Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T21:52:47.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - From Periodicals to Gambling: A review of systemic issues addressed by WTO adjudicatory bodies under the GATS

from PART 4 - GATS case law: A first assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Marion Panizzon
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Nicole Pohl
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Pierre Sauvé
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) broke new ground when it entered into force on 1 January 1995 as part of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement). It put in place a set of disciplines that now regulates trade in services among close to 150 countries. GATS negotiators faced a significant challenge when having to craft a comprehensive set of disciplines in this area. Trade in services is complex, in particular due to the various forms of delivery that are involved and the extensive nature of regulation in many sectors, for instance, financial services and professional services. Disciplines also often had to be developed anew.

The result is somewhat complex. Some obligations, in particular the most-favoured-nation treatment (MFN) obligation, apply to any measure affecting trade in services. Others, like the market access and national treatment obligations, apply only in respect of service sectors or sub-sectors (hereinafter ‘sectors’) of a Member's choosing. There is overlap between the market access and national treatment obligations, and the relationship between these two disciplines and those on domestic regulation is not clearly established. Additional obligations have been adhered to on a voluntary basis, in particular those contained in the Reference Paper on basic telecommunications services and the Understanding on Commitments in Financial Services. In general, the interpretation and understanding of Members’ Schedules of Specific Commitments (‘Schedules’) proves to be a laborious exercise.

This provides fertile ground for difficult and often sensitive interpretive issues to arise.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlung, R., Public Services and the GATS, World Trade Organization, Economic Research and Statistics Division, Working Paper ERSD-2005–03, July 2005.
Ahnlid, A., ‘Comparing General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and GATS: Regime Creation under and after Hegemony’, Review of International Political Economy 3 (1996), p. 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, M. and Larouche, P., ‘The World Trade Organization Regime for Telecommunications Services’, in Macrory, P. F. J., Appleton, A. E. and Plummer, M. G. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (New York: Springer, 2005).Google Scholar
Krajewski, M., ‘Playing by the Rules of the Game?’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 4 (2005), p. 417.Google Scholar
Leroux, E. H., ‘What Is a “Service Supplied in the Exercise of Governmental Authority” under Article I:3(b) and (c) of the GATS?’, Journal of World Trade 3 (2006), p. 345.Google Scholar
Leroux, E. H.,‘Trade in Financial Services under the World Trade Organization’, Journal of World Trade 3 (2002), p. 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroux, E. H.,‘L'Accord général sur les services (AGCS): règles propres à des secteurs particuliers’, Cahiers de Droit 43 (2002), p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortino, F., ‘Treaty Interpretation and the World Trade Organization Appellate Body Report in US–Gambling: A Critique’, Journal of International Economic Law 1 (2006), p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., ‘Rien Ne Va Plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and GATS’, World Trade Review 2 (2005), p. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, I., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Second Edition, (Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P., ‘United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services’, American Journal of International Law 99 (2005), p. 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., and Howse, R., The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd edn, (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Wunsch-Vincent, S., ‘The Internet, Cross-Border Trade in Services and the GATS: Lessons from US–Gambling’, World Trade Review 5 (2006), p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×