No11. London: Abba Litho Ltd. UK, 2004.
Zimmerman, ER, Robertson, KR, Kim, H, Drobnis, EZ, Nakajima, ST. Semen preparation with the sperm select system versus a washing technique. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(2):269–75.
Goldberg, JM, Mascha, E, Falcone, T, Attaran, M. Comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor sperm: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(5):792–5.
Kaplan, PF, Katz, SL, Thompson, AK, Freund, RD. Cycle fecundity in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Influence of the number of mature follicles at hCG administration. J Reprod Med. 2002;47(7):535–9.
Perez-Medina, T, Bajo-Arenas, J, Salazar, F, Redondo, T, Sanfrutos, L, Alvarez, P, Engels, V. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(6):1632–5.
Stone, BA, Vargyas, JM, Ringler, GE, Stein, AL, Marrs, RP. Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(6 Pt. 1):1522–34.
Mathieu, C, Ecochard, R, Bied, V, Lornage, J, Czyba, JC. Cumulative conception rate following intrauterine artificial insemination with husband's spermatozoa: influence of husband's age. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(5):1090–7.
Brzechffa, PR, Buyalos, RP. Female and male partner age and menotrophin requirements influence pregnancy rates with human menopausal gonadotrophin therapy in combination with intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(1):29–33.
Nuojua-Huttunen, S, Tomas, C, Bloigu, R, Tuomivaara, L, Martikainen, H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):698–703.
Steures, P, Steeg, JW, Mol, BW, Eijkemans, MJ, Veen, F, Habbema, JD, Hompes, PG, Bossuyt, PM, Verhoeve, HR, Kasteren, YM, Dop, PA; CECERM (Collaborative Effort in Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive Medicine). Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):45–51.
Iberico, G, Vioque, J, Ariza, N, Lozano, JM, Roca, M, Llacer, J, Bernabeu, R. Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1308–13.
Khalil, MR, Rasmussen, PE, Erb, K, Laursen, SB, Rex, S, Westergaard, LG. Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 1131 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(4):342–8.
Rizk, B. Clinical guidelines for treatment of selected cases of endometriosis by ART or surgery. American Society For Reproductive Medicine, 60th Annual Meeting, Postgraduate Course, Endometriosis Treatment: Medical, Surgical and Assisted Reproductive Technology. ASRM Postgraduate course syllabus. October 16, 2004.
Werbrouck, E, Spiessens, C, Meuleman, C, D'Hooghe, T. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(3):566–71.
Sikandar, R, Virk, S, Lakhani, S, Sahab, H, Rizvi, J. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the treatment of subfertility. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15(12):782–5.
Tomlinson, MJ, Amissah-Arthur, JB, Thompson, KA, Kasraie, JL, Bentick, B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(9):1892–6.
Chang, MY, Chiang, CH, Hsieh, TT, Soong, YK, Hsu, KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(3):505–10.
Rumste, MM, Hartog, JE, Dumoulin, JC, Evers, JL, Land, JA. Is controlled ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination an acceptable therapy in couples with unexplained non-conception in the perspective of multiple pregnancies?Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):701–4. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
Valbuena, D, Simon, C, Romero, JL, Remohi, J, Pellicer, A. Factors responsible for multiple pregnancies after ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination with gonadotropins. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13(8):663–8.
Tur, R, Barri, PN, Coroleu, B, Buxaderas, R, Parera, N, Balasch, J. Use of a prediction model for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):116–21.
Olufowobi, O, Sharif, K, Papaioannou, S, Mohamed, H, Neelakantan, D, Afnan, M. Role of rescue IVF-ET treatment in the management of high response in stimulated IUI cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(2):166–8.
Dickey, RP, Pyrzak, R, Lu, PY, Taylor, SN, Rye, PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(4):684–9.
Westerlaken, , Naaktgeboren, N, Helmerhorst, FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(6):359–64.
Campana, A, Sakkas, D, Stalberg, A, Bianchi, PG, Comte, I, Pache, T, Walker, D. Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(4):732–6.
