Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: March 2013

12 - Ethical issues

Summary

The discussion of ethics in scholarly publishing has become more common in recent years. One could argue that this is due to an increasing amount of unethical behavior by authors, who are under ever more pressure to publish often and in high-profile journals, and who may stretch or breach the boundaries of what is ethical in order to do so. One could also argue that the use of technology to create a manuscript makes it easier to copy and paste published texts, or to tweak the information shown in a figure. But at the same time, this technology makes instances of unethical conduct easier to find, because, for example, it is easy to compare two documents electronically, to open an electronic figure file to see how it was changed, or to search for text online to see if it has been copied from another source. So one could equally argue that authors are not more dishonest than they used to be, but that ethical issues are more easily, and therefore more frequently, found. More than likely, the apparent increase in cases of ethical misconduct is a combination of all of the above.

There is a spectrum of ethical issues, and some can be considered more serious than others, as will be clear throughout this chapter. They range from unintentional sloppiness, through intentional pushing of the boundaries and “researchers behaving badly,” to the kind of behavior that negates published research, destroys careers, and tarnishes the research enterprise.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Handbook of Journal Publishing
  • Online ISBN: 9781139107860
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107860
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
American Physiological Society, 2007, Ethics in figure preparation, Bethesda MD, American Physiological Society ()
Bates, Tamara, Anić, Ante, Marušić, Matko, and Marušić, Ana, 2004, Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms, Journal of the American Medical Association 292: 86–8 ()
Campbell, Eric G, and Zinner, Darren E, 2010, Disclosing industry relationships – toward an improved research policy, New England Journal of Medicine 12: 604–6 ()
Cromey, Douglas W, 2010, Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images, Science and Engineering Ethics 16: 639–67 ()
Davis, Phil, 2010, Controversial math journal relaunches: new editors, focus on rigorous review, Scholarly Kitchen, March ()
Drazen, Jeffrey M, de Leeuw, Peter W, Laine, Christine, Mulrow, Cynthia, DeAngelis, Catherine D, Frizelle, Frank A, Godlee, Fiona, Haug, Charlotte, Hébert, Paul C, James, Astrid, Kotzin, Sheldon, Marušić, Ana, Reyes, Humberto, Rosenberg, Jacob, Sahni, Peush, Van der Weyden, Martin B, and Zhaori, Getu, 2010, Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form, Journal of the American Medical Association 304: 212–13 ()
Drazen, Jeffrey M, Van der Weyden, Martin B, Sahni, Peush, Rosenberg, Jacob, Marušić, Ana, Laine, Christine, Kotzin, Sheldon, Horton, Richard, Hébert, Paul C, Haug, Charlotte, Godlee, Fiona, Frizelle, Frank A, de Leeuw, Peter W, and DeAngelis, Catherine D, 2009, Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals, New England Journal of Medicine 362: 1896–7 ()
Register, Federal, 2005, Case summary – Eric T Poehlman, Federal Register 70: 15092–5 ()
Fontanarosa, Phil B, Flanagin, Annette, and DeAngelis, Catherine D, 2010, Implementation of the ICMJE form for reporting potential conflicts of interest, Journal of the American Medical Association 304: 1496 ()
Frank, Martin, 2011, We must do better!, Physiologist 54: 43–5 ()
Gallagher, Richard, 2009, For shame, Merck and Elsevier: everyone makes mistakes – it’s how you handle them that matters, The Scientist 23: 13 ()
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2010, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, updated 2010 ()
Kennedy, Donald, 2006, Editorial retraction, Science 311: 335 ()
Kintisch, Eli, 2005, Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers, Science 307: 1851 ()
McVeigh, Marie, 2003, Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports, Thomson Reuters ()
Okike, Kanu, Kocher, Mininder S, Wei, Erin X, Mehlman, Charles T, and Bhandari, Mohit, 2009, Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians, New England Journal of Medicine 361: 1466–74 ()
Rennie, Drummond, Yank, Veronica, and Emanuel, Linda, 1997, When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable, Journal of the American Medical Association, 278: 579–85 ()
Rochon, Paula A, Bero, Lisa A, Bay, Ari M, Gold, Jennifer L, Dergal, Julie M, Binns, Malcolm A, Streiner, David L, and Gurwitz, Jerry H, 2002, Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals, Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 2853–6 ()
Rochon, Paula A, Gurwitz, Jerry H, Cheung, C Mark, Hayes, Jason A, and Chalmers, Thomas C, 1994, Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal, Journal of the American Medical Association 272: 108–12 ()
Rockey, Sally J, and Collins, Francis S, 2010, Managing financial conflict of interest in biomedical research, Journal of the American Medical Association 303: 2400–2 ()
Ross, Joseph S, Hill, Kevin P, Egilman, David S, and Krumholz, Harlan M, 2008, Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation, Journal of the American Medical Association, 299:1800–12 ()
Rossner, Mike, 2002, Figure manipulation: assessing what is acceptable, Journal of Cell Biology 158: 1151 ()
Scott-Lichter, Diane, and the Editorial Policy Committee, 2009, Council of Science Editors, CSE’s white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications, 2009 update, Reston, VA, Council of Science Editors ()
Sismondo, Sergio, 2009, Ghosts in the machine: publication planning in the medical sciences, Social Studies of Science 39:171 ()
Testa, James, 2008, Playing the system puts self-citation’s impact under review, Nature 455: 729 ()
Van den Eynden, Veerle, Corti, Louise, Woollard, Matthew, Bishop, Libby, and Horton, Laurence, 2011, Managing and sharing data, UK Data Archive, University of Essex, May ( )
Wager, Liz, 2011, How should editors respond to plagiarism?, COPE discussion paper ( )
World Medical Association, 2008, Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, Ferney-Voltaire, France, World Medical Association ( )
Zuckerman, Joseph D, 2010, Accuracy of financial disclosures reported by physicians, New England Journal of Medicine 362: 470 ()
Further reading
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) resources (); COPE flowcharts ()
Hames, Irene, 2007, Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice, Oxford, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers/Wiley-Blackwell