Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:26:51.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Assessment of Pelvic Abnormalities Prior to Assisted Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

By
Anusch Yazdani
Edited by
Gab Kovacs  and
Robert Norman
Gab Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Robert Norman
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Improve Preconception Health to Maximize IVF Success , pp. 51 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Abrao, M. S., Gonçalves, M. O. d. C., Dias, J. A., et al. (2007). Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Human Reproduction 22(12): 3092–3097.Google Scholar
Alcázar, J. L., Martinez-Astorquiza Corral, T., Orozco, R., et al. (2016). Three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography for the assessment of tubal patency in women with infertility: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 81(4): 289–295.Google Scholar
ASRM Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 103(6): e44–e50.Google Scholar
Bulletti, C., Panzini, I., Borini, A., et al. (2008). Pelvic factor infertility: diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1127(1): 73–82.Google Scholar
Chawla, I., Tripathi, S., Vohra, P., and Singh, P. (2014). To evaluate the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) for evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol India 64(3): 197–201.Google Scholar
Dun, E. C. and Nezhat, C. H. (2012). Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 39(4): 551–566.Google Scholar
Groszmann, Y. S. and Benacerraf, B. R. (2016). Complete evaluation of anatomy and morphology of the infertile patient in a single visit; the modern infertility pelvic ultrasound examination. Fertil Steril 105(6): 1381–1393.Google Scholar
Hrehorcak, M. and Nargund, G. (2011). “One-Stop” fertility assessment using advanced ultrasound technology. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 3(1): 8–12.Google Scholar
Luciano, D. E., Exacoustos, C., and Luciano, A. A. (2014). Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(6): 994–998.Google Scholar
Luttjeboer, F. Y., Verhoeve, H. R., van Dessel, H. J., et al. (2009). The value of medical history taking as risk indicator for tuboperitoneal pathology: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 116(5): 612–625.Google Scholar
NICE (2013). Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. Clinical Guideline [CG156] www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156Google Scholar
Nisenblat, V., Prentice, L., Bossuyt, P. M. M., et al. (2016). Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (7).Google Scholar
Padilla, L. A., Radosevich, D. M. and Milad, M. P. (2005). Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 88(1): 84–88.Google Scholar
Panchal, S. and Nagori, C. (2014). Imaging techniques for assessment of tubal status. J Hum Reprod Sci 7(1): 2–12.Google Scholar
Soliman, A. A., Shaalan, W., Abdel-Dayem, T., et al. (2015). Power Doppler flow mapping and four-dimensional ultrasound for evaluating tubal patency compared with laparoscopy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 195: 83–87.Google Scholar
Ubaldi, F., Wisanto, A., Camus, M., et al. (1998). The role of transvaginal ultrasonography In the direction of pelvic pathologies in the infertility workup. Human Reproduction 13(2): 330–333.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×