Miller, DC, Hollenbeck, BK, Smith, GD, Randolph, JF, Christman, GM, Smith, YR, Lebovic, DI, Ohl, DA. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology. 2002;60(3):497–501.
Voorhis, BJ, Barnett, M, Sparks, AE, Syrop, CH, Rosenthal, G, Dawson, J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(4):661–8.
Weert, JM, Repping, S, Voorhis, BJ, Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM, Mol, BW. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):612–20.
Yalti, S, Gurbuz, B, Sezer, H, Celik, S. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Arch Androl. 2004;50(4):239–46.
Shulman, A, Hauser, R, Lipitz, S, Frenkel, Y, Dor, J, Bider, D, Mashiach, S, Yogev, L, Yavetz, H. Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(6):381–5.
Pasqualotto, EB, Daitch, JA, Hendin, BN, Falcone, T, Thomas, AJ Jr., Nelson, DR, Agarwal, A. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16(9):476–82.
Burr, RW, Siegberg, R, Flaherty, SP, Wang, XJ, Matthews, CD. The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(1):127–32.
Spiessens, C, Vanderschueren, D, Meuleman, C, D'Hooghe, T. Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(5):1185–9.
Shibahara, H, Obara, H, Ayustawati, Hirano Y, Suzuki, T, Ohno, A, Takamizawa, S, Suzuki, M. Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility. Int J Androl. 2004;27(2):63–8.
Grigoriou, O, Pantos, K, Makrakis, E, Hassiakos, D, Konidaris, S, Creatsas, G. Impact of isolated teratozoospermia on the outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):773–5.
Cohlen, BJ, Vandekerckhove, P, te Velde, ER, Habbema, JD. Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000360. Review.
Verhulst, SM, Cohlen, BJ, Hughes, E, Te Velde, E, Heineman, MJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD001838.
Zeyneloglu, HB, Arici, A, Olive, DL, Duleba, AJ. Comparison of intrauterine insemination with timed intercourse in superovulated cycles with gonadotropins: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(3):486–91.
Marcus, SF. Intrauterine insemination. In (Brinsden, PR Ed.), Textbook of In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction. Chapter 13. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 2005; pp. 259–69.
Noci, I, Dabizzi, S, Evangelisti, P, Cozzi, C, Cameron Smith, M, Criscuoli, L, Fuzzi, B, Branconi, F. Evaluation of clinical efficacy of three different insemination techniques in couple infertility. A randomized study. Minerva Ginecol. 2007;59(1):11–18.
Tiemessen, CH, Bots, RS, Peeters, MF, Evers, JL. Direct intraperitoneal insemination compared to intrauterine insemination in superovulated cycles: a randomized cross-over study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1997;44(3):149–52.
Sills, ES, Palermo, GD. Intrauterine pregnancy following low-dose gonadotropin ovulation induction and direct intraperitoneal insemination for severe cervical stenosis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2002; Nov. 26;2(1):9.
Flierman, PA, Hogerzeil, HV, Hemrika, DJ. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(9):1945–8.
Carroll, N, Palmer, JR. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(4):656–60.
Patton, PE, Burry, KA, Thurmond, A, Novy, MJ, Wolf, DP. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(3):559–64.
Hurd, WW, Randolph, JF Jr., Ansbacher, R, Menge, AC, Ohl, DA, Brown, AN. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(2):339–42.
Rizk, B, Lenton, W, Vere, M, Martin, R, Latarche, E. Superovulation and intrauterine insemination in couples with azoospermia after failed intracervical insemination. 7th World Congress on In vitro Fertilization and Assisted Procreation, Paris, June 1991. Hum Reprod, Abstract book, p. 171–2.
Guzick, DS, Carson, SA, Coutifaris, C, Overstreet, JW, Factor- Litvak, P, Steinkampf, MP, Hill, JA, Mastroianni, L, Buster, JE, Nakajima, ST, Vogel, DL, Canfield, RE. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med. 1999; Jan. 21;340(3):177–83.
