Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2009

16 - The European Union dimension: Supranational integration, free movement of persons, and immigration politics

Summary

Introduction

European integration (the transfer of policy-making authority from national governments to Brussels) presents a dilemma for national immigration authorities. The walls and borders that divided east and west have slowly crumbled and the lines between insiders and outsiders are increasingly blurred. The European Union (EU) has expanded its membership, and will eventually allow 500 million persons to move freely across its national borders. With little or no coordination on security and immigration issues, Europe will experience an unprecedented challenge. Can nation-states construct free-trade zones – allowing free movement of persons, services, and goods – without common immigration policies? Or is a common immigration policy the inevitable product of the functioning of regional economic cooperation, despite the national pressure to maintain domestic control over this sensitive issue?

There is a third option. Europe's states could try to avoid the explicit construction of strong common immigration policies – and such policies might not be strictly inevitable in functional terms – but they might come about through unintended institutional processes. Looking at the history of European integration, one sees that in other policy areas (such as gender equality or environmental protection), Member State governments did not originally anticipate the degree to which the EU's central institutions (the European Commission, Court of Justice, and Parliament) would eventually gain policy-making authority as the EU evolved (Stone Sweet and Sandholtz 1998; Stone Sweet and Caporaso 1998; Cichowski 1998; Stone Sweet 2000; Stone Sweet et al. 2001).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Cichowski, Rachel A. 1998Integrating the Environment: The European Court and the Construction of Supranational Policy.Journal of European Public Policy 5(3): 387–405.
European Commission 1985 “Council Resolution of 16 July 1985 on Guidelines for a Community Policy on Migration.” COM (85) 48. Brussels: European Commission, March 7
European Commission 2000 “A Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a Community Immigration Policy.” COM(2000) 757 final. Brussels: European Commission, November 22. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2000-com2000_0755en01.pdf
European Council 1999 “Presidency Conclusions: Tampere European Council, 15 and 16 October.” Brussels: European Council. www.parliament.cy/parliamentgr/101/conclusion_tampere.pdf
European Council 2002 “Draft Council Directive Concerning the Status of Third-Country Nationals who are Long-Term Residents.” Interinstitutional File: 2001/0074 (CNS), Working Party on Migration and Expulsion. Brussels: European Council
European Parliament 2001 “Movement and Residence of EU Citizens. A5-0207/2000.” Official Journal of the European Communities 44(May 7): 189–93. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/c_135/c_13520010507en01890193.pdf
Garrett, Geoffrey R., Kelemen, Daniel and Schulz, Heiner 1998The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union.International Organization 52(1) (Winter): 149–76.
Geddes, Andrew 2000 Immigration and European Integration: Towards Fortress Europe?Manchester: Manchester University Press
Givens, Terri G. 2002 “The Role of Socioeconomic Variables in the Success of Radical Right Parties.” Chapter 7 in Shadows over Europe: The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe, Schain, Martin, Zolberg, Aristide R. and Hossay, Patrick (eds). New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 137–58
Givens, Terri and Luedtke, Adam 2004The Politics of European Union Immigration Policy: Institutions, Salience, and Harmonization.Policy Studies Journal 32(1) (February): 145–65.
Givens, Terri and Luedtke, Adam 2005European Immigration Policies in Comparative Perspective: Issue Salience, Partisanship and Immigrant Rights.Comparative European Politics 3: 1–22.
Guild, Elspeth 1998Competence, Discretion and Third Country Nationals: The European Union's Legal Struggle with Migration.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 24(4) (October): 613–25.
Guiraudon, Virginie 1998Third Country Nationals and European Law: Obstacles to Rights’ Expansion.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 24(4) (October): 657–74.
Guiraudon, Virginie 2000European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-making as Venue Shopping.Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2): 251–71.
Guiraudon, Virginie and Lahav, Gallya 2000A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate: The Case of Migration Control.Comparative Political Studies 33(2) (March): 163–95.
Hailbronner, Kay and Polakiewicz, Jörg 1992Non-EC Nationals in the European Community: The Need for a Coordinated Approach.Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 3(1): 49–88.
Hix, Simon 1995 “The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the Future of the Third Pillar.” Briefing Paper No 20. Brussels: Churches’ Commission for Migrants in Europe
Hix, Simon and Jan Niessen 1997 “Reconsidering European Migration Policies: The 1996 IGC and the Reform of the Maastricht Treaty.” Brussels: Migration Policy Group
Hooghe, Liesbet 2001 The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association. 2003 “ILPA Response to Proposed EC Directive on the Status of Third Country Nationals Long-Term Residence.” London: ILPA. www.ilpa.org.uk/submissions/residents.html
Joppke, Christian 2000 Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Luedtke, Adam 2005European Integration, Public Opinion and Immigration Policy: Testing the Impact of National Identity.European Union Politics 6(1): 83–112.
Mattli, Walter and Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1998Revisiting the European Court of Justice.International Organization 52(1) (Winter): 177–209.
Monar, Jörg 1998Justice and Home Affairs.Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (Annual): 121–37.
Moravcsik, Andrew 1998 The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Papademetriou, Demetrios 1996 Coming Together or Pulling Apart? The European Union's Struggle with Immigration and Asylum. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Pollack, Mark A. 1998 “The Engines of Integration? Supranational Autonomy and Influence in the European Union,” in European Integration and Supranational Governace, Sandholtz, Wayne and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–49
Schain, Martin, Zolberg, Aristide R. and Patrick Hossay 2002 “The Development of Radical Right Parties in Western Europe.” Chapter 1 in Shadows Over Europe: The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe, 1st edn, Schain, Martin, Zolberg, Aristide R., and Hossay, Patrick (eds). London: Palgrave Macmillan
Sniderman, Paul M., Peri, Pierangelo, RuiFigueiredo, J. P. Jr., and Piazza, Thomas 2002 The Outsider: Prejudice and Politics in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Statewatch 2003 “Statewatch Comments for House of Lords Select Committee on the European Union Proposed Directive on Long-Term Residents.” London: Statewatch
Stone Sweet, Alec 2000 Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Stone Sweet, Alec and Caporaso, James A. 1998From Free Trade to Supranational Polity: The European Court and Integration.” Chapter 3 in European Integration and Supranational Governance, Wayne Sandholt, and Alec Stone Sweet (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92–133.
Stone Sweet, Alec and Wayne Sandholtz 1998 “Integration, Supranational Governance and the Institutionalization of the European Polity.” Chapter 1 in European Integration and Supranational Governance, Sandholtz, Wayne and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–26
Stone Sweet, Alec, Neil Fligstein and Wayne Sandholtz 2001 “The Institutionalization of European Space.” Chapter 1 in The Institutionalization of Europe, Sweet, Alec Stone, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Fligstein, Neil (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Uçarer, Emek M. 2001From the Sidelines to Center Stage: Sidekick No More? The European Commission in Justice and Home Affairs.European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 5(5) (May 17) http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-005a.htm.
Weiler, J. H. H. 1993 “Thou Shalt Not Oppress a Stranger (Ex: 23:9): On the Judicial Protection of the Human Rights of Non-EC Nationals,” in Free Movement of Persons in Europe: Legal Problems and Experiences, Schermers, Henry G. (ed). Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 248–71
Weiler, J. H. H. 1994A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors.Comparative Political Studies 26 (January): 510–34.