Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T10:25:55.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - An Introduction to Fluid Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John Watton
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access

Summary

Fluid Types

The preferred working fluid for most applications is mineral oil, although in some applications there is a requirement for a water-based or synthetic fluid, mainly for reasons of fire hazards and increasingly for environmental considerations. The drive toward nonmineral oil fluids has seen a renewed attitude to pure water hydraulics together with the emergence of biodegradable and vegetable-based fluids. Fire-resistant fluids in use fall under the following classifications:

  1. HFA 5/95 oil-in-water emulsion, typically 5% oil and 95% water

  2. HFB 60/40 water-in-oil emulsion, typically 60% oil and 40% water

  3. HFC 60/40 water-in-glycol emulsion, typically 60% glycol and 40% water

  4. HFD synthetic fluid containing no water

  5. HFE synthetic biodegradable fluid

The use of water-based fluids has implications for component material selection – for example, the use of stainless steel, plastics, and ceramics. In addition, serious consideration of fluid properties must also be given, particularly viscosity, which can be very high at low temperatures in some cases. Fluids are being continually developed, and the following information is intended to reflect the general trend and is not considered as definitive because this would require an overview of many suppliers from many countries around the world – for example, see www.shell.com.

Type HFA 5/95 oil-in-water emulsions are fire-resistant emulsions that exhibit enhanced stability, lubrication, and antiwear characteristics and have the following important aspects:

  • They have much improved stability toward variations in temperature, pressure, shear, and bacterial attack.

  • The performance limitations become obvious for systems operating well above 70 bar, reliability and efficiency often being sacrificed where fire resistance is of paramount importance.