Trout, SW, Kemmann, E. Fallopian sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial and metaanalysis of the literature. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):881–5.
Fanchin, R, Olivennes, F, Righini, C, Hazout, A, Schwab, B, Frydman, R. A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(3):505–10.
Kahn, JA, Sunde, A, Koskemies, A, During, V, Sordal, T, Christensen, F, Molne, K. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(6):890–4.
Ricci, G, Nucera, G, Pozzobon, C, Boscolo, R, Giolo, E, Guaschino, S. A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(6):1242–8.
Cantineau, AE, Cohlen, BJ, Al-Inany, H, Heineman, MJ. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3): CD001502. Review.
Nuojua-Huttunen, S, Tuomivaara, L, Juntunen, K, Tomas, C, Martikainen, H. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):939–42.
Mamas, L. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):735–40.
Nulsen, JC, Walsh, S, Dumez, S, Metzger, DA. A randomized and longitudinal study of human menopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(5):780–6.
Chaffkin, LM, Nulsen, JC, Luciano, AA, Metzger, DA. A comparative analysis of the cycle fecundity rates associated with combined human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus either hMG or IUI alone. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(2):252–7.
Cohlen, BJ, te Velde, ER, Kooij, RJ, Looman, CW, Habbema, JD. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1553–8.
Martinez, AR, Bernardus, RE, Voorhorst, FJ, Vermeiden, JP, Schoemaker, J. Intrauterine insemination does and clomiphene citrate does not improve fecundity in couples with infertility due to male or idiopathic factors: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(5):847–53.
Arcaini, L, Bianchi, S, Baglioni, A, Marchini, M, Tozzi, L, Fedele, L. Superovulation and intrauterine insemination vs. superovulation alone in the treatment of unexplained infertility. A randomized study. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(8):614–18.
Mahani, IM, Afnan, M. The pregnancy rates with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in superovulated cycles employing different protocols (clomiphene citrate (CC), human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and HMG + CC) and in natural ovulatory cycle. J Pak Med Assoc. 2004;54(10):503–5.
Demirol, A, Gurgan, T. Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):97–100. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
Dankert, T, Kremer, JA, Cohlen, BJ, Hamilton, CJ, Pasker-de Jong, PC, Straatman, H, Dop, PA. A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):792–7. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
Baysoy, A, Serdaroglu, H, Jamal, H, Karatekeli, E, Ozornek, H, Attar, E. Letrozole versus human menopausal gonadotrophin in women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(2):208–12.
Jee, BC, Ku, SY, Suh, CS, Kim, KC, Lee, WD, Kim, SH. Use of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate combined with gonadotropins in intrauterine insemination cycles: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(6):1774–7. Epub 2006 May 4.
Rizk, B. Epidemiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: iatrogenic and spontaneous. In Rizk, B (Ed.), Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Chapter 2. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006; pp. 10–42.
Mitwally, MF, Biljan, MM, Casper, RF. Pregnancy outcome after the use of an aromatase inhibitor for ovarian stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):381–6.
Casper, RF, Mitwally, MF. Review: aromatase inhibitors for ovulation induction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(3):760–71.
Dhaliwal, LK, Sialy, RK, Gopalan, S, Majumdar, S. Minimal stimulation protocol for use with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2000;45(3):232–5.
Crosignani, PG, Somigliana, E; Intrauterine Insemination Study Group. Effect of GnRH antagonists in FSH mildly stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles: a multicentre randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(2):500–5. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
Allegra, A, Marino, A, Coffaro, F, Scaglione, P, Sammartano, F, Rizza, G, Volpes, A. GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):101–18. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
Checa, MA, Prat, M, Robles, A, Carreras, R. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists to overcome the drawbacks of intrauterine insemination on weekends. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(3):573–7.
