Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Cited by 7
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: May 2018

19 - Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Climate Governance

from Part IV - Substantive Governance Challenges
  • View HTML
    • Send chapter to Kindle

      To send this chapter to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats
      ×
Abbott, K. (2012). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88(3), 543564.
Abbott, K., Green, J. and Keohane, R. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247277.
Aligica, P. and Tarko, V. (2012). Polycentricity: from Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond. Governance, 25(2), 237262.
Andresen, S. (2014). Exclusive approaches to climate governance: more effective than the UNFCCC? In Toward a New Climate Agreement: Conflict, Resolution and Governance, ed. Cherry, T. L., Hovi, J and McEvoy, D. M.. London: Routledge, 167181.
Auld, G. (2014). Constructing Private Governance: The Rise and Evolution of Forest, Coffee, and Fisheries Certification. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Auld, G. and Gulbrandsen, L. (2010). Transparency in nonstate certification: consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97119.
Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74102.
Bäckstrand, K. and Kuyper, J. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: the UNFCCC, non-state actors and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 764768.
Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. and Linnér, B. et al. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 561579.
Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 1751.
Bernstein, S. and Cashore, B. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 347371.
Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(1), 137164.
Brandi, C. and Bauer, S. (forthcoming 2017). Climate Clubs: Potentials and Pitfalls for Enhancing Legitimacy in Global Climate Governance. Bonn: German Development Institute, in press.
Buchanan, A. and Keohane, R. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405437.
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. and Betsill, M. et al. (2014). Transnational Climate Change Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cashore, B., Auld, G. and Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Chan, S., Falkner, R. and Goldberg, M. et al. (2018). Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of non-state climate actions. Climate Policy, 18(1), 2435.
Cole, D. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5(2), 114118.
Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism. Transnational Governance and Legitimacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dorsch, M. and Flachsland, C. (2017). Examining a polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 4564.
Eckersley, R. (2012). Moving forward in the climate negotiations: multilateralism or minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 2442.
Falkner, R. (2016a). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 95(2), 128.
Falkner, R. (2016b). A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits, and international legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 87101.
Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio-economic Review, 10(1), 163192.
Fung, A., Graham, M. and Weil, D. (2008). Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gampfer, R. (2016). Minilateralism or the UNFCCC? The political feasibility of climate clubs. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 6288.
Gehring, F. and Faude, B. (2014). A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: how competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor. Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 471498.
Grant, R. and Keohane, R. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 2944.
Green, J. (2014). Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gulbrandsen, L. and Auld, G. (2016). Contested accountability logics in evolving nonstate certification for fisheries sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 4260.
Gupta, A. and Mason, M. (eds.). (2014). Transparency in Global Environmental Governance: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, T. (2008). Transparency, accountability, and global governance. Global Governance, 14(1), 7394.
Hale, T. (2016). ‘All hands on deck’: the Paris Agreement and non-state climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 1221.
Hickmann, T. (2017). The reconfiguration of authority in global climate governance. International Studies Review, 19(3), 430451.
Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. and Sælen, H. et al. (2016). Climate change mitigation: a role for climate clubs? Palgrave Communications, 2, 16020.
International Trade Centre (ITC). (2017). Standards Map. Available at: www.standardsmap.org/ [Accessed 8 August 2017].
Kahler, M. (1992). Multilateralism with small and large numbers. International Organization, 46(3), 681708.
Kramarz, T. and Park, S. (2016). Accountability in global environmental governance: a meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 121.
Krisch, N. (2017). Liquid authority in global governance. International Theory, 9(2), 237260.
MacDonald, K. and MacDonald, T. (2017). Liquid authority and political legitimacy in transnational governance. International Theory, 9(2), 329351.
Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science and Policy, 36, 810.
McGee, J. and Taplin, R. (2009). The role of the Asia Pacific partnership in discursive contestation of the international climate regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3), 213238.
Oberthür, S. (2016). Reflections on global climate politics post Paris: power, interests and polycentricity. The International Spectator, 51(4), 115.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550557.
Ostrom, V. (1999). Polycentricity – Part 1. In Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, ed. McGinnis, M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 5274.
Overdevest, C. and Zeitlin, J. (2014). Assembling an experimentalist regime: transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 2248.
Ponte, S. (2014). ‘Roundtabling’ sustainability: lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum, 54, 261271.
Roger, C., Hale, T. and Andonova, L. (2017). The comparative politics of transnational climate governance. International Interactions, 43(1), 125.
Sabel, C. and Victor, D. (2017). Governing global problems under uncertainty: making bottom-up climate policy work. Climatic Change, 144(1), 1527.
Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: the case of European Union biofuel governance. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 533546.
Schleifer, P. (2016). Let’s bargain: setting standards for sustainable biofuels. In Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood: Contesting the New Modes of Governance, ed. Esguerra, A., Helmerich, N. and Risse, T.. New York: Springer, 4773.
Schleifer, P., Fiorini, M. and Auld, G. (2017). Transparency in Transnational Sustainability Governance: A Multivariate Analysis of Regulatory Standard-Setting Programs, EUI Working Papers, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies 2017/16.
Schouten, G. and Bitzer, V. (2015). The emergence of southern standards in agricultural value chains: a new trend in sustainability governance? Ecological Economics, 120, 175184.
Schouten, G., Glasbergen, P. and Leroy, P. (2012). On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: the roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 83, 4250.
Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance, 18(1), 89110.
Sörensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2004). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195218.
Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J. (2014). Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Asselt, H. (2007). From UN-ity to diversity? The UNFCCC, the Asia-Pacific Partnership, and the future of international law on climate change. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 1(1), 1728.
van Asselt, H. and Bößner, S. (2016). The shape of things to come: global climate governance after Paris. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 10(1), 4661.
Weischer, L., Morgan, J. and Patel, M. (2012). Climate clubs: can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 21(3), 177192.
Zelli, F. (2011). The fragmentation of the climate governance architecture. WIREs Climate Change, 2(2), 255270.