Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: June 2015

Bibliography

Aelbrecht, Lobke (2010) The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Antaki, Charles, Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke and Rapley, Mark (2000) “‘Brilliant. Next question…’: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(3): 235262.
Antaki, Charles and Kent, Alexandra (2012) Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics 44(6–7): 876889.
Argyle, Michael (1975 [2010]) Bodily Communication. London: Routledge.
Aronsson, Karin and Cekaite, Asta (2011) Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse and Society 22: 137154.
Asher, Nicholas, Hardt, Daniel, and Busquets, Joan (2001) Discourse parallelism, ellipsis, and ambiguity. Journal of Semantics 18(1):125.
Maxwell, Atkinson J. and Heritage, John, eds. (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 299345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, Peter (1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-taking. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody and conversation, pp. 57100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, Peter (2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1): 736.
Auer, Peter (2014) Syntactic structures and their symbiotic guests: Notes on analepsis from the perspective of online syntax. Pragmatics 24(3): 533560.
Auer, Peter, Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Müller, Frank (1999) Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baltin, Mark (2003) Interaction of ellipsis and binding: Implications for the sequencing of Principle A. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(2): 215246.
Barnes, Scott (2012) On ‘that’s right’ and its combination with other tokens. Journal of Pragmatics 44(3): 243260.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar (2011) Double sayings of German ‘ja’: More observations on their phonetic form and alignment function. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(2): 157185.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Reber, Elisabeth, and Selting, Margret, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barton, Ellen (1990) Nonsentential Constituents: A Theory of Grammatical Structure and Pragmatic Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Benjamin, Trevor (2012) When problems pass us by: Using ‘you mean’ to help locate the source of trouble. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 82109.
Benjamin, Trevor and Mazeland, Harrie (2012) Conversation analysis and other– initiated repair. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics [DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1310].
Benjamin, Trevor and Walker, Traci (2013) Managing problems of acceptability through high rise–fall repetitions. Discourse Processes 50(2),107138.
Bolden, Galina and Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2011) Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication 61(1): 94119.
Bühler, Karl (2011 [1934]) Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan (2001) Frequency effects on French liaison. In Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, pp. 337359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan (2002) Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Givon, Talmy and Malle, Bertram, eds., The Evolution of Language from Pre-language, pp. 109132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan (2006) From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 529551.
Bybee, Joan (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chao, Wynn (1988) On ellipsis. New York: Garland.
Childs, Carrie (2012a) Directing and requesting: Two interactive uses of the mental state terms ‘want’ and ‘need.’ Text & Talk 32(6): 727749.
Childs, Carrie (2012b) ‘I’m not X, I just want Y’: Formulating ‘wants’ in interaction. Discourse Studies 14(2): 181196.
Clayman, Steven E. (2013) Turn constructional units and the transition relevance place in conversation. In Stivers, Tanya and Sidnell, Jack, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 150166. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clayman, Steven E., Elliott, Marc, Heritage, John, and Laurie, MacDonald (2006) Historical trends in questioning presidents 1953–2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(4): 561583.
Clayman, Steven E. and John, Heritage (2002a) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, Steven E. and John, Heritage (2002b) Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U. S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication 52(4): 749–75.
Clayman, Steven E. and John, Heritage (2014) Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Requesting in Social Interaction, pp. 5586. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clift, Rebecca (2001) Meaning in interaction: the case of actually. Language 77(2): 245291.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1993) English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2001) Interactional prosody: High onsets in reason-for-the-call turns. Language in Society 30: 2953.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2007) Assessing and accounting. In Holt, Elizabeth and Clift, Rebecca, eds., Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, pp. 81119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2012) Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions. In de Ruiter, Jan Peter, ed., Questions, pp. 123145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2014) What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24(3): 623647.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Marja, Etelämäki (2014) On divisions of labor in request and offer environments. In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Requesting in Social Interaction, pp. 115144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Fox, Barbara A. and Thompson, Sandra A. (2014) Forms of responsivity: Grammatical formats for responding to two types of request in conversation. In Günthner, Susanne, Imo, Wolfgang, and Bücker, Jörg, eds., Grammar and Dialogism, pp. 109138. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Ono, Tsuyoshi (2007) Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective. Pragmatics 17(4): 513552.