Matorras, R, Ramon, O, Exposito, A, Corcostegui, B, Ocerin, I, Gonzalez-Lopera, S, Rodriguez-Escudero, FJ. Gn-RH antagonists in intrauterine insemination: the weekend-free protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23(2):51–4. Epub 2006 Mar 22.
Rizk, B. Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In Rizk, B (Ed.), Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Cambridge: United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2006: chapter 7; 130–199.
Vermesh, M, Kletzky, OA, Davajan, V, Israel, R. Monitoring techniques to predict and detect ovulation. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(2):259–64.
Kosmas, IP, Tatsioni, A, Fatemi, HM, Kolibianakis, EM, Tournaye, H, Devroey, P. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration vs. luteinizing monitoring for intrauterine insemination timing, after administration of clomiphene citrate: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(3):607–12. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
Alborzi, S, Motazedian, S, Parsanezhad, ME, Jannati, S. Comparison of the effectiveness of single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI per cycle in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):595–9.
Cantineau, AE, Heineman, MJ, Cohlen, BJ. Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003854. Review.
Ng, EH, Makkar, G, Yeung, WS, Ho, PC. A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands semen. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(7):542–6.
Liu, W, Gong, F, Luo, K, Lu, G. Comparing the pregnancy rates of one versus two intrauterine inseminations (IUIs) in male factor and idiopathic infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23(2):75–9. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
Ragni, G, Maggioni, P, Guermandi, E, Testa, A, Baroni, E, Colombo, M, Crosignani, PG. Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(4):619–22.
Casadei, L, Zamaro, V, Calcagni, M, Ticconi, C, Dorrucci, M, Piccione, E. Homologous intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a comparison among three different regimens. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;129(2):155–61. Epub 2006 May 9.
Huang, FJ, Chang, SY, Chang, JC, Kung, FT, Wu, JF, Tsai, MY. Timed intercourse after intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;80(2):257–61.
Crosignani, PG, Somigliana, E, Colombo, M et al. The current role of intrauterine insemination for the treatment of male factor and unexplained infertility. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2005;10:29–42.
Dickey, RP, Taylor, SN, Lu, PY, Sartor, BM, Rye, PH, Pyrzak, R. Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(5):1088–95.
Aboulghar, M, Mansour, R, Serour, G, Abdrazek, A, Amin, Y, Rhodes, C. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of unexplained infertility should be limited to a maximum of three trials. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(1):88–91.
Vermeylen, AM, D'Hooghe, T, Debrock, S, Meeuwis, L, Meuleman, C, Spiessens, C. The type of catheter has no impact on the pregnancy rate after intrauterine insemination: a randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(9):2364–7. Epub 2006 May 16.
Fancsovits, P, Toth, L, Murber, A, Szendei, G, Papp, Z, Urbancsek, J. Catheter type does not affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):699–704.
Miller, PB, Acres, ML, Proctor, JG, Higdon, HL 3rd, Boone, WR. Flexible versus rigid intrauterine insemination catheters: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(5):1544–6.
Boomsma, CM, Heineman, MJ, Cohlen, BJ, Farquhar, C. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD004507. Review.
Carrell, DT, Kuneck, PH, Peterson, CM, Hatasaka, HH, Jones, KP, Campbell, BF. A randomized, prospective analysis of five sperm preparation techniques before intrauterine insemination of husband sperm. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(1):122–6.
Dodson, WC, Moessner, J, Miller, J, Legro, RS, Gnatuk, CL. A randomized comparison of the methods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(3):574–5.
Duran, HE, Morshedi, M, Kruger, T, Oehninger, S. Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(4):373–84.
Henkel, RR, Schill, WB. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:108. Review.
Fountain, S, Rizk, B, Palmer, C, Wada, I, Macnamee, M, Blayney, M, Brinsden, P, Smith, SK. A prospective randomized controlled trial of pentoxifylline in severe male factor infertility and previous failure of in vitro fertilization. The 49th Annual Meeting of the AFS, Montreal, Canada, October 1993. Fertil Steril, ProgramSupplement, 1993, S17–18.
