Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:08:35.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Parts of Articles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 8197.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13, 515.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). “Am I famous yet?” Judging scholarly merit in psychological science: An introduction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 877881.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2016). The psychologist's companion (6th edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ackerman, J. M., Becker, D. V., Mortensen, C. R., Sasaki, T., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 478485.Google Scholar
Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Judgment and decision making in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 211224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Anderson, U. S., Perea, E. F., Becker, D. V., Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 804808.Google Scholar
Ballash, N., Leyfer, O., Buckley, A. F., & Woodruff-Borden, J. (2006). Parental control in the etiology of anxiety. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9, 113133.Google Scholar
Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Blackwell, K. C., & Smith, D. M. (2007). The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 179190.Google Scholar
Beutel, A. M., & Marini, M. M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60, 436448.Google Scholar
Bögels, S. M., & Brechman-Toussaint, M. L. (2006). Family issues in child anxiety: Attachment, family functioning, parental rearing and beliefs. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 834856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). The development of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 3.Google Scholar
Cobham, V. E. (1998). The case for involving the family in the treatment of childhood anxiety. Behaviour Change, 15, 203212.Google Scholar
Comer, J. S., Dantowitz, A., Chou, T., Edson, A. L., Elkins, R. M., Kerns, C., … Green, J. G. (2014). Adjustment among area youth after the Boston Marathon bombing and subsequent manhunt. Pediatrics, 134, 714.Google Scholar
Comer, J. S., Fan, B., Duarte, C. S., Wu, P., Musa, G. J., Mandell, D. J., … Hoven, C. W. (2010). Attack-related life disruption and child psychopathology in New York City public schoolchildren 6-months post-9/11. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 460469.Google Scholar
Comer, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2007). Terrorism: The psychological impact on youth. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14, 179212.Google Scholar
Elgar, F. J., Napoletano, A., Saul, G., Dirks, M. A., Craig, W., Poteat, V. P., … Koenig, B. W. (2014). Cyberbullying victimization and mental health in adolescents and the moderating role of family dinners. JAMA Pediatrics, 168, 10151022.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Field, A. P. (2006). Is conditioning a useful framework for understanding the development and treatment of phobias? Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 857875.Google Scholar
Gar, N. S., & Hudson, J. L. (2008). An examination of the interactions between mothers and children with anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 12661274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginsburg, G. S., Grover, R. L., Cord, J. J., & Ialongo, N. (2006). Observational measures of parenting in anxious and nonanxious mothers: Does type of task matter? Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35, 323328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginsburg, G. S., & Schlossberg, M. C. (2002). Family-based treatment of childhood anxiety disorders. International Review of Psychiatry, 14, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, S. K., Pellmar, T. C., Kleinman, A. M., & Bunney, W. E. (2002). Reducing suicide: A national imperative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Hoven, C. W., Duarte, C. S., Lucas, C. P., Wu, P., Mandell, D. J., Goodwin, R. D., … Susser, E. (2005). Psychopathology among New York City public school children 6 months after September 11. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 545551.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2004). From anxious temperament to disorder: An etiological model. In Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Mennin, D. S. (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 5176). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, P. C., & Beidas, R. (2007). Smoothing the trail for dissemination of evidence-based practices for youth: Flexibility within fidelity. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 1320.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Borges, G., Nock, M., & Wang, P. S. (2005). Trends in suicide ideation, plans, gestures, and attempts in the United States, 1990–1992 to 2001–2003. JAMA, 293, 24872495.Google Scholar
Krohne, H. W., & Gutenberg, J. (1990). Parental childrearing and anxiety development. In Hurrelmann, K. & Loesel, F. (Eds.), Health hazards in adolescence (pp. 115130). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Last, C. G., Hersen, M., Kazdin, A. E., Francis, G., & Grubb, H. (1987). Psychiatric illness in the mothers of anxious children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 15801583.Google ScholarPubMed
Manassis, K., & Bradley, S. J. (1994). The development of childhood anxiety disorders: Toward an integrated model. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 345366.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S. L., … Schaller, M. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 6378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nock, M. K., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Prediction of suicide ideation and attempts among adolescents using a brief performance-based test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 707715.Google Scholar
Pfefferbaum, B., Nixon, S. J., Krug, R. S., Tivis, R. D., Moore, V. L., Brown, J. M., … Gurwitch, R. H. (1999). Clinical needs assessment of middle and high school students following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 10691074.Google Scholar
Pfefferbaum, B., Nixon, S. J., Tucker, P. M., Tivis, R. D., Moore, V. L., Gurwitch, R. H., … Geis, H. K. (1999). Posttraumatic stress responses in bereaved children after the Oklahoma City bombing. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 13721379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfefferbaum, B., North, C. S., Doughty, D. E., Gurwitch, R. H., Fullerton, C. S., & Kyula, J. (2003). Posttraumatic stress and functional impairment in Kenyan children following the 1998 American Embassy bombing. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73, 133.Google Scholar
Rapee, R. M. (2001). The developmental of generalized anxiety. In Vasey, M. W. & Daads, M. R. (Eds.), The developmental psychopathology of anxiety (pp. 481503). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., & Mills, R. S. (1991). Conceptualizing developmental pathways to internalizing disorders in childhood. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23, 300.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010.Google Scholar
Shahar, G., Cohen, G., Grogan, K. E., Barile, J. P., & Henrich, C. C. (2009). Terrorism-related perceived stress, adolescent depression, and social support from friends. Pediatrics, 124, e235e240.Google Scholar
Strunk, W. J., & White, E. B. (2009). The elements of style (5th edn.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1.Google Scholar
Woodruff-Borden, J., Morrow, C., Bourland, S., & Cambron, S. (2002). The behavior of anxious parents: Examining mechanisms of transmission of anxiety from parent to child. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 31, 364374.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2005). World Health Organization: Suicide prevention. Retrieved October 26, 2005, from www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/Google Scholar

