Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global International SocietyA New Framework for Analysis, pp. 244 - 261Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Aalberts, Tanja E. (2014) ‘Rethinking the Principle of (Sovereign) Equality as a Standard of Civilisation’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:3, 767–89.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2004) ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, 58:2, 239–75.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2011) ‘Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World’, International Studies Quarterly, 55:1, 95–123.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2019) Towards a Global International Relations: Reflections on IR at 100, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias (1999) ‘Observing World Politics: Luhmann’s Systems Theory of Society and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28:2, 239–65.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias and Buzan, Barry (2011) ‘Securitization, Sectors and Functional Differentiation’, Security Dialogue, Special Issue, 42:4–5, 413–25.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry and Zürn, Michael (eds.) (2013) Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir (1976) Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (2013) The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition, London and Brooklyn: Verso.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David (1993) Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society, Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David (1998) ‘Globalization and the Social State’, Review of International Studies, 24:4, 461–78.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David (1999) ‘Law, Justice and the Idea of a World Society’, International Affairs, 75:3, 547–61.Google Scholar
Ayoob, Mohammed (1999) ‘From Regional System to Regional Society: Exploring Key Variables in the Construction of Regional Order’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 53:3, 247–60.Google Scholar
Ayoob, Mohammed (2010) ‘Making Sense of Global Tensions: Dominant and Subaltern Conceptions of Order and Justice in the International System’, International Studies, 47:2–4, 129–41.Google Scholar
Bain, William (2003) Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bain, William (2014) ‘The Pluralist-Solidarist Debate in the English School’, in Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds.) Guide to the English School in International Studies, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 159–70.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha (1999) ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, 53:4, 699–732.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2013) ‘Race and International Relations: Introduction’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26:1, 1–4.Google Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H. (1993) Old World Encounters: Cross-Cultural Contacts and Exchanges in Pre-Modern Times, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Eric M. (2011) ‘Why Is There No Gender in the English School?’, Review of International Studies, 37:2, 855–79.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan (2016) ‘Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change’, Review of International Studies, 42:2, 310–33.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan and Scott, Shirley V. (eds.) (2017) Norm Antipreneurs and the Politics of Resistance to Global Normative Change, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boli, John and Thomas, George M. (eds.) (1999) Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett (2009) The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kindle edn.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett (2014) ‘To Rethink Standards of Civilisation, Start with the End’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:3, 614–31.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., Ikenberry, G. John and Wohlforth, William (2012–13) ‘Don’t Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment’, International Security, 37:3, 7–51.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada (2002) Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard MacKay, Reus-Smit, Christian and Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2012) Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1980) ‘The Great Irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and World Order’, International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 35:3, 437–47.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1984a) ‘The Revolt against the West’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–28.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1984b) Justice in International Relations, Hagey Lectures, Ontario: University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1990) ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’, in Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict and Roberts, Adam (eds.) Hugo Grotius and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon, 65–93.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) (1984a) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (1984b) ‘Introduction’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–9.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (1966) ‘Preface’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: George Allen & Unwin, 11–13.Google Scholar
Butzer, Karl W. (2012) ‘Collapse, Environment, and Society’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109:10, 3632–9.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (1991 [1983]) People, States & Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post–Cold War Era, 2nd edition, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (1993) ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization 47:3, 327–52.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2004a) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2004b) ‘“Civil” and “Uncivil” in World Society’, in Guzzini, Stefano and Jung, Dietrich (eds.) Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research, London: Routledge, 94–105.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2005) ‘The Challenge of International Political Economy and Globalization’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.) International Society and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–33.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2006) ‘Will the “Global War on Terrorism” Be the New Cold War?’, International Affairs, 82:6, 1101–18.