Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:48:40.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Imitation: thoughts about theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Geoffrey Bird
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK
Cecilia Heyes
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Get access

Summary

Many behavioural features and psychological states can be transmitted between natural systems. A person or animal can acquire through observation of another a tendency to go to the same place, effect the same transformation of an object, perform the same body movements, make the same sounds, feel similar emotions or think similar thoughts. In our discussion of imitation we will focus on cases in which body movements are transmitted or ‘copied’ between model and observer, because these cases present a distinctive explanatory challenge.

The problem of producing a movement that matches one observed is made difficult due to the nature of the codes representing the observed and executed movements. The observer must formulate motor commands to match visual input. This is a special case of what has become known as the ‘correspondence problem’ (Alissandrakis et al., 2002; Nehaniv and Dautenhahn, 2001), and it is made particularly difficult when simple perceptual matching cannot be used to produce imitative movements, as in the following example. A tennis coach demonstrates a serve to a novice, which the novice then attempts to imitate. If the novice successfully imitates the coach's action the two actions will not ‘match’ from the novice's perspective. The novice will perceive the coach's actions as a whole body movement, in which the back arches and one arm moves in an overhead arc.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions
, pp. 23 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alissandrakis, A., Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2002). Imitation with ALICE: learning to imitate corresponding actions across dissimilar embodiments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Part A – Systems and Humans, 32(4), 482–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Maeda, F., Zaidel, E., Mazziotta, J. and Iacoboni, M. (2002). Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study. Experimental Brain Research, 144(1), 127–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bapi, R. S., Doya, K. and Harner, A. M. (2000). Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during Motor Sequence Learning. Experimental Brain Research, 132, 149–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, G. and Heyes, C. M. (2005). Effector-dependent learning by observation of a finger movement sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 262–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Bird, G., Osman, M., Saggerson, A. and Heyes, C. M. (2005). British Journal of Psychology, 96(3), 371–88.Google Scholar
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. and Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., Cramon, Matthes-von G. and Cramon, D. Y. (2003). Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychology, 17(2), 265–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. L. and Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G. and Umilta, C. (1998). Visuomotor priming. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. (1994). Pavlovian conditioning: laws of association. In N. J. Mackintosh, (ed.), Animal Learning and Cognition. San Diego: Academic Press, 15–43.CrossRef
Hall, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 24, 233–55.CrossRef
Heyes, C. M. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. M. (2005). Imitation by association. In Chater, N. and Hurley, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Imitation: from Cognitive Neuroscience to Social Science.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M., Bird, G., Johnson, H. L. and Haggard, P. (2005). Experience Modulates Automatic Imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 233–40.CrossRef
Heyes, C. M. and Foster, C. L. (2002). Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A – Human Experimental Psychology, 55(2), 593–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. M. and Ray, E. D. (2000). What is the significance of imitation in animals? In Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 29, 215–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakin, J. L. and Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, F., Kleiner-Fisman, G. and Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87(3), 1329–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcovitch, S. and Flanagan, J. R. (submitted). Effector-specific learning of hand target sequences. Experimental Brain Research.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. and Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn-infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54(3), 702–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. and Moore, M. K. (1994). Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 17(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. and Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6(3–4), 179–92.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2001). Like me? – Measures of correspondence and imitation. Cybernetics and Systems, 32(1–2), 11–51.Google Scholar
Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: a review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In Prinz, W. and Sanders, A. F. (eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 255–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, M., Bird, G. and Heyes, C. M. (2005) Action observation supports effector-dependent learning of finger movement sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 165(1), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rand, M. K., Hikosaka, O., Miyachi, S., Lu, X.Miyashita, K. (1998). Characteristics of a long-term procedural skill in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 118(3), 293–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strafella, A. P. and Paus, T. (2000). Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport, 11(10), 2289–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Human Perception and Performance, 26(6), 1746–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wohlschläger, A., Gattis, M. and Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences, 358, 501–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Imitation: thoughts about theories
    • By Geoffrey Bird, Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK, Cecilia Heyes, Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK
  • Edited by Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, University of Hertfordshire, Kerstin Dautenhahn, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book: Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489808.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Imitation: thoughts about theories
    • By Geoffrey Bird, Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK, Cecilia Heyes, Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK
  • Edited by Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, University of Hertfordshire, Kerstin Dautenhahn, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book: Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489808.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Imitation: thoughts about theories
    • By Geoffrey Bird, Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK, Cecilia Heyes, Department of Psychology and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK
  • Edited by Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, University of Hertfordshire, Kerstin Dautenhahn, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book: Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489808.003
Available formats
×