Craven, Alexandra. and Potter, Jonathan (2010) Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies 12(4): 419442.
Culpeper, Jonathan (2010) Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 32323245.
Curl, Traci. S. (2005) Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions.’ Discourse Processes 39(1): 144.
Curl, Traci. S. (2006) Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics 38(8): 12571280.
Curl, Traci. S. and Drew, Paul (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2): 129153.
Davidson, Judy (1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Heritage, John, eds., Structures of Social Action, pp. 102–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dingemanse, Mark and Enfield, Nick J. (2015) Other-initiated repair across languages: Towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics 1: 98118. doi 10.2478/opli-2014-0007.
Drew, Paul (1997) ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28(1): 69101.
Drew, Paul (2005) Is ‘confusion’ a state of mind? In Molder, Hedwig te and Potter, Jonathan, eds., Conversation and Cognition, pp. 161183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, Paul (2012) What drives sequences?. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 6168.
Drew, Paul and Holt, Elizabeth (1988) Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems 35(4): 398417.
Drew, Paul and Holt, Elizabeth (1998) Figures of speech: Idiomatic expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society 27(4): 495522.
Du Bois, John W. (2003) Discourse and grammar. In Tomasello, M. (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2, 4787. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Du Bois, John W. (2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert, ed., Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, pp. 139182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Duranti, Alessandro (1993) Intentions, self, and responsibility: An essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. In Hill, Jane and Irvine, Judith, eds., Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, pp. 2447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Egbert, Maria (1997) Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research in Language and Social Interaction 30(1): 151.
Egbert, Maria and Monika, Vöge (2008) Wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond: German ‘warum’ (why) and ‘wieso’ (why) and English (why). Discourse Studies 10(1): 1736.
Elugardo, Reinaldo and Stainton, Robert (2005) Ellipsis and nonsentential speech. Dordrecht: Springer.
Emmertsen, Sofie and Heinemann, Trine (2010) Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction. Research in Language and Social Interaction 43(2): 109132.
Enfield, Nick J. (2006) Social consequences of common ground. In Enfield, Nick J. and Levinson, Stephen C. eds., Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, pp. 399430. Oxford: Berg.
Enfield, Nick J. (2011) Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge, and agency. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza and Steensig, Jakob, eds., The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, pp. 285312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, Nick J. (2013) Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Enfield, Nick J. and Stivers, Tanya, eds. (2007) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Englebretson, Robert and Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, eds (2014) Discourse participants in interaction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on subject expression and ellipsis. Journal of Pragmatics 63.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1976) Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5: 2566.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1981) How to make and understand a request. In Parret, Herman, Sbisa, Marina, and Verschueren, Jef, eds., Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, pp. 195211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, Nicholas (1993) Code, inference, placedness and ellipsis. In Foley, William A., ed., The role of theory in linguistic description, pp. 243280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fasulo, Alessandra and Chiara, Monzoni (2009) Assessing mutable objects: A multimodal analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(4): 362376.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1988) The mechanisms of ‘construction grammar.’ BLS 14:3555.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1989) Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In Dietrich, Rainer and Graumann, Carl F., eds., Language Processing in Social Context, 1738. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1996) The pragmatics of constructions. In Slobin, Dan, Gerhardt, Julie, Kyratzis, Amy and Guo, Jiansheng, eds., Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Erving-Tripp, pp. 5371. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary Catherine (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3): 501538.
Ford, Cecilia E. (2001a) At the intersection of turn and sequence: Negation and what comes next. In Selting, Margret and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics, pp. 5179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E. (2001b) Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In Bybee, Joan and Noonan, Michael, eds., Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, pp. 6178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E. (2011) Multimodal formulations in transition spaces. Paper presented at Social Action Formats: Conversational Patterns in Embodied Interaction. May 17–19, 2011, University of Oulu, Finland.
