Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T12:35:08.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - ♂♀ Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder versus Gynecologic Tract Carcinomas with Micropapillary Features: Similarities and Differences

from Section 6 - Transitional Cell Tumors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Maria Rosaria Raspollini
Affiliation:
University Hospital Careggi, Florence
Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Affiliation:
Cordoba University Medical School
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic and Urologic Pathology
Similarities, Differences and Challenges
, pp. 278 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, M.B., Ro, J.Y., el-Sharkawy, T., et al. Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18: 12241232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moch, H., Humphrey, P.A., Ulbright, T.M., Reuter, V.E.. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, 4th edn, Vol. 8. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016.Google Scholar
Lopez-Beltran, A., Montironi, R., Blanca, A., Cheng, L.. Invasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum Pathol 2010; 41: 11591164.Google Scholar
Guo, C.C., Tamboli, P., Czerniak, B.. Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract: a clinicopathologic study of 11 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 6266.Google Scholar
Holmang, S., Thomsen, J., Johansson, L.. Micropapillary carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. J Urol 2006; 175: 463467.Google Scholar
Sangoi, A.R., Beck, A.H., Amin, M.B., et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34: 13671376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Beltran, A., Cheng, L.. Histologic variants of urothelial carcinoma: differential diagnosis and clinical implications. Hum Pathol 2006; 37: 13711388.Google Scholar
Kamat, A.M., Dinner, C.P., Gee, J.R., et al. Micropapillary bladder cancer: a review of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience with 100 consecutive patients. Cancer 2007; 110: 6267.Google Scholar
Kamat, A.M., Dinner, C.P., Gee, J.R., et al. The case for early cystectomy in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma. J Urol 2006; 175: 881885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sui, W., Matulay, J.T., James, M.B., et al. Micropapillary bladder cancer: insights from the National Cancer Database. Bladder Cancer 2016; 2: 415423.Google Scholar
Lim, M., Adsay, N.V., Grignon, D., et al. Urothelial carcinoma with villoglandular differentiation: a study of 14 cases. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 12801286.Google Scholar
Fernández, M.I., Williams, S.B., Willis, D.L., et al. Clinical risk stratification in patients with surgically resectable micropapillary bladder cancer. BJU Int 2017; 119: 684691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samaratunga, H., Khoo, K.. Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder; a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 2004; 45: 5564.Google Scholar
Nguyen, D., Taheri, D., Springer, S., et al. High prevalence of TERT promoter mutations in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2016; 469: 427434.Google Scholar
Maranchie, J.K., Bouyounes, B.T., Zhang, P.L., et al. Clinical and pathological characteristics of micropapillary transitional cell carcinoma: a highly aggressive variant. J Urol 2000; 163: 748751.Google Scholar
Lopez-Beltran, A., Montironi, R., Blanca, A., Cheng, L.. Invasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum Pathol 2010; 41: 11591164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertz, S., Wach, S., Taubert, H., et al. Micropapillary morphology is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with transurethral resection and radiochemotherapy. Virchows Arch 2016; 469: 339344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, A.L., Osunkoya, A.O.. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: an analysis of 27 cases. Hum Pathol 2016; 57: 160164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×