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A, Kulkarni, P, Vieira, SL, Naganathan, N [2001]. An overview of magneto and electrorheological fluids and their applications in fluid power systems. Int. J. Fluid Power 2(2), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowns, and J, Worton-Griffiths [1973]. The effect of air in the fluid on the operating characteristics of a hydrostatic transmission. In Proceedings of the 3rd BHRA International Fluid Power Symposium.
Conrad, F [2005]. Trend in design of water hydraulics. In Proceedings of the 6th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 420–431.
Dalibert, A [1971]. Fire-resistant hydraulic fluids. In Proceedings of the 2nd BHRA Fluid Power Symposium, Paper F3.
Day, MJ, Way, NR, Thompson, K [1987]. The use of particle counting techniques in the condition monitoring of fluid power systems. In Condition Monitoring '87, edited by Jones, MH, Pineridge Press Ltd., 322–339.Google Scholar
Elliott, R [2007]. Development of a magnetorheological active damping system to improve the yaw response of a racing vehicle. Ph.D. thesis, Cardiff University, School of Engineering.
Environmental Impact of Fluid Power Systems [1999]. Organized by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. London, collection of 11 papers.
Evans, JS and Hunt, TM [2004]. Oil Analysis, Coxmoor.Google Scholar
Gao, H, Fu, X, Yang, H, Tsukiji, T [2002]. Numerical and experimental investigation of cavitating flow in oil hydraulic ball valve. In Proceedings of the 5th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 923–928.
Gohler, O-C [2006]. Approach to the simulation of ageing of environmentally compatible fluids in hydraulic systems. Int. J. Fluid Power 7(2), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohler, O-C, Murrenhoff, H, Schmidt, M [2004]. Ageing simulation of biodegradable fluids by means of neural networks. In Proceedings of the Power Transmission and Motion Control Workshop, PTMC 2004. Professional Engineering Publications Ltd., 71–83.Google Scholar
ATJ, Hayward [1961]. Aeration in hydraulic systems: its assessment and control. In Proceedings of the Oil in Hydraulics Conference, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, pp. 216–224.Google Scholar
Hodges, P [1996]. Hydraulic Fluids, Arnold.Google Scholar
Hunt, TM and Tilley, DG [1984]. Techniques for the assessment of contamination in hydraulic oils. In Contamination Control in Hydraulic Systems, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, 57–63.Google Scholar
,IMechE [1984]. Contamination Control in Hydraulic Systems [1984]. Institution of Mechanical Engineering, 65–77.
Iudicello, F and Baseley, S [1999]. Fluid-borne noise characteristics of hydraulic and electrohydraulic pumps. In Power Transmission and Motion Control, Professional Engineering Publications Ltd., 313–323.Google Scholar
Jinghong, Y, Zhaoneng, C, Yuanzhang, L [1994]. The variation of oil effective bulk modulus in hydraulic systems. Trans ASME, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 116, 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, DN and Edge, KA [1991]. In-situ measurement of the wave speed and bulk modulus in hydraulic systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I, 205(I3), 191–197.Google Scholar
Kalin, M, Majdič, F, Vižintin, J, Perʐdirnik, J, Velkarrh, I [2008]. Analysis of the long-term performance of an axial piston pump using diamond-like carbon-coated piston shoes and biodegradable oil. ASME J. Tribol. 130, 011013/1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, ES [1973]. Fire-resistant fluids – factors in heating equipment and circuit design. In Proceedings of the 3rd BHRA Fluid Power Symposium.
Knight, GC [1977]. Water hydraulics: Application of water-based fluids in hydraulic systems. Tribol. Int., 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, RT [1987]. Analysis of ferrous wear debris. In Condition Monitoring '87, edited by Jones, MH, Pineridge Press Ltd., 360–370.Google Scholar
Li, ZY, Yu, ZY, He, XF, Yang, SD [1999]. The development and perspective of water hydraulics. In Proceedings of the 4th JHPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 335–344.
Lichtarowicz, A [1979]. Cavitating jet apparatus for cavitation erosion test. ASTM STP 664, 530–549.Google Scholar
Lord, [2002]. MR fluid product bulletins. Available at www.lord.com.
Maxwell, JF [1979]. Water-based hydraulic fluids: Coping with the steel industry – A manufacturer's point of view. Iron Steel Eng. 56(8), 57–60.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P [1984]. Ferrography and particle analysis in hydraulic power systems. In Contamination Control in Hydraulic Systems, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
Molyet, KE, Ciocanel, C, Yamamoto, H, Naganathan, NG [2006]. Design and performance of a MR torque transfer device. Int. J. Fluid Power 7(3), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, M, Yamashita, K, Kawakami, Y, Okamura, H [2005]. Dynamic shear flow of electrrheological fluids between two rotating plates. In Proceedings of the 6thJFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 612–617.Google Scholar
Nikkila, P and Vilenius, M [2003]. The simulation of cleanliness level in hydraulics. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference in Fluid Power Technology, Methods for Solving Practical Problems in Design and Control, Fluid Power Net Publications, 233–244.Google Scholar
