Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: May 2015

14 - Inference generation during online study and multimedia learning

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 2561.
Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–81.
Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1459–68.
Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–70.
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–79.
Aleven, V., Koedinger, K. R., Sinclair, H. C., & Snyder, J. (1998). Combatting shallow learning in a tutor for geometry problem solving. In Goettl, B. P., Halff, H. M., Redfield, C. L., & Shute, V. J. (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Fourth International Conference, ITS ‘98. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1452 (pp. 364–73). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Amadieu, F., Mariné, C., & Laimay, C. (2011). The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 3640.
Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a nonlinear electronic document: disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 381–8.
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167207.
Bartholomé, T., & Bromme, R. (2009). Coherence formation when learning from text and pictures: what kind of support for whom? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 282–93.
Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Bruchmüller, K., & Hacker, S. (2005). Supporting learning with interactive multimedia through active integration of representations. Instructional Science, 33, 73–5.
Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 325–41.
Bogacz, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2005). Understanding dynamic and static displays: using images to reason dynamically. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(4), 312–9.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning & Instruction, 21(2), 180–92.
Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182–97.
Butcher, K. R. (2010). How diagram interaction supports learning: evidence from think alouds during intelligent tutoring. In Goel, A., Jamnik, M., & Narayanan, N. H. (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6170 (pp. 295–7). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Butcher, K. R. (in press). The multimedia principle. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.
Butcher, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2008). Diagram interaction during intelligent tutoring in geometry: support for knowledge retention and deep understanding. In Love, B. C., McRae, K., & Sloutsky, V. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1736–41). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Butcher, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2010). Learning during intelligent tutoring: when do integrated visual-verbal representations improve student outcomes? In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2888–93). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Butcher, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2013). Using student interactions to foster rule-diagram mapping during problem solving in an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 9881009.
Butcher, K. R., Bhushan, S., & Sumner, T. (2006). Multimedia displays for conceptual search processes: information seeking with strand maps. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 11(3), 236–48.
Butcher, K. R., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). How Can Diagrams Scaffold Text Comprehension? Paper presented at the EARLI SIG2 Conference, August 30–September 1, 2006, Nottingham, UK.
Butcher, K. R., & Davies, S. (in preparation). Cognitive processes during diagram interaction in an intelligent tutoring system.
Butcher, K. R., & Kintsch, W. (2012). Text comprehension and discourse processing. In Healy, A. F. & Proctor, R. W. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. IV: Experimental Psychology (2nd. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Butcher, K. R., & Sumner, T. (2011). Self-directed learning and the sensemaking paradox. Human Computer Interaction, 26(1), 123–59.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–82.
Cook, A. E., Limber, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (2001). Situation-based context and the availability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 220–34.
Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In Helander, M., Landauer, T. K., & Prabhu, P. (eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.) (pp. 849–74). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Corbett, A. T., McLaughlin, M., & Scarpinatto, K. C. (2000). Modeling student knowledge: cognitive tutors in high school and college. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 10(2/3), 81108.
Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428–34.
Cromley, J. G., Bergey, B. W., Fitzhugh, S., Newcombe, N., Wills, T. W., Shipley, T. F., & Tanaka, J. C. (2013). Effects of three diagram instruction methods on transfer of diagram comprehension skills: the critical role of inference while learning. Learning and Instruction, 26(0), 4558.
Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 5974.
Davies, S., Butcher, K. R., & Stevens, C. (2013). Self-regulated learning with graphical overviews: when spatial information detracts from learning. In Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N., & Wachsmuth, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2136–41). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
De Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on knowledge acquisition in hypertext. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 219–31.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 731746.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–40.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010a). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 111–22.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010b). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55(2), 681–91.
Evans, C., & Gibbons, N. J. (2007). The interactivity effect in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1147–60.
Ferrara, L., & Butcher, K. (2011). Visualizing feedback: using graphical cues to promote self-regulated learning. In Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., & Shipley, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
Florax, M., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and spatial proximity. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 216–24.
Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–31.
Graham, L., & Metaxas, P. T. (2003). Of course it's true; I saw it on the Internet! Communications of the ACM, 46(5), 71–5.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325–60.
Heiser, J., & Tversky, B. (2006). Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 581–92.
Jamet, E. (2014). An eye-tracking study of cueing effects in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32(0), 4753.
Jamet, E., Gavota, M., & Quaireau, C. (2008). Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 135–45.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–91.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 117.
Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3(2), 87108.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–82.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Klin, C. M., Guzmán, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (1999). Prevalence and persistence of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 593604.
Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 3043.
Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(11),
Lea, R. B. (1995). Online evidence for elaborative logical inferences in text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1469–82.
Levin, J. R., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In Britton, B. K., Woodward, A., & Binkley, M. (eds.), Learning from Textbooks: Theory and Practice (pp. 95114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning & Instruction, 13, 177–89.
Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225–44.
Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157–76.
Lynch, C. (2008). Digital libraries, learning communities, and open education. In Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, M. S. V. (eds.), Opening Up Education (pp. 105–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95109.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 240–46.
Mayer, R. E. (1993). Illustrations that instruct. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol. V, pp. 253–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 119.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–52.
Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 6473.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–26.
Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bowers, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 3143.
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2009). The use of adjunct displays to facilitate comprehension of causal relationships in expository text. Instructional Science, 37(1), 6586.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–66.
Myers, J. L., Cook, A. E., Kambe, G., Mason, R. A., & O'Brien, E. J. (2000). Semantic and episodic effects on bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 179–99.
Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 488–96.
Ozcelik, E., & Acarturk, C. (2011). Reducing the spatial distance between printed and online information sources by means of mobile technology enhances learning: using 2D barcodes. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2077–85.
Ozcelik, E., Arslan-Ari, I., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 110–17.
Ozcelik, E., Karakus, T., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). An eye-tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 53(2), 445–53.
Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In van Oostendorp, H. & Goldman, S. (eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading (pp. 99122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 129.
Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-based Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Salmerón, L., Baccino, T., Cañas, J. J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I. (2009). Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53(4), 1308–19.
Salmerón, L., Cañas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 171–91.
Salmerón, L., Gil, L., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). Comprehension effects of signalling relationships between documents in search engines. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 419–26.
Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J. J. (2006). Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Information Design Journal, 14(1), 4555.
Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Extending multimedia research: how do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(0), 7384.
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100–10.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning & Instruction, 13(2), 141–56.
Schnotz, W., & Heiß, A. (2009). Semantic scaffolds in hypermedia learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 371–80.
Schüler, A., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2013). Is spoken text always better? Investigating the modality and redundancy effect with longer text presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 15901601.
Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1227–43.
Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning & Instruction, 13, 227–37.
Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 539–48.
Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733–43.
Tibus, M., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2013). Do films make you learn? Inference processes in expository film comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 329–40.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, G., & Gilabert, R. (2000). Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 107–16.
Wiley, J., & Myers, J. L. (2003). Availability and accessibility of information and causal inferences from scientific text. Discourse Processes, 36(2), 109–29.
Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467502.