Ford, Cecilia E. and Fox, Barbara A. (2010) Multiple practices for constructing laughables. In Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Reber, Elisabeth, and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody in Interaction, pp. 339368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. and Hellerman, John (2004) Getting past no. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Ford, Cecilia E., eds., Sound Patterns in Interaction, pp. 233269. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., and Thompson, Sandra A. (2013) Units or action trajectories: The language of grammatical categories and the language of social action. In Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice and Raymond, Geoffrey, eds., Units of Talk, Units of Action, pp. 1356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E., Thompson, Sandra A., and Drake, Veronika (2012) Bodily–visual practices and turn continuation. Discourse Processes 49(3–4): 192212.
Fox, Barbara A. (1987) Anaphora and the Structure of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, Barbara A. (1996) Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fox, Barbara A. (2007) Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies 9: 299318.
Fox, Barbara A. (2011) Social action formats revisited: exploring action and grammar. Paper presented at Social Action Formats: Conversational Patterns in Embodied Interaction. May 17–19, University of Oulu, Finland.
Fox, Barbara A. and Thompson, Sandra. A. (2010) Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2): 133156.
Freed, Alice (1994) The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 621644.
Freese, Jeremy and Maynard, Douglas W. (1998) Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation. Language in Society 27(2): 195219.
Gardner, Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gardner, Rod (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper & Row.
Gardner, Rod (1976) Replies and responses. Language in Society 5: 257313.
Gardner, Rod (1979) Footing. Semiotica 25: 129.
Gardner, Rod (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Golato, Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses: Grammatical Structure and Sequential Organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Golato, Andrea (2010) Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso and ach in German interaction. Discourse Studies 12(2): 147176.
Golato, Andrea (2012) German oh: Marking an emotional change of state. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(3): 245268.
Golato, Andrea and Betz, Emma (2008) German ach and achso in repair uptake: Resources to sustain or remove epistemic asymmetry. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27(1): 737.
Golato, Andrea, Betz, Emma, Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, and Drake, Veronika (2012) Repeated assessments. Paper presented at the National Communication Association 2012 Annual Convention, Orlando, Florida.
Golato, Andrea and Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2008) Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ‘ja’ and the role of prosody: A conversation-analytic perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3): 130.
Goldberg, Jo Ann (1975) A system for the transfer of instructions in natural settings. Semiotica 14(3): 269296.
Goodwin, Charles (1981) Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press. [www.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/publish.htm]
Goodwin, Charles (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Heritage, John eds., Structures of Social Action, pp. 225–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles (1986a) Between and within: Alternative treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 9: 205217.
Goodwin, Charles (1986b) Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6(3): 283316.
Goodwin, Charles (2007) Interactive footing. In Holt, Elizabeth and Clift, Rebecca, eds., Reporting Talk, pp. 1646. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles (2010) Things and their embodied environments. In Malafouris, Lambros and Renfrew, Colin, eds., The Cognitive Life of Things, pp. 103120. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1): 154.
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1992) Assessments and the construction of context. In Goodwin, Charles and Duranti, Alessandro, eds., Rethinking Context, pp. 147189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie H. (2004) Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro, ed., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, pp. 222244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1980) Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50: 303317.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1997) By-play: Negotiating evaluation in story-telling. In Guy, Gregory R., Baugh, John, Schiffrin, Deborah and Feagin, Crawford, eds., Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov, pp. 77102. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (2006) Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text and Talk 26(4/5): 513542.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. and Cekaite, Asta (2013) Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 46: 122138.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. and Cekaite, Asta (2014) Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction. In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Requesting in Social Interaction, pp. 185214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Günthner, Susanne (1996) The prosodic contextualization of moral work: an analysis of reproaches in ‘why’-formats. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody in Conversation, pp. 271302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haddington, Pentti (2006) The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking. Text and Talk 26(3): 281328.
Hakulinen, Auli (2001a) On some uses of the discourse particle ‘kyl(lä)’ in Finnish conversation. In Selting, Margret and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics, pp. 171198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hakulinen, Auli (2001b) Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes–no questions. Pragmatics 11: 115.