Oshima, S, Leiro, T, Linjama, M, Koskinen, KT, Vilenius, M [2001]. Effect of cavitation in water hydraulic poppet valves. Int. J. Fluid Power 2(3), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, AL, Roylance, BJ, Zie, LX [1987]. The PQ – A method for the rapid quantification of wear debris. In Condition Monitoring '87, edited by Jones, MH, Pineridge Press Ltd., 391–405.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, M [2003]. Hydraulic Fluids, ASME Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raw, I [1987]. Particle size analyser based on filter blockage. In Condition Monitoring '87, edited by Jones, MH, Pineridge Press Ltd., 875–894.Google Scholar
Riipinen, H, Varjus, S, Soini, S, Puhakka, JA, Koskinen, KT, Vilenius, M [2002]. Effects of microbial growth and particles on filtration in water hydraulic systems. In Proceedings of the 5th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 173–176.
Rinkinen, J and Kiiso, T [1993]. Using portable particle counter in oil system contamination control. In Proceedings of the 3rd Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, Vol. 1, 309–328.
Ritchie, T and Thomson, J [1971]. An emulsifying hydraulic fluid for submarine systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd BHRA Fluid Power Symposium.
Roylance, BJ and Hunt, TM [1999]. Wear Debris Analysis. Coxmoor.Google Scholar
Sandt, J, Rinkinen, J, Laukka, [1997]. Particle and water on-line monitoring for hydraulic system diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 5th Scandinavian Conference on Fluid Power, 257–268.
Shutto, S and Toscano, J [2005]. Magnetorheological (MR) fluid and its application. In Proceedings of the 6th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, pp. 590–594.
Silva, G [1990]. Wear generation in hydraulic pumps. In Proceedings of the SAE International Off-Highway and Powerplant Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper 901679.Google Scholar
Smith, LH, Peeler, RL, Bernd, LH [1960]. Hydraulic fluid bulk modulus – Its effect on system performance and techniques for physical measurement. In Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Industrial Hydraulics, Vol. 14, 179–196.
Sommer, HT, Raze, TL, Hart, JM [1993]. The effects of optical material properties on particle counting results of light scattering and extinction sensors. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fluid Power – The Future for Hydraulics, MEP Publications, 289–308.Google Scholar
Stecki, JS, editor [1998]. Total Contamination Control, Fluid Power Net.
Stecki, JS, editor [2002]. Total Contamination Control, Fluid Power Net.
Stewart, HL [1979]. Fire-resistant hydraulic fluids. Plant Eng. 33, 157–160.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K and Urata, E [2002]. Cavitation erosion of materials for water hydraulics. In Power Transmission and Motion Control 2002, Professional Engineering Publications Ltd., 127–139.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, S [2001]. Influence of line design on pump performance. In Power Transmission and Motion Control 2001, Professional Engineering Publications Ltd., 33–46.Google Scholar
Totten, GE, Reichel, J, Kling, GH [1999]. Biodegradable fluids: A review. In Proceedings of the 4th JHPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 285–290.
Tsai, CP [1981]. Particle counting in water-based fluids using light-blockage-type automatic instruments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Fluid Power Conference, 87–94.
Urata, E [1998]. Cavitation erosion in various fluids. In Power Transmission and Motion Control 1998, Professional Engineering Publications Ltd., 269–284.Google Scholar
Urata, E [2002]. Evaluation of filtration performance of a filter element. In Power Transmission and Motion Control 2002, Professional Engineering Publications Ltd., 291–304.Google Scholar
Urata, E [2005]. Notes on contamination control. In Proceedings of the 6th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 629–633.
Virvalo, T, Makinen, E, Vilenius, M [1999]. On the damping of water hydraulic cylinder drives. In Proceedings of the 4th JHPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 351–356.
Wang, X, Han, B, Xa, H, Tang, R [1999]. On the factors influencing the bubble content in air/hydro system. In Proceedings of the 4th JHPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, 57–62.
Warring, RH [1970]. Fluids for Power Systems, Trade and Technical Press.Google Scholar
Watton, J [2007]. Modelling, Monitoring and Diagnostic Techniques for Fluid Power Systems, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Watton, J and Xue, [1994]. A new direct-measurement method for determining fluid bulk modulus in oil hydraulic systems. In Proceedings of FLUCOME '94, pp. 543–548.
Wei, K-X, Meng, G, Zhu, S-S [2004]. Fluid power control unit using electrorheological fluids. Int. J. Fluid Power 4(3), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, A, Kazama, T, Inoue, K, Onoue, J [2001]. Comparison of cavitation erosion test results between vibratory and cavitating jet methods. Int. J. Fluid Power 2(1), 25–30.Google Scholar
Yu, J [1991]. Measurement of oil effective bulk modulus in hydraulic systems. Chin. Fluid Power Eng. No. 3, 46–48.Google Scholar
Zaun, M [2006]. Design of cylinder drives based on electrorheological fluids. Int. J. Fluid Power 7(1), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, S, Wei, K, Wang, Q, Huang, Y [2005]. The response performance of electrorheological fluids in a control flow field. Int. J. Fluid Power 6(3), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×