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2010a) ‘Culture and International Society’, International Affairs, 86:1, 1–25.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2010b) ‘China in International Society: Is “Peaceful Rise” Possible?’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3:1, 5–36.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2012) ‘How Regions Were Made, and the Legacies of That Process for World Politics’, in Paul, T. V. (ed.) International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22–46.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2014a) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2014b) ‘The “Standard of Civilization” as an English School Concept’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:3, 576–94.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2017) ‘Universal Sovereignty’, in Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds.) The Globalisation of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–47.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2018a) ‘Revisiting World Society’, International Politics, 55:1, 125–40.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2018b) ‘China’s Rise in English School Perspective’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18:3.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles and Little, Richard (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole and de Wilde, Jaap (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Wæver, Ole (2003) Regions and Powers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (eds.) (2009) International Society and the Middle East, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2009) ‘Introduction: Watson and World History’, in Watson, Adam (ed.) The Evolution of International Society, reissued with a new introduction, London: Routledge, ix–xxxv.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Albert, Mathias (2010) ‘Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 16:3, 315–37.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2014) ‘The Historical Expansion of International Society,’ in Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds.) Guide to the English School in International Studies, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 59–75.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Zhang, Yongjin (2014) ‘Introduction: Interrogating Regional International Society in East Asia’, in Buzan, Barry and Zhang, Yongjin (eds.) Contesting International Society in East Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2014a) ‘Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:2, 437–62.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2014b) ‘Capitalism and the Emergent World Order’, International Affairs, 90:1, 71–91.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2015a) The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2015b) ‘Twentieth Century Benchmark Dates in International Relations: The Three World Wars in Historical Perspective’, International Security Studies (Beijing), 1:1, 39–58.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2016) ‘The Impact of the “Global Transformation” on Uneven and Combined Development’, in Anievas, Alexander and Matin, Kamran (eds.) Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 171–84.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2018) ‘The English School: History and Primary Institutions as Empirical IR Theory?’, in Thompson, William R. (ed.) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Empirical International Relations Theories, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. (2004) ‘Nationalising International Theory: Race, Class and the English School’, Global Society, 18:4, 305–23.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. (2009) ‘Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?’, International Studies Review, 10:4, 749–61.Google Scholar
Cantir, Cristian (2016) ‘World Society, International Society and the Periphery: British Abolitionists and the Post-Slave State of Haiti in the Early Nineteenth Century’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29:2, 660–76.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. (1946) The Twenty Year’s Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, Volume I. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (1997) The Power of Identity, Volume II. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (1998) End of Millennium, Volume III. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cerny, Phil (1993) ‘“Plurilateralism”: Structural Differentiation and Functional Conflict in the Post-Cold War World Order’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 22:1, 27–51.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve (2006) ‘Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 100:2, 348–72.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, Christopher and Hall, Thomas D. (1997) Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Yudan (2015) ‘Chinese Notions of Sovereignty’, in Gaskarth, Jamie (ed.) China, India and the Future of International Society, London: Rowman and Littlefield, 39–52.Google Scholar
Clapton, William (2014) Risk and Hierarchy in International Society: Liberal Interventionism in the Post–Cold War Era, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (1989) The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2005) Legitimacy in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2007) International Legitimacy and World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2009a) ‘Democracy in International Society: Promotion or Exclusion?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37:3, 563–81.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2009b) ‘Towards an English School Theory of Hegemony’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:2, 203–28.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2013) The Vulnerable in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cline, Eric E. (2014) 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2009) ‘Charting the Ethics of the English School: What “Good” Is There in a Middle-Ground Ethics?’, International Studies Quarterly, 53:1, 203–25.Google Scholar
Cohen, Raymond, and Westbrook, Raymond (eds.) (2002) Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginnings of International Relations, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul (2008) The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done about It, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert (1996) The Postmodern State and the World Order, London: Demos, Paper no. 19.Google Scholar