Hakulinen, Auli and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2009) Designing utterances for action: Verb repeat responses to assessments. In Haakana, Markku, Laakso, Minna, and Lindström, Jan, eds., Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, pp. 124151. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Hakulinen, Auli and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2011) Ways of agreeing with negative stance taking. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza and Steensig, Jakob, eds., The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, pp. 235256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayano, Kaoru (2011) Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, and Steensig, Jan, eds., The Morality of Knowing in Conversation, pp. 5881. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayano, Kaoru (2013a) Question design in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 395414. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hayano, Kaoru (2013b) Territories of Knowledge in Japanese Conversation. Ph.D. diss. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Hayashi, Makoto and Kushida, Shuya (2013) Responding with resistance to Wh-Questions in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(3): 231255.
Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey, and Sidnell, Jack (2013) Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey, and Sidnell, Jack, eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, pp. 168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Christian (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, Lena (2011) Non-coordination-based ellipsis from a construction grammar perspective: The case of the coffee construction. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1): 5580.
Heinemann, Trine (2006) ‘Will you or can’t you?’: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 10811104.
Heinemann, Trine (2009) Two answers to inapposite inquiries. In Sidnell, Jack, ed., Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, pp. 159186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine, Lindström, Anna, and Steensig, Jakob (2011) Addressing epistemic incongruence in question–answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, and Steensig, Jakob, eds., The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, pp. 107130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hepburn, Alexa and Bolden, Galina B. (2013) The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 5776. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Heritage, John, eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 299345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John (1998) Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27: 291334.
Heritage, John (2002) Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara, and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence, pp. 196224. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, John (2011) Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, and Steensig, Jakob, eds., The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, pp. 159183. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 129.
Heritage, John (2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 3052.
Heritage, John (2013) Epistemics in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 370394. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John and Raymond, Geoffrey (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1):1538.
Heritage, John and Raymond, Geoffrey (2012) Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In de Ruiter, Jan Peter, ed., Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, pp. 179192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John and Roth, Andrew L. (1995) Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(1): 160.
Hill, Jane and Irvine, Judith, eds. (1993) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoey, Elliott. (2014) Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(2): 175200.
Höhle, Tilman (1992) Über Verumfokus im Deutschen. In Jacobs, Joachim, ed., Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, pp. 112141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Holt, Elizabeth (2012) Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(4): 430448.
Hopper, Paul J. (1997a) Dispersed verbal predicates in vernacular written narrative. In Kamio, Akio, ed., Directions in Functional Linguistics, pp. 118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. (1997b) Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language and Communication 17(2): 93102.
Hopper, Paul J. (1998) Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, Michael, ed., The New Psychology of Language, pp. 155175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hopper, Paul J. (2011) Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Auer, Peter and Pfänder, Stefan, eds., Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, pp. 2244. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1987) Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal–Acceptance Sequences. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris.
Jakobsen, Roman (1960) Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, Thomas, ed., Style in Language, pp. 350377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jefferson, Gail (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, Jim, ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, pp. 219248. New York: Academic Press.
Jefferson, Gail (1980) On ‘trouble-premonitory’ response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry 50: 53185.
Jefferson, Gail (1981) The abominable ‘ne?’ An exploration of post-response pursuit of response. In Shröder, P., ed., Sprache der Gegenwaart, pp. 5388. Dusseldorf. BRD: Pedagogischer Verlag Schwann. [expanded Version in Manchester Sociology Occasional Papers (1981), No. 6, 1–82]
Jefferson, Gail (1984) Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In D’Urso, Valentina and Leonardi, Paolo, eds., Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetorics, pp. 1138. Padova: CLEUP.
Jefferson, Gail (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35(4): 418442.