Brown, SE, Toner, JP, Schnorr, JA, Williams, SC, Gibbons, WE, Ziegler, D, Oehninger, S. Vaginal misoprostol enhances intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:96–101.
Toner, J, Ziegler, D, Brown, S, Gibbons, WE, Oehninger, S, Schnorr, JA, Williams, SC. High rates of cramping with misoprotol administration for intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1051.
Vandekerckhove, P, Lilford, R, Vail, A, Hughes, E. Kinin enhancing drugs for unexplained subfertility in men (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
Grigoriou, O, Makrakis, E, Konidaris, S, Hassiakos, D, Papadias, K, Baka, S, Creatsas, G. Effect of sperm treatment with exogenous platelet-activating factor on the outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):618–21.
Roudebush, WE, Toledo, AA, Kort, HI, Mitchell-Leef, D, Elsner, CW, Massey, JB. Platelet-activating factor significantly enhances intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates in non-male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):52–6. Erratum in: Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):768.
Al-Ramahi, M, Leader, A, Leveille, MC. An allergic reaction following intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(12):3368–70.
Nuojua-Huttunen, S, Gissler, M, Martikainen, H, Tuomivaara, L. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies after intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(8):2110–15.
Wang, JX, Norman, RJ, Kristiansson, P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(4):945–9.
Dickey, RP, Taylor, SN, Lu, PY, Sartor, BM, Rye, PH, Pyrzak, R. Relationship of follicle numbers and estradiol levels to multiple implantation in 3,608 intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(1):69–78.
Rizk, B, Dickey, RP. In: Dickey, RP, Brinsden, PR, Pryzak, R (Eds.), Intrauterine insemination. Cambridge: United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2009, in press.
Rizk, B, Dill, SR. Counseling HIV patients pursuing infertility investigation and treatment. Hum Reprod 1997;12(3):415–16.
Englert, Y, Lesage, B, Vooren, JP, Liesnard, C, Place, I, Vannin, AS, Emiliani, S, Delbaere, A. Medically assisted reproduction in the presence of chronic viral diseases. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(2):149–62. Review.
Kim, LU, Johnson, MR, Barton, S, Nelson, MR, Sontag, G, Smith, JR, Gotch, FM, Gilmour, JW. Evaluation of sperm washing as a potential method of reducing HIV transmission in HIV-discordant couples wishing to have children. AIDS. 1999;13(6):645–51.
Sauer, MV. Sperm washing techniques address the fertility needs of HIV-seropositive men: a clinical review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(1):135–40. Review.
Kato, S, Hanabusa, H, Kaneko, S, Takakuwa, K, Suzuki, M, Kuji, N, Jinno, M, Tanaka, R, Kojima, K, Iwashita, M, Yoshimura, Y, Tanaka, K. Complete removal of HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA from semen by the swim-up method: assisted reproduction technique using spermatozoa free from HIV-1. AIDS. 2006;20(7):967–73.
Garrido, N, Meseguer, M, Remohí, J, Simón, C, Pellicer, A. Semen characteristics in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and hepatitis C (HCV)-seropositive males: predictors of the success of viral removal after sperm washing. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(4):1028–34.
Savasi, V, Ferrazzi, E, Lanzani, C, Oneta, M, Parrilla, B, Persico, T. Safety of sperm washing and ART outcome in 741 HIV-1- serodiscordant couples. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):772–7.
Semprini, AE, Fiore, S. HIV and reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16(3):257–62.
Nicopoullos, JD, Almeida, PA, Ramsay, JW, Gilling-Smith, C. The effect of human immunodeficiency virus on sperm parameters and the outcome of intrauterine insemination following sperm washing. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2289–97. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
Ohl, J, Partisani, M, Wittemer, C, Schmitt, MP, Cranz, C, Stoll-Keller, F, Rongieres, C, Bettahar-Lebugle, K, Lang, JM, Nisand, I. Assisted reproduction techniques for HIV serodiscordant couples: 18 months of experience. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(6):1244–9.