Costa-Buranelli, Filippo (2015) ‘“Do You Know What I Mean?” “Not Exactly”: English School, Global International Society and the Polysemy of Institutions’, Global Discourse, 5:3, 499–514.Google Scholar
Cui, Shunji (2014)《人的发展与人的尊严：再思人的安全概念》[Human Development and Human Dignity: Rethinking the Concept of Human Security], Journal of International Security Studies, 32:1, 63–77.Google Scholar
Cui, Shunji and Buzan, Barry (2016) ‘Great Power Management in International Society’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9:2, 181–210.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas (2013) NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society, London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas (2017) ‘Institutions of World Society: Parallels with the International Society of States’, paper presented at the International Studies Association’s Annual Convention in Baltimore.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James (2003) ‘The Question of Information Technology’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32:3, 441–56.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (forthcoming) Dark Skies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., Burrell, Sidney A., Kann, Robert A., Lee, Maurice Jr, Lichtenman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond E., Loewenheim, Francis L. and Van Wagenen, Richard W. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared (1998) Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Diez, Thomas (2000) ‘Cracks in the System, Or Why Would I Need Luhmann to Analyze International Relations’, Draft paper for the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) workshop on ‘Modern Systems Theory and International Society’, Copenhagen: COPRI.Google Scholar
Diez, Thomas and Whitman, Richard (2002) ‘Analysing European Integration, Reflecting on the English School: Scenarios for an Encounter’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:1, 43–67.Google Scholar
Diez, Thomas, Manners, Ian and Whitman, Richard G. (2011) ‘The Changing Nature of International Institutions in Europe: The Challenge of the European Union’, European Integration, 33:2, 117–38.Google Scholar
Donelan, Michael D. (ed.) (1978) Reason of States: Study in International Political Theory, London and Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (1998) ‘Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?’, International Affairs, 74:1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2006) ‘Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:2, 139–70.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2007) ‘The Relative Universality of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 29:2, 281–306.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2009) ‘Rethinking Political Structures: From “Ordering Principles” to “Vertical Differentiation” – and Beyond’, International Theory, 1:1, 49–86.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2012) ‘The Elements of the Structures of International Systems’, International Organization, 66:4, 609–43.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim (2003) ‘Society and Hierarchy in International Relations’, International Relations, 17:3, 303–20.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Chris (2017) The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile (translated by Simpson, George) (2013 [1893]) The Division of Labor in Society, Overland Park: Digireads.com Publishing.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart (2013) The Birth of Territory, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016) ‘“One of Us” Citizens’ Initiative’. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/initiatives/successful/details/2012/000005 (accessed 4 January 2016).Google Scholar
Fairbank, John King (1968) The Chinese World Order, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Falkner, Robert (2016) ‘The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics’, International Affairs, 92:5, 1107–25.Google Scholar
Falkner, Robert and Buzan, Barry (2017) ‘The Emergence of Environmental Stewardship as a Primary Institution of Global International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, online first.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. (2007) State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale and Mansbach, Richard (1996), Polities: Authority, Identities and Change, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52:4, 887–917.Google Scholar
Flockhart, Trine (2016) ‘The Coming Multi-Order World’, Contemporary Security Policy, 37:1, 3–30.Google Scholar
Frank, André Gunder (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Freedom House (2015) ‘Freedom in the World 2015’. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.VfvIu5ezk84 (accessed 18 September 2015).Google Scholar
Fund for Peace (2016) ‘Fragile States Index 2016’. Available at: http://fsi.fundforpeace.org/rankings-2016 (accessed 22 December 2016).Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan (1971) ‘A Theory of Structural Imperialism’, Journal of Peace Research, 8:2, 81–118.Google Scholar
Geldenhuys, Deon (2009) Contested States in World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Wu, Tim (2006) Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerritt W. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (2009) ‘The Primary Institutions of the Middle Eastern Regional Interstate Society’, in Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (eds.) International Society and the Middle East, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 92–116.Google Scholar
Gray, Jack (2002) Rebellions and Revolutions: China from the 1800s to 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Andy and Janmaat, Jan Germen (2011) Regimes of Social Cohesion: Societies and the Crisis of Globalization, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grimm, Sonja, Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas and Nay, Olivier (2014) ‘“Fragile States”: Introducing a Political Concept’, Third World Quarterly, 35:2, 197–209.Google Scholar
Haldén, Peter (2011) ‘Republican Continuities in the Vienna Order and the German Confederation 1815–1866’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:2, 281–304.Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas D., Kardulius, P. Nick and Chase-Dunn, Christopher (2011) ‘World-Systems Analysis and Archaeology: Continuing the Dialogue’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 19:3, 233–79.Google Scholar