Jefferson, Gail (1990) List construction as a task and interactional resource. In Psathas, George, ed., Interactional Competence, pp. 6392. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Jefferson, Gail (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, Gene H., ed., Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, pp. 1331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnson, Kyle, ed. (2008) Topics in Ellipsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaimaki, Marianna (2011) Sequentially determined function of pitch contours: The case of English news receipts. York Papers in Linguistics 2(3): 4973.
Kaimaki, Marianna (2012) Sequential and prosodic design of English and Greek non-valenced news receipts. Language and Speech 55(1): 12.
Kamio, Akio (1997) Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen, Elise (2007) The role of ‘I guess’ in conversational stancetaking. In Englebretson, Robert, ed. Stancetaking in Discourse, pp. 183219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen, Elise and Keisanen, Tiina (2011) Social action formats in embodied interaction. Paper presented at Social Action Formats: Conversational Patterns in Embodied Interaction. May 17–19, University of Oulu, Finland.
Kärkkäinen, Elise and Keisanen, Tiina (2012) Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers. Discourse Studies 14(5): 587611.
Kay, Paul and Fillmore, Charles J. (1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1): 133.
Keevallik, Leelo (2010) Minimal answers to yes–no questions in the service of sequence organization. Discourse Studies 12(3): 127.
Keisanen, Tiina and Rauniomaa, Mirka (2012) The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(4): 323351.
Kendon, Adam (2003) Some uses of the head shake. Gesture 2(2): 147182.
Kendrick, Kobin H. and Drew, Paul (2014) The putative preference for offers over requests. In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Requesting in Social Interaction, pp. 87113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kent, Alexandra (2012) Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives. Discourse Studies 14(6): 711730.
Koivisto, Aino (2015) Displaying now-understanding: The Finnish change-of-state token aa. Discourse Processes 52(2): 111148.
Labov, William and Fanshel, David (1977) Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
Ladd, Robert D. (1996) Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lappin, Shalom and Benmamoun, Elabbas (1999) Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and Gapping. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Seung-Hee (2013) Response design in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 415432. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lerner, Gene H. (1994) Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(1): 2033.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1987) Minimization and conversational inference. In Papi, Marcella Bertuccelli and Verschueren, Jef, eds., The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, pp. 61130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1988) Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s participation framework. In Drew, Paul and Wootton, Anthony, eds., Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 161227. Oxford: Polity Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2007) Optimizing person reference – perspectives from usage on Rossel Island. In Enfield, Nick J. and Stivers, Tanya, eds., Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, pp. 2972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2010) Questions and responses in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 27412755
Levinson, Stephen C. (2013) Action formation and ascription. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 103130. Malden, MA, Wiley Blackwell.
Lindström, Anna (1997) Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Uppsala: Institutionen för Nordiska Spräk vid Uppsaka Universitet.
Lindström, Anna (2005) Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In Hakulinen, Auli and Selting, Margret, eds., Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, pp. 209233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindström, Anna (2009) Projecting nonalignment in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack, ed., Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, pp. 135186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindström, Anna and Mondada, Lorenza (2009) Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language & Social Interaction 42(10): 299308.
Lindström, Anna and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2013) Affiliation in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 350369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lobeck, Anne (1995) Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Local, John (1996) Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody in Conversation: Ethnomethodological Studies, pp. 177230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Local, John (2007) Phonetic detail in talk-in-interaction: On the deployment and interplay of sequential context and phonetic resources. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française 28: 6786.
Local, John and Walker, Gareth (2008) Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk 28(6): 723747.
Maynard, Douglas W. (1997) The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30(2): 93130.
Maynard, Douglas W. (2003) Bad News Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Maynard, Douglas W. and Freese, Jeremy (2012) Good news, bad news, and affect: Practical and temporal ‘emotion work’ in everyday life. In Peräkylä, Anssi and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, eds., Emotion in Interaction, pp. 92112. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Mazeland, Harrie (1992) Vraag/antwoord-Sequenties [question/answer sequences]. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU. [published version of: Harrie Mazeland (1992) Vraag/antwoord-sequenties. Ph.D. diss., University of Groningen]
Merchant, Jason (2001) The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mondada, Lorenza (2009) The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(4): 329361.