References

Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2003). The psychology of problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Meier, E., Lipka, J., Mohatt, G., Yanez, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Academic and practical intelligence: A case study of the Yup'ik in Alaska. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 183207.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger-Greenwood.Google Scholar
Kalmar, D. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Theory knitting: An integrative approach to theory development. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 153170.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 116.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Components of human intelligence. Cognition, 15, 148.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984a). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269287.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984b). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13, 515.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985a). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1985b). Human abilities: An information-processing approach. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Managerial intelligence: Why IQ isn't enough. Journal of Management, 23(3), 475463.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997b). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997c). The triarchic theory of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 92104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Successful intelligence: Finding a balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 436442.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325338.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A new model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 7684. doi:10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). What universities can be: A new model for preparing students for active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16(June), 3744.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1983). Insight in the gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18, 5157.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Snook, S., Williams, W. M., Wagner, R. K., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 43, 274280.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Hedlund, J. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance, 15(1/2), 143160.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., Birney, D., Naples, A., Stemler, S., Newman, T., Otterbach, R., Randi, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Testing the theory of successful intelligence in teaching grade 4 language arts, mathematics, and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 881899.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations of the nature of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29, 401418.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Suben, J. (1986). The socialization of intelligence. In Perlmutter, M. (Ed.), Perspectives on intellectual development: Vol. 19. Minnesota symposia on child psychology (pp. 201235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