Headrick, Daniel R. (2010) Power over Peoples: Technology, Environments and Western Imperialism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David, McGrew, Anthony G., Goldblatt, David and Perraton, Jonathan (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, Jeffrey (2000) States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. and Sharman, J. C. (2005) ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations, 11:1, 63–98.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. (1991) Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. (2004) Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoover, Joe (2015) ‘The Human Right to Housing and Community Empowerment: Home Occupation, Eviction Defence and Community Land Trusts’, Third World Quarterly, 36:6, 1092–109.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael (1984) ‘The Military Factor in European Expansion’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–42.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael (2008) ‘Lost Friend’, in Bell, Coral and Thatcher, Meredith (eds.) Remembering Hedley, Canberra: ANU Press, 127–9.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1993) ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’, Foreign Affairs, 72:3, 22–49.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations: And the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (1995) ‘Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective’, in Fawcett, Louise and Hurrell, Andrew (eds.) Regionalism in World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–73.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2007a) ‘One World? Many Worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society’, International Affairs, 83:1, 127–46.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2007b) On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John (2009) ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 71–87.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John (2011) Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert (1999) ‘Introduction: Sovereignty at the Millennium’, Political Studies, 47:3, 423–30.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. (1990) Quasi-States, Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, C. L. R. (2001) The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Scott A. J. (2017) Why Did Ancient Civilizations Fail?, New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles A. (2006) ‘War in the Twenty-First Century: An Institution in Crisis’, in Little, Richard and Williams, John (eds.) The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 162–88.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles A. (2007) American Civilization, London: Institute for the Study of the Americas.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2003) ‘Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks’, International Security, 27:4, 57–85.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2003–4) ‘Hierarchy, Balancing and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International Relations’, International Security, 28:3, 165–80.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2005) ‘Why China’s Rise Will Be Peaceful: Hierarchy and Stability in the East Asian Region’, Perspectives on Politics, 3:3, 551–4. [page references are to the online version, which goes from 1–6].Google Scholar
Karns, Margaret P. and Mingst, Karen A. (2010) International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance, 2nd edition, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keal, Paul (2003) European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002) Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2009) ‘International Society as an Ideal Type’, in Navari, Cornelia (ed.) Theorising International Society: English School Methods, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 104–24.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2014) ‘The Standard of “Civilisation”, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-Century International Social Space’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:3, 651–73.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kettell, Steven and Sutton, Alex (2013) ‘New Imperialism: Toward a Holistic Approach’, International Studies Review, 15:2, 243–58.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict (1999) ‘Sovereignty and Inequality’, in Hurrell, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire (eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 66–94.Google Scholar
Kirby, Paul and Shepherd, Laura J. (2016) ‘Reintroducing Women, Peace and Security’, International Affairs, 92:2, 249–54.Google Scholar
Knudsen, Tonny Brems and Navari, Cornelia (eds.) (forthcoming) International Organization in the Anarchical Society: The Institutional Structure of World Order, Palgrave.Google Scholar
Koff, Harlan (2013) ‘Comparing the “A, B, Cs” of Social Cohesion across World Regions: Association, Belonging and Change’, in Moore, Candice (ed.) Regional Integration and Social Cohesion, Bruxelles: P. I. E. Peter Lang, 41–72.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara (2016) The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kozyrev, Vitaly (2016) ‘Harmonizing ‘Responsibility to Protect’: China’s Vision of a Post-Sovereign World’, International Relations, 30:3, 328–45.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. (1998) ‘After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of Stable Multipolarity’, International Security, 23:2, 40–79.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. (2002) The End of the American Era: US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. (2012) No One’s World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. (2014) ‘The Normative Foundations of Hegemony and the Coming Challenge to Pax Americana’, Security Studies, 23:2, 219–57.Google Scholar
Lach, Donald F. (1965, 1970, 1993) Asia in the Making of Europe, Vols. 1–3, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lasmar, Jorge M., Zahreddine, Danny and Lage, Delber Andrade Gribel (2015) ‘Understanding Regional and Global Diffusion in International Law: The Case for a Non-Monolithic Approach to Institutions’, Global Discourse, 5:3, 470–96.Google Scholar