Mori, Junko (2006) The workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences: An analysis of sequential context, turn shape, and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38(8): 11751205.
Morita, Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk: The Japanese Interactional Particles ne and sa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ogden, Richard (2006) Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 17521775.
Overstreet, Maryann (1999) Whales, Candlelight and Shit Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita (1978) Compliment responses: Notes of the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Schenkein, Jim, ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, pp. 79112. New York: Academic Press.
Pomerantz, Anita (1980) Telling my side: limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 186198.
Pomerantz, Anita (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Heritage, John, eds., Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 57101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita (1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monograph 55: 360373.
Prkachin, Kenneth M. (2009) Assessing pain by facial expression: facial expression as nexus. Pain Research & Management 14(1): 5358.
Progovac, Ljiljana, Paesanii, Kate, Casielles, Eugenia, and Bartee, Ellen (2006) The Syntax of Nonsentials. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan, eds. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Raclaw, Joshua (2013) Indexing inferables and organizational shifts: ‘no’-prefaces in English conversation. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado, Boulder.
Rae, John (2001) Organizing participation in interaction: Doing participation framework. Research on Language in Social Interaction 34(2): 253278.
Rauniomaa, Mirka and Keisanen, Tiina (2012) Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 829842.
Raymond, Geoffrey (2000) The structure of responding. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., UCLA.
Raymond, Geoffrey (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes–no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939967.
Raymond, Geoffrey (2013) At the intersection of turn and sequence organization: On the relevance of “slots” in type-conforming responses to polar interrogatives. In Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond, eds., Units of Talk– Units of Action, pp. 169206. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Raymond, Geoffrey and Heritage, John (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in society 35(5): 677705.
Raymond, Geoffrey and Heritage, John (2013) One question after another: Same-turn-repair in the formation of yes–no type initiating actions. In Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey, and Sidnell, Jack, eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, pp. 213272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reber, Elisabeth (2012) Affectivity in Interaction: Sound Objects in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roberts, Felicia and Francis, Alexander L. (2013) Identifying a temporal threshold of tolerance for silent gaps after requests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(6). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4802900]
Robinson, Jeffery D. (2013) Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey, and Sidnell, Jack, eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, pp. 411465. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. and Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi (2010) Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(3): 232259.
Rossano, Federico (2013) Gaze in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack, and Stivers, Tanya, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 308329. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rossi, Giovanni (2012) Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes 49(5): 426458.
Rossi, Giovanni (2014) When do people not use language to make requests? In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Requesting in Social Interaction, pp. 303334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna and Anssi, Peräkylä (2009) Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(4): 377394.
Sacks, Harvey (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel, eds., Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, pp. 337353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1975) Everyone has to lie. In Blount, Ben and Sanches, Mary, eds., Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use, pp. 5779. New York: Academic Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1978) Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In Schenkein, J., ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, pp. 249269. New York: Academic Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1995) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey and Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Psathas, George, ed., Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 1521. New York, Irvington.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question.’ Sociological Inquiry 50: 104152.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, Deborah, ed, Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, 7193. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9: 111151.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1989) Reflections of language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In Bornstein, Marc H. and Bruner, Jerome S., eds., Interaction in Human Development, pp. 139153. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1996a) Turn organization: One direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Interaction and Grammar, pp. 52133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1996b) Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction, and co-participation context. In Hovy, Eduard and Scott, Donia, eds., Discourse Processing: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 335. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23: 499545.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, and Sacks, Harvey (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361382.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. and Lerner, Gene (2009) Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(2): 91115.
Searle, John R. (1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 123.
Selting, Margret (1992) Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 315345.
Selting, Margret (1996) On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics 6(3): 357388.
Selting, Margret (1997) Sogenannte Ellipsen als interaktiv relevante Konstruktionen? Ein neuer Versuch über die Reichweite und Grenzen des Ellipsenbegriffs für die Analyse gesprochener Sprache in Interaktionen. In Schlobinski, Peter, ed., Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch, pp. 117156. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Selting, Margret (2007) Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 483526.