References

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Crano, W. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1973). Principles of research in social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 99108.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Altman, D. G., & Schulz, K. F. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8, 18.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A., Fletcher, P. C., Henson, R. N., Worsley, K. J., Brett, M., & Nichols, T. E. (2008). Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 40, 409441.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Gable, S. L., & Maniaci, M. R. (2014). Methods for studying everyday experience in its natural context. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edn., pp. 373403). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Gordeeva, T. (1996). What makes an article influential? Psychological Science, 7, 6975.Google Scholar
West, S. G., Cham, H., & Liu, Y. (2014). Causal inference and generalization in field settings: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In Reis, H. T. &Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edn., pp. 4980). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abelson, R. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . (2013). Making methods clearer. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . (2014). More bang for your byte. Scientific Data, 1, 140010. doi:10.1038/sdata.2014.10Google Scholar
Barnes, N. (2010). Publish your computer code: It is good enough. Nature, 467, 753. doi:10.1038/467753aGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Begley, C. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2015). Reproducibility in science. Improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circulation Research, 116, 116126. doi:doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819Google Scholar
Buckheit, J., & Donoho, D. L. (1995). Wavelab and reproducible research. In Antoniadis, A. & Oppenheim, G. (Eds.), Wavelets and statistics (pp. 5581). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475Google Scholar
Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29, 158159.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 13041312. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.12.1304Google Scholar
Cohen, M. X. (2017). Rigor and replication in time-frequency analyses of cognitive electrophysiology data. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111(Supplement C), 8087. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.02.001Google Scholar
Coppock, A. (2015). 10 things you need to know about multiple comparisons. Retrieved from http://egap.org/methods-guides/10-things-you-need-know-about-multiple-comparisons.Google Scholar
Dumas-Mallet, E., Button, K. S., Boraud, T., Gonon, F., & Munafò, M. R. (2017). Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 160254. doi:10.1098/rsos.160254Google Scholar
Forstmeier, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Parker, T. H. (2017). Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings – a practical guide. Biological Reviews, 92, 19411968. doi:10.1111/brv.12315Google Scholar
Gorgolewski, K. J., Margulies, D., & Milham, M. (2013). Making data sharing count: A publication-based solution. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(9). doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00009Google Scholar
Gorgolewski, K. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016). A practical guide for improving transparency and reproducibility in neuroimaging research. PLoS Biology, 14(7), 113. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002506Google Scholar
Haeffel, G. J., Hein, S., Square, A., Macomber, D., Lee, M., Chapman, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Evaluating a social problem solving intervention for juvenile detainees: Depressive outcomes and moderators of effectiveness. Development and Psychopathology, 29(3), 10351042. doi:10.1017/S0954579416001000Google Scholar
Hein, S., Tan, M., Rakhlin, N., Doyle, N., Hart, L., Macomber, D., … Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Psychological and sociocultural adaptation of children adopted from Russia and their associations with pre-adoption risk factors and parenting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 26692680.Google Scholar
Iqbal, S. A., Wallach, J. D., Khoury, M. J., Schully, S. D., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Reproducible research practices and transparency across the biomedical literature. PLoS Biology, 14, e1002333. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333Google Scholar
Kellmeyer, P. (2017). Ethical and legal implications of the methodological crisis in neuroimaging. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 26, 530554. doi:10.1017/S096318011700007XGoogle Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196217. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4Google Scholar
Klatzky, R., Au, T., Berntsen, D., Bar, M., Dawson, G., Hartfiled, E. A., … Weber, E. (2018). Firm foundations: Leading researchers name the most replicated findings in psychological science. Observer, 31(1), 2528.Google Scholar
Laws, K. R. (2016). Psychology, replication & beyond. BMC Psychology, 4, 30. doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2Google Scholar
Maynard, O. M., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Methods reporting in human laboratory studies. Addiction, 108, 10021003. doi:10.1111/add.12132Google Scholar
McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd edn.). Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing.Google Scholar
Mourgues, C., Tan, M., Hein, S., Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Using creativity to predict future academic performance: An application of Aurora's five subtests for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 378386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, A. (2012). Scientific misconduct in social psychology – Towards a currency reform in science. European Bulletin of Social Psychology, 24, 47.Google Scholar
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., … Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0021. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82, 591605. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.xGoogle Scholar
Pampaka, M., Hutcheson, G., & Williams, J. (2016). Handling missing data: Analysis of a challenging data set using multiple imputation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39, 1937. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.979146Google Scholar
Patil, P., Peng, R. D., & Leek, J. T. (2016). What should researchers expect when they replicate studies? A statistical view of replicability in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 539544. doi:10.1177/1745691616646366Google Scholar
Peng, R. D. (2015). The reproducibility crisis in science: A statistical counterattack. Significance, 12, 3032.Google Scholar
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE, 2, e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308Google Scholar
Schooler, J. W. (2014). Metascience could rescue the “replication crisis.” Nature, 515, 9. doi:10.1038/515009aGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 13591366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632Google Scholar
Stevens, J. R. (2017). Replicability and reproducibility in comparative psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 862. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00862Google Scholar
Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 5971. doi:10.1177/1745691613514450Google Scholar
Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. PLoS Biology, 15, e2000797. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797Google Scholar
Vandewalle, P. (2012). Code sharing is associated with research impact in image processing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 14(4), 4247. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2012.63Google Scholar
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p-values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779804. doi:10.3758/bf03194105Google Scholar
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426432. doi:10.1037/a0022790Google Scholar
Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6, e26828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026828Google Scholar

References

Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1987). Writing the empirical journal article. In Zanna, M. P. & Darley, J. M. (Eds.), The compleat academic (pp. 171201). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189196.Google Scholar
Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Orr, K., & Bennett, M. (2017). Relational leadership. Storytelling, and narratives: Practices of local government chief executives. Public Administration Review, 77, 515527.Google Scholar
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 319.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. (2017). Storytelling: Bewitching the modern mind. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons.Google Scholar
Singer, J. A., & Salovey, P. (1993). The remembered self: Emotion and memory in personality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Love is a story. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2016). The psychologist's companion (6th edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Calfee, R. C. (2000). What does it all mean? The discussion. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29.Google Scholar
Strunk, W. & White, E. B. (2009). The elements of style (5th edn.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S. (1999). The practical researcher: A student guide to conducting psychological research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mele, C. (2016). USA Today cuts ties with crossword puzzle editor after plagiarism scandal. The New York Times. Retrieved May 10 from www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/us/usa-today-cuts-ties-with-crossword-editor-after-plagiarism-scandal.html?_r=0Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×