Lawler, Andrew (2010) ‘Collapse? What Collapse? Societal Change Revisited’, Science, 330:6006, 907–9.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew (2016) Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Little, Richard (2007) The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lövbrand, Eva and Stripple, Johannes (2006) ‘The Climate as Political Space: On the Territorialisation of the Global Carbon Cycle’, Review of International Studies, 32:2, 217–35.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1986) The Sources of Social Power, Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1993) The Sources of Social Power, Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (2012) The Sources of Social Power, Volume 3: Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (2013) The Sources of Social Power, Volume 4: Globalizations, 1945–2011, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1998) ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization, 52:4, 943–69.Google Scholar
Mayall, James (1990) Nationalism and International Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayall, James (2000) ‘Democracy and International Society’, International Affairs, 76:1, 61–76.Google Scholar
McAnany, Patricia A. and Yoffee, Norman (eds.) (2010) Questioning Collapse: Human Resilience, Ecological Vulnerability, and the Aftermath of Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merke, Federico (2011) ‘The Primary Institutions of Latin American Regional Interstate Society’, Paper for IDEAS Latin America Programme, LSE, 27 January 2011.Google Scholar
Merke, Federico (2015) ‘Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil’s Rising Power’, International Politics, 52:2, 178–92.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. (2010) ‘World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor’, Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M. and Ramirez, Francisco O. (1997) ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology, 103:1, 144–81.Google Scholar
Middleton, Guy D. (2012) ‘Nothing Lasts Forever: Environmental Discourses on the Collapse of Past Societies’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 20:3, 257–307.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Ian (2014) War! What Is It Good For? Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots, reprint edition, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Mueller, Milton L. (2010) Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. Taggart (2014) Japan and the Shackles of the Past, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis (1983) The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (ed.) (1991) Condition of States: A Study in International Political Theory, Milton Keynes and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (2007) ‘States and State Systems: Democratic, Westphalian or Both?’, Review of International Studies, 33:4, 577–95.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (2016) ‘Primary and Secondary Institutions: Quo Vadit?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51:1, 121–7.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (2018) ‘Two Roads to World Society: Meyer’s “World Polity” and Buzan’s “World Society”’, International Politics, 55:1, 11–25.Google Scholar
Noortmann, Math, Arts, Bas and Reinalda, Bob (2001) ‘The Quest for Unity in Empirical and Conceptual Complexity’, in Noortmann, Math, Arts, Bas and Reinalda, Bob (eds.) Non-State Actors in International Relations, Aldershot: Ashgate, 299–307.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John Joseph and Weingast, Barry R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. (2014) ‘The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities’, Global Commission on Internet Governance Paper Series, no. 1, Waterloo and London: Centre for International Governance (CIGI) and Chatham House.Google Scholar
Onapajo, Hakeem and Isike, Christopher (2016) ‘The Global Politics of Gay Rights: The Straining Relations between the West and Africa’, Journal of Global Analysis, 6:1, 21–45.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas (2002) ‘Institutions, Intentions and International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 28:2, 211–28.Google Scholar
Paine, S. C. M. (2003) The Sino–Japanese War of 1894–5: Perceptions, Power and Primacy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, S. C. M. (2012) The Wars for Asia 1911–1949, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, S. C. M. (2017) The Japanese Empire: Grand Strategy from the Meiji Restoration to the Pacific War, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parent, Joseph M. (2011) Uniting States: Voluntary Union in World Politics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. (2010) ‘State Capacity and South Asia’s Perennial Insecurity Problems’, in Paul, T.V. (ed.) South Asian’s Weak States: Understanding the Regional Insecurity Predicament, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 3–27.Google Scholar
Pearcey, Mark (2015) ‘Sovereignty, Identity, and Indigenous-State Relations at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century: A Case of Exclusion by Inclusion’, International Studies Review, 17:3, 441–54.Google Scholar
Pejcinovic, Lacy (2013) War in International Society, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pella Jr, John Anthony (2013) ‘Thinking Outside International Society: A Discussion of the Possibilities for English School Conceptions of World Society’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:1, 65–77.Google Scholar
Pella Jr, John Anthony (2015a) Africa and the Expansion of International Society: Surrendering the Savannah, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pella Jr, John Anthony (2015b) ‘World Society, International Society and the Colonization of Africa’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28:2, 210–28.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew (2012) ‘Saving Civilization from Empire: Belligerency, Pacifism and the Two Faces of Civilization during the Second Opium War’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:1, 5–27.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, J. C. (2015) International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel (2001) Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pieke, Frank N. (2016) Knowing China: A Twenty-First Century Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2003) Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange, London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2011) ‘Global Multiculture: Cultures, Transnational Culture, Deep Culture’, in Baraldi, Claudio, Borsari, Andrea and Carli, Augusto (eds.) Hybrids, Differences, Visions: On the Study of Culture, Aurora: Davies Group, 81–96.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri (2012) The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2014) ‘Setting Status in Stone: The Negotiation of International Institutional Privileges’, in Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.) Status in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 192–215.Google Scholar
Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard and Aisbett, Emma (2013). ‘When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning’, World Politics, 65:2, 273–313.Google Scholar
Quayle, Linda (2013) Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations: A Region-Theory Dialogue, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2007) Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ren, Xiao (2015) ‘Human Security in Practice: The Chinese Experience’, JICA-RI Working Paper, No.92, March.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2011) ‘Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System’, International Organization, 65:2, 207–42.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan (2004) ‘Space Law in the 21st Century: Some Thoughts in Response to the Bush Administration’s Space Initiative’, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 69, 413–23.Google Scholar
Riemer, Andrea K. and Stivachtis, Yannis A. (eds.) (2002) Understanding EU’s Mediterranean Enlargement: The English School and the Expansion of Regional International Societies, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1995) ‘Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Introduction’, in Risse-Kappen, Thomas (ed.) Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–33.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2002) ‘Transnational Actors and World Politics’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.) Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, 255–74.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.) (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin (2013) ‘Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the Mirror of Uneven and Combined Development’, International Politics, 50:2, 183–230.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin (2016) ‘International Relations in the Prison of Political Science’, International Relations, 30:2, 127–53.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. (1960) The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roughead, Gary (2015) ‘In the Race for Arctic Energy, the U.S. and Russia Are Polar Opposites’, Wall Street Journal. Available at: www.wsj.com/articles/in-the-race-for-arctic-energy-the-u-s-and-russia-are-polar-opposites-1440542608 (accessed 28 August 2015).Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (1983) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Towards a Neo-Realist Synthesis’, World Politics, 35:2, 261–85.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (1993) ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’, International Organization, 47:1, 139–74.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia (2008) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schell, Orville and Delury, John (2013) Wealth and Power: China’s Long March to the Twenty-First Century, London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Schouenborg, Laust (2011) ‘A New Institutionalism? The English School as International Sociological Theory’, International Relations, 25:1, 26–44.Google Scholar
Schouenborg, Laust (2012) ‘Exploring Westphalia’s Blind Spots: Exceptionalism Meets the English School’, Geopolitics, 17:1, 130–52.Google Scholar
Schouenborg, Laust (2013) The Scandinavian International Society: Primary Institutions and Binding Forces, 1815–2010, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schouenborg, Laust (2017) International Institutions in World History: Divorcing International Relations Theory from the State and Stage Models, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schulz, Carsten-Andreas (2014) ‘Civilisation, Barbarism and the Making of Latin America’s Place in 19th-Century International Society’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:3, 837–59.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1999) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shimazu, Naoko (1998) Japan, Race and Equality: The Racial Equality Proposal of 1919, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry (2004) Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura (2012) ‘Gender, Structure, and War: What Waltz Couldn’t See’, International Theory, 4:1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Smith, Gayle (2014) ‘Hailing the Contributions of the Private and Non-Profit Sectors to the Ebola Fight’, White House, 6 November 2014. Available at: www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/11/06/hailing-contributions-private-and-non-profit-sectors-ebola-fight (accessed 17 March 2018).Google Scholar
Sørensen, Georg (2001) Changes in Statehood: The Transformation of International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Spandler, Kilian (2015) ‘The Political International Society: Change in Primary and Secondary Institutions’, Review of International Studies, 41:3, 601–22.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik (1994) The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Philip J. (2011) The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis A. (2003) ‘Europe and the Growth of International Society: Anarchy More Than Culture’, Global Dialogue, 5:3/4, 87–99.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis A. (2006) ‘Democracy, the Highest Stage of “Civilised” Statehood’, Global Dialogue, 8:3/4, 101–12.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis A. (2010) ‘International Society: Global/Regional Dimensions and Geographic Expansion’, in Denemark, Robert A. (ed.) The International Studies Encyclopedia, Blackwell Publishing for International Studies Association (ISA).Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis A. (2014) ‘European Union and World Order: An English School Approach’, Estudos Internacionais, 2:2, 321–41.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis (2015) ‘Interrogating Regional International Societies, Questioning the Global International Society’, Global Discourse, 5:3, 327–40.Google Scholar
Storey, Rebecca and Storey, Glenn R. (2017) Rome and the Classic Maya: Comparing the Slow Collapse of Civilizations, New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strandsbjerg, Jeppe (2012) ‘Cartopolitics, Geopolitics and Boundaries in the Arctic’, Geopolitics, 17:4, 818–42.Google Scholar