Selting, Margret, Auer, Peter, et al. (2009) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2) Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353402. [www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de]
Sidnell, Jack and Barnes, Rebecca (2013) Alternative, subsequent descriptions. In Makoto, Hayashi, Raymond, Geoffrey, and Sidnell, Jack, eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, pp. 511541. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidnell, Jack and Enfield, Nick J. (2012) Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology 53(3): 302333.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2001a) Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2001b) Simple answers to polar questions. In Selting, Margret and Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics, pp. 405431. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2002) Recipient activities: the particle no as a go-ahead response in Finnish conversations. In Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence, pp. 164195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena and Hakulinen, Auli (2009) Alternative responses to assessments. In Sidnell, Jack, ed., Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, pp. 281303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stainton, Robert (2006) Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Steensig, Jakob and Heinemann, Trine (2013) When ‘yes’ is not enough – as an answer to a yes–no question. In Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice and Raymond, Geoffrey, eds., Units of Talk-Units of Action, pp. 207241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steensig, Jakob and Heinemann, Trine (2014) The social and moral work of modal constructions in granting remote requests. In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Requesting in Social Interaction, pp. 145170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stevanovic, Melisa (2011) Participants’ deontic rights and action formation: The case of declarative requests for action. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52 [www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de]
Stevanovic, Melisa (2013) Deontic rights in interaction: A conversation analytic study on authority and cooperation. Ph.D. diss., University of Helsinki, Finland.
Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi, Peräkylä (2012) Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(3): 297321.
Stivers, Tanya (2004) ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2): 260293.
Stivers, Tanya (2005) Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language in Social Interaction 38(2):131158.
Stivers, Tanya (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction. 41(1): 3157.
Stivers, Tanya (2011) Morality and question design: ‘Of course’ as contesting a presupposition of askability. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, and Steensig, Jakob, eds., The Morality of Knowing in Conversation, pp. 82106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya and Hayashi, Makoto (2010) Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society 39: 125.
Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, and Steensig, Jakob (2011) Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, and Steensig, Jakob, eds., The morality of knowledge in conversation, pp. 326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen (2005) Contingent requests: Their sequential organization and turn shape. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(2): 159179.
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen (2006) Request Sequences: The Intersection of Grammar, Interaction and Social Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Terasaki, Alene Kiku (1976/2004) Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Lerner, Gene, ed., Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, pp. 171223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Suzuki, Ryoko (2014) Reenactments in conversation: Gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies 16(6): 816846.
Tomasello, Michael (2008) Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Uhmann, Susanne (1996) On rhythm in everyday German conversation: Beat clashes in assessment utterances. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody in Conversation, pp. 303365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vinkhuyzen, Erik and Szymanski, Margaret H. (2005) ‘Would you like to do it yourself?’ Service requests and their non-granting responses. In Richards, Keith and Seedhouse, Paul, eds., Applying Conversation Analysis, pp. 91106. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Walker, Traci, Drew, Paul, and Local, John (2011) Responding indirectly. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 24342451.
Weber, Elizabeth G. (1993) Varieties of Questions in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wells, Bill and Peppe, Sue (1996) Ending up in Ulster: prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody in Conversation, pp. 101130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, Kevin A. (2011) Some uses of head nods in ‘third position’ in talk-in-interaction. Gesture 11(2): 12.
Wilkinson, Sue and Kitzinger, Celia (2006) Surprise as an interactional achievement: reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2): 150182.
Winkler, Susanne (2005) Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wootton, Anthony J. (1981) Two request forms of four year olds. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 511523.
Wootton, Anthony J. (2005) Interactional and sequential features informing request format selection in children’s speech. In Hakulinen, Auli and Selting, Margret, eds., Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, pp. 185207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wray, Alison (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zinken, Jörg and Ogiermann, Eva (2011) How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of Polish trzeba x (‘one needs to x’). Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(3): 263287.
Zinken, Jörg and Ogiermann, Eva (2013) Responsibility and action: Invariants and diversity in requests for objects in British English and Polish everyday interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(3): 256276.