Strauss, Michael J. (2013) ‘Boundaries in the Sky and a Theory of Three-Dimensional States’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28:3, 369–82.Google Scholar
Stroikos, Dimitrios (2015) ‘Failure and Denial in International Society: Modernity, Technology and the Global Nuclear Order’, paper for Millennium Conference, LSE, October.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo (2009) Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo, Zhang, Yongjin and Quirk, Joel (eds.) (2014) International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swope, Kenneth M. (2009) A Dragon’s Head and a Serpent’s Tail: Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, Kindle editon, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Tainter, Joseph (1988) The Collapse of Complex Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1990) Coercion, Capital and European States AD 990–1990, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. (2009) ‘The Status of Women as a Standard of “Civilization”’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:4, 681–706.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. (2010) Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. (2012) ‘Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion “from Below”’, International Organization, 66:2, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui (2005) ‘Feminism’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.) International Society and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–62.Google Scholar
United Nations (2013) International Migration Report 2013, New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015) ‘World Population Projected to Reach 9.7 Billion by 2050’. Available at: www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/2015-report.html (accessed 14 November 2016).Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2015) World at War: UNHCR Global Trends – Forced Displacement 2014, Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
Vatican (2015) ‘Population’, Available at: www.vaticanstate.va/content/vaticanstate/en/stato-e-governo/note-generali/popolazione.html (accessed 31 August 2015) (appears in ch. 2).Google Scholar
Vincent, R. John (1984) ‘Racial Equality’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239–54.Google Scholar
Vincent, R. John (1986), Human Rights and International Relations: Issues and Responses, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, William (2012) A Perpetual Menace: Nuclear Weapons and International Order, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Qiu-bin (2007) ‘The Northeast Asia Regional International Society: From the English School Perspective’, Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2, 59–65.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (1984) ‘European International Society and Its Expansion’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–32.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (1997) The Limits of Independence: Relations between States in the Modern World, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (2001) ‘Foreword’ to ‘Forum on the English School’, Review of International Studies, 27:3, 467–70.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. (2013) Global Governance: Why? What? Whither?, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2004) ‘Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 10:2, 189–234.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin (2006) Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1960) ‘Why Is There No International Theory?’, International Relations, 2:1, 35–48.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (edited by Wight, Gabriele and Porter, Brian) (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, John (2011) ‘Structure, Norms and Normative Theory in a Re-Defined English School: Accepting Buzan’s Challenge’, Review of International Studies, 37:3, 1235–53.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter (2012) ‘The English School Meets the Chicago School: The Case for a Grounded Theory of International Institutions’, International Studies Review, 14:4, 567–90.Google Scholar
Womack, Brantly (2014) ‘China’s Future in a Multinodal World Order’, Pacific Affairs, 87:2, 265–84.Google Scholar
World Society Research Group (WSRG) (1995) ‘In Search of World Society’, Darmstadt/Frankfurt/M.: World Society Research Group Working paper no. 1. Updated version (2000) ‘Introduction: World Society’, in Albert, Mathias, Brock, Lothar and Wolf, Klaus Dieter (eds.) Civilizing World Politics. Society and Community Beyond the State, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1–17.Google Scholar
Young, Crawford (1994) The African Colonial State in Comparative Perspective, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yurdusev, Nuri (2009) ‘The Middle East Encounter with the Expansion of European International Society’, in Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (eds.) International Society and the Middle East, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 70–91.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed (2009) The Post-American World and the Rise of the Rest, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe (2011) After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng (2009) ‘Rethinking the “Tribute System”: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2:4, 545–74.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin (1991) ‘China’s Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standard of “Civilization”’, Review of International Studies, 17:1, 3–16.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin (1998) China in International Society since 1949, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin (2001) ‘System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations’, in Cox, Michael, Dunne, Tim, and Booth, Ken (eds.) Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics, Cambridge University Press, 43–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin (2014) ‘The Standard of “Civilisation” Redux: Towards the Expansion of International Society 3.0?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42:3, 674–96.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin and Buzan, Barry (2012) ‘The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5:1, 3–36.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael, Buzan, Barry and Albert, Mathias (2013) ‘Conclusion: Differentiation Theory and World Politics’, in Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry and Zürn, Michael (eds.) Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228–